Menu
▾
▴
vimcdoc-translate — Translator's place.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(124) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(61) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(11) |
May
|
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(21) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(9) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-24 03:19:12
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:05:24 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > Yes indeed. As you might or might not notice. > I've uploaded it to http://vim.sf.net. Good move. > Only 9 download till now. 12 now. :-) >I guess it is a fame thing, isn't it? ;-) Absolutely. We are getting more 'famous'.. :D |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-24 02:56:42
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:09:14 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've made a draft of our new webpage available online: > http://vimcdoc.sf.net > Nice Nice. |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 17:09:19
|
Hi all, I've made a draft of our new webpage available online: http://vimcdoc.sf.net This page is generated by a simple python script, which I will be checking in when it is ready. I think it looks way better than the old one. Please let me know what you think. Any comments will be welcomed. It is still a work in progress. E.g. it can't be valideted by w3c. And last time I use IE to view it, I got refused. Send in your input. Thanks, lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 15:07:06
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:35:39 +0800, "wandys" <al...@so...> said: > > Come on, lad. Everything takes time... > Anyway, SF is far more famous than cosoft. It helps our project get > 'well known'. :-) Yes indeed. As you might or might not notice. I've uploaded it to http://vim.sf.net. Only 9 download till now. I guess it is a fame thing, isn't it? ;-) -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 15:06:03
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:30:53 +0800, "wandys" <al...@so...> said: > Well, you wont believe this but i've thought of this issue last nite in > my dream... Wow. Truely unbelievable. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > THE VIMCDOC LICENSE > > Vimcdoc are copyrighted by its respective translators. > No commercial use allowed without the authors' prior written permission. > Free to install & copy in non-commercial use. > > THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' WITHOUT ANY WARRANT. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Good. Let me mull this over and hopefully I can have a draft ready in two days for review then. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-23 11:49:52
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:12:24 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > Hi all, > > As we are moving alone, translating new files and improve the > quality of the existing onece. I wonder has anyone here considered > the license issue. Well, you wont believe this but i've thought of this issue last nite in my dream... > I used Vim uganda.txt for the start. But it > doesn't really apply to use, since we have maily documents and > little source code. What I am thinking is vimcdoc should be: > 1. Free to use > 2. Free to copy > 3. Copyrighted by the individule translator when apply > 4. No commercial use should be allowed without the authors > permission > ..... I think the items above suffices. We aint a large project nor do we have any "true" source code.. So better keep the license simple and concise. -------------------------------------------------------------------- THE VIMCDOC LICENSE Vimcdoc are copyrighted by its respective translators. No commercial use allowed without the authors' prior written permission. Free to install & copy in non-commercial use. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' WITHOUT ANY WARRANT. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-23 11:39:12
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:04:35 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > > > No,it's not me (it's dromany<dr...@ho...> ...maybe ). He's > > so warm-hearted to help our project join Linuxfans, wasn't he? > Yes. It turns out that it was our naughty wandys. Good move anyway. Nah.. How naughty i am... ;^) > > I have been muttering these days on the mailing list, haven't I? :-) > No. It make this place feel cosy. :-) I like this feeling. :-) |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-23 11:36:20
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 03:18:10 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > > I made a new tarball using the new Makefile yesterday[doc/CVS > > included]: > > > > http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/download/vimcdoc-0.4.0.tar.gz > > Nice. Settled then. I don't think there will be many ppl > downloading from sf anyway. :( > Come on, lad. Everything takes time... Anyway, SF is far more famous than cosoft. It helps our project get 'well known'. :-) |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-23 11:31:13
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:12:24 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > Hi all, > > As we are moving alone, translating new files and improve the > quality of the existing onece. I wonder has anyone here considered > the license issue. Well, you wont believe this but i've thought of this issue last nite in my dream... > I used Vim uganda.txt for the start. But it > doesn't really apply to use, since we have maily documents and > little source code. What I am thinking is vimcdoc should be: > 1. Free to use > 2. Free to copy > 3. Copyrighted by the individule translator when apply > 4. No commercial use should be allowed without the authors > permission > ..... I think the items above suffices. We aint a large project nor do we have any "true" source code.. So better keep the license simple and concise. -------------------------------------------------------------------- THE VIMCDOC LICENSE Vimcdoc are copyrighted by its respective translators. No commercial use allowed without the authors' prior written permission. Free to install & copy in non-commercial use. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' WITHOUT ANY WARRANT. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 11:18:13
|
> Well, no serious problems. It's just that there's no 'doc/CVS' dir > inside. > > I made a new tarball using the new Makefile yesterday[doc/CVS included]: > > http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/download/vimcdoc-0.4.0.tar.gz Nice. Settled then. I don't think there will be many ppl downloading from sf anyway. :( -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen european swallow |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-23 11:13:38
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:01:54 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > > Seems i was too hasty.. > > Indeed it was. SF have changed their CVS server configuration > and I had to wait about 2 days to make this release. And by > the time I did, I had no patience. > > > > > I updated the data/Makefile, along with data/www/Makefile to fix all > > this and to make it work smoothly on BSD. Correct me if somewhere > > i'm wrong. > > Did you check them in? Yes, i committed the changes yesterday. > > > > > Anyway, have to build the tarball again... 0.4.0 doesnt come out so > > easy.. > Do we need a new 0.4.0 tarball? Is it too much hassel? I think non of > the bugs are show-stoppers. Can we live with them and wait for a week > or two for a .1 or .2 release? > Well, no serious problems. It's just that there's no 'doc/CVS' dir inside. I made a new tarball using the new Makefile yesterday[doc/CVS included]: http://vcd.cosoft.org.cn/download/vimcdoc-0.4.0.tar.gz |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 09:47:47
|
> Lang2, now u see, it's wandys, not me. :-) Yes. I could have figured out already. ;-) > Humm.. I agree. It feels a little bitter when I surf on > vimcdoc.sf.net pages with 800x600 video resolution. Believe it or not. I am actually making a move to easy to pain both to read and maintain the website. Check back in two days! > Interesting! That means anyone can post on the mailing list without > authorization. That's the way? hmmmmm. Never brought to my attention. A little investigation is needed. --=20 Simon Liang wzh...@sp... --=20 http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different=85 |
|
From: Dasn C. <da...@us...> - 2003-09-23 09:25:54
|
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:17:36PM -0800, Simon Liang wrote: > > Well guys, dont be upset or surprised at this email. > > I just registered an account this morning at linuxfans.org to promote > > our translated works: > > > > http://www.linuxfans.org/nuke/modules.php?name=Site_Downloads&op=geninfo&did=1410 > > > > As of this writing, 85 downloads already. > > > > I did this all because i want our project to get known & used by more > > ppl so that we can get more feedbacks to improve our docs (and hopefully > > more ppl joining us). > Lang2, now u see, it's wandys, not me. :-) > Thanks wandys, Thanks again wandys. > That's a very good move and good news. I do think that > this thing should be easier to be accepted on a Chinese > website than a foreign one. Thank god vcd.cosoft.org.cn > is 100 times prettier than vimcdoc.sf.net. Humm.. I agree. It feels a little bitter when I surf on vimcdoc.sf.net pages with 800x600 video resolution. > Can you keep this up in the future? I.e. after a new release, > announce it on linuxfans? > > I do have one complain though. It seems like someone > used the account to post in linuxfans forum, resulting > in automatic notification sent to our mailing list, which > isn't that pleasant. > > http://www.linuxfans.org/nuke/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=3855356#3855356 > > So whoever it is among us, please don't do it anymore > in the future. If you do want to post in linuxfans, use > your own account. Interesting! That means anyone can post on the mailing list without authorization. That's the way? > > -- > Simon Liang > wzh...@sp... > -- /* Don't frown. * Don't complain. * Don't touch yourself. */ Best Regards... Dasn |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 09:13:59
|
Hi all, As we are moving alone, translating new files and improve the quality of the existing onece. I wonder has anyone here considered the license issue. I used Vim uganda.txt for the start. But it doesn't really apply to use, since we have maily documents and little source code. What I am thinking is vimcdoc should be: 1. Free to use 2. Free to copy 3. Copyrighted by the individule translator when apply 4. No commercial use should be allowed without the authors permission ..... I have no experience in this. Any thoughts would be welcomed. Please speack up on this if you can read this mail. This includes the old friend, ken, YC, etc, if you are still here. Looking forward to hear from you all. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service. |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 09:06:15
|
> No,it's not me (it's dromany<dr...@ho...> ...maybe ). He's > so warm-hearted to help our project join Linuxfans, wasn't he? Yes. It turns out that it was our naughty wandys. Good move anyway. > I have been muttering these days on the mailing list, haven't I? :-) No. It make this place feel cosy. :-) lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Sent 0.000002 seconds ago |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-23 09:05:08
|
> Seems i was too hasty.. Indeed it was. SF have changed their CVS server configuration and I had to wait about 2 days to make this release. And by the time I did, I had no patience. > > I updated the data/Makefile, along with data/www/Makefile to fix all > this and to make it work smoothly on BSD. Correct me if somewhere i'm > wrong. Did you check them in? > > Anyway, have to build the tarball again... 0.4.0 doesnt come out so > easy.. Do we need a new 0.4.0 tarball? Is it too much hassel? I think non of the bugs are show-stoppers. Can we live with them and wait for a week or two for a .1 or .2 release? lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free |
|
From: Dasn C. <da...@us...> - 2003-09-22 23:55:32
|
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:50:18AM -0800, Simon Liang wrote: > Are you dasn? > > Is this kind of a invitation or what? > > On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:06:08 +0800, dr...@ho... said: > > ?????? ???úLinux????! > > > > ?ú????×???????????±????? (vim...@li...) > > ??×??á????,ì? ???úLinux????. ??????×??? > > > > ???????? vimcdoc > > ???? joinus > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Vimcdoc-translate mailing list > > Vim...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vimcdoc-translate > -- > Simon Liang > wzh...@sp... > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Sent 0.000002 seconds ago > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Vimcdoc-translate mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vimcdoc-translate No,it's not me (it's dromany<dr...@ho...> ...maybe ). He's so warm-hearted to help our project join Linuxfans, wasn't he? Anyway, I replied that mail in order to test whether the mailing list could handle Chinese characters well. As we can see, the Chinese characters in your mail seems strange to me, but in other mails not. I can't figure out whose problem it is, but this time I don't wanna guess the reason ^_^ I have been muttering these days on the mailing list, haven't I? :-) -- /* Don't frown. * Don't complain. * Don't touch yourself. */ Best Regards... Dasn |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-22 17:00:15
|
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 07:44:07 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > > So i updated the > > 'doc/Makefile' to try to fix this problem. [Please do a 'cvs > > update'] > > Holy "?$"$?. Thank god you spotted that first. It should be fixed > by now. Please check again. Seems i was too hasty.. There was a minor bug in the original Makefile, which would unfortunately remove the directory 'doc/CVS' when you did a 'make clean'. Thus there's no 'doc/CVS' included in the tarball. [What's worse, you maybe wont properly update the doc/* files anymore.] You have to remove the doc/ dir in your local repository and then re-check it out from the CVS server. I updated the data/Makefile, along with data/www/Makefile to fix all this and to make it work smoothly on BSD. Correct me if somewhere i'm wrong. Anyway, have to build the tarball again... 0.4.0 doesnt come out so easy.. Regards, |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-22 15:48:12
|
[snip] > > - dasn: gui_w16.txt gui_w32.txt > > - lang2: usr_40.txt usr_42.txt usr_31.txt usr_43.txt > > > > Cheer up! > > Well, have to report a ?bug?. I downloaded the new release tarball > from SF, finding there's no 'vimcdoc.sh' included. So i updated the > 'doc/Makefile' to try to fix this problem. [Please do a 'cvs update'] Holy "?$"$?. Thank god you spotted that first. It should be fixed by now. Please check again. > > Also a suggestion: How about adding a 'CHANGES' file (both to the CVS > and to the release tarball/exe)? It sounds good. But would be for next release. Thanks again. lang2 -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail... |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-22 15:21:47
|
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 05:45:36 -0800 "Simon Liang" <wzh...@sp...> wrote: > All, > > We've did it again! The latest vimcdoc - 0.4.0 has just > been released! > > Release Name: 0.4.0 > > Notes: > Another major release! This release features > 1. a better install/uninstall method for both Win32 and Linux > platform. 2. translation of all windows platform related documents. > 3. a few more review documents. > > Changes: > Installation: > - wandys: A Linux, BSD install/uninstall script. > - lang2: win32 now has a uninstaller if backup is made during > installation. > > Newly translated: > - dasn: if_ole.txt os_win32.txt os_msdos.txt os_dos.txt > Reviewed: > - dasn: gui_w16.txt gui_w32.txt > - lang2: usr_40.txt usr_42.txt usr_31.txt usr_43.txt > Cheer up! Well, have to report a ?bug?. I downloaded the new release tarball from SF, finding there's no 'vimcdoc.sh' included. So i updated the 'doc/Makefile' to try to fix this problem. [Please do a 'cvs update'] Also a suggestion: How about adding a 'CHANGES' file (both to the CVS and to the release tarball/exe)? |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-22 13:47:42
|
All, We've did it again! The latest vimcdoc - 0.4.0 has just=20 been released! Release Name: 0.4.0 Notes:=20 Another major release! This release features=20 1. a better install/uninstall method for both Win32 and Linux platform.=20 2. translation of all windows platform related documents.=20 3. a few more review documents.=20 Changes:=20 Installation:=20 - wandys: A Linux, BSD install/uninstall script.=20 - lang2: win32 now has a uninstaller if backup is made during installation.=20 Newly translated:=20 - dasn: if_ole.txt os_win32.txt os_msdos.txt os_dos.txt=20 Reviewed:=20 - dasn: gui_w16.txt gui_w32.txt=20 - lang2: usr_40.txt usr_42.txt usr_31.txt usr_43.txt --=20 Simon Liang wzh...@sp... --=20 http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different=85 |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-22 13:37:13
|
> > oki now. Good. Which means you can read this and hopefully go ahead and mirror the latest and the greatest! ;-) -- Simon Liang wzh...@sp... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service. |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-22 13:14:06
|
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:08:41 +0800 wandys <al...@so...> wrote: > Test oki now. |
|
From: wandys <al...@so...> - 2003-09-22 13:09:38
|
Test |
|
From: Simon L. <wzh...@sp...> - 2003-09-22 09:00:20
|
No. On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 07:11:44 +0800, "Dasn Cups" <da...@us...> said: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:06:08AM +0800, dr...@ho... wrote: > > =E6=AC=A2=E8=BF=8E=E6=9D?=E4=B8??=BDLinux=E5=85?=A4=BE! > >=20 > > =E6=82=A8=E7=9A=84=E7=94=B5=E5=AD=90=E9=82?=BB=B6=E5=B8=90=E5=8F=B7=E5= =B7=B2=E8?=E4=BD=BF=E7=94=A8 (vim...@li...) =E8= =AF=B7=E6=B3=A8=E5=86=8C=E5=B8=90=E5=8F?=E6=96?=E4=B8??=BDLinux=E5=85?=A4= =BE. =E4=BD=BF=E7=94=A8=E8=80=85=E8=B5=84=E8=AE?> >=20 > > =E7=99=BB=E5=85=A5=E5=90=8D=E7=A7=B0 vimcdoc --=20 Simon Liang wzh...@sp... --=20 http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service. |
357 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
