|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-08-24 16:37:00
|
I've modified the build script to include the html_single version of the html docs in the two release packages. If somebody thinks that the normal (split out) html version is a better idea to be included, or we should include both, just speak up. Note that I've modified the "release" target to also depend on "refdoc". The old version didn't, which meant it was very easy to build a release with old docs. Additionally, I've made the build fail with a nice message if the XSLT support libs are not available where they should be (since this is a manual step that people have to do). I have also killed the version of spring-reference.pdf which was checked in under /docs. It did not make sense to me to have that version there, which had to be manually updated, when we generate a fresh one automatically under /docs/reference/pdf. The build now just includes the one under /docs/reference/pdf. Regards, Colin Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > I'll do it. It's just a bit of playing with the build script. > > jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: > >> Any thoughts on such an HTML version of the reference docs? Not for >> 1.1 RC2, which I'll release tomorrow morning, but for 1.1 final... >> >> Juergen >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag >> von jürgen höller [werk3AT] >> Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 23:52 >> An: spr...@li... >> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final >> >> >> >> Colin, >> >> Can you have a look at this? We could indeed ship an HTML version of >> the reference docs too... What do you think? >> >> Juergen >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag >> von Aleksei Gopachenko >> Gesendet: Di 17.08.2004 13:18 >> An: spr...@li... >> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for Spring 1.1 final >> >> >> >> On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:03:40 +0200, jürgen höller [werk3AT] >> <jue...@we...> wrote: >> >> >> >>> From my point of view, Spring 1.1 final is ready for release; the only >>> remaining point is documentation. >>> >> >> >> Guys, is there any chance that html versions of docs will be included in >> binary distribution? >> PDF is great, but IMO at least html_single version should go in. >> >> -- >> >> //regards, neuro > |