Menu
▾
▴
web-erp-developers — Discussion on development of webERP
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(347) |
Oct
(272) |
Nov
(270) |
Dec
(424) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(549) |
Feb
(232) |
Mar
(134) |
Apr
(103) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(74) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(45) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(187) |
Nov
(238) |
Dec
(127) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(137) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(152) |
Jul
(137) |
Aug
(154) |
Sep
(176) |
Oct
(104) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(64) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(56) |
Feb
(303) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(113) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(89) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(43) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(49) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(144) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(72) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(90) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(174) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(110) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(162) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(126) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(75) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(100) |
Oct
(57) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(125) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(72) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(123) |
Jun
(100) |
Jul
(96) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(39) |
Nov
(166) |
Dec
(103) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(148) |
Mar
(77) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(126) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(76) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(167) |
Dec
(93) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(57) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(60) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(70) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(52) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(56) |
Feb
(73) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(30) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-05 19:15:37
|
Interesting, my use case is similar. I build electronic subassemblies in lots of 5, 10, etc and would need to assign connector serial numbers, sensor serial numbers, etc. to each subassembly serial number as assembled (or in one or more groups at stages in the assembly process). Dale On 2013-07-05, at 9:39 AM, webERP Developers <web...@li...> wrote: > We are using the BOM, WO and other capabilities of the Manufacturing Midule > and have the following challenges: > > * We have items that contain batch or serial numbered parts. If we create a > work order for a number of parts, and issue a number of serialized or batch > controlled items, there exists no means to force a specific component to a > finished part. For example we have serial numbered item ABC as a component > of serial numbered part DEF. When we build DEF we assign a unique serial > number and incorporate one of serial numbered item ABC. > > There is no way to make sure that Part DEF Serial Number 123 contains > component ABC 888. > > We need to trace back items by serial number and batch. We recognize that > some of this information is in the transaction trail. But the 1 to 1 > relationship is not known. > > If our work orders are for one piece then the relationship can be > maintained, but such is very onerous for all involved. > > * We too frequently make mistakes issuing items to Work Orders of make data > entry errors on serial numbers. The needs to be a way to "roll > back"/diassemble an item so the inventory is correct and proper item can be > built. > > Bob Thomas > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Inventory-in-Manufacturing-tp4656561.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-05 15:39:45
|
We are using the BOM, WO and other capabilities of the Manufacturing Midule and have the following challenges: * We have items that contain batch or serial numbered parts. If we create a work order for a number of parts, and issue a number of serialized or batch controlled items, there exists no means to force a specific component to a finished part. For example we have serial numbered item ABC as a component of serial numbered part DEF. When we build DEF we assign a unique serial number and incorporate one of serial numbered item ABC. There is no way to make sure that Part DEF Serial Number 123 contains component ABC 888. We need to trace back items by serial number and batch. We recognize that some of this information is in the transaction trail. But the 1 to 1 relationship is not known. If our work orders are for one piece then the relationship can be maintained, but such is very onerous for all involved. * We too frequently make mistakes issuing items to Work Orders of make data entry errors on serial numbers. The needs to be a way to "roll back"/diassemble an item so the inventory is correct and proper item can be built. Bob Thomas -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Inventory-in-Manufacturing-tp4656561.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-05 08:31:02
|
the problem is that one cannot put jquery plugins into single scripts if you have not loaded them in the header. But also, one does not want to load all js for all scripts, if the plugins are not needed there. . Therefore, it is good if an ndividual script can ask weberp to add something to the header, for example, as web2project does. One could copy their functionality. . Then I can use jquery for manufacturing and BOM, whereas someone else who does concentrate on something else can use an individual js approach. And each script would only load that js that is actually needed. Klaus -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656558.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-05 07:00:54
|
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">My proposal is to make the user
interface user-friendly which it is actually not. Just an example:
Account inquiry. I want to make the account inquiry for the
account 1030. Therefore, I click "Account Inquiry". Then I write
"1030" and click for search. Then I click "1030". Then I click
"Account Inquiry" again. Why is that? Or there is not possible to
delete rows from invoices or credit invoices, somewhere it was not
possible to delete. Or that many buttons have the
submit-functionality. If I deliberately push "Enter" then it does
something else I wanted it to do and my entered information is
lost, for instance by making a GL entry. It is therefore a better
approach not to use submit-buttons at all and that every button
has an "onclick"-functionality. Once UX is done, one can think of
some third-party crazy stuff like JQuery. I personally do not want
JQuery to be included because its code is to robust if one wants
to make some changes. Everything needed can be done without a
third-party stuff.<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<div>
<p> <b>Kalmer Piiskop, MSc.</b> </p>
<p> <strong> <span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:#448593">Instituudi tee
3-27</span> </strong> </p>
<p> <strong> <span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Verdana;
color:#448593">EE76902</span> </strong> <strong> <span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:#448593">Harku</span>
</strong> </p>
<p> <strong>Harku</strong> </p>
<p> <strong>Harjumaa</strong> </p>
<p> <strong>European Union</strong> </p>
<p> <strong> <span style="font-size: 10.0pt;
font-family:"MS sans-serif"; color: #448593">+372
652 4228</span> </strong> </p>
<p> <strong> <span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family:
Verdana; color: #448593">+372 5620 4556</span> </strong>
</p>
<p> <strong> <span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family:
Verdana; color:#448593">callto://pandeero</span> </strong>
</p>
<p> <strong> <span style="font-size: 7.5pt; font-family:
Verdana; color: #448593">Danske Bank A/S Eesti filiaal
(FORE EE 2X): EE893300336314570000</span> </strong> </p>
<p> <span style="font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: Verdana;
color: #448593">Hansapank (HABA EE2X):
EE451100001107112667</span> </p>
<p> <strong> <span
style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:Verdana;
color:#448593">__________________________________________________________________</span>
</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
05.07.2013 00:21, webERP Developers kirjutas:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:418...@em..."
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<style type="text/css">.mceResizeHandle {position: absolute;border: 1px solid black;background: #FFF;width: 5px;height: 5px;z-index: 10000}.mceResizeHandle:hover {background: #000}img[data-mce-selected] {outline: 1px solid black}img.mceClonedResizable, table.mceClonedResizable {position: absolute;outline: 1px dashed black;opacity: .5;z-index: 10000}
</style>
<div> Well the trunk has jquery and the validate plugin is already
included in the header already see includes/header.inc I will
leave this as is for this release - although we only have one
script jQuerified currently. Once it is loaded it is cached so
it is not like it is an overhead for every page just a one off.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Will need the tables plugin too and datepicker but this is
for the main jqueryisation project after 4.11 is released. </div>
<div> </div>
<div> Phil <br>
<br>
Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 <br>
Skype: daintree <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.logicworks.co.nz">http://www.logicworks.co.nz</a> </div>
<div> <br>
On 05 July 2013 at 09:14 webERP Developers
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:web...@li..."><web...@li...></a> wrote: <br>
> Phil, <br>
> <br>
> many thanks. <br>
> <br>
> One thing is necessary and may be there and I did not find
it, or not: <br>
> <br>
> Certain scripts need to include js (jquery code or plugins)
into the header <br>
> - sometimes it works also if called only in body but is
more stable if sent <br>
> in header. <br>
> <br>
> Is this currently possible? <br>
> <br>
> web2project, for example, ncludes an xxx.js into the header
whenever <br>
> index.php calls the script xxx.php (all their calls go
through the main <br>
> index.php. <br>
> Just my 2 ct. <br>
> <br>
> Klaus <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> View this message in context:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656552.html">http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656552.html</a>
<br>
> Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at
Nabble.com. <br>
> <br>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: <br>
> <br>
> Build for Windows Store. <br>
> <br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev">http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev</a> <br>
> _______________________________________________ <br>
> Web-erp-developers mailing list <br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Web...@li...">Web...@li...</a> <br>
>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers</a>
</div>
<div id="ox-signature"> </div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev">http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev</a></pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Web-erp-developers mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Web...@li...">Web...@li...</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
|
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-05 03:13:08
|
Hi Exson, Good point - I had not explored this idea - maybe html 5 is the better way to go I will do a bit more research. I do like the idea for sorting/filtering tables tough too - it maybe overkill though for that too.... Phil On 05 July 2013 at 14:56 webERP Developers <web...@li...> wrote: > *Hi, Phil:* > > Sorry for the late. I'll do my best to complete the new > installer within this weekend. > > Concerning to the Jquery, if we only use it to do validation, it > seems overkill. The validation functions have been implemented almost by > every main browser in html5 now. > > > Best regards! > > Exson > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656555.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers Phil Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 Skype: daintree http://www.logicworks.co.nz |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-05 02:57:04
|
*Hi, Phil:*
Sorry for the late. I'll do my best to complete the new
installer within this weekend.
Concerning to the Jquery, if we only use it to do validation, it
seems overkill. The validation functions have been implemented almost by
every main browser in html5 now.
Best regards!
Exson
--
View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656555.html
Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-05 02:01:29
|
Hi all: I need to improve the freight calculation system in webERP, for those (like me) not having an API with the preferred courier system to get online, update, error-free freight quotes. Currently we have the table freightcosts CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `freightcosts` ( `shipcostfromid` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `locationfrom` varchar(5) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `destination` varchar(40) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `shipperid` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', `cubrate` double NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', `kgrate` double NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', `maxkgs` double NOT NULL DEFAULT '999999', `maxcub` double NOT NULL DEFAULT '999999', `fixedprice` double NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', `minimumchg` double NOT NULL DEFAULT '0', PRIMARY KEY (`shipcostfromid`), KEY `Destination` (`destination`), KEY `LocationFrom` (`locationfrom`), KEY `ShipperID` (`shipperid`), KEY `Destination_2` (`destination`,`locationfrom`,`shipperid`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=1 ; I propose to improve the destination part. We can split it in 2 fields: destinationcountry destinationzone Function CalcFreightCost will get all 6 address fields as parameters. Country should be use in the city (zone) search then: - If a destination country has the same rate for all its cities, then 1 record will be enough to get it (no need to maintain all cities). - If a destination country has different rates for different zones, regions, states, zips, etc, then will be eaiser to find out - It will not mix up (as current version does with Christchurch city in UK and a city of the same name in NZ). Hundreds of similar city names problems. Same for the same ZIP code in different countries. Those using an API can code an if statement at the beginning of CalcFreightCost and use the webERP calculation as last resort. Any other ideas? Regards, Ricard |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-04 21:21:33
|
Well the trunk has jquery and the validate plugin is already included in the header already see includes/header.inc I will leave this as is for this release - although we only have one script jQuerified currently. Once it is loaded it is cached so it is not like it is an overhead for every page just a one off. Will need the tables plugin too and datepicker but this is for the main jqueryisation project after 4.11 is released. Phil Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 Skype: daintree http://www.logicworks.co.nz On 05 July 2013 at 09:14 webERP Developers <web...@li...> wrote: > Phil, > > many thanks. > > One thing is necessary and may be there and I did not find it, or not: > > Certain scripts need to include js (jquery code or plugins) into the header > - sometimes it works also if called only in body but is more stable if sent > in header. > > Is this currently possible? > > web2project, for example, ncludes an xxx.js into the header whenever > index.php calls the script xxx.php (all their calls go through the main > index.php. > Just my 2 ct. > > Klaus > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656552.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-04 21:15:18
|
Phil, many thanks. One thing is necessary and may be there and I did not find it, or not: Certain scripts need to include js (jquery code or plugins) into the header - sometimes it works also if called only in body but is more stable if sent in header. Is this currently possible? web2project, for example, ncludes an xxx.js into the header whenever index.php calls the script xxx.php (all their calls go through the main index.php. Just my 2 ct. Klaus -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656552.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-04 09:09:26
|
Hi Klaus, Yes, I heard you and I am going to adopt your work throughout ... of course it is a big mission so I am looking for support to assist with it. I also hear Jo - he is right that we do not want to become dependent on javascript/jQuery to work at all, but have the server do the same checks to so there is a happy fall back i.e. progressive jQuery. I have demonstrated how this can be done I think with AccountGroups.php Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz skype:daintree On 04/07/13 21:03, webERP Developers wrote: > on better table display: > > I gave an example a long time ago using a jquery plugin that has good > functionality and can be used next to the current pagination: > > features: > sorting searching in table using javascript, no server action necessary > column reordering > user can store his/her preferred order on his machine > pagination done by plugin > > and much more. > Simple use: > all tables nead ... (not present yet). > one simple call of the javascript plugin. > if Javascript works, set number of items per page in configuration to a > large number - jquery does pagination and search > > if not, use as before. > > I think I prepared a demo for BOM's or some other manufacturing related > table a year ago. > > If you are interested, I can post more info. > > And yes, usability is a big issue. > Please do not be offended, but nobody in my company wants to use weberp. > Coming from a windows world (which I don't praise - I am here active in open > source land) , having drag and drop and all that, the waiting for webserver > response and keyboard orientation is slow ... > > A modern UI is much appreciated and I am glad that you are pushing it. > Thanks for that. > > > > Klaus > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656549.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-04 09:03:39
|
on better table display: I gave an example a long time ago using a jquery plugin that has good functionality and can be used next to the current pagination: features: sorting searching in table using javascript, no server action necessary column reordering user can store his/her preferred order on his machine pagination done by plugin and much more. Simple use: all tables nead ... (not present yet). one simple call of the javascript plugin. if Javascript works, set number of items per page in configuration to a large number - jquery does pagination and search if not, use as before. I think I prepared a demo for BOM's or some other manufacturing related table a year ago. If you are interested, I can post more info. And yes, usability is a big issue. Please do not be offended, but nobody in my company wants to use weberp. Coming from a windows world (which I don't praise - I am here active in open source land) , having drag and drop and all that, the waiting for webserver response and keyboard orientation is slow ... A modern UI is much appreciated and I am glad that you are pushing it. Thanks for that. Klaus -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Intention-to-roll-up-new-version-and-future-plans-tp4656547p4656549.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-04 08:17:39
|
Hi Phil, > Not sure if there any reason not to just do this now as we are stable to the best of my knowledge. I'd say to release often is better than not with open source. > I am keen to kick off with the transition to jQuery - I have not been familiar with the plans for 'transition to jQuery' with webERP. By that do you mean introducing jQuery to handle some additional 'beautification' to the code? eg first level validations of forms etc. > The aim is to have: > 1. Messages against each error to show users how to correct > 2. Trap errors before forms are submitted > 3. Ensure all fields required are entered before the form is submitted > 4. Prevent incorrect entry as it is attempted to be entered > 5. More functional and attractive date picking > 6. Table filtering and sorting capabilities especially on searches I think it is a good idea as long as the functionality does not rely on the javascript so that we can have javascript turned off and still have functional pages and validating forms. > This "jQueryisation" should give the application a serious face-lift as well as functional and usability improvements which are so important to first impressions - where I think we have suffered in the past. I agree, although it is hard to apply standards based unobtrusive javascript in a system without some type of templating system. Would that also be on the agenda? A light weight templating engine? That way it is very easy to integrate and have users customise their pages with javascript behaviours. I'm very much in favour of the use of javascript (not always necessarily jQuery - but jQuery where applicable and just javascript where more efficient) in the pages, with the provisos above about having functionality still there and proper validation with javascript turned off. Cheers, Jo On 04/07/2013, at 8:42 AM, webERP Developers <web...@li...> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am wondering about a new version, it is 5 months since 4.10.1 was released now. I was holding off pending the new installer work that Exson was doing, but this can wait if it is still some way off. We have some good new functionality in the trunk, with: > > 1. The bank transaction importer and analysis - currently only works with MT940 format bank feeds, but could easily be adapted to work with others (let me know off list if you need another format - keen to work with businesses as usual). > 2. The fixed asset maintenance module - that allows a planned maintenance schedule to be set up for fixed assets and email reminders sent to engineers and managers as necessary. > 3. The back end functionality that is required for webERP to work with webSHOP - new configuration parameters and webSHOP sales categories, currencies etc. > 4. Exson's smtp mail options > 5. Sales person now recorded against the debtor transaction > 6. Quite a few important bug fixes too > > Not sure if there any reason not to just do this now as we are stable to the best of my knowledge. > > I am keen to kick off with the transition to jQuery - I have only done 1 script so far the AccountGroups.php and have had a couple of off-list discussions about it and think we should move to jQuery date-picking and tables too - but being mindful of the bandwidth implications for the really big result sets in searches. I would like to get going on this across all scripts - but after I have webSHOP stable with freight API links etc. it would be great if there were a team of us working on this as is it a big task and looking for volunteers to follow the work done on AccountGroups.php and roll it out across all scripts. > > The aim is to have: > 1. Messages against each error to show users how to correct > 2. Trap errors before forms are submitted > 3. Ensure all fields required are entered before the form is submitted > 4. Prevent incorrect entry as it is attempted to be entered > 5. More functional and attractive date picking > 6. Table filtering and sorting capabilities especially on searches > > These are major usability enhancements in my view and should go a long way to resolve the most often criticised shortcoming of webERP. This functionality is pretty much expected in modern web-applications and we have fallen a bit short here previously due to the reluctance to get stuck into javascript and the various incompatibilities that dogged it. > > This "jQueryisation" should give the application a serious face-lift as well as functional and usability improvements which are so important to first impressions - where I think we have suffered in the past. > > So, after this next release this is the direction I would like us to head. Hope there are a few of you guys who can see this value of this vision and keen to help me make it happen :-) > > Phil > > Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 > Skype: daintree > http://www.logicworks.co.nz > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev_______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-07-03 23:12:57
|
Hi Team, I am wondering about a new version, it is 5 months since 4.10.1 was released now. I was holding off pending the new installer work that Exson was doing, but this can wait if it is still some way off. We have some good new functionality in the trunk, with: 1. The bank transaction importer and analysis - currently only works with MT940 format bank feeds, but could easily be adapted to work with others (let me know off list if you need another format - keen to work with businesses as usual). 2. The fixed asset maintenance module - that allows a planned maintenance schedule to be set up for fixed assets and email reminders sent to engineers and managers as necessary. 3. The back end functionality that is required for webERP to work with webSHOP - new configuration parameters and webSHOP sales categories, currencies etc. 4. Exson's smtp mail options 5. Sales person now recorded against the debtor transaction 6. Quite a few important bug fixes too Not sure if there any reason not to just do this now as we are stable to the best of my knowledge. I am keen to kick off with the transition to jQuery - I have only done 1 script so far the AccountGroups.php and have had a couple of off-list discussions about it and think we should move to jQuery date-picking and tables too - but being mindful of the bandwidth implications for the really big result sets in searches. I would like to get going on this across all scripts - but after I have webSHOP stable with freight API links etc. it would be great if there were a team of us working on this as is it a big task and looking for volunteers to follow the work done on AccountGroups.php and roll it out across all scripts. The aim is to have: 1. Messages against each error to show users how to correct 2. Trap errors before forms are submitted 3. Ensure all fields required are entered before the form is submitted 4. Prevent incorrect entry as it is attempted to be entered 5. More functional and attractive date picking 6. Table filtering and sorting capabilities especially on searches These are major usability enhancements in my view and should go a long way to resolve the most often criticised shortcoming of webERP. This functionality is pretty much expected in modern web-applications and we have fallen a bit short here previously due to the reluctance to get stuck into javascript and the various incompatibilities that dogged it. This "jQueryisation" should give the application a serious face-lift as well as functional and usability improvements which are so important to first impressions - where I think we have suffered in the past. So, after this next release this is the direction I would like us to head. Hope there are a few of you guys who can see this value of this vision and keen to help me make it happen :-) Phil Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 Skype: daintree http://www.logicworks.co.nz |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-24 01:42:18
|
Looks great. Best Regards www.sistemaciesac.com we...@si... Telf. 00 51 - 1 - 6284745 Cel 00 51 - 99613-7334 RPM #916661 2013/6/23 webERP Developers <web...@li...> > ** > I have put up a demo of my new webSHOP > > at http://www.weberp.org/webSHOP/ > > I am looking to work with a business to iron out any remaining kinks. I > have payment gateways for Pay Pal - the traditional Pay Pal Express > checkout, PayPal Pro and Pay Flow Pro - credit cards and SwipeHQ credit > cards - a New Zealand outfit. > > There is no freight recharge capability ... yet. > > Appreciate all comments and (constructive) criticism. > > Thanks > > Phil > > Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 > Skype: daintree > http://www.logicworks.co.nz > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-24 00:53:06
|
Hi Phil: Loved it! Count on me for any test. I'm checking it out in detail and let you know ASAP. Regards, Ricard 2013/6/24 webERP Developers <web...@li...> > ** > I have put up a demo of my new webSHOP > > at http://www.weberp.org/webSHOP/ > > I am looking to work with a business to iron out any remaining kinks. I > have payment gateways for Pay Pal - the traditional Pay Pal Express > checkout, PayPal Pro and Pay Flow Pro - credit cards and SwipeHQ credit > cards - a New Zealand outfit. > > There is no freight recharge capability ... yet. > > Appreciate all comments and (constructive) criticism. > > Thanks > > Phil > > Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 > Skype: daintree > http://www.logicworks.co.nz > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-23 22:31:25
|
I have put up a demo of my new webSHOP at http://www.weberp.org/webSHOP/ I am looking to work with a business to iron out any remaining kinks. I have payment gateways for Pay Pal - the traditional Pay Pal Express checkout, PayPal Pro and Pay Flow Pro - credit cards and SwipeHQ credit cards - a New Zealand outfit. There is no freight recharge capability ... yet. Appreciate all comments and (constructive) criticism. Thanks Phil Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 Skype: daintree http://www.logicworks.co.nz |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-12 05:02:43
|
Hi Ade, Yes - you need to just run off the fixed asset register and ensure that you post the cost and accumulated depreciation values that you imported into the fixed assets module as a manual journal to the general ledger. No general ledger journal is created by the importation process. Phil On 12 June 2013 at 14:52 webERP Developers <web...@li...> wrote: > *Hi, Tim :* > >From what I know, the assets I've imported only register it's value to GL > transaction after I run the Depreciation Journal from Asset Manager module, > which is depreciation report on Balance Sheet, but the cost of the assets is > not in General Ledger, it should be in different GL Account isn't it? > > > *Hi, Phil :* > So, after I import the assets then I need to do a manual gl journal to get > the cost into the GL? > > Thank's > > Regards, > Ade > > > > ----- > Baliboss > Bali Open Source Solution > www.baliboss.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Import-Fixed-Assets-with-Z-ImportFixedAssets-php-questions-tp4656473p4656477.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers Phil Ph: +64 (0)275 567890 Skype: daintree http://www.logicworks.co.nz |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-12 02:53:37
|
*Hi, Tim :* >From what I know, the assets I've imported only register it's value to GL transaction after I run the Depreciation Journal from Asset Manager module, which is depreciation report on Balance Sheet, but the cost of the assets is not in General Ledger, it should be in different GL Account isn't it? *Hi, Phil :* So, after I import the assets then I need to do a manual gl journal to get the cost into the GL? Thank's Regards, Ade ----- Baliboss Bali Open Source Solution www.baliboss.com -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Import-Fixed-Assets-with-Z-ImportFixedAssets-php-questions-tp4656473p4656477.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-11 10:19:35
|
The import of fixed assets just imports to the fixed assets module and you need to do a manual gl journal to get the cost and accumulated depreciation into the general ledger. From there on depreciation and additions and disposals are all integrated to GL. Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz skype:daintree On 11/06/13 21:01, webERP Developers wrote: > Hi, to all webERP developers > > I'm using the Z_ImportFixedAssets.php script which also contain the cost for > an assets to import my existing assets, when the .csv file imported > successfully I can see all my assets through Asset Manager module, then I > run the Depreciation Journal. > When I go to Balance Sheet, I can see depreciation report there, but I can't > see the cost of the asset in my assets lists. > Is the Z_ImportFixedAssets.php only import assets in asset manager and not > to General Ledger? > > For the record, I already set up the Fixed Asset Category Maintenance and > Fixed Asset Locations properly, do the Re-Post all GL transactions from a > specified period too, but no luck. > > Please explain the Z_ImportFixedAssets.php process and let me know where I > get it wrong? Thank's > > Regards, > Ade > > > > ----- > Baliboss > Bali Open Source Solution > www.baliboss.com > -- > View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Import-Fixed-Assets-with-Z-ImportFixedAssets-php-questions-tp4656473.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-11 09:02:25
|
Hi, to all webERP developers I'm using the Z_ImportFixedAssets.php script which also contain the cost for an assets to import my existing assets, when the .csv file imported successfully I can see all my assets through Asset Manager module, then I run the Depreciation Journal. When I go to Balance Sheet, I can see depreciation report there, but I can't see the cost of the asset in my assets lists. Is the Z_ImportFixedAssets.php only import assets in asset manager and not to General Ledger? For the record, I already set up the Fixed Asset Category Maintenance and Fixed Asset Locations properly, do the Re-Post all GL transactions from a specified period too, but no luck. Please explain the Z_ImportFixedAssets.php process and let me know where I get it wrong? Thank's Regards, Ade ----- Baliboss Bali Open Source Solution www.baliboss.com -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Import-Fixed-Assets-with-Z-ImportFixedAssets-php-questions-tp4656473.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-10 09:44:46
|
Oh dear ... sorry my bad ... will have to put back... thanks for reporting. Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz skype:daintree On 10/06/13 20:49, webERP Developers wrote: > To All webERP developers, > > After upgrade to the recent webERP version, I realize that the GL > Transaction Inquiry for Receipt not showing the detail transactions like > before, for example, if I enter receipt for more than one customers or more > than one Invoice, then I see the GL Transaction Inquiry for that receipt, > it's only showing total amount of receipt and the first customer, like this > : > <http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/file/n4656466/erp1.jpg> > > in previous version of webERP it's like this : > <http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/file/n4656466/erp2.jpg> > > I prefer the old version of script which is showing the detail transaction. > Is there any modification for the GLTransInquiry.php script? and why it's > changes? > > Thank's > > Regards > =========== > Ade / baliboss > > > > ----- > Baliboss > Bali Open Source Solution > www.baliboss.com > -- > View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/GL-Transaction-Inquiry-for-Receipt-not-showing-detail-transactions-tp4656466.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-10 08:49:42
|
To All webERP developers, After upgrade to the recent webERP version, I realize that the GL Transaction Inquiry for Receipt not showing the detail transactions like before, for example, if I enter receipt for more than one customers or more than one Invoice, then I see the GL Transaction Inquiry for that receipt, it's only showing total amount of receipt and the first customer, like this : <http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/file/n4656466/erp1.jpg> in previous version of webERP it's like this : <http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/file/n4656466/erp2.jpg> I prefer the old version of script which is showing the detail transaction. Is there any modification for the GLTransInquiry.php script? and why it's changes? Thank's Regards =========== Ade / baliboss ----- Baliboss Bali Open Source Solution www.baliboss.com -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/GL-Transaction-Inquiry-for-Receipt-not-showing-detail-transactions-tp4656466.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-09 01:51:29
|
okay noted Phil. tq thomas ----- Thomas Timothy Lie Bali Open Source Solution, Indonesia http://www.baliboss.com -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Database-is-not-upgraded-4-10-4-11-automatically-tp4656459p4656465.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-08 22:51:45
|
Hi Thomas, There is only one SQL update file per version increment, so when the SQL update file is run, it updates the database version (in this case to 4.11 - which is not yet released) - subsequent changes to this file before the release of 4.11 would then not be automatically applied. That's why there is no automatic update of the database beyond the last released version when doing an update from svn. Of course since there is no such version as 4.11 yet, then there is no automatic upgrade from the svn code - you must apply database changes from the sql file manually. Phil Phil Daintree Logic Works Ltd - +64 (0)275 567890 http://www.logicworks.co.nz skype:daintree On 09/06/13 01:07, webERP Developers wrote: > Hi again, > > After svn update, I access > Setup -> Currency Maintenance > and receive the following error > > Database Error 1054 : > Unknown column 'webcart' in 'field list' > Database SQL Failure : The SQL that failed was > SELECT currency, currabrev, country, hundredsname, rate, decimalplaces, > webcart FROM currencies > > I'm aware that we can just run > /sql/mysql/upgrade4.10-4.11.sql > > but it's usually done when we fist login to webERP after upgrade > but this one is not prompted > > thanks, > Thomas > > > > ----- > Thomas Timothy Lie > Bali Open Source Solution, Indonesia > http://www.baliboss.com > -- > View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Database-is-not-upgraded-4-10-4-11-automatically-tp4656459.html > Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > |
|
From: webERP D. <web...@li...> - 2013-06-08 14:50:56
|
Just re-posting the reply........ =============== Hi Thomas, 4.11 is not out yet. Unfortunately it was decided that when you do an svn update you wouldn't be prompted to update automatically. Thanks Tim ----- Thomas Timothy Lie Bali Open Source Solution, Indonesia http://www.baliboss.com -- View this message in context: http://weberp-accounting.1478800.n4.nabble.com/Database-is-not-upgraded-4-10-4-11-automatically-tp4656459p4656461.html Sent from the web-ERP-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
231 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
