Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-08-18 19:45:06
|
Seth, =20 Any progress on the form simplification macros for JSP? It would be = great to have them ready in time for 1.1 final by the end of August. = We'll ship the Velocity/FreeMarker macros in 1.1 RC2 tomorrow morning. = If there appear to be any consistency issues with the upcoming JSP = macros, we can still refine naming etc for 1.1 final. =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Mi 18.08.2004 00:07 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final FYI, I've arranged with Darren that we do ship the Velocity/FreeMarker = form simplification macros in their current state, after a brief review = of mine (tomorrow). However, analogous JSP macros are still missing. After a discussion with Colin on JIRA, we've also decided to strictly = just use a generic constructor argument value (without index) a single = time: for example, resolve a single String value against java.io.File's = single String constructor rather than its double String constructor. = While this is strictly speaking not backwards-compatible, I doubt that = anyone relies on the previous behavior. Neither the DTD nor the docs = hinted at the exact behavior either, so I guess we're free to strictly = define it now. In combination with a recent change in the property editor registration = mechanism, the new HTTP invoker remoting strategy and the new JSF = VariableResolver, the two issues above make me wonder whether we should = rather release 1.1 RC2 tomorrow, with 1.1 final following up quickly (in = two weeks at the latest). We might want to get some further feedback on = these recent changes, to catch any design/definition issues. I don't think that an RC2 is absolutely necessary, but I'd still like to = suggest it. Thoughts? Opinions? My main concern is that we should fully = trust in the codebase that we release as 1.1. I want to avoid a quick = 1.1.1 fix release just because of things that slipped into 1.1 final. In = particular, APIs and semantics need to be fully backwards-compatible = from 1.1 final on; we can't easily fix naming issues or the like after = 1.1 final anymore. Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Gesendet: Mo 16.08.2004 20:26 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final Darren, I consider it preferable to keep the form simplification macros in the = sandbox for the time being, and release 1.1 final without them. I'd like = to have some review there before releasing and supporting them. = Furthermore, Seth's form tags for JSP are not ready yet either. So I = suggest to release all of those macros at a later point of time: either = in a 1.1 point release or in 1.2 RC1 (which is scheduled for late = October). What do you think? Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Darren Davison Gesendet: Sa 14.08.2004 21:22 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 20:03, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > Everybody, > > From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only > remaining point is documentation. There's no reference docs on the = HTTP > invoker yet, for example: While this is not too critical, I'll try to = add > docs on it till Monday. > > Feel free to give the current CVS snapshot a final try, and to do some > final proof-reading of the docs! Please report any issues ASAP: I > currently plan to do the release Monday night, provided that there are = no > showstoppers. I'll have the Velocity & FreeMarker form rendering macros ready to = commit tonight or tomorrow - they're working pretty well now - but the docs may take a day or two longer. - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/pages/key.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHmaKKLMLAN01aw0RArmdAJ9TsBw/CRzFeJkbh5u7yLb2EFQ+YwCcCZvp Ks0gKuK/+VrGviu6SIET8Sg=3D =3DJvk4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
