Menu
▾
▴
tilp-devel — This list is intended to TiLP's developers, contributors and advanced users.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(47) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
|
| 2004 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(59) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(57) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(68) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(62) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-23 16:55:01
|
Hi,
> So, to get rid of this, we could use something like this:
>
> void ....{
> gchar **argv = (gchar *) malloc(3 * sizeof(gchar *));
> argv[0] = g_strdup(...);
> argv[1] = ...;
> argv[2] = NULL;
> g_strfreev(argv);
> }
>
bug fixed !
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> TiLP-devel mailing list
> TiL...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel
roms.
--
Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...>
The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org>
"Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !"
|
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-23 11:10:08
|
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:19:34 +0200, Romain Lievin wrote: > > While you're at it, there seem to be similar problems with the tilp > > tarball. "src/pbars_db.c" is missing there. > > I removed this this file because no longer needed (pbars are generated > by libglade). You can remove pbars_db.h too then I think. |
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-23 10:43:02
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:53:55 +0200 (CEST), Romain LIEVIN wrote:
> > I'm getting an error when I try to access the User Manual from the
> > help menu
> >
> > tilp free: junk pointer (too high to make sense)
> >
> > The problem is with a g_strfreev() call. At first sight there don't
> > seem to be any problems with this function at other places, so I was
> > wondering if anybody else has this too.
>
> I noticed problems with this function. This is the reason why it's
> replaced by a set of free() calls somewhere in the source code.
>
> This function worked fine before or I am mis-using it...
>
> Anyways, it's a bug to fix. Thanks !
It's because of the array notation. An array of pointers and a double
pointer (with a malloc) aren't the same.
Because it's a local variable in a function, the entire array is stored
on the stack, whereas with the pointer notation, only the value of the
pointer is stored. I bet "g_strfreev()" gives the error when it tries to
free mem from the stack.
So, to get rid of this, we could use something like this:
void ....{
gchar **argv = (gchar *) malloc(3 * sizeof(gchar *));
argv[0] = g_strdup(...);
argv[1] = ...;
argv[2] = NULL;
g_strfreev(argv);
}
|
|
From: Julien B. <jb...@jb...> - 2003-04-23 07:04:00
|
Tijl Coosemans <ti...@ul...> wrote: >> s/CVS/Subversion/ and it should be available on Tuesday evening if the >> changes between 6.62 and 6.62 are small (they should be). > > Can you post some general instructions when it's ready? Of course :) The bad news is, it won't be ready until thursday, as I'll be away today and didn't have the latest sources yesterday... JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb...@jb...> |
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-22 21:15:13
|
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:29:31 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > s/CVS/Subversion/ and it should be available on Tuesday evening if the > changes between 6.62 and 6.62 are small (they should be). Can you post some general instructions when it's ready? |
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-21 22:25:53
|
I'm getting an error when I try to access the User Manual from the help menu tilp free: junk pointer (too high to make sense) The problem is with a g_strfreev() call. At first sight there don't seem to be any problems with this function at other places, so I was wondering if anybody else has this too. |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-21 09:34:35
|
Hi, On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > "Romain Lievin" <rom...@wa...> wrote: > > Hi, > > > 1°) About version number: there will not be a 7.xx but it will be a > > release >= 6.50 (currently 6.65). Given that the current release is just a > > port to GTK+ 2.0. and does not include major enhancements, I did not increase > > the major number. > > Hopefully, starting with the next 6.xx release we should see a joint > release for Linux/Mac OS X/FreeBSD/Windows. > > It means that : > - all changes will need to be committed to the repository > - a build on all platforms will need to be tested before the release > - Romain finally pushes the big red button > > > 2°) There is a stuff which is lacking in the current release of TiLP: the GFM > > (Group File Manager) plugin. It was present in earlier version of TiLP but > > as a built-in feature. > > Uh uh. That means I'll have to add plugin support on OS X. Duh. > It will be great but nobody wants to develop for TiLP and I can not do all stuffs. > > 3°) I would have loved this version extensively tested before being > > released. Unfortunately, I'm not at school any longer and I have to use > > emulators for calcs I don't own. Thus, testing is quite so far to be perfect. > > I'm currently discussing a calculator loan Texas Instruments France. > > I'm having some calcs tested by OS X users (TI83+/V200, and TI89 of course) > > > 4°) CVS repository is not fully working at this time. > > s/CVS/Subversion/ and it should be available on Tuesday evening if the > changes between 6.62 and 6.62 are small (they should be). > > > 4°) We are at the end of April. May is coming soon. I think we can wait for > > you... > > > > Anyways, the official release will not be done now. I (Linux/Win32) will do > > some pre-release on ticalc.org before in order to get some feedback, fix-up > > stuff, re-release, ... THis may take a while. > > Same for me. > > I still have another problem, wrt libticalcs and glib > version. Although we discussed it before implementing the current > solution, I'm not too comfortable with it. Having the soname bumped to > 5 still seems the right way to me, but oh well. > > JB. > > -- > BOFH excuse #44: > bank holiday - system operating credits not recharged > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Julien B. <jb...@jb...> - 2003-04-21 09:28:55
|
"Romain Lievin" <rom...@wa...> wrote: Hi, > 1=B0) About version number: there will not be a 7.xx but it will be a=20 > release >=3D 6.50 (currently 6.65). Given that the current release is j= ust a=20 > port to GTK+ 2.0. and does not include major enhancements, I did not i= ncrease=20 > the major number. Hopefully, starting with the next 6.xx release we should see a joint release for Linux/Mac OS X/FreeBSD/Windows. It means that : - all changes will need to be committed to the repository - a build on all platforms will need to be tested before the release - Romain finally pushes the big red button > 2=B0) There is a stuff which is lacking in the current release of TiLP:= the GFM > (Group File Manager) plugin. It was present in earlier version of TiLP = but > as a built-in feature. Uh uh. That means I'll have to add plugin support on OS X. Duh. > 3=B0) I would have loved this version extensively tested before being=20 > released. Unfortunately, I'm not at school any longer and I have to use > emulators for calcs I don't own. Thus, testing is quite so far to be pe= rfect. > I'm currently discussing a calculator loan Texas Instruments France. I'm having some calcs tested by OS X users (TI83+/V200, and TI89 of cours= e) > 4=B0) CVS repository is not fully working at this time. s/CVS/Subversion/ and it should be available on Tuesday evening if the changes between 6.62 and 6.62 are small (they should be). > 4=B0) We are at the end of April. May is coming soon. I think we can wa= it for > you... > > Anyways, the official release will not be done now. I (Linux/Win32) wil= l do > some pre-release on ticalc.org before in order to get some feedback, fi= x-up > stuff, re-release, ... THis may take a while. Same for me. I still have another problem, wrt libticalcs and glib version. Although we discussed it before implementing the current solution, I'm not too comfortable with it. Having the soname bumped to 5 still seems the right way to me, but oh well. JB. --=20 BOFH excuse #44: bank holiday - system operating credits not recharged |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-21 08:36:17
|
Hi Brent ! On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:13:22AM -0500, Brent Redeker wrote: > Hi Romain, > > It's your Gentoo packager again. Sorry I haven't talked in a while, but I have > been lurking on the mailing lists, so I saw that TiLP is in feature freeze for > the next release. > It should be... > I've been pretty busy, and haven't had nearly the time that I wish I had to > work on getting my ebuilds into Gentoo's official repository. But since the > end of the school year is approaching for me, I'm going to try and make a > point of doing that. > ok > With that in mind, I was just wondering if you'll be releasing the next > version (7.0?) before May. Since you're just beginning the release > preparations, I think not - but there's always a chance. If the next version > won't be out soon, I'll just try and get my current ebuilds into the > repository. Otherwise, I'll update them and try to get the updated ones > submitted. > 1°) About version number: there will not be a 7.xx but it will be a release >= 6.50 (currently 6.65). Given that the current release is just a port to GTK+ 2.0. and does not include major enhancements, I did not increase the major number. 2°) There is a stuff which is lacking in the current release of TiLP: the GFM (Group File Manager) plugin. It was present in earlier version of TiLP but as a built-in feature. 3°) I would have loved this version extensively tested before being released. Unfortunately, I'm not at school any longer and I have to use emulators for calcs I don't own. Thus, testing is quite so far to be perfect. I'm currently discussing a calculator loan Texas Instruments France. 4°) CVS repository is not fully working at this time. 4°) We are at the end of April. May is coming soon. I think we can wait for you... Anyways, the official release will not be done now. I (Linux/Win32) will do some pre-release on ticalc.org before in order to get some feedback, fix-up stuff, re-release, ... THis may take a while. > Thanks, > > Brent > > PS: please mail to the tilp-devel mailing list (til...@li...) so that other developer/packager can participate in this discussion. The answer has been CC/ to the list... Thx, roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-21 08:21:11
|
Hi, On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 11:35:38PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 17:44:09 +0200, Romain Lievin wrote: > > > a new development release has been upload in the SF archive (v6.65) > > for Linux/Windows/FreeBSD. > > FYI, this version fixed my screendump segfault. > Really ?! I have just moved some code from screenshot.c to tilp_screen.c (for JB and I). Great anyways ! > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-21 08:19:43
|
Hi, On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 11:30:08PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:14:07 +0200, Romain Lievin wrote: > > > porttalk.c added in EXTRA_DIST > > While you're at it, there seem to be similar problems with the tilp > tarball. "src/pbars_db.c" is missing there. > I removed this this file because no longer needed (pbars are generated by libglade). > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-21 02:00:43
|
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:14:07 +0200, Romain Lievin wrote: > porttalk.c added in EXTRA_DIST While you're at it, there seem to be similar problems with the tilp tarball. "src/pbars_db.c" is missing there. |
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-20 21:35:55
|
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 17:44:09 +0200, Romain Lievin wrote: > a new development release has been upload in the SF archive (v6.65) > for Linux/Windows/FreeBSD. FYI, this version fixed my screendump segfault. |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-20 21:14:16
|
porttalk.c added in EXTRA_DIST On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 08:48:47PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Tijl Coosemans <ti...@ul...> wrote: > > > The build in po/ seems to need src/porttalk.c, but that file isn't > > included in the package. Is porttalk.c no longer needed and should po/ > > be modified? > > It's still needed, if it's missing in the dist tarball then there's a > bug :) > > JB. > > -- > Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> > <jb...@jb...> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-20 21:12:38
|
Hi, On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 08:48:47PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Tijl Coosemans <ti...@ul...> wrote: > > > The build in po/ seems to need src/porttalk.c, but that file isn't > > included in the package. Is porttalk.c no longer needed and should po/ > > be modified? > > It's still needed, if it's missing in the dist tarball then there's a > bug :) > porttalk.c is Win32 only but must be present in po given that i18n is used for the Windows port, too. > JB. > > -- > Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> > <jb...@jb...> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel I'm fixing this. roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Julien B. <jb...@jb...> - 2003-04-20 18:48:11
|
Tijl Coosemans <ti...@ul...> wrote: > The build in po/ seems to need src/porttalk.c, but that file isn't > included in the package. Is porttalk.c no longer needed and should po/ > be modified? It's still needed, if it's missing in the dist tarball then there's a bug :) JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb...@jb...> |
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-20 18:45:42
|
The build in po/ seems to need src/porttalk.c, but that file isn't included in the package. Is porttalk.c no longer needed and should po/ be modified? |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-20 08:21:17
|
Hi, On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 04:55:10PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > These patches get TiLP running on FreeBSD. I still need to test a few > things here and there though. Screen dump seems gives a segmentation > fault for example. your patches have been merged. roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-11 18:16:01
|
Hi, On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:06:32PM +0200, Sylvain Garsault wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the "French guy" who is (trying) to translate TiLP. I've just suscribed > the mailing list. Does anyone know how to test a translation without > re-compiling (newbie speaking) ? Is it worth translating the documentation ? What I do (better suggestions are welcome !): - ./configure - cd po - make - make install - lauch TiLP and see > By the way, when is the first translated release (German, French, Dutch...) > supposed to be ready ? > A beta release is available on SF (French, German). The first official release will be ready when I will have fixed some fonts problems. > Bye, > > Sylvain Garsault > roms. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger > for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and > disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX > and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Sylvain G. <syl...@fr...> - 2003-04-11 17:10:40
|
Hi, I'm the "French guy" who is (trying) to translate TiLP. I've just suscribed the mailing list. Does anyone know how to test a translation without re-compiling (newbie speaking) ? Is it worth translating the documentation ? By the way, when is the first translated release (German, French, Dutch...) supposed to be ready ? Bye, Sylvain Garsault |
|
From: Tijl C. <ti...@ul...> - 2003-04-11 15:01:01
|
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:35:43 +0200, Romain Lievin wrote:
> Moreover, ${INTLLIBS} is empty on my platform.
>
> Anyways, I remembering something is lacking about that in
> Makefile.am...
>
> For which reason do you need it ?
BSDs don't have GNU gettext in libc. It's installed as a separate lib
(libintl) and as such ${INTLLIBS} is set to "-lintl" on my system. Maybe
that can be added to LDFLAGS, just like the flags for libusb now...
|
|
From: Julien B. <jb...@jb...> - 2003-04-10 19:59:16
|
"Romain Lievin" <rom...@wa...> wrote:
> About Makefile.in/Makefile: these file are generated by automake/autoco=
nf=20
> from Makefile.am. They should not be modified.
> Moreover, ${INTLLIBS} is empty on my platform.=20
While you're at it, add AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to each and every
configure.ac, then run autoreconf.
You'll need to run ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode to get the
current behaviour back (ie automatically rebuild the build system when
a change has been done in eg configure.ac).
I just spent an hour fighting with the autotools to get rid of this,
before I realized AM_MAINTAINER_MODE wasn't in configure.ac.
At the very least, add the macro when the release is ready to go, but
never again release without it.
(Remember the hours we spent to fix broken libtools in the various
packages ? It's part of it...)
JB.
--=20
CF : Tu vois l'int=E9r=EAt d'en faire tourner une sous WinCE ?
PAD: L'=E9cran bleu ?
SP : Voil=E0. Une sorte de "Game over" al=E9atoire, en fait...
+ SP in Guide du Macounet Pervers : Playstation II c plus fort que toi+
|
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-10 19:35:52
|
HI,
patch merged.
About Makefile.in/Makefile: these file are generated by automake/autoconf
from Makefile.am. They should not be modified.
Moreover, ${INTLLIBS} is empty on my platform.
Anyways, I remembering something is lacking about that in Makefile.am...
For which reason do you need it ?
roms.
--
Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...>
The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org>
"Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !"
|
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-09 19:33:33
|
Hi, I released V6.62 for Linux. It includes French and German (partial) translations. People who want to test TiLP or add translations for their country are welcome ! The final release is coming soon... roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
|
From: Romain L. <rom...@wa...> - 2003-04-06 16:28:47
|
Hi, On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 05:20:35PM +0200, Thomas Otto wrote: > >[ UTF-8 ] > > Well, as Julien already pointed out, recode or iconv will do, though > opening and saving the po file in kbabel will do the same. > > I would also recommend to the other translators to use kbabel rather > than plaintext editors (though i bet there is a pofile script for emacs > by now) since it is a quite advanced pofile generator. There was an > older translation by Michael Piefel with many useful phrases which I > could load as a helpfile and then copy the matching phrase with only a > keystroke. > It also prevents you from messing up with \n and %i/%u etc stuff. ok. There is also GTranslator for Gnome people which seems to be quite interesting. It manages locale to UTF8 charset conversions, too. But, I will try and test Kbabel... > > -Thomas > > P.S.: No, I'm not that much a KDE fan - Window Maker is running here and > no KDE Apps at the moment ;-). > LOL ! I'm a WindowMaker fan, too ! > > -- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel roms. -- Romain Lievin, aka 'roms' <ro...@ti...> The TiLP project is on <http://www.ti-lpg.org> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |
379 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
