tuxpaint-devel Mailing List for Tux Paint (Page 138)
An award-winning drawing program for children of all ages
Brought to you by:
wkendrick
Menu
▾
▴
tuxpaint-devel — General discussion list for Tux Paint developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(39) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(64) |
Oct
(161) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(64) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(78) |
Jul
(85) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(151) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(91) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(41) |
Apr
(32) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(35) |
May
|
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(98) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(58) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
|
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(19) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(11) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
(42) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: TOYAMA Shin-i. <sh...@wm...> - 2006-10-22 00:15:29
|
Congratulations for new release! RPM packages for tuxpaint-0.9.16 are ready for release. http://z1.plala.jp/tuxpaint/0.9.16/ a) tuxpaint tuxpaint-0.9.16-7.fc5.i386.rpm : for Fedora Core 5 tuxpaint-0.9.16-7.fc4.i386.rpm : for Fedora Core 4 tuxpaint-0.9.16-7.fc1-fc3.i386.rpm : for Fedora Core 1 - 3 tuxpaint-0.9.16-7.rh80-rh9.i386.rpm : for RedHat 8.0 - 9 tuxpaint-0.9.16-7.rh73.i386.rpm : for RedHat 7.3 tuxpaint-0.9.16-7.rh62.i386.rpm : for RedHat 6.2 b) tuxpaint-config tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-7.fc3-fc5.i386.rpm : for Fedora Core 3 - 5 tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-7.rh80-fc2.i386.rpm : for RedHat 8.0 - Fedora Core 2 tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-7.rh73.i386.rpm : for RedHat 7.3 tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-7.rh62.i386.rpm : for RedHat 6.2 c) tuxpaint-stamps tuxpaint-stamps-xxx-2006.10.21-1.noarch.rpm : noarch ( There are 16 "xxx" packages ) d) fltk fltk-1.1.7-1.rh80-fc2.i386.rpm : for RedHat 8.0 - Fedora Core 2 fltk-1.1.7-1.rh73.i386.rpm : for RedHat 7.3 fltk-1.1.7-1.rh62.i386.rpm : for RedHat 6.2 (*) You can install fltk via 'yum' command on Fedora Core 3 and later. > >I've uploaded Tux Paint 0.9.16, Tux Paint Config 0.0.7 and >Tux Paint Stamps 2006.10.21 to my FTP site and to SourceForge.net. > >I have not yet activated the links on the website, or sent any announcements. > >John, can you put together Win32 builds today? :) > >Thanks!!! > >-- >-bill! >bi...@ne... >http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Tuxpaint-devel mailing list >Tux...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel -- TOYAMA Shin-ichi mailto:sh...@wm... |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-21 22:07:07
|
I've uploaded Tux Paint 0.9.16, Tux Paint Config 0.0.7 and Tux Paint Stamps 2006.10.21 to my FTP site and to SourceForge.net. I have not yet activated the links on the website, or sent any announcements. John, can you put together Win32 builds today? :) Thanks!!! -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-21 21:14:57
|
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:57:08PM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
>
> Downloading this, and Tux Paint itself, right now. Thanks!
>
I apparently had installed Tux Paint Stamps before, so they were already
available in my new Tux Paint, but I played with the installer anyway.
WHen I tried to install for All Users, I got a window full of permission
errors from 'tar', but otherwise, the other two options ("Current User",
and "Application") worked fine.
If/when you can get around to adding a set of checkboxes that list
the various stamp categories (it's simply the top-level set of directories
inside 'stamps'... see the Makefile, or the screenshot of the Win32
installer I posted the other day), please let me know.
In the meantime, I won't let lack of that stop me from releasing the
new version.
Thanks, Martin!
-bill!
|
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-21 20:57:11
|
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 10:06:42AM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote: > On 10/20/06, Martin Fuhrer <mf...@gm...> wrote: > > I'll post Tux Paint Stamps installer tonight, once I get some new > > webhosting in place. > > Tux Paint Stamps (universal) is available here: > http://home.primus.ca/~mfuhrer/tuxpaint/ > Downloading this, and Tux Paint itself, right now. Thanks! -bill! |
|
From: Martin F. <mf...@gm...> - 2006-10-21 16:06:45
|
On 10/20/06, Martin Fuhrer <mf...@gm...> wrote: > I'll post Tux Paint Stamps installer tonight, once I get some new > webhosting in place. Tux Paint Stamps (universal) is available here: http://home.primus.ca/~mfuhrer/tuxpaint/ Martin |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-20 17:30:55
|
so...@so... wrote: > The uming includes Bopomofo it's just meaning there includes 37 symbols, > but chinese character and bopomofo symbols combined with characters in > wangfont subset, the symbols can to represent the sounds of Mandarin > and in conjunction with that character. > > FYR: > http://www.omniglot.com/writing/mandarin.htm#bopomofo > http://pinyin.info/romanization/bopomofo/ > I see now. Thanks, Song. That's very useful info to have. But after further discussion with AndrewLee on #dot, I have learned that Arphic Inc. wants to sue the Wangfonts author, which brings the GPL status of the font into question. This is why it hasn't yet been packaged for Debian. However, we don't yet know the outcome. Do you have any info about this? See: http://www.arphic.com.tw/tw/service/talk/cont.asp?id=493&toppage=4 Ben |
|
From: <so...@so...> - 2006-10-20 15:10:26
|
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:21:59PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Ben Armstrong wrote: > > But the description of the ttf-arphic-uming package in Debian says: > > > > It has been extended from the original "AR PL Mingti2L Big5" and > > "AR PL SungtiL GB" fonts with additional glyphs now covering > > ISO8859-1,2,3,4,9,10,13,14,15, BIG5, GB2312-80 and HKSCS 2004. > > It also includes Bopomofo Extensions for Hakka and Minnan according > > to the Unicode 4.1 standard. MBE variants of those glyphs are also > > included. The uming includes Bopomofo it's just meaning there includes 37 symbols, but chinese character and bopomofo symbols combined with characters in wangfont subset, the symbols can to represent the sounds of Mandarin and in conjunction with that character. FYR: http://www.omniglot.com/writing/mandarin.htm#bopomofo http://pinyin.info/romanization/bopomofo/ > > > > I asked more about this today on #dot @ irc.debian.org. AndrewLee tells > me ArneGoetje is both the Debian maintainer and upstream for uming, and > is quite active maintaining his package. I think this is a strong > argument for switching Tuxpaint to use uming and not worry about getting > wangfonts packaged for Debian. Andrew encouraged me to contact Arne at > ar...@li... if we discover any problems with substituting uming > for wangfonts, and Arne will quickly provide us with a fix. > > The only issue is this one: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-chinese-big5/2005/02/msg00019.html > > In this message, Ming Hua states: "Arphic license is NOT GPL > compatible". This causes problems for including the font in Tuxpaint > upstream, but not for Debian because I'm not including the font in the > GPL-licensed Tuxpaint. In theory, Tuxpaint upstream could solve the > problem the same way, by distributing tuxpaint-font-zh_tw as a separate > package under the Arphic license, though this would be cumbersome, and > may not therefore be worth it. > > If Debian does continue to diverge from Tuxpaint upstream because we use > a different font for zh_tw, I worry about possible support issues in > future due to this difference. But we'll cross that bridge when we get > to it. |
|
From: Martin F. <mf...@gm...> - 2006-10-20 13:41:20
|
> PS - Were you going to send me a beta version to try out on my PPC Mini? :) > (Once you tell me "go", I'll release the real, final 0.9.16. :) ) I've posted Tux Paint 0.9.16 (universal) here: http://www.box.net/public/bzekfld2oy I added a quick fix for the eraser problem last night, so I'm comfortable to make this the final release version, barring no other major problems. I'll post Tux Paint Stamps installer tonight, once I get some new webhosting in place. (Box.net has a 10MB file upload limit for freebe accounts). Martin |
|
From: Martin F. <mf...@gm...> - 2006-10-20 06:45:52
|
> Hi Martin - you haven't happened to look into why Tux Paint prints > sideways (and cut-off) by default on Macs, have you? :) I haven't looked into this yet. I'll take a closer look at the problems in a few weeks... > PS - Were you going to send me a beta version to try out on my PPC Mini? :) > (Once you tell me "go", I'll release the real, final 0.9.16. :) ) Yes, I have the disk images ready to go. Only problem is, my university web account was shut down this evening - I finished my masters over a year ago, so I was expecting this to happen at any time :-) Is there a public space where I can upload the disk images? Martin > Thx! > > -- > -bill! > bi...@ne... > http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Tuxpaint-devel mailing list > Tux...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel > |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-20 06:18:52
|
Hi Martin - you haven't happened to look into why Tux Paint prints sideways (and cut-off) by default on Macs, have you? :) I'm not too concerned about this for the upcoming release, since they can hold Alt/Option to get a printer dialog... but that in itself is a little messed up, too. (See the bugs in SourceForge.) Just wondering if you've looked into it yet. Thanks! PS - Were you going to send me a beta version to try out on my PPC Mini? :) (Once you tell me "go", I'll release the real, final 0.9.16. :) ) Thx! -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-19 18:22:15
|
Ben Armstrong wrote: > But the description of the ttf-arphic-uming package in Debian says: > > It has been extended from the original "AR PL Mingti2L Big5" and > "AR PL SungtiL GB" fonts with additional glyphs now covering > ISO8859-1,2,3,4,9,10,13,14,15, BIG5, GB2312-80 and HKSCS 2004. > It also includes Bopomofo Extensions for Hakka and Minnan according > to the Unicode 4.1 standard. MBE variants of those glyphs are also > included. > I asked more about this today on #dot @ irc.debian.org. AndrewLee tells me ArneGoetje is both the Debian maintainer and upstream for uming, and is quite active maintaining his package. I think this is a strong argument for switching Tuxpaint to use uming and not worry about getting wangfonts packaged for Debian. Andrew encouraged me to contact Arne at ar...@li... if we discover any problems with substituting uming for wangfonts, and Arne will quickly provide us with a fix. The only issue is this one: http://lists.debian.org/debian-chinese-big5/2005/02/msg00019.html In this message, Ming Hua states: "Arphic license is NOT GPL compatible". This causes problems for including the font in Tuxpaint upstream, but not for Debian because I'm not including the font in the GPL-licensed Tuxpaint. In theory, Tuxpaint upstream could solve the problem the same way, by distributing tuxpaint-font-zh_tw as a separate package under the Arphic license, though this would be cumbersome, and may not therefore be worth it. If Debian does continue to diverge from Tuxpaint upstream because we use a different font for zh_tw, I worry about possible support issues in future due to this difference. But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. Ben |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-19 18:00:41
|
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:02:28PM -0300, Gabriel Gazz=E1n wrote: > Just a question: I see the eraser outline is always a square, even when= the=20 > eraser shape is round. Is this a bug or a feature? :-P > I see it that way in Windows, running inside a window. *cough* Neither. Simply lack-of-feature. :) It might be nice to have stamp-like outlines for the round erasers, and for the paint brush tool, as well. (Or perhaps some alpha-blending, as a= n option for people w/ high-end systems?) -bill! |
|
From: Gabriel <gab...@gm...> - 2006-10-19 16:06:17
|
using rc6 thx El Jue 19 Oct 2006 12:22, Ben Armstrong escribi=F3: > Gabriel Gazz=E1n wrote: > > Just a question: I see the eraser outline is always a square, even when > > the eraser shape is round. Is this a bug or a feature? :-P > > I see it that way in Windows, running inside a window. > > Using which release candidate? We're up to rc6 now ... > > ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/win32 > > Ben > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Tuxpaint-devel mailing list > Tux...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-19 15:22:41
|
Gabriel Gazz=E1n wrote: > Just a question: I see the eraser outline is always a square, even = when the=20 > eraser shape is round. Is this a bug or a feature? :-P > I see it that way in Windows, running inside a window. > =20 Using which release candidate? We're up to rc6 now ... ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/win32 Ben |
|
From: Gabriel <gab...@gm...> - 2006-10-19 15:02:26
|
Just a question: I see the eraser outline is always a square, even when the= =20 eraser shape is round. Is this a bug or a feature? :-P I see it that way in Windows, running inside a window. cheers. Gabriel El Jue 19 Oct 2006 11:32, Martin Fuhrer escribi=F3: > The one thing I forgot to mention is that the ghosted lines / eraser > bug is still there in the Mac version - if Tux Paint is run in > windowed mode as opposed to full screen mode. I'll see if I can > figure out a quick fix tonight - maybe force a full window refresh > (ifdefing it for the Mac version only). The strange thing is, the > refresh under the eraser cursor was only taking place while the mouse > button was released... > > Martin |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-19 14:45:07
|
so...@so... wrote: > I prefer use the wangfont subset, because there have Bopomofo symbols in > the wangfont's right side. Bopomofo, a semi-syllabic script used in Taiwan > mainly to help teach children to read. > But the description of the ttf-arphic-uming package in Debian says: It has been extended from the original "AR PL Mingti2L Big5" and "AR PL SungtiL GB" fonts with additional glyphs now covering ISO8859-1,2,3,4,9,10,13,14,15, BIG5, GB2312-80 and HKSCS 2004. It also includes Bopomofo Extensions for Hakka and Minnan according to the Unicode 4.1 standard. MBE variants of those glyphs are also included. How can I tell if this works properly with my Tuxpaint package for Debian? Ben |
|
From: Martin F. <mf...@gm...> - 2006-10-19 14:33:06
|
On 19-Oct-06, at 1:06 AM, Bill Kendrick wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:56:18PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote: >> I'm pretty much ready to make a release here as well. > > Awesome! The one thing I forgot to mention is that the ghosted lines / eraser bug is still there in the Mac version - if Tux Paint is run in windowed mode as opposed to full screen mode. I'll see if I can figure out a quick fix tonight - maybe force a full window refresh (ifdefing it for the Mac version only). The strange thing is, the refresh under the eraser cursor was only taking place while the mouse button was released... Martin |
|
From: <so...@so...> - 2006-10-19 14:23:28
|
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:37:04AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > Thanks, Song. This is good to have in Tuxpaint upstream. But for the > Debian package, I think it is best to keep on using ttf-arphic-uming as > I do now. I am sure Traditional Chinese Debian users will already have > this package installed, so there is no need for me to use the subset of > the wangfonts font. If we decide that the wangfonts font is superior > for some reason, then it should be packaged for Debian, and then I will > switch. Dear Ben, I prefer use the wangfont subset, because there have Bopomofo symbols in the wangfont's right side. Bopomofo, a semi-syllabic script used in Taiwan mainly to help teach children to read. Best regards, song. |
|
From: Morten S. <mo...@si...> - 2006-10-19 13:38:08
|
After a recent apt-get dist-upgrade on my debian box, my children came running, 'dad, there is a lot of new things in tuxpaint!!!' They have still not started to use the slide show features, but they are really happy for the other new things. A big thumbs up to all of you! Morten |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-19 11:08:34
|
Bill Kendrick wrote: > I see Martin is still working on a few Mac OS X things. > Is there anything major that I should wait for you on, before releasing > 0.9.16 officially? > > John and Ben, anything in the Win32 or Debian worlds we need to worry about? > I haven't tried anything new since rc5, but in rc5 everything looked ready to go. Ben |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-19 07:07:16
|
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:57:49AM +0100, John Popplewell wrote: > I'm not aware of any serious problems. Excellent! Barring any bug reports from beta-testers, I think we're about ready! > I assume I should include the modified and now working zh_tw.ttf (small) > font and docs again? Yes, please do. :) I'm about to commit the Catalan updates, then head to bed! -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-19 07:06:36
|
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:56:18PM -0600, Martin Fuhrer wrote: > I'm pretty much ready to make a release here as well. Awesome! > I'll package a new Mac version tomorrow, and I'll let you take it > for a final run through, Bill. Would you have a chance to run it on > one of the Intel Macs at the store across your street? I just want > to be sure that the universal binary works fine. Actually, I don't work there any more, I got an offer at a new place (doing similar stuff). However, my favorite coffee shop is a block away, so I can probably swing by some morning and give it a go. (And hopefully the Mac Geniuses there won't kick me out for messing around.) > Also, add the following paragraph to the font webpage: > http://www.tuxpaint.org/download/fonts/ Updated, thanks! -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: Martin F. <mf...@gm...> - 2006-10-19 04:56:25
|
On 18-Oct-06, at 7:56 PM, Bill Kendrick wrote: > > I see Martin is still working on a few Mac OS X things. > Is there anything major that I should wait for you on, before > releasing > 0.9.16 officially? I'm pretty much ready to make a release here as well. I'll package a new Mac version tomorrow, and I'll let you take it for a final run through, Bill. Would you have a chance to run it on one of the Intel Macs at the store across your street? I just want to be sure that the universal binary works fine. Also, add the following paragraph to the font webpage: http://www.tuxpaint.org/download/fonts/ Mac OS X users can download the ".tar.gz" archive of the desired font. Once extracted, double click the font file and click the "Install Font" button. Alternatively, drag the font file into the / Library/Fonts folder (if you want to make it available for all users) or the ~/Library/Fonts folder (if you want to make it available just for the current user). Thanks! Martin |
|
From: John P. <jo...@jo...> - 2006-10-19 02:57:52
|
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:56:15PM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote: > > I see Martin is still working on a few Mac OS X things. > Is there anything major that I should wait for you on, before releasing > 0.9.16 officially? > > John and Ben, anything in the Win32 or Debian worlds we need to worry about? I'm not aware of any serious problems. I assume I should include the modified and now working zh_tw.ttf (small) font and docs again? regards, John. > > I haven't heard much else, so I assume everything else is suitable. > I've got a few Catalan updates to drop in, but otherwise, I'm pretty much > set -- just waiting for Martin to catch up. > > Thanks! :) > > -- > -bill! > bi...@ne... > http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-19 01:56:17
|
I see Martin is still working on a few Mac OS X things. Is there anything major that I should wait for you on, before releasing 0.9.16 officially? John and Ben, anything in the Win32 or Debian worlds we need to worry about? I haven't heard much else, so I assume everything else is suitable. I've got a few Catalan updates to drop in, but otherwise, I'm pretty much set -- just waiting for Martin to catch up. Thanks! :) -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
49 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
