Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-16 09:01:36
|
Thomas,
=20
As mentioned in a JIRA comment, I've just coded such a =
WebLogicJtaTransactionManager via reflection (to avoid compile-time =
dependencies on WebLogic), also leveraging new internal hooks in =
JtaTransactionManager. Please give it a try on WebLogic 8.1!
=20
If we keep getting the NullPointerException on WebLogic 7.0, we'll need =
some further research there. It's already good to have it working on =
WebLogic 8.1, though!
=20
Juergen
=20
________________________________
Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag =
von Thomas Risberg
Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 07:39
An: spr...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
I was able to reproduce the error using WLS 8.1SP2. The following code
did fix the problem and I did not get the nullpointer exception.
package org.springframework.transaction.jta;
public class WebLogicJtaTransactionManager extends JtaTransactionManager =
{
protected void doResume(Object transaction, Object suspendedResources) =
{
try {
super.doResume(transaction, suspendedResources);
} catch
(org.springframework.transaction.IllegalTransactionStateException ex) {
logger.debug("ForceResuming: " + suspendedResources.toString());
weblogic.transaction.TransactionManager wtm =3D
(weblogic.transaction.TransactionManager) getTransactionManager();
wtm.forceResume((javax.transaction.Transaction) =
suspendedResources);
}
}
}
I have attached a spring-weblogic-jta-patch.jar containing this class to
JIRA. If you could test with this jar together with the most recent
1.1RC1 spring.jar to see if it works in your environment. If not I will
have to investigate further using WLS 7.0.
Thomas
Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I'll try to run that code on wls 8 and will attach clent junit test
> to JIRA tomorrow morning.
>
> regards,
> Eugene
>
>
> Thomas Risberg wrote:
>
>> I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple of days. From an
>> initial look at the problem it seems to be more of a WebLogic issue.=20
>> Have you tried running the same code in WLS 8.1?
>>
>> First I'm going to try to reproduce this locally - you woldn't happen
>> to have the client code that calls this EJB?
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder if there is any chance that SPR-251 JIRA could be
>>> resolved for 1.1 release?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Eugene
>>>
>>> Rod Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I haven't documented the new "factory-bean" attribute that supports
>>>> the use
>>>> of instance (rather than static) factory methods in the Reference
>>>> Manual
>>>> yet. (It is documented in the DTD.) Doesn't justify holding the
>>>> release, but
>>>> worth noting. (Hint, hint.)
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately I won't have time to do this myself before the =
release.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: spr...@li...
>>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On
>>>> Behalf Of
>>>> j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
>>>> Sent: 14 August 2004 20:04
>>>> To: spr...@li...
>>>> Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
>>>>
>>>> Everybody,
>>>>=20
>>>>
>>>>> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the
>>>>> only
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the
>>>> HTTP
>>>> invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try
>>>> to add
>>>> docs on it till Monday.
>>>>=20
>>>> Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do
>>>> some final
>>>> proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I
>>>> currently plan
>>>> to do the release Monday night, provided that there are no
>>>> showstoppers.
>>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
|
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-16 10:42:49
|
BTW, Eugene: Have you decompiled your WebLogic EJB proxy to see the = resume/forceResume code? In that case, is it obvious to you how WebLogic = applies the "transaction-isolation" setting (from its EJB deployment = descriptor)? We'd like to provide that for Spring on WebLogic too, but = don't know how to set the isolation level on WebLogic JTA, because the = standard JTA API does not support per-transaction isolation levels... =20 We do already support isolation levels for our native transactions = strategies, like DataSourceTransactionManager and co. Our = JtaTransactionManager just provides a hook currently; we do not have = isolation level support for any JTA backend yet. =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Eugene Kuleshov Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 03:16 An: spr...@li... Cc: Dmitri Maximovich Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Hi Thomas, I'll try to run that code on wls 8 and will attach clent junit test = to JIRA tomorrow morning. regards, Eugene Thomas Risberg wrote: > I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple of days. From an > initial look at the problem it seems to be more of a WebLogic issue.=20 > Have you tried running the same code in WLS 8.1? > > First I'm going to try to reproduce this locally - you woldn't happen = to > have the client code that calls this EJB? > > Thomas > > > Eugene Kuleshov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if there is any chance that SPR-251 JIRA could be resolved >> for 1.1 release? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Eugene >> >> Rod Johnson wrote: >> >>> I haven't documented the new "factory-bean" attribute that supports >>> the use >>> of instance (rather than static) factory methods in the Reference = Manual >>> yet. (It is documented in the DTD.) Doesn't justify holding the >>> release, but >>> worth noting. (Hint, hint.) >>> >>> Unfortunately I won't have time to do this myself before the = release. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: spr...@li... >>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On >>> Behalf Of >>> j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] >>> Sent: 14 August 2004 20:04 >>> To: spr...@li... >>> Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final >>> >>> Everybody, >>>=20 >>> >>>> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the = only >>> >>> >>> remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the = HTTP >>> invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try = to >>> add >>> docs on it till Monday. >>>=20 >>> Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do >>> some final >>> proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I = currently >>> plan >>> to do the release Monday night, provided that there are no = showstoppers. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Rod J. <ro...@in...> - 2004-08-16 12:26:27
|
Eugene, you may want to check your WebLogic license to see whether such decompilation is permitted (I guess it's kind of *your* code, rather = than purely BEA's)... We wouldn't want to advise anyone to violate a = commercial license.=20 -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf = Of j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Sent: 16 August 2004 11:46 To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final BTW, Eugene: Have you decompiled your WebLogic EJB proxy to see the resume/forceResume code? In that case, is it obvious to you how WebLogic applies the "transaction-isolation" setting (from its EJB deployment descriptor)? We'd like to provide that for Spring on WebLogic too, but = don't know how to set the isolation level on WebLogic JTA, because the = standard JTA API does not support per-transaction isolation levels... =20 We do already support isolation levels for our native transactions strategies, like DataSourceTransactionManager and co. Our JtaTransactionManager just provides a hook currently; we do not have isolation level support for any JTA backend yet. =20 Juergen =20 |
|
From: Eugene K. <eu...@pl...> - 2004-08-16 13:43:51
|
Rod Johnson wrote: > Eugene, you may want to check your WebLogic license to see whether such > decompilation is permitted (I guess it's kind of *your* code, rather than > purely BEA's)... We wouldn't want to advise anyone to violate a commercial > license. Sure. I'm aware of that. That is why -keepgenerated option of ejbc is really handy. regards, Eugene > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of > jürgen höller [werk3AT] > Sent: 16 August 2004 11:46 > To: spr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final > > BTW, Eugene: Have you decompiled your WebLogic EJB proxy to see the > resume/forceResume code? In that case, is it obvious to you how WebLogic > applies the "transaction-isolation" setting (from its EJB deployment > descriptor)? We'd like to provide that for Spring on WebLogic too, but don't > know how to set the isolation level on WebLogic JTA, because the standard > JTA API does not support per-transaction isolation levels... > > We do already support isolation levels for our native transactions > strategies, like DataSourceTransactionManager and co. Our > JtaTransactionManager just provides a hook currently; we do not have > isolation level support for any JTA backend yet. > > Juergen > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Eugene K. <eu...@pl...> - 2004-08-16 12:28:13
|
jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: > BTW, Eugene: Have you decompiled your WebLogic EJB proxy to see the > resume/forceResume code? In that case, is it obvious to you how > WebLogic applies the "transaction-isolation" setting (from its EJB > deployment descriptor)? We'd like to provide that for Spring on > WebLogic too, but don't know how to set the isolation level on > WebLogic JTA, because the standard JTA API does not support > per-transaction isolation levels... > > We do already support isolation levels for our native transactions > strategies, like DataSourceTransactionManager and co. Our > JtaTransactionManager just provides a hook currently; we do not have > isolation level support for any JTA backend yet. Actually you no need to decompile anything. There is an option in Weblogic's ejbc compiller to keep sources for generated stubs/proxies. We've tried to look at those, but they quite complex and rely on some Weblogic internal classes. If you are interested, I can attach all of those to JIRA. regards, Eugene > Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag > von Eugene Kuleshov Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 03:16 An: > spr...@li... Cc: Dmitri Maximovich > Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 > final > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > I'll try to run that code on wls 8 and will attach clent junit test > to JIRA tomorrow morning. > > regards, Eugene > > > Thomas Risberg wrote: > > >> I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple of days. From >> an initial look at the problem it seems to be more of a WebLogic >> issue. Have you tried running the same code in WLS 8.1? >> >> First I'm going to try to reproduce this locally - you woldn't >> happen to have the client code that calls this EJB? >> >> Thomas >> >> >> Eugene Kuleshov wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wonder if there is any chance that SPR-251 JIRA could be >>> resolved for 1.1 release? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Eugene >>> >>> Rod Johnson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I haven't documented the new "factory-bean" attribute that >>>> supports the use of instance (rather than static) factory >>>> methods in the Reference Manual yet. (It is documented in the >>>> DTD.) Doesn't justify holding the release, but worth noting. >>>> (Hint, hint.) >>>> >>>> Unfortunately I won't have time to do this myself before the >>>> release. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: >>>> spr...@li... >>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] >>>> On Behalf Of jürgen höller [werk3AT] Sent: 14 August 2004 20:04 >>>> To: spr...@li... Subject: >>>> [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final >>>> >>>> Everybody, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; >>>>> the only >>>> >>>> >>>> remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on >>>> the HTTP invoker yet, for example: While this is not too >>>> critical, I'll try to add docs on it till Monday. >>>> >>>> Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to >>>> do some final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any >>>> issues ASAP: I currently plan to do the release Monday night, >>>> provided that there are no showstoppers. |
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-16 13:54:15
|
Good point. Just removed that stacktrace: It's unnecessary, even for a =
debug log message.
Juergen
-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf
Of Thomas Risberg
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:42 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
It works in 8.1SP2. I would remove the stack trace generated from the=20
log statement though and just leave the log message that we are retrying =
with forceResume.
Thomas
j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:
>Thomas,
>=20
>As mentioned in a JIRA comment, I've just coded such a =
WebLogicJtaTransactionManager via reflection (to avoid compile-time =
dependencies on WebLogic), also leveraging new internal hooks in =
JtaTransactionManager. Please give it a try on WebLogic 8.1!
>=20
>If we keep getting the NullPointerException on WebLogic 7.0, we'll need =
some further research there. It's already good to have it working on =
WebLogic 8.1, though!
>=20
>Juergen
>=20
>
>________________________________
>
>Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag =
von Thomas Risberg
>Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 07:39
>An: spr...@li...
>Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
>
>
>
>I was able to reproduce the error using WLS 8.1SP2. The following code
>did fix the problem and I did not get the nullpointer exception.
>
>package org.springframework.transaction.jta;
>
>public class WebLogicJtaTransactionManager extends =
JtaTransactionManager {
>
> protected void doResume(Object transaction, Object =
suspendedResources) {
> try {
> super.doResume(transaction, suspendedResources);
> } catch
>(org.springframework.transaction.IllegalTransactionStateException ex) {
> logger.debug("ForceResuming: " + suspendedResources.toString());
> weblogic.transaction.TransactionManager wtm =3D
>(weblogic.transaction.TransactionManager) getTransactionManager();
> wtm.forceResume((javax.transaction.Transaction) =
suspendedResources);
> }
> }
>}
>
>I have attached a spring-weblogic-jta-patch.jar containing this class =
to
>JIRA. If you could test with this jar together with the most recent
>1.1RC1 spring.jar to see if it works in your environment. If not I =
will
>have to investigate further using WLS 7.0.
>
>Thomas
>
>
>Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>
> =20
>
>>Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I'll try to run that code on wls 8 and will attach clent junit test
>>to JIRA tomorrow morning.
>>
>> regards,
>> Eugene
>>
>>
>>Thomas Risberg wrote:
>>
>> =20
>>
>>>I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple of days. From an
>>>initial look at the problem it seems to be more of a WebLogic issue.=20
>>>Have you tried running the same code in WLS 8.1?
>>>
>>>First I'm going to try to reproduce this locally - you woldn't happen
>>>to have the client code that calls this EJB?
>>>
>>>Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>>>
>>> =20
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if there is any chance that SPR-251 JIRA could be
>>>>resolved for 1.1 release?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Eugene
>>>>
>>>>Rod Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> =20
>>>>
>>>>>I haven't documented the new "factory-bean" attribute that supports
>>>>>the use
>>>>>of instance (rather than static) factory methods in the Reference
>>>>>Manual
>>>>>yet. (It is documented in the DTD.) Doesn't justify holding the
>>>>>release, but
>>>>>worth noting. (Hint, hint.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Unfortunately I won't have time to do this myself before the =
release.
>>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: spr...@li...
>>>>>[mailto:spr...@li...] On
>>>>>Behalf Of
>>>>>j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
>>>>>Sent: 14 August 2004 20:04
>>>>>To: spr...@li...
>>>>>Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
>>>>>
>>>>>Everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> =20
>>>>>
>>>>>>From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the
>>>>>>only
>>>>>> =20
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the
>>>>>HTTP
>>>>>invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try
>>>>>to add
>>>>>docs on it till Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>>Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do
>>>>>some final
>>>>>proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I
>>>>>currently plan
>>>>>to do the release Monday night, provided that there are no
>>>>>showstoppers.
>>>>> =20
>>>>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
>>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
>>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
>>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
>>_______________________________________________
>>Springframework-developer mailing list
>>Spr...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>>
>> =20
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
> =20
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
|
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-16 18:26:44
|
Darren, =20 I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the = sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd like = to have some review there before releasing and supporting them. = Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I = suggest to release all of those macros at a later point of time: either = in a 1.1 point release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for late = October). What do you think? =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Darren Davison Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Everybody, > > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only > remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the = HTTP > invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to = add > docs on it till Monday. > > Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some > final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I > currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are = no > showstoppers. I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to = commit tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the docs may take a day or two longer.=20 - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg=3D =3DJvk4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-16 18:33:30
|
Oops, I've just noticed that you already committed the extended form = macros. I'd still like to have at least a brief review phase for those, = so I'm a bit unclear on how to proceed. As the release is supposed to = happen tomorrow night and I'm occupied tomorrow during the day, I don't = see much chance for review from my side. =20 So it might still be better to move them to the sandbox for the time = being, and release them in 1.1.1, possibly together with Seth's JSP = tags. My main concern is consistency here, between the = Velocity/FreeMarker macros and the JSP tags. Once we include them in a = final release, we're bound to support them as-is... =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 20:26 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Darren, =20 I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the = sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd like = to have some review there before releasing and supporting them. = Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I = suggest to release all of those macros at a later point of time: either = in a 1.1 point release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for late = October). What do you think? =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Darren Davison Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Everybody, > > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only > remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the = HTTP > invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to = add > docs on it till Monday. > > Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some > final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I > currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are = no > showstoppers. I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to = commit tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the docs may take a day or two longer.=20 - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg=3D =3DJvk4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Matt R. <li...@ra...> - 2004-08-16 19:36:55
|
I have an app that has all three options: JSP 2.0, FreeMarker and=20 Velocity. I can give these macros a test drive if you like. Matt On Aug 16, 2004, at 12:33 PM, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Oops, I've just noticed that you already committed the extended form=20= > macros. I'd still like to have at least a brief review phase for=20 > those, so I'm a bit unclear on how to proceed. As the release is=20 > supposed to happen tomorrow night and I'm occupied tomorrow during the=20= > day, I don't see much chance for review from my side. > > So it might still be better to move them to the sandbox for the time=20= > being, and release them in 1.1.1, possibly together with Seth's JSP=20 > tags. My main concern is consistency here, between the=20 > Velocity/FreeMarker macros and the JSP tags. Once we include them in a=20= > final release, we're bound to support them as-is... > > Juergen > > > ________________________________ > > Von: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] > Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 20:26 > An: spr...@li... > Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 = final > > > Darren, > > I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the=20= > sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd=20 > like to have some review there before releasing and supporting them.=20= > Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I=20= > suggest to release all of those macros at a later point of time:=20 > either in a 1.1 point release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for=20 > late October). What do you think? > > Juergen > > > ________________________________ > > Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag=20= > von Darren Davison > Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 > An: spr...@li... > Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 = final > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: >> Everybody, >> >> =46rom my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the = only >> remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the=20 >> HTTP >> invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to=20= >> add >> docs on it till Monday. >> >> Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do = some >> final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I >> currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there=20 >> are no >> showstoppers. > > I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to=20 > commit > tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the docs=20= > may > take a day or two longer. > > - -- > Darren Davison > Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp > Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg=3D > =3DJvk4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-17 06:59:36
|
I'll have a look at that issue today. =20 Indeed, I haven't posted there yet, though I'm reading them: Part of my = experiment on how the Spring community can cope without my postings for = a couple of days, in preparation for a couple of days that I'd like to = take off ;-) =20 The problem is that the developer list and the JIRA issues already keep = me busy enough on the Spring side of things. Of course, the forums will = still receive due respect from me :-) =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Daniel Miller Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 23:39 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Juergen, I haven't noticed you posting any comments to the new Spring forum (I = may be blind, please forgive me if I missed them). You may want to have = a look at this issue before you release 1.1 final: http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?t=3D108 Thanks. Daniel Miller j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Everybody, >=20 >>From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only = remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the HTTP = invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to = add docs on it till Monday. >=20 > Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some = final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I = currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are = no showstoppers. >=20 > Juergen > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-17 22:07:29
|
FYI, I've arranged with Darren that we do ship the Velocity/FreeMarker = form simplification macros in their current state, after a brief review = of mine (tomorrow). However, analogous JSP macros are still missing. =20 After a discussion with Colin on JIRA, we've also decided to strictly = just use a generic constructor argument value (without index) a single = time: for example, resolve a single String value against java.io.File's = single String constructor rather than its double String constructor. = While this is strictly speaking not backwards-compatible, I doubt that = anyone relies on the previous behavior. Neither the DTD nor the docs = hinted at the exact behavior either, so I guess we're free to strictly = define it now. =20 In combination with a recent change in the property editor registration = mechanism, the new HTTP invoker remoting strategy and the new JSF = VariableResolver, the two issues above make me wonder whether we should = rather release 1.1 RC2 tomorrow, with 1.1 final following up quickly (in = two weeks at the latest). We might want to get some further feedback on = these recent changes, to catch any design/definition issues. =20 I don't think that an RC2 is absolutely necessary, but I'd still like to = suggest it. Thoughts? Opinions? My main concern is that we should fully = trust in the codebase that we release as 1.1. I want to avoid a quick = 1.1.1 fix release just because of things that slipped into 1.1 final. In = particular, APIs and semantics need to be fully backwards-compatible = from 1.1 final on; we can't easily fix naming issues or the like after = 1.1 final anymore. =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 20:26 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Darren, I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the = sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd like = to have some review there before releasing and supporting them. = Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I = suggest to release all of those macros at a later point of time: either = in a 1.1 point release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for late = October). What do you think? Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Darren Davison Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Everybody, > > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only > remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the = HTTP > invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to = add > docs on it till Monday. > > Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some > final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I > currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are = no > showstoppers. I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to = commit tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the docs may take a day or two longer. - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg=3D =3DJvk4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-08-18 02:20:58
|
I like the idea of RC2, if there's any doubt about the current codebase... Colin jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >FYI, I've arranged with Darren that we do ship the Velocity/FreeMarker form simplification macros in their current state, after a brief review of mine (tomorrow). However, analogous JSP macros are still missing. > >After a discussion with Colin on JIRA, we've also decided to strictly just use a generic constructor argument value (without index) a single time: for example, resolve a single String value against java.io.File's single String constructor rather than its double String constructor. While this is strictly speaking not backwards-compatible, I doubt that anyone relies on the previous behavior. Neither the DTD nor the docs hinted at the exact behavior either, so I guess we're free to strictly define it now. > >In combination with a recent change in the property editor registration mechanism, the new HTTP invoker remoting strategy and the new JSF VariableResolver, the two issues above make me wonder whether we should rather release 1.1 RC2 tomorrow, with 1.1 final following up quickly (in two weeks at the latest). We might want to get some further feedback on these recent changes, to catch any design/definition issues. > >I don't think that an RC2 is absolutely necessary, but I'd still like to suggest it. Thoughts? Opinions? My main concern is that we should fully trust in the codebase that we release as 1.1. I want to avoid a quick 1.1.1 fix release just because of things that slipped into 1.1 final. In particular, APIs and semantics need to be fully backwards-compatible from 1.1 final on; we can't easily fix naming issues or the like after 1.1 final anymore. > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von jürgen höller [werk3AT] >Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 20:26 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final > > > >Darren, > >I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd like to have some review there before releasing and supporting them. Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I suggest to release all of those macros at a later point of time: either in a 1.1 point release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for late October). What do you think? > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von Darren Davison >Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: > > >>Everybody, >> >>From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only >>remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the HTTP >>invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to add >>docs on it till Monday. >> >>Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some >>final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I >>currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are no >>showstoppers. >> >> > >I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to commit >tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the docs may >take a day or two longer. > >- -- >Darren Davison >Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp >Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg= >=Jvk4 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > |
|
From: Rod J. <ro...@in...> - 2004-08-18 06:31:38
|
Agreed. No point rushing it.=20 -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf = Of Colin Sampaleanu Sent: 18 August 2004 03:20 To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final I like the idea of RC2, if there's any doubt about the current = codebase... Colin j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: >FYI, I've arranged with Darren that we do ship the Velocity/FreeMarker = form simplification macros in their current state, after a brief review of = mine (tomorrow). However, analogous JSP macros are still missing. >=20 >After a discussion with Colin on JIRA, we've also decided to strictly = just use a generic constructor argument value (without index) a single time: = for example, resolve a single String value against java.io.File's single = String constructor rather than its double String constructor. While this is strictly speaking not backwards-compatible, I doubt that anyone relies = on the previous behavior. Neither the DTD nor the docs hinted at the exact behavior either, so I guess we're free to strictly define it now. >=20 >In combination with a recent change in the property editor registration mechanism, the new HTTP invoker remoting strategy and the new JSF VariableResolver, the two issues above make me wonder whether we should rather release 1.1 RC2 tomorrow, with 1.1 final following up quickly (in = two weeks at the latest). We might want to get some further feedback on = these recent changes, to catch any design/definition issues. >=20 >I don't think that an RC2 is absolutely necessary, but I'd still like = to suggest it. Thoughts? Opinions? My main concern is that we should fully trust in the codebase that we release as 1.1. I want to avoid a quick = 1.1.1 fix release just because of things that slipped into 1.1 final. In particular, APIs and semantics need to be fully backwards-compatible = from 1.1 final on; we can't easily fix naming issues or the like after 1.1 = final anymore. >=20 >Juergen >=20 > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag=20 >von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] >Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 20:26 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final > > > >Darren, > >I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd like = to have some review there before releasing and supporting them. = Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I suggest to = release all of those macros at a later point of time: either in a 1.1 point = release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for late October). What do you think? > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag=20 >von Darren Davison >Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > =20 > >>Everybody, >> >>From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only = >>remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the=20 >>HTTP invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll=20 >>try to add docs on it till Monday. >> >>Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some = >>final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I=20 >>currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are = >>no showstoppers. >> =20 >> > >I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to=20 >commit tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the=20 >docs may take a day or two longer. > >- -- >Darren Davison >Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp >Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg=3D >=3DJvk4 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > =20 > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media = 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-17 22:56:19
|
Colin, =20 Can you have a look at this? We could indeed ship an HTML version of the = reference docs too... What do you think? =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Aleksei Gopachenko Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 13:18 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:03:40 +0200, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]=20 <jue...@we...> wrote: > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only = > remaining point is documentation. Guys, is there any chance that html versions of docs will be included in = binary distribution? PDF is great, but IMO at least html_single version should go in. -- //regards, neuro ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Alef A. <al...@jt...> - 2004-08-18 08:58:17
|
There was a question on the forums about the fieldMarker and how to =
retrieve it automatically somehow using a property in the request or =
something.
=20
I don't have time to investigate right now, but my guess is that it =
wouldn't be hard to add a getFieldMarker() to the BindStatus, would it.
=20
This way devs could just do:
=20
<input type=3D"hidden" name=3D"<c:out value=3D"${status.fieldMarker}"/>" =
value=3D"bla"/>
=20
Juergen, or somebody else, since I don't have the time today or =
tomorrow, could you have a look at it?
=20
alef
=20
________________________________
From: spr...@li... on behalf of =
j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
Sent: Wed 8/18/2004 3:00 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
Colin,
Can you have a look at this? We could indeed ship an HTML version of the =
reference docs too... What do you think?
Juergen
________________________________
Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag =
von Aleksei Gopachenko
Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 13:18
An: spr...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:03:40 +0200, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
<jue...@we...> wrote:
> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only
> remaining point is documentation.
Guys, is there any chance that html versions of docs will be included in
binary distribution?
PDF is great, but IMO at least html_single version should go in.
--
//regards, neuro
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
|
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-18 19:42:22
|
Any thoughts on such an HTML version of the reference docs? Not for 1.1 = RC2, which I'll release tomorrow morning, but for 1.1 final... =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 23:52 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Colin, Can you have a look at this? We could indeed ship an HTML version of the = reference docs too... What do you think? Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Aleksei Gopachenko Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 13:18 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:03:40 +0200, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] <jue...@we...> wrote: > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only > remaining point is documentation. Guys, is there any chance that html versions of docs will be included in binary distribution? PDF is great, but IMO at least html_single version should go in. -- //regards, neuro ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-08-19 14:14:55
|
I'll do it. It's just a bit of playing with the build script. jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >Any thoughts on such an HTML version of the reference docs? Not for 1.1 RC2, which I'll release tomorrow morning, but for 1.1 final... > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von jürgen höller [werk3AT] >Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 23:52 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final > > > >Colin, > >Can you have a look at this? We could indeed ship an HTML version of the reference docs too... What do you think? > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von Aleksei Gopachenko >Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 13:18 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final > > > >On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:03:40 +0200, jürgen höller [werk3AT] ><jue...@we...> wrote: > > > >>From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only >>remaining point is documentation. >> >> > >Guys, is there any chance that html versions of docs will be included in >binary distribution? >PDF is great, but IMO at least html_single version should go in. > >-- > >//regards, neuro > > |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-08-24 16:37:00
|
I've modified the build script to include the html_single version of the html docs in the two release packages. If somebody thinks that the normal (split out) html version is a better idea to be included, or we should include both, just speak up. Note that I've modified the "release" target to also depend on "refdoc". The old version didn't, which meant it was very easy to build a release with old docs. Additionally, I've made the build fail with a nice message if the XSLT support libs are not available where they should be (since this is a manual step that people have to do). I have also killed the version of spring-reference.pdf which was checked in under /docs. It did not make sense to me to have that version there, which had to be manually updated, when we generate a fresh one automatically under /docs/reference/pdf. The build now just includes the one under /docs/reference/pdf. Regards, Colin Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > I'll do it. It's just a bit of playing with the build script. > > jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: > >> Any thoughts on such an HTML version of the reference docs? Not for >> 1.1 RC2, which I'll release tomorrow morning, but for 1.1 final... >> >> Juergen >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag >> von jürgen höller [werk3AT] >> Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 23:52 >> An: spr...@li... >> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final >> >> >> >> Colin, >> >> Can you have a look at this? We could indeed ship an HTML version of >> the reference docs too... What do you think? >> >> Juergen >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag >> von Aleksei Gopachenko >> Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 13:18 >> An: spr...@li... >> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final >> >> >> >> On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:03:40 +0200, jürgen höller [werk3AT] >> <jue...@we...> wrote: >> >> >> >>> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only >>> remaining point is documentation. >>> >> >> >> Guys, is there any chance that html versions of docs will be included in >> binary distribution? >> PDF is great, but IMO at least html_single version should go in. >> >> -- >> >> //regards, neuro > |
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-18 19:45:06
|
Seth, =20 Any progress on the form simplification macros for JSP? It would be = great to have them ready in time for 1.1 final by the end of August. = We'll ship the Velocity/FreeMarker macros in 1.1 RC2 tomorrow morning. = If there appear to be any consistency issues with the upcoming JSP = macros, we can still refine naming etc for 1.1 final. =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Mi 18.08.2004 00:07 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final FYI, I've arranged with Darren that we do ship the Velocity/FreeMarker = form simplification macros in their current state, after a brief review = of mine (tomorrow). However, analogous JSP macros are still missing. After a discussion with Colin on JIRA, we've also decided to strictly = just use a generic constructor argument value (without index) a single = time: for example, resolve a single String value against java.io.File's = single String constructor rather than its double String constructor. = While this is strictly speaking not backwards-compatible, I doubt that = anyone relies on the previous behavior. Neither the DTD nor the docs = hinted at the exact behavior either, so I guess we're free to strictly = define it now. In combination with a recent change in the property editor registration = mechanism, the new HTTP invoker remoting strategy and the new JSF = VariableResolver, the two issues above make me wonder whether we should = rather release 1.1 RC2 tomorrow, with 1.1 final following up quickly (in = two weeks at the latest). We might want to get some further feedback on = these recent changes, to catch any design/definition issues. I don't think that an RC2 is absolutely necessary, but I'd still like to = suggest it. Thoughts? Opinions? My main concern is that we should fully = trust in the codebase that we release as 1.1. I want to avoid a quick = 1.1.1 fix release just because of things that slipped into 1.1 final. In = particular, APIs and semantics need to be fully backwards-compatible = from 1.1 final on; we can't easily fix naming issues or the like after = 1.1 final anymore. Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 20:26 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Darren, I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the = sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd like = to have some review there before releasing and supporting them. = Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I = suggest to release all of those macros at a later point of time: either = in a 1.1 point release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for late = October). What do you think? Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Darren Davison Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Everybody, > > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only > remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the = HTTP > invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to = add > docs on it till Monday. > > Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some > final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I > currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are = no > showstoppers. I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to = commit tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the docs may take a day or two longer. - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg=3D =3DJvk4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Alef A. <al...@jt...> - 2004-08-18 21:18:22
|
That'd be good. I don't think it would be a big deal in terms of size. = Basically calling ant dochtml should be enough. Juergen, do you need = anything else? =20 alef =20 ________________________________ From: spr...@li... on behalf of = j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Sent: Wed 8/18/2004 10:15 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Any thoughts on such an HTML version of the reference docs? Not for 1.1 = RC2, which I'll release tomorrow morning, but for 1.1 final... Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 23:52 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Colin, Can you have a look at this? We could indeed ship an HTML version of the = reference docs too... What do you think? Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Aleksei Gopachenko Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 13:18 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:03:40 +0200, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] <jue...@we...> wrote: > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only > remaining point is documentation. Guys, is there any chance that html versions of docs will be included in binary distribution? PDF is great, but IMO at least html_single version should go in. -- //regards, neuro ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@tr...> - 2004-08-16 12:41:54
|
It works in 8.1SP2. I would remove the stack trace generated from the
log statement though and just leave the log message that we are retrying
with forceResume.
Thomas
jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:
>Thomas,
>
>As mentioned in a JIRA comment, I've just coded such a WebLogicJtaTransactionManager via reflection (to avoid compile-time dependencies on WebLogic), also leveraging new internal hooks in JtaTransactionManager. Please give it a try on WebLogic 8.1!
>
>If we keep getting the NullPointerException on WebLogic 7.0, we'll need some further research there. It's already good to have it working on WebLogic 8.1, though!
>
>Juergen
>
>
>________________________________
>
>Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von Thomas Risberg
>Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 07:39
>An: spr...@li...
>Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
>
>
>
>I was able to reproduce the error using WLS 8.1SP2. The following code
>did fix the problem and I did not get the nullpointer exception.
>
>package org.springframework.transaction.jta;
>
>public class WebLogicJtaTransactionManager extends JtaTransactionManager {
>
> protected void doResume(Object transaction, Object suspendedResources) {
> try {
> super.doResume(transaction, suspendedResources);
> } catch
>(org.springframework.transaction.IllegalTransactionStateException ex) {
> logger.debug("ForceResuming: " + suspendedResources.toString());
> weblogic.transaction.TransactionManager wtm =
>(weblogic.transaction.TransactionManager) getTransactionManager();
> wtm.forceResume((javax.transaction.Transaction) suspendedResources);
> }
> }
>}
>
>I have attached a spring-weblogic-jta-patch.jar containing this class to
>JIRA. If you could test with this jar together with the most recent
>1.1RC1 spring.jar to see if it works in your environment. If not I will
>have to investigate further using WLS 7.0.
>
>Thomas
>
>
>Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I'll try to run that code on wls 8 and will attach clent junit test
>>to JIRA tomorrow morning.
>>
>> regards,
>> Eugene
>>
>>
>>Thomas Risberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple of days. From an
>>>initial look at the problem it seems to be more of a WebLogic issue.
>>>Have you tried running the same code in WLS 8.1?
>>>
>>>First I'm going to try to reproduce this locally - you woldn't happen
>>>to have the client code that calls this EJB?
>>>
>>>Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if there is any chance that SPR-251 JIRA could be
>>>>resolved for 1.1 release?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Eugene
>>>>
>>>>Rod Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I haven't documented the new "factory-bean" attribute that supports
>>>>>the use
>>>>>of instance (rather than static) factory methods in the Reference
>>>>>Manual
>>>>>yet. (It is documented in the DTD.) Doesn't justify holding the
>>>>>release, but
>>>>>worth noting. (Hint, hint.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Unfortunately I won't have time to do this myself before the release.
>>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: spr...@li...
>>>>>[mailto:spr...@li...] On
>>>>>Behalf Of
>>>>>jürgen höller [werk3AT]
>>>>>Sent: 14 August 2004 20:04
>>>>>To: spr...@li...
>>>>>Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
>>>>>
>>>>>Everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the
>>>>>>only
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the
>>>>>HTTP
>>>>>invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try
>>>>>to add
>>>>>docs on it till Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>>Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do
>>>>>some final
>>>>>proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I
>>>>>currently plan
>>>>>to do the release Monday night, provided that there are no
>>>>>showstoppers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
>>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
>>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
>>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
>>_______________________________________________
>>Springframework-developer mailing list
>>Spr...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
>
>
|
