Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final

[Eugene K. <eu...@pl...>]

jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:

> BTW, Eugene: Have you decompiled your WebLogic EJB proxy to see the
> resume/forceResume code? In that case, is it obvious to you how
> WebLogic applies the "transaction-isolation" setting (from its EJB
> deployment descriptor)? We'd like to provide that for Spring on
> WebLogic too, but don't know how to set the isolation level on
> WebLogic JTA, because the standard JTA API does not support
> per-transaction isolation levels...
> 
> We do already support isolation levels for our native transactions
> strategies, like DataSourceTransactionManager and co. Our
> JtaTransactionManager just provides a hook currently; we do not have
> isolation level support for any JTA backend yet.

   Actually you no need to decompile anything. There is an option in
Weblogic's ejbc compiller to keep sources for generated stubs/proxies.
   We've tried to look at those, but they quite complex and rely on some 
Weblogic internal classes. If you are interested, I can attach all of 
those to JIRA.

   regards,
   Eugene


> Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag
> von Eugene Kuleshov Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 03:16 An:
> spr...@li... Cc: Dmitri Maximovich
>  Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1
> final
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I'll try to run that code on wls 8 and will attach clent junit test
> to JIRA tomorrow morning.
> 
> regards, Eugene
> 
> 
> Thomas Risberg wrote:
> 
> 
>> I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple of days.  From
>> an initial look at the problem it seems to be more of a WebLogic
>> issue. Have you tried running the same code in WLS 8.1?
>> 
>> First I'm going to try to reproduce this locally - you woldn't
>> happen to have the client code that calls this EJB?
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> 
>> Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I wonder if there is any chance that SPR-251 JIRA could be
>>> resolved for 1.1 release?
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> Eugene
>>> 
>>> Rod Johnson wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I haven't documented the new "factory-bean" attribute that
>>>> supports the use of instance (rather than static) factory
>>>> methods in the Reference Manual yet. (It is documented in the
>>>> DTD.) Doesn't justify holding the release, but worth noting.
>>>> (Hint, hint.)
>>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately I won't have time to do this myself before the
>>>> release.
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message----- From:
>>>> spr...@li... 
>>>> [mailto:spr...@li...]
>>>> On Behalf Of jürgen höller [werk3AT] Sent: 14 August 2004 20:04
>>>>  To: spr...@li... Subject:
>>>> [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
>>>> 
>>>> Everybody,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release;
>>>>> the only
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on
>>>> the HTTP invoker yet, for example: While this is not too
>>>> critical, I'll try to add docs on it till Monday.
>>>> 
>>>> Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to
>>>> do some final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any
>>>> issues ASAP: I currently plan to do the release Monday night,
>>>> provided that there are no showstoppers.