vim-latex-devel Mailing List for Vim-Latex (Page 55)
Brought to you by:
srinathava,
tmaas
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(120) |
Dec
(118) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(145) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(88) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(43) |
2004 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(19) |
2005 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(16) |
2006 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(10) |
2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(15) |
2008 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
|
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(2) |
2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(6) |
2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(41) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(9) |
2012 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(7) |
2013 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(3) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Rhys U. <rhy...@gm...> - 2008-03-07 23:19:23
|
Hi all, Is anyone else experiencing an extra double quote within align* environments? E.g., \begin{align*} " \end{align*}<++> after the environment insertion ends. It occurs when hitting F5 and selecting align or align* (options 7/8) from the list. Typing either environment name first and hitting F5 doesn't behave the same way. Vim version 7.1 off the latest CVS. - Rhys |
From: Christian E. <bla...@gm...> - 2008-03-07 22:43:53
|
Hi Ted, * Ted Pavlic on Friday, March 07, 2008 at 17:00:04 -0500 > Check out the solution at: > > http://links.tedpavlic.com/shell_scripts/vimlatex Very neat. > I implemented the sed scripts with single quotes to help make the > "trick" documented on that page a little more clear. Yup. You beat me to it. Single quotes are much easier to handle as long as you don't /have/ to use double quotes. > The "trick" puts a "\" at the end of the sed script and then inserts a > NEWLINE right in the middle of the string. The "\" somehow tells the > shell (or sed) to continue to the next line before assembling the string. > > So, really all you need is something like... > > sed -e 's/blah/\'$'\n''stuff/' > > which will replace "blah" with a newline and then "stuff". Thanks for clarifying. > Hopefully that will do it. Works like a charm with both Apple shipped sed and gsed. > Side notes: > > 1. The OS/X sed has no trouble MATCHING a newline with \n) Ah, right. > 2. I changed the ORDER of the search strings. I also added a SECOND > search string for catching numbers split across lines. It's meant to > catch lines like: > > things 12 > 34 stuff 56 > 78 other things > > Now, if that pattern continues, it will miss a few. I'm hoping that just > catching three lines in a row will be sufficient. A better solution > would be to use perl... but I don't know what's included with OS/X > without installing the developer tools. :( Python and Perl are included; the libs are in a non-standard location: /Library/Perl/... But for for executing scripts you should be fine. Still for these tasks sed and awk are way cooler and faster. c -- __ _ _ _ __ _ _ \ \ | |__| |__ _ __| |_\ \| |_ _ _ __ _ __| |_ \ \| '_ \ / _` / _| / /\ \ _| '_/ _` (_-< ' \ http://www.blacktrash.org/ \_\_.__/_\__,_\__|_\_\ \_\__|_| \__,_/__/_||_| Jabber-ID: bla...@gm... |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-03-07 22:00:22
|
Check out the solution at: http://links.tedpavlic.com/shell_scripts/vimlatex I implemented the sed scripts with single quotes to help make the "trick" documented on that page a little more clear. The "trick" puts a "\" at the end of the sed script and then inserts a NEWLINE right in the middle of the string. The "\" somehow tells the shell (or sed) to continue to the next line before assembling the string. So, really all you need is something like... sed -e 's/blah/\'$'\n''stuff/' which will replace "blah" with a newline and then "stuff". Hopefully that will do it. Side notes: 1. The OS/X sed has no trouble MATCHING a newline with \n) 2. I changed the ORDER of the search strings. I also added a SECOND search string for catching numbers split across lines. It's meant to catch lines like: things 12 34 stuff 56 78 other things Now, if that pattern continues, it will miss a few. I'm hoping that just catching three lines in a row will be sufficient. A better solution would be to use perl... but I don't know what's included with OS/X without installing the developer tools. :( Thanks, again -- Ted Christian Ebert wrote: > * Ted Pavlic on Friday, March 07, 2008 at 14:39:10 -0500 >> Here's an interesting solution... >> >> http://www.culmination.org/2008/02/10/sed-on-mac-os-x-105-leopard/ > > Indeed. > >> Use: >> >> \\”$’\n’”\ >> >> instead. >> >> I'll make that change and update. > > I'm eager to know how you do it. > > I get > ": unescaped newline inside substitute pattern > > Also, IIRC, you have to use [0-9][0-9]* instead of [0-9]\+. > [0-9]\{1,\} works on MacOS, but breaks on other machines. > > c -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Christian E. <bla...@gm...> - 2008-03-07 20:29:49
|
* Ted Pavlic on Friday, March 07, 2008 at 14:39:10 -0500 > Here's an interesting solution... > > http://www.culmination.org/2008/02/10/sed-on-mac-os-x-105-leopard/ Indeed. > Use: > > \\”$’\n’”\ > > instead. > > I'll make that change and update. I'm eager to know how you do it. I get ": unescaped newline inside substitute pattern Also, IIRC, you have to use [0-9][0-9]* instead of [0-9]\+. [0-9]\{1,\} works on MacOS, but breaks on other machines. c -- _B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! --->> <http://www.blacktrash.org/baustellen.html> |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-03-07 19:39:20
|
Here's an interesting solution... http://www.culmination.org/2008/02/10/sed-on-mac-os-x-105-leopard/ Use: \\”$’\n’”\ instead. I'll make that change and update. Thanks! --Ted Ted Pavlic wrote: >> Note, however, that by using sed you encounter portability >> issues! For me, on MacOS 10.4.11, the script only works because I >> have GNU Sed (gsed) installed. Apple shipped sed in /usr/bin >> can't handle "\n". >> >> For portability you might want to wrap this in python or perl. > > Another good point. However, does OS/X ship with python or perl > standard? For portability, I think I'd want to use a utility standard > with them all. > > I may just have to suck it up and encode a newline (rather than a \n) in > the script (and stick with sed). :( > > Thoughts? > > Thanks -- > Ted > > > -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-03-07 19:25:03
|
> Note, however, that by using sed you encounter portability > issues! For me, on MacOS 10.4.11, the script only works because I > have GNU Sed (gsed) installed. Apple shipped sed in /usr/bin > can't handle "\n". > > For portability you might want to wrap this in python or perl. Another good point. However, does OS/X ship with python or perl standard? For portability, I think I'd want to use a utility standard with them all. I may just have to suck it up and encode a newline (rather than a \n) in the script (and stick with sed). :( Thoughts? Thanks -- Ted -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Christian E. <bla...@gm...> - 2008-03-07 19:07:24
|
Ted, * Ted Pavlic on Friday, March 07, 2008 at 12:48:46 -0500 [ replace pipe thru sed instances by several -e ] > That's an EXCELLENT suggestion. I've implemented it and updated all > on-line versions (with credit to you in the comments/version history). Heh, I'm flattered. Note, however, that by using sed you encounter portability issues! For me, on MacOS 10.4.11, the script only works because I have GNU Sed (gsed) installed. Apple shipped sed in /usr/bin can't handle "\n". For portability you might want to wrap this in python or perl. c -- _B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! --->> <http://www.blacktrash.org/baustellen.html> |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-03-07 17:48:54
|
Christian -- That's an EXCELLENT suggestion. I've implemented it and updated all on-line versions (with credit to you in the comments/version history). Thanks! -- Ted > Instead of piping through several sed instances, repeat -e -- The > line continuation is personal taste. > > Or have you already tried this, and it breaks? -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Christian E. <bla...@gm...> - 2008-03-07 17:14:49
|
Hi Ted, * Ted Pavlic on Friday, March 07, 2008 at 10:10:05 -0500 > It's well-known (yet not often discussed) that Vim has a hard time > parsing LaTeX error messages because they are nested within parentheses, > and multiple nests can closed on a single line (e.g., you can find ")))" > on a single line). When these nest closings do not get parsed correctly > by Vim, then Vim-LaTeX will open the wrong file when it encounters an > error. > > > I've put together a wrapper (implemented with bash) to filter latex > error messages to fix this problem: > > http://links.tedpavlic.com/shell_scripts/vimlatex Very neat! Thanks for your efforts at keeping vim-latex alive anyway. How about: --- vimlatex.orig 2008-03-07 18:03:11.000000000 +0100 +++ vimlatex 2008-03-07 18:07:20.000000000 +0100 @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ shift exec 3>&1 -retcode=$( exec 4>&1; { ${texprg} "$@"; echo $? >&4; } | sed -e "s/(/\n(/g" | sed -e "s/)/)\n/g" | sed -e "/[0-9]\+$/{N;s/\n\([0-9]\+\)/\1/;}" >&3) +retcode=$( exec 4>&1; { ${texprg} "$@"; echo $? >&4; } \ +| sed -e "s/(/\n(/g" -e "s/)/)\n/g" -e "/[0-9]\+$/{N;s/\n\([0-9]\+\)/\1/;}" >&3) exec 3>&- exit ${retcode} Instead of piping through several sed instances, repeat -e -- The line continuation is personal taste. Or have you already tried this, and it breaks? c -- _B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! --->> <http://www.blacktrash.org/baustellen.html> |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-07 15:13:32
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4822389 By: neodore It's well-known (yet not often discussed) that Vim has a hard time parsing LaTeX error messages because they are nested within parentheses, and multiple nests can closed on a single line (e.g., you can find ")))" on a single line). When these nest closings do not get parsed correctly by Vim, then Vim-LaTeX will open the wrong file when it encounters an error. I've put together a wrapper (implemented with bash) to filter latex error messages to fix this problem: http://links.tedpavlic.com/shell_scripts/vimlatex I've also posted this script at vim.org. I've put some additional information at: http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2008/03/fixing-vim-latex-compiler-error.html At least one other similar script exists on the web. However, because bash pipelines return the rightmost return code, those scripts often require writing to a temporary file in order for the wrapper to return whatever latex returns. My script uses a bash file descriptor trick to get around using temporary files. I hope this is helpful to someone. --Ted ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=173627 |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-03-07 15:10:11
|
It's well-known (yet not often discussed) that Vim has a hard time parsing LaTeX error messages because they are nested within parentheses, and multiple nests can closed on a single line (e.g., you can find ")))" on a single line). When these nest closings do not get parsed correctly by Vim, then Vim-LaTeX will open the wrong file when it encounters an error. I've put together a wrapper (implemented with bash) to filter latex error messages to fix this problem: http://links.tedpavlic.com/shell_scripts/vimlatex I've also posted this script at vim.org. I've put some additional information at: http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2008/03/fixing-vim-latex-compiler-error.html At least one other similar script exists on the web. However, because bash pipelines return the rightmost return code, those scripts often require writing to a temporary file in order for the wrapper to return whatever latex returns. My script uses a bash file descriptor trick to get around using temporary files. I hope this is helpful to someone. --Ted -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-07 15:03:23
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4822367 By: polyformal_sp Hello folks, i finally got rid of this. The problem comes from the vimspell plugin [1] , and i found that since vim >= 7 i don't need this plugin anymore [2] and [3]. [1] http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=465 [2] http://www.linux.com/articles/54068 [3] http://slip-shod.blogspot.com/2006/05/vim-7-launched.html My setup was Debian lenny, vim 7.1.245 best regards Stefan Pampel ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=173627 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-07 14:16:59
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4822252 By: marvinthepa First of all, a little bit more information would have been nice, e.g. operating system, version of vim that you are using, version of latex-suite, if you installed latex-suite with package-management or by hand, system-wide or in your home directory. I vaguely remember having the same problem a long time ago, but I don't know how I solved it. jfgi found this though: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=259385 So maybe it is a problem with your version of vim. Good luck and happy vimming Martin ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=173627 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-07 09:13:25
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4821789 By: polyformal_sp Hello, first, vim-latex ist nice to handle latex documents ;) But i have an issue when typing documents: Typing a '.' (dot) or ',' (comma) these signs appears on the right side of the cursor when continue typing. So i have to use the cursor to right if i want continue typing on the right side of the dot or comma, otherwise typing continues on the left side of commy or dot. This behavior is only in tex documentes while installed the latexsuite plugin. some hints? Thanks and best regards Stefan Pampel ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=173627 |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-03-05 22:13:34
|
Vim has a hard time parsing TeX output of the form... (file (file (file ))) (i.e., nested output where all of the closing parentheses come on one line). So, Vim-LaTeX tends to open the wrong file on compiler errors. I've put together a simple-to-use script to try to fix this. See: http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2008/03/fixing-vim-latex-compiler-error.html and, for the script: http://links.tedpavlic.com/shell_scripts/vimlatex Then add "vimlatex" to the front of any compiler command you use. For example, if you've been executing: latex blah blah blah then execute: vimlatex latex blah blah blah instead. This isn't a new idea. However, it's an idea that's hard to find on the web. -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Daniele A. <d.a...@gm...> - 2008-02-21 13:09:05
|
I believe the following link may help http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1172 Best wishes. Daniele On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:57 PM, davide <lis...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> wrote: > > You should post to the main Vim list, as this is a Vim question and not > > a vim-latex question. I'm guessing that some of the Vim-experts will > > have a method (that applies more broadly than to just TeX files). > > Ok, thank you very much. > > I'll repost in the main Vim list. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Vim-latex-devel mailing list > Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel > |
From: davide <lis...@gm...> - 2008-02-21 12:57:54
|
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> wrote: > You should post to the main Vim list, as this is a Vim question and not > a vim-latex question. I'm guessing that some of the Vim-experts will > have a method (that applies more broadly than to just TeX files). Ok, thank you very much. I'll repost in the main Vim list. |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-02-20 14:19:05
|
You should post to the main Vim list, as this is a Vim question and not a vim-latex question. I'm guessing that some of the Vim-experts will have a method (that applies more broadly than to just TeX files). That being said, revision control systems as old as RCS can look for keywords within your files and update them on check-ins. For example: $Revision: 1.10 $ will get updated automatically by RCS. --Ted davide wrote: > Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to update automagically > the header of a latex file as the following one. > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% -*- Mode: Latex -*- > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %% file.tex --- %% Author : > First Name %% Created On : Mon Feb 24 03:00 PM 2006 C %% Last > Modified By: Friend of First Name %% Last Modified On: Tue Feb 29 > 15:28:45 CET 2007 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > > > > I think the header was generated by emacs. > > thank you. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. > Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ Vim-latex-devel > mailing list Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel > -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: davide <lis...@gm...> - 2008-02-20 14:11:25
|
Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to update automagically the header of a latex file as the following one. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% -*- Mode: Latex -*- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %% file.tex --- %% Author : First Name %% Created On : Mon Feb 24 03:00 PM 2006 C %% Last Modified By: Friend of First Name %% Last Modified On: Tue Feb 29 15:28:45 CET 2007 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% I think the header was generated by emacs. thank you. |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-02-19 22:29:08
|
>> 2. \lv When using \lv, instead of opening the file it gives a bunch >> of errors. On the vim-latex documentation, it says that the system >> should open it automatically (I didn't customize it yet). Why isn't >> this working? I am using Mac OS X Tiger. > > See: > > http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2007/07/vim-latex-modification-forward.html > > Make the modifications described there, and I think you'll be on your way. NOTE: Those modifications assume that you're using Skim, PDFView, or TeXniscope as your viewer. It *could* be changed to support Preview or Adobe too, but I don't quite see the point (especially with Preview). If you're doing LaTeX work on OSX, you should be using a viewer like those. All of them support auto-reloading of PDFs, so your PDF will automatically refresh at every change. In Preview, it's difficult to even *FORCE* a refresh. --Ted >> Thanks in advance, Mars >> >> >> --- >> >> Hwasung Mars Lee >> >> Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, 24-29 St Giles', Oxford, >> OX1 3LB, United Kingdom >> >> It is by logic that we prove, but by intuition that we discover. - >> Henri Poincaré >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Share what Santa brought you https://www.mycooluncool.com >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. >> Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ Vim-latex-devel >> mailing list Vim...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel >> > -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Ted P. <te...@te...> - 2008-02-19 22:20:35
|
> 1. When opening a file When opening a file in Mac OS, I have to press > enter after vim tells me what file it is opening. After I press > enter, it finally shows the contents to me. This doesn't happen when > I am using Linux, what's going wrong? I am using vim 7.1. This is a problem with the traditional gvim. There are several workarounds, but they don't work 100% of the time. Try MacVim instead: http://code.google.com/p/macvim/ > 2. \lv When using \lv, instead of opening the file it gives a bunch > of errors. On the vim-latex documentation, it says that the system > should open it automatically (I didn't customize it yet). Why isn't > this working? I am using Mac OS X Tiger. See: http://phaseportrait.blogspot.com/2007/07/vim-latex-modification-forward.html Make the modifications described there, and I think you'll be on your way. --Ted > Thanks in advance, Mars > > > --- > > Hwasung Mars Lee > > Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, 24-29 St Giles', Oxford, > OX1 3LB, United Kingdom > > It is by logic that we prove, but by intuition that we discover. - > Henri Poincaré > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Share what Santa brought you https://www.mycooluncool.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. > Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ Vim-latex-devel > mailing list Vim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel > -- Ted Pavlic <te...@te...> |
From: Hwasung M. L. <hwa...@ho...> - 2008-02-19 22:12:06
|
Hello, With the help of some people, I managed to solve the problem I was having on Linux machines. Now, I want to ask some questions when using Mac OS. 1. When opening a file When opening a file in Mac OS, I have to press enter after vim tells me what file it is opening. After I press enter, it finally shows the contents to me. This doesn't happen when I am using Linux, what's going wrong? I am using vim 7.1. 2. \lv When using \lv, instead of opening the file it gives a bunch of errors. On the vim-latex documentation, it says that the system should open it automatically (I didn't customize it yet). Why isn't this working? I am using Mac OS X Tiger. Thanks in advance, Mars --- Hwasung Mars Lee Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, 24-29 St Giles', Oxford, OX1 3LB, United Kingdom It is by logic that we prove, but by intuition that we discover. - Henri Poincaré _________________________________________________________________ Share what Santa brought you https://www.mycooluncool.com |
From: Christian E. <bla...@gm...> - 2008-02-19 21:08:32
|
* Hwasung Mars Lee on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 17:11:25 +0000 > I have just switched to vim, but I can't configure it to > compile my tex files into pdf rather than dvi. My tex.vim under > ~/.vim/ftplugin reads, > > g:Tex_DefaultTargetFormat = 'pdf' let g:Tex_DefaultTargetFormat = 'pdf' ^^^ or was that just a typo? c -- _B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! --->> <http://www.blacktrash.org/baustellen.html> |
From: Hwasung M. L. <hwa...@ho...> - 2008-02-19 17:11:31
|
Hello, I have just switched to vim, but I can't configure it to compile my tex files into pdf rather than dvi. My tex.vim under ~/.vim/ftplugin reads, g:Tex_DefaultTargetFormat = 'pdf' Why is vim-latex macros still compiling it into dvi? Thanks in advance, Mars --- Hwasung Mars Lee It is by logic that we prove, but by intuition that we discover. - Henri Poincaré _________________________________________________________________ Share what Santa brought you https://www.mycooluncool.com |
From: Martin S. <fo...@un...> - 2008-01-23 23:37:20
|
Hey list. I have spent some time now and it is really annoying. When I do inverse searching from xdvi (which was hard to set up in the first place..), I get this awful annoying "Press ENTER or type command to continue" message most of the time, although there is no long message shown. I have done all that is suggested in ":help press-enter". It seems to me that vim does something like ":file" when you call --remote-silent, and I can't find a way to turn that off.. Does anybody have any ideas? Sorry if I don't make any sense, its late.. Martin |