vim-latex-devel Mailing List for Vim-Latex (Page 56)
Brought to you by:
srinathava,
tmaas
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(120) |
Dec
(118) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(145) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(88) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(43) |
2004 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(19) |
2005 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(16) |
2006 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(10) |
2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(15) |
2008 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
|
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(2) |
2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(6) |
2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(41) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(9) |
2012 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(7) |
2013 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(3) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: ahmet n. <ahm...@ya...> - 2008-01-17 08:16:48
|
Hi, I am using debian/testing and corresponding vim-latexsuite from debian repository. I have also the latest version of gvim and vim-python installed. The strange thing that the problem which I explained below, is not existent in gvim6.4. I think newer version of gvim in future bring some more inconsistencies with vim-latexsuite. So I abondened using gvim 7.1 with vim-latexsuite. Regards, Ahmet --- Vaidotas Zemlys <ze...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 04:40 -0800, ahmet nurlu > a écrit : > > Hi, > > I am sorry to repeat my problem again because this > bug > > is still persistent. I submitted this bug to the > list > > before but I think nobody except me has a problem > with > > it. > > I am explaining the problem briefly. In the > vim-latex > > suite manual, it says that: > > > > # > > > > If a \bibliography command is not found, then > > Latex-Suite tries to scan the present file for a > > \begin{thebibliography} environment. If found, > > Latex-Suite searches the present file for bib-keys > of > > the form \bibitem. > > # > > > > The above explanation doesn't work for me. > \cite{+f9 > > doesn't bring any bibitem. It happens nothing. But > > \ref{+f9 works. > > > > I wonder someone advise me a workaround. > > What version of latex-suite do you use? Try the > latest and install > vim-python. Also try opening tex file with gvim or > vim from the > terminal. > > Vaidotas Zemlys > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Vim-latex-devel mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs |
From: Vaidotas Z. <ze...@gm...> - 2008-01-15 08:44:33
|
Hi, Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 04:40 -0800, ahmet nurlu a écrit : > Hi, > I am sorry to repeat my problem again because this bug > is still persistent. I submitted this bug to the list > before but I think nobody except me has a problem with > it. > I am explaining the problem briefly. In the vim-latex > suite manual, it says that: > > # > > If a \bibliography command is not found, then > Latex-Suite tries to scan the present file for a > \begin{thebibliography} environment. If found, > Latex-Suite searches the present file for bib-keys of > the form \bibitem. > # > > The above explanation doesn't work for me. \cite{+f9 > doesn't bring any bibitem. It happens nothing. But > \ref{+f9 works. > > I wonder someone advise me a workaround. What version of latex-suite do you use? Try the latest and install vim-python. Also try opening tex file with gvim or vim from the terminal. Vaidotas Zemlys |
From: ahmet n. <ahm...@ya...> - 2008-01-14 12:40:59
|
Hi, I am sorry to repeat my problem again because this bug is still persistent. I submitted this bug to the list before but I think nobody except me has a problem with it. I am explaining the problem briefly. In the vim-latex suite manual, it says that: # If a \bibliography command is not found, then Latex-Suite tries to scan the present file for a \begin{thebibliography} environment. If found, Latex-Suite searches the present file for bib-keys of the form \bibitem. # The above explanation doesn't work for me. \cite{+f9 doesn't bring any bibitem. It happens nothing. But \ref{+f9 works. I wonder someone advise me a workaround. > > Hi, > > I have been getting this recent error with a vim7.1. > It is not happening with vim6.4. > > The problem is that \cite{} command doesn't search > through \begin{thebibliography} environment.(It is > strange that when I type "\cite" , its color becomes > blue.) > > My tex file(try.tex) is something like: > -------------------------------------> > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage{color} > \usepackage{listings} > \begin{document} > try try try > > \cite{}<++> > > \begin{thebibliography}{99} > \bibitem{goossens93} Michel Goossens, The Latex > Book > \end{thebibliography} > \end{document} > ---------------------------------------------< > > when the cursor positions itself into the \cite{}, > pressing F9 brings no action. > > This problem doesn't arise if I prepare a bib > file(trybib.bib) and put my bibliography index into > it. For example, > > my_Directory/ > try.tex > trybib.bib > -------------------------------------------------> > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage{color} > \usepackage{listings} > \begin{document} > try try try > > \cite{}<++> > \bibliographystyle{plain} > \bibliography{trybib} > > \end{document} > > I am using vim-latexsuite(debian/unstable). Any > suggestions? > > Regards, > Ahmet ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-01-11 20:16:06
|
Sure, of course, but if you want to FORCE production of a DVI (for example, when you select "dvi" as a target in Vim), you'll have to add the command-line switch in your .vimrc. --Ted Qiuye Wang wrote: > Hi, > > thank you all for the responses. I think i've found the reason why the > pdftex generated the pdf file directly. There is a STRING ``pdftex'' > in the preamble of the tex file (\usepackage[pdftex,bookmarks] > {hyperref}). If i remove it from the tex file, then i get a dvi file. > > Hmm, that's weird because i could get a dvi file sometime with the > very same tex file. > > Anyway, thank you again for the help. > QY > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:46:19AM +0100, Qiuye Wang wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> well, my problem should be already out of the range of this list, but >> maybe i'd get some useful hints. >> >> Anyway, i was trying to generate dvi file, but found the latex doesn't >> do it anymore, i'm pretty sure that the target format is dvi. The >> binary program of latex is from the package texlive-latex-base >> 2007-13. >> >> To get the dvi file is really important to me because of my native >> language. Does anyone know about this story? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> QY >> -- >> Linux version 2.6.22-3-686 >> Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >> just about anything Open Source. >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace >> _______________________________________________ >> Vim-latex-devel mailing list >> Vim...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel >> > -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Qiuye W. <qi...@gm...> - 2008-01-11 20:11:22
|
Hi, thank you all for the responses. I think i've found the reason why the pdftex generated the pdf file directly. There is a STRING ``pdftex'' in the preamble of the tex file (\usepackage[pdftex,bookmarks] {hyperref}). If i remove it from the tex file, then i get a dvi file. Hmm, that's weird because i could get a dvi file sometime with the very same tex file. Anyway, thank you again for the help. QY On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:46:19AM +0100, Qiuye Wang wrote: >Hello list, > >well, my problem should be already out of the range of this list, but >maybe i'd get some useful hints. > >Anyway, i was trying to generate dvi file, but found the latex doesn't >do it anymore, i'm pretty sure that the target format is dvi. The >binary program of latex is from the package texlive-latex-base >2007-13. > >To get the dvi file is really important to me because of my native >language. Does anyone know about this story? > >Thanks in advance. >QY >-- >Linux version 2.6.22-3-686 >Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >It's the best place to buy or sell services for >just about anything Open Source. >http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace >_______________________________________________ >Vim-latex-devel mailing list >Vim...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel > -- Thinkpad T60 with ATI x1400 128M Driver: fglrx-driver 8.40.4-2 Linux version 2.6.22-3-686 Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-01-11 13:37:42
|
> AFAIU that's pretty much default in most distributions and TeXLive > now. (actually it should be pdflatex, not pdftex.) Does it help if > you specify '-output-format dvi' as a command-line parameter? (man > pdflatex) pdflatex symlinks to pdftex. pdftex is what runs them all. Everything has been consolidated into pdftex. pdftex --help is a quick way to verify all of this. Of course, "man pdftex" will also work fine. Note that "man pdftex" brings up the same man page as "man pdflatex". --Ted -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-01-11 13:35:23
|
Don't be deceived by the name. "pdftex" just means "normal tex that is able to produce PDFs, but it doesn't have to." If you type: pdftex --help I think you'll find a bunch of options that answer your question. In particular, pdftex -output-format=dvi Hope that helps. -- Ted Qiuye Wang wrote: > Well, it seems that my linux-distro has changed the symbol-link of the > /usr/bin/latex to pdftex. But to which file should /usr/bin/latex have > pointed, so that i can get the dvi file again? > > Thank you. > QY > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:46:19AM +0100, Qiuye Wang wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> well, my problem should be already out of the range of this list, but >> maybe i'd get some useful hints. >> >> Anyway, i was trying to generate dvi file, but found the latex doesn't >> do it anymore, i'm pretty sure that the target format is dvi. The >> binary program of latex is from the package texlive-latex-base >> 2007-13. >> >> To get the dvi file is really important to me because of my native >> language. Does anyone know about this story? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> QY >> -- >> Linux version 2.6.22-3-686 >> Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >> just about anything Open Source. >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace >> _______________________________________________ >> Vim-latex-devel mailing list >> Vim...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel >> > -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Andreas W. <A.W...@st...> - 2008-01-11 06:52:16
|
Hello Qiuye, hello list, * Qiuye Wang wrote on Jan/11/2008: > Well, it seems that my linux-distro has changed the symbol-link of the > /usr/bin/latex to pdftex. But to which file should /usr/bin/latex have > pointed, so that i can get the dvi file again? AFAIU that's pretty much default in most distributions and TeXLive now. (actually it should be pdflatex, not pdftex.) Does it help if you specify '-output-format dvi' as a command-line parameter? (man pdflatex) HTH, Andreas -- Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand. -- My Public PGP Keys: 1024 Bit DH/DSS: 0x869F81BA 768 Bit RSA: 0x1AD97BA5 |
From: Qiuye W. <qi...@gm...> - 2008-01-11 00:05:22
|
Well, it seems that my linux-distro has changed the symbol-link of the /usr/bin/latex to pdftex. But to which file should /usr/bin/latex have pointed, so that i can get the dvi file again? Thank you. QY On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:46:19AM +0100, Qiuye Wang wrote: >Hello list, > >well, my problem should be already out of the range of this list, but >maybe i'd get some useful hints. > >Anyway, i was trying to generate dvi file, but found the latex doesn't >do it anymore, i'm pretty sure that the target format is dvi. The >binary program of latex is from the package texlive-latex-base >2007-13. > >To get the dvi file is really important to me because of my native >language. Does anyone know about this story? > >Thanks in advance. >QY >-- >Linux version 2.6.22-3-686 >Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >It's the best place to buy or sell services for >just about anything Open Source. >http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace >_______________________________________________ >Vim-latex-devel mailing list >Vim...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel > -- Linux version 2.6.22-3-686 Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid |
From: Qiuye W. <qi...@gm...> - 2008-01-10 23:46:19
|
Hello list, well, my problem should be already out of the range of this list, but maybe i'd get some useful hints. Anyway, i was trying to generate dvi file, but found the latex doesn't do it anymore, i'm pretty sure that the target format is dvi. The binary program of latex is from the package texlive-latex-base 2007-13. To get the dvi file is really important to me because of my native language. Does anyone know about this story? Thanks in advance. QY -- Linux version 2.6.22-3-686 Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2007-12-29 22:35:18
|
For inverse searches (using both MacVim or gvim), see: http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2007/12/pdfsync-inverse-searches-in-macvim.html --Ted Ted Pavlic wrote: > I thought this list was dead. To my surprise, there are recent messages > in here. > > If anyone ever updates the Vim-LaTeX suite, they may want to apply these > patches: > > http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2007/07/vim-latex-modification-forward.html > > which allow forward searches/forward viewing to actually work in OS X. > > I have also made numerous changes to the compiler.vim file to make > compiling smoother (i.e., actually run MAKEINDEX when necessary and > re-run bibtex at smarter times). > > --Ted > -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2007-12-29 21:41:29
|
I thought this list was dead. To my surprise, there are recent messages in here. If anyone ever updates the Vim-LaTeX suite, they may want to apply these patches: http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2007/07/vim-latex-modification-forward.html which allow forward searches/forward viewing to actually work in OS X. I have also made numerous changes to the compiler.vim file to make compiling smoother (i.e., actually run MAKEINDEX when necessary and re-run bibtex at smarter times). --Ted -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-12-28 10:37:45
|
Bugs item #1859626, was opened at 2007-12-28 11:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=466456&aid=1859626&group_id=52322 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jarek Miszczak (jarekadam) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem with thebibliography environment Initial Comment: Hi, I have notices that environment macro for thebibliography LaTeX environment (ETB in insert modd) puts \item command instead \bibitem in the created environment. I attach patch for vimfiles/ftplugin/latex-suite/envmacros.vim file. It has solved the problem for, but I'm not sure if this is all. I'm using CVS version of latex-suite (latexSuite20071228.tar.gz). Cherrs, Jarek Miszczak ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=466456&aid=1859626&group_id=52322 |
From: Guido M. <gui...@un...> - 2007-12-19 17:29:25
|
Many thanks for the information kindly supplied by listmembers. i was not aware of vim-addon-manager (shame; I use vim everyday and I should have known). I decided to leave the main installation as it was because another user could use the same files. I noticed that the installation process of this vim-addon-manager was simply a set of symbolik links in my home (clever indeed). So I copied manually my personal settings (file texrc) in .vim/ftplugin/tex and it's all right. Best regards, guido, from genoa, italy ------- Guido Milanese http://docenti.unicatt.it/milanese_guido http://www.arsantiqua.org |
From: Sebastian M. <seb...@un...> - 2007-12-19 15:59:25
|
Am Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:26:15 +0200 schrieb Vaidotas Zemlys <ze...@gm...>: > If you open tex file with gvim from nautilus, at least on Ubuntu 7.04, > gvim does not set the correct current directory. Then F9 completion > does not work with \cite and bibtex. Try opening file from terminal > from the directory where the file resides. Offtopic: I have that behavior often. Is there a workaround to get gvim play nicely with nautilus, i.e. set the cwd correctly? Seb. |
From: Vaidotas Z. <ze...@gm...> - 2007-12-19 12:26:20
|
Le mercredi 19 décembre 2007 à 12:18 +0100, Valentin Flunkert a écrit : > Hi All, > > I have some trouble with the F9 completition of my bibtex items under > Ubuntu 7.10. > When I write \cite{ and F9 an empty preview window comes up. (My bib > file is setup correctly) > For the \ref{ command it works. > > I also installed the latest version in my .vim folder (removing the > ubuntu package before) but this didn't change anything. > Can anyone reproduce this? If you open tex file with gvim from nautilus, at least on Ubuntu 7.04, gvim does not set the correct current directory. Then F9 completion does not work with \cite and bibtex. Try opening file from terminal from the directory where the file resides. Vaidotas Zemlys |
From: Valentin F. <flu...@gm...> - 2007-12-19 11:54:04
|
Thanks for the quick reply. > > Works perfectly for me. > How are you including your .bib-file, with extension or without? > I use \bibliography{mybib} and mybib.bib is the bibtex file in the same directory. On another machine, running gentoo, this works fine. > By the way it would be nice if you started a new thread when you ask a > question that is unrelated to the ones that was asked before (okay, you > are also using Ubuntu 7.10, but that one was not about bibtex at all). > sorry. > Happy vimming > > Martin > To you too, Valentin |
From: Martin S. <fo...@un...> - 2007-12-19 11:33:34
|
> I have some trouble with the F9 completition of my bibtex items under Ubuntu > 7.10. > When I write \cite{ and F9 an empty preview window comes up. (My bib file is > setup correctly) > For the \ref{ command it works. > > I also installed the latest version in my .vim folder (removing the ubuntu > package before) but this didn't change anything. > Can anyone reproduce this? Works perfectly for me. How are you including your .bib-file, with extension or without? By the way it would be nice if you started a new thread when you ask a question that is unrelated to the ones that was asked before (okay, you are also using Ubuntu 7.10, but that one was not about bibtex at all). Happy vimming Martin |
From: Valentin F. <flu...@gm...> - 2007-12-19 11:18:43
|
Hi All, I have some trouble with the F9 completition of my bibtex items under Ubuntu 7.10. When I write \cite{ and F9 an empty preview window comes up. (My bib file is setup correctly) For the \ref{ command it works. I also installed the latest version in my .vim folder (removing the ubuntu package before) but this didn't change anything. Can anyone reproduce this? regards, Valentin On Dec 19, 2007 12:07 PM, Martin Sander <fo...@un...> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:55:43AM +0100, Sebastian Menge wrote: > > the version is outdated. Current version in > > Ubuntu (and probably Debian) is "20060325-3". > > No it is not, see [1]: > Latest version of Latex-Suite: > * latexSuite20060325.tar.gz (212.3 Kb; March 25, 2006) > > > Is there no active package maintainer for a debianized vim-latex-suite? > > Actually debian even patched latex-suite, I don't know if these patches > are going upstream though. The latest patch in the changelog that is not > debian-specific is from jan 16th. > > Happy vimming > > Martin > > [1] > http://vim-latex.sourceforge.net/index.php?subject=download&title=Download > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services > for just about anything Open Source. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Vim-latex-devel mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel > |
From: Martin S. <fo...@un...> - 2007-12-19 11:07:07
|
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:55:43AM +0100, Sebastian Menge wrote: > the version is outdated. Current version in > Ubuntu (and probably Debian) is "20060325-3". No it is not, see [1]: Latest version of Latex-Suite: * latexSuite20060325.tar.gz (212.3 Kb; March 25, 2006) > Is there no active package maintainer for a debianized vim-latex-suite? Actually debian even patched latex-suite, I don't know if these patches are going upstream though. The latest patch in the changelog that is not debian-specific is from jan 16th. Happy vimming Martin [1] http://vim-latex.sourceforge.net/index.php?subject=download&title=Download |
From: Sebastian M. <seb...@un...> - 2007-12-19 10:56:02
|
Am Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:30:41 +0100 schrieb Guido Milanese <gui...@un...>: > Would you suggest to remove this installation and install the program > manually (on my Mandriva I did so and it's all right), to use a > symbolic link or can I use this unusual location of the files? Yes. Especicially since the version is outdated. Current version in Ubuntu (and probably Debian) is "20060325-3". Is there no active package maintainer for a debianized vim-latex-suite? Sebastian. |
From: Vaidotas Z. <ze...@gm...> - 2007-12-19 10:54:52
|
Hi, Le mercredi 19 décembre 2007 à 11:30 +0100, Guido Milanese a écrit : > Dear all, > I am experimenting a new Linux distribution (Ubunto 7.10), which I am very > impressed by. I installed vim-latex using an automatic installation tool, > called Synaptic, but to my amazement the files were not installed in the .vim > directory (which does not exist), but on > /usr/share/vim/addons/ftplugin/latex-suite > > Would you suggest to remove this installation and install the program manually > (on my Mandriva I did so and it's all right), to use a symbolic link or can I > use this unusual location of the files? The location is not unusual, it is site-wide installation, i.e. everybody user on your system can use vim-latex, without the need of installing it. If you are the sole user of the computer I think it makes sense to install vim-latex locally (as you did in Mandriva), since this is the way the author suggests it, and all the tutorials are written with this configuration in mind. Of course you must remove the Ubuntu package before installing local version. Ubuntu package is ok, if you do not intend to change any vim-latex settings, and use the defaults. Vaidotas Zemlys |
From: Guido M. <gui...@un...> - 2007-12-19 10:30:43
|
Dear all, I am experimenting a new Linux distribution (Ubunto 7.10), which I am very impressed by. I installed vim-latex using an automatic installation tool, called Synaptic, but to my amazement the files were not installed in the .vim directory (which does not exist), but on /usr/share/vim/addons/ftplugin/latex-suite Would you suggest to remove this installation and install the program manually (on my Mandriva I did so and it's all right), to use a symbolic link or can I use this unusual location of the files? Thank you, and congratulations on this excellent program. I am writing a manual on LaTeX for the humanities (in Italian) and the program will be mentioned as an excellent "companion" for scholars in our fields. Cheers, g ------- Guido Milanese http://docenti.unicatt.it/milanese_guido http://www.arsantiqua.org |
From: Valentin F. <flu...@gm...> - 2007-12-16 17:33:21
|
Thanks for the help. I figured it out. The problem is that s: only defines local functions. So i copied the files envmacros.vim and wizardfunctions.vim (where the functions and macros are defined) to .vim/after/ftplugin/ and changed all the commands in envmacros.vim using a recording :-). Valentin What about .vim/after/ftplugin/tex.vim? > Afaik this file gets sourced last. > > happy vimming > > Martin > > |
From: Valentin F. <flu...@gm...> - 2007-12-16 01:11:49
|
Dear All, I just learned about the latex suite and i really like it. However, I have a problem with the macros. The bibtex-ids i use are of the form "first three letters of the author and the year " for example SCH99. SCH for instance now clashes with the chapter-macro. I could turn the three-letter-macros of, but I would prefer to change them, for example using "_SCH". I tried this in my tex.vim file call IMAP('SCH','SCH','tex') call s:Tex_SectionMacros('_SCH', 'chapter') but i get an error that s:Tex_SectionMacros is not defined. Thanks for any suggestions, Valentin P.S: the same question has been asked before: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=20060417091533.GA5584%40localhost.localdomain |