sourcejammer-users Mailing List for SourceJammer (Page 7)
Brought to you by:
robertmacgrogan
Menu
▾
▴
sourcejammer-users — For help with SJ, use this list.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(102) |
Feb
(92) |
Mar
(83) |
Apr
(89) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
|
From: Albert M. <amo...@ev...> - 2005-11-09 11:35:27
|
Hum, then I guess the version was the same, but Robert will give you a better answer anyway. The truth is that the proper way to copy the files would be using the installation scripts that come with SJ, but the method you used should have worked as well. Check the values inside <<SOURJAMMER_CONTEXT_PATH>>/WEB-INF/conf/serverconf.xml are properly set, and then edit with a text editor the s.ja files inside the folder referred to in the FileSysDirectory tag of the above XML. This last verification of the paths in the sja files, though, has nothing to do with the users.xml file that is not found, but will be necessary after that is fixed. About the server logs, it depends which one you are running. If Tomcat, they are placed in <<TOMCAT_HOME>>/logs, and depending on the specific version and OS they'll be written into catalina.out, or stout_<<DATE>>.log, or similar files. Old versions of Tomcat running on Windows, however, will not save them in a file if running as a service, which I hope is not your case. Hoping this helps rather than confuses, Albert. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John F. Schank III" <js...@ma...> To: "Albert Moliner" <amo...@ev...> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:06 PM Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Moving to new server > Hi Albert, > Unfortunately, I don't remember what the server version was when we > used this last. > I think we are using the same version...I looked in the project > folder and it says that the files were created with 2.1.0.0, so I > think we're up to date. > As far as the sever logs are concerned, I can't seem to find them. > I tried re-copying the files again. And this time I get an > "Unable to access file information.null" message. > John Schank > > > > On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:16 AM, Albert Moliner wrote: > > > > > Hello, John. > > > > I don't remember much problems when we recently suffered a similar > > situation. As > > long as the two server versions are the same, copying the old files > > in the new > > directories is enough, provided you configure the new paths. How > > did you do this > > step? Was the old one a 2.1.0 version too? Can you look at the > > application > > server logs? At start up (or when the first user logs in, I don't > > remember), the > > path where the users.xml file is looked up is printed. > > > > Albert. |
|
From: Albert M. <amo...@ev...> - 2005-11-09 10:16:49
|
Hello, John. I don't remember much problems when we recently suffered a similar situation. As long as the two server versions are the same, copying the old files in the new directories is enough, provided you configure the new paths. How did you do this step? Was the old one a 2.1.0 version too? Can you look at the application server logs? At start up (or when the first user logs in, I don't remember), the path where the users.xml file is looked up is printed. Albert. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John F. Schank III" <js...@ma...> To: <sou...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 10:45 AM Subject: [SourceJammer-users] Moving to new server > Hello, > My old server died so I am trying to move my sourcejammer > installation to a new server...But I'm having problems. > Here is what I did... > 1) I Saved a copy of the old installation both the servlet and the > directory where source jammer puts its data. > 2) Installed the 2.1.0.0 sourcejammer server on my server. > 3) Told it where to put its files. > 4) Put copies of the old files into the new location. (archives etc) > 5) Now when I try to connect to the archive, it does not recognize > any of my users, nor will it allow me to maintain the archives. > What step am I missing? > Thank you for any advice you might have. > John Schank > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > |
|
From: John F. S. I. <js...@ma...> - 2005-11-09 09:46:03
|
Hello, My old server died so I am trying to move my sourcejammer installation to a new server...But I'm having problems. Here is what I did... 1) I Saved a copy of the old installation both the servlet and the directory where source jammer puts its data. 2) Installed the 2.1.0.0 sourcejammer server on my server. 3) Told it where to put its files. 4) Put copies of the old files into the new location. (archives etc) 5) Now when I try to connect to the archive, it does not recognize any of my users, nor will it allow me to maintain the archives. What step am I missing? Thank you for any advice you might have. John Schank |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-26 16:40:46
|
Hi, Gus. SJ is definitely actively supported. As for development, it's been a while since the last release, but I've just started work on a new release. Also, a patched client and server should be released this week, so I guess it's actively being developed as well (after a bit of a hiatus). --Rob --- Gus Stechmann <gu...@st...> wrote: > Hello Robert, > > SourceJammer is a great tool and we are looking at > using it in our project. > > Is it still being actively developed & supported? > > > Kind regards, > /Gus > > __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com |
|
From: <hwa...@ya...> - 2005-10-25 16:46:02
|
--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote: > I want to apologize to everyone on this list for the > problems we're having with spam. I've been > resisting making this list subscription only because > I hate to put any roadblocks in between > user's who need help and this forum. Subscribing to > a mailing list may not seem like a huge > burden, but I know that it can be frustrating when > you're required to register for something just > so you can ask a question. > > Still, with all the spam we've been getting, I see > no alternative. Allowing the archives of this > list to be polluted with all sorts of ridiculous > messages is not going to be helpful to anyone. > > So, from this point forward, you will have to be > subscribed to the sj-users list in order to post > messages to it. > > --Rob > > > > __________________________________ > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training > Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees > Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification > for more information > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > I'm definitely for it. I have to subscribe to every other list I use anyways, plus I get enough spam without getting it from the mailing lists as well. So, a great BIG thanks from me for making it required to subscribe. Wade |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-25 16:01:54
|
I want to apologize to everyone on this list for the problems we're having with spam. I've been resisting making this list subscription only because I hate to put any roadblocks in between user's who need help and this forum. Subscribing to a mailing list may not seem like a huge burden, but I know that it can be frustrating when you're required to register for something just so you can ask a question. Still, with all the spam we've been getting, I see no alternative. Allowing the archives of this list to be polluted with all sorts of ridiculous messages is not going to be helpful to anyone. So, from this point forward, you will have to be subscribed to the sj-users list in order to post messages to it. --Rob __________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs |
|
From: Aghavni B. <agh...@ra...> - 2005-10-25 14:54:36
|
I started having an affair with a younger, supersexy coworker about two months ago. I was very nervous and had tremendous anxiety about going to bed with her. Sure enough, the first time we tried I could not perform. I felt worthless and could not believe that I blew an opportunity to be with a woman so incredibly beautiful. I decided to get some Vjaagra online http://www.becokedonit.com and give it a try. The next time we were together things were wonderfully different. My cock was hard enough to cut through diamonds and I couldn't believe how full and swollen it was. We had great sex that day and have continued to do so. It is my little secret, but I want to share with other men that Vjaagra does work. P.S. If you have a problem, try Vjaagra, it is great http://www.becokedonit.com |
|
From: James S. <jam...@sw...> - 2005-10-25 04:26:54
|
Rob, Many thanks once again. All operational now. Cheers, James Robert MacGrogan wrote: >HI, James. > >There's an entry in the SJ docs page about this (kind of hidden under "Import/Export SourceJammer >archive": > >http://www.sourcejammer.org/importExportArchive.html > >--Rob > > > >--- James Saffery <jam...@sw...> wrote: > > > >>Hi, >> >>I need to move a SourceJammer archive from an HP-UX server to a my local >>machine, a Windows notebook. Actually the HP server has already left the >>office and is being shipped to client site. Before it left, I shutdown >>SourceJammer and then copied the whole contents of archives and filesys >>directories to my notebook. >> >>I then installed Tomcat and SJ server on my notebook, and with SJ >>shutdown, copied the archives and filesys directories to the new SJ >>installation's server directory. I was hoping that this would be >>sufficient to move the archive, but when I attempt to connect I got the >>following message: >> >> Error: Unable to obtain filesystem lock on the requested node. >> >>I also saw the following in the client console: >> >> # Error: There is no current session with id 6421978686599122094. >> Disconnected >> >>The new SJ installation on my notebook is otherwise good. I am able to >>create a new test archive and connect to it. >> >>Any help much appreciated. >> >>Thanks, >> >>James >> >>-- >> >>James Saffery >>Project Leader for Foster's Wine Estates Software >>Swisslog Australia Pty Limited >> >>+61 400 203 718 mobile >>+61 2 9869 5929 direct >>+61 2 9869 5900 office >>+61 2 9869 5959 fax >> >> >>____________________________________________________________ >>This message may contain legally privileged or confidential >>information and is therefore addressed to the named persons only. >>The recipient should inform the sender and delete this message, >>if he/she is not named as addressee. >>The sender disclaims any and all liability for the integrity >>and punctuality of this message. >>The sender has activated an automatic virus scanning by >>Messagelabs, but does not guarantee the virus free >>transmission of this message. >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. >>Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course >>Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 >>Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information >>_______________________________________________ >>SourceJammer-users mailing list >>Sou...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users >> >> >> > > > > > >__________________________________ >Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 >http://mail.yahoo.com > >____________________________________________________________ >This message has been checked for all known viruses by Messagelabs. > > -- James Saffery Project Leader for Foster's Wine Estates Software Swisslog Australia Pty Limited +61 400 203 718 mobile +61 2 9869 5929 direct +61 2 9869 5900 office +61 2 9869 5959 fax ____________________________________________________________ This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information and is therefore addressed to the named persons only. The recipient should inform the sender and delete this message, if he/she is not named as addressee. The sender disclaims any and all liability for the integrity and punctuality of this message. The sender has activated an automatic virus scanning by Messagelabs, but does not guarantee the virus free transmission of this message. |
|
From: Rudi G. <ru...@gm...> - 2005-10-24 19:35:12
|
I am a 39 year old male and in good health and fairly fit, but realized a = while back that sometimes I had a hard time maintaining an erection. I am single, but I do date a lot and I believe many times the problem was due = to anxiety and pressure to perform with someone new. I bought Vjaggra online http://www.carbodrat.com and decided to give it a go. WOW WOW WOW it kicked in after about 20-30 minutes and that was just perfect, = as I knew where the evening was going. She is a beautiful woman with a great body and I did not think I needed it = with her, but let me just say After the 5th time I am not kidding ;) she said: Please no more lol unbelievable. It was like being a teenager over again. Amazing! |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-24 15:36:30
|
HI, James. There's an entry in the SJ docs page about this (kind of hidden under "Import/Export SourceJammer archive": http://www.sourcejammer.org/importExportArchive.html --Rob --- James Saffery <jam...@sw...> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to move a SourceJammer archive from an HP-UX server to a my local > machine, a Windows notebook. Actually the HP server has already left the > office and is being shipped to client site. Before it left, I shutdown > SourceJammer and then copied the whole contents of archives and filesys > directories to my notebook. > > I then installed Tomcat and SJ server on my notebook, and with SJ > shutdown, copied the archives and filesys directories to the new SJ > installation's server directory. I was hoping that this would be > sufficient to move the archive, but when I attempt to connect I got the > following message: > > Error: Unable to obtain filesystem lock on the requested node. > > I also saw the following in the client console: > > # Error: There is no current session with id 6421978686599122094. > Disconnected > > The new SJ installation on my notebook is otherwise good. I am able to > create a new test archive and connect to it. > > Any help much appreciated. > > Thanks, > > James > > -- > > James Saffery > Project Leader for Foster's Wine Estates Software > Swisslog Australia Pty Limited > > +61 400 203 718 mobile > +61 2 9869 5929 direct > +61 2 9869 5900 office > +61 2 9869 5959 fax > > > ____________________________________________________________ > This message may contain legally privileged or confidential > information and is therefore addressed to the named persons only. > The recipient should inform the sender and delete this message, > if he/she is not named as addressee. > The sender disclaims any and all liability for the integrity > and punctuality of this message. > The sender has activated an automatic virus scanning by > Messagelabs, but does not guarantee the virus free > transmission of this message. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-24 15:29:57
|
I'm not sure I trust Notepad not to think it can make a better decision than you can, but it's possible SJ's not doing something right. Still, for non-latin characters I generally find that ISO-8859-1 works the best. Give that one a try and see if it works out better. --Rob --- ste <st...@co...> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for the reply. Brilliant! > > Hmmm yeah I though I had set the config file up correctly. > > I have attached a two text files both containing Hungarian characters. > One file is saved from XP Notepad with UTF-8 encoding, the other is as > is returned from SourceJammer. > > Maybe I'm missing something obvious!? > > Any help is really appreciated. > > Thanks > > Ste > > Robert MacGrogan wrote: > > >Hi, Ste. > > > >You've set up the config file just right as far as I can see. What makes you say the files are > not > >being stored using UTF-8? > > > >--Rob > > > > > >--- Ste Brennan <st...@co...> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Hi Robert, > >> > >> We have been trialing SourceJammer as our source control solution. Everything seems to be > >>going extremely well and working a treat. However we seem to have problems configuring > >>SourceJammer to store text files using UTF-8. I have modified the conf.xml for both Server > and > >>Client but these seems to make to difference. Here is my conf.xml file: > >> > >> <?xml version="1.0"?> > >> <SJConfig> > >> <DontZipFileExtensions>zip gz jpg jar</DontZipFileExtensions> > >> <TextEncodingCharset>UTF-8</TextEncodingCharset> > >> <XMLEncodingCharset>UTF-8</XMLEncodingCharset> > >> </SJConfig> > >> > >> We are running SJ on Windows XP for client and 2003 for server (SJ server 2.1.0.0, SJ client > >>2.1.2.0 beta and SJ client 2.1.0.0) > >> > >> Any help would be most appreciated > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Ste Brennan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________ > >Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > > *Ste Brennan* > > Technical Consultant > > > > Code Computer Love > 21 Back Turner St Manchester M41FR 0161 834 7171 www.computerlove.co.uk > > > > NEW MEDIA AGENCY OF THE YEAR > We know we're good. Our clients know we're good. And now it's official! > Code Computer Love has been named as Adline's New Media Agency of the > Year 2004. For more details visit www.computerlove.co.uk and hit News. > > > > DISCLAIMER > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, > distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in > this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those > of Code Computer Love. > > > > Although Code Computer Love Ltd has taken precautions to ensure no > viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept > responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email > or attachments. > > > Sajtószoba BefektetÅ?i kapcsolatok > Ã?lláslehetÅ?ségek az Intelnél Kormányzás és társadalmi felelÅ?sségvállalás> Sajtószoba BefektetÅi kapcsolatok > ÃlláslehetÅségek az Intelnél Kormányzás és társadalmi felelÅsségvállalás __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-24 14:43:29
|
Hi, Ste. You've set up the config file just right as far as I can see. What makes you say the files are not being stored using UTF-8? --Rob --- Ste Brennan <st...@co...> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > We have been trialing SourceJammer as our source control solution. Everything seems to be > going extremely well and working a treat. However we seem to have problems configuring > SourceJammer to store text files using UTF-8. I have modified the conf.xml for both Server and > Client but these seems to make to difference. Here is my conf.xml file: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <SJConfig> > <DontZipFileExtensions>zip gz jpg jar</DontZipFileExtensions> > <TextEncodingCharset>UTF-8</TextEncodingCharset> > <XMLEncodingCharset>UTF-8</XMLEncodingCharset> > </SJConfig> > > We are running SJ on Windows XP for client and 2003 for server (SJ server 2.1.0.0, SJ client > 2.1.2.0 beta and SJ client 2.1.0.0) > > Any help would be most appreciated > > Regards > > Ste Brennan > > > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: James S. <jam...@sw...> - 2005-10-24 04:11:07
|
Hi, I need to move a SourceJammer archive from an HP-UX server to a my local machine, a Windows notebook. Actually the HP server has already left the office and is being shipped to client site. Before it left, I shutdown SourceJammer and then copied the whole contents of archives and filesys directories to my notebook. I then installed Tomcat and SJ server on my notebook, and with SJ shutdown, copied the archives and filesys directories to the new SJ installation's server directory. I was hoping that this would be sufficient to move the archive, but when I attempt to connect I got the following message: Error: Unable to obtain filesystem lock on the requested node. I also saw the following in the client console: # Error: There is no current session with id 6421978686599122094. Disconnected The new SJ installation on my notebook is otherwise good. I am able to create a new test archive and connect to it. Any help much appreciated. Thanks, James -- James Saffery Project Leader for Foster's Wine Estates Software Swisslog Australia Pty Limited +61 400 203 718 mobile +61 2 9869 5929 direct +61 2 9869 5900 office +61 2 9869 5959 fax ____________________________________________________________ This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information and is therefore addressed to the named persons only. The recipient should inform the sender and delete this message, if he/she is not named as addressee. The sender disclaims any and all liability for the integrity and punctuality of this message. The sender has activated an automatic virus scanning by Messagelabs, but does not guarantee the virus free transmission of this message. |
|
From: M vd H. - N. S. <mvd...@no...> - 2005-10-22 14:01:10
|
Uppon creating a new archive i get the following error message: Sourcejammer is having trouble communicating with the server. A fault was generated: Fault Code = SOAP-ENV:server Fault String = Exception from service object: Provider for javax.xml.transform.TransfomerFactory cannot be found. What should i to make sourcejammer work. What files should i check etc... |
|
From: M vd H. - N. S. <mvd...@no...> - 2005-10-22 13:28:19
|
Uppon creating a new archive i get the following error message: Sourcejammer is having trouble communicating with the server. A fault was generated: Fault Code = SOAP-ENV:server Fault String = Exception from service object: Provider for javax.xml.transform.TransfomerFactory cannot be found. What should i to make sourcejammer work. What files should i check etc... |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-21 14:39:14
|
That would be great, Deanna. By the way, it looks like the bugs in the command line have been fixed. I'll try to do a new release today. --Rob --- Deanna J Peugeot <dpe...@cs...> wrote: > Thanks for the information. I'll be sure to Give the community my code > when I'm done! > > Deanna > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of > e-mail for such purpose. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Robert MacGrogan <robertmacgrogan > @yahoo.com> > 10/20/2005 09:21 PM > > To: Deanna J Peugeot/DEF/CSC@CSC, > sou...@li... > cc: > Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Converting from > SourceJammer > > > Hi, Deanna. > > Yes, SJ has a very decent command line. Just run the batch file > sj_client.bat in the root client > directory after you install. One limitation is that you will have to run > the client on a box that > can run a GUI, even though the CL is strictly CL. It won't run on a Sun > box without X Windows > installed, for example. > > You need to specify the URL for the server in the sj_client.bat file. > Should be pretty easy to > figure out. Just type "help" at the prompt to get a list of commands. One > other trick: One command > is not listed in the help for some reason. The command to view a list of > versions of a file is > "ver [filename]". > > The CL is not aware of shares, so watch out for that. I don't think it can > work with the current > label architecture (it's a little bit dusty). You might end up just > skipping any labels or > re-creating them in Clear Case, which will probably not be too great a > burden. > > One other option you might consider if you know your way around Java is > the SimpleInterface class, > which provide a relatively simple way to automate the SJ client code. > > Best of luck. Any chance of you open-sourcing your SJ to CC tool? It might > be nice for potential > SJ users to know it's not a dead end if they decide they need to switch. > > --Rob > > > --- Deanna J Peugeot <dpe...@cs...> wrote: > > > We're a Rational ClearCase shop (sorry, but it's actually in our > contract, > > so I can't change it). We've just been given another company's codebase > > > which is archived in SourceJammer. One of the first things I want to do > > > is move this over into ClearCase so our developers can start modifying > the > > code. Which poses some difficulties, as I'm sure you can guess. > > > > Has anyone attempted this? If not, does SourceJammer have a decent > > command line which I can use to get specific versions of files and all > > label information? If it does, I can bastardize the current ClearCase > > conversion scripts to do this. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Deanna > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > > > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use > of > > e-mail for such purpose. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-21 14:38:13
|
I don't believe there is a maximum number of files or size of archive for SJ. This would only be limited by the size of the hard disk where your SJ archive is stored. I don't think SJ gets slower or less reliable based on the size of the archive. The only limitiation I would expect SJ to have would be with the number of concurrent users. I don't know the exact limit because I've only used SJ with relatively small teams, but I'd guess that you might run into problems if you have more than 50 people hitting the same archive on a regular basis. This is just a guess, though. The number could be higher or lower. --Rob --- Nishit J Desai <nis...@in...> wrote: > Hi, > Can anybody tell me what is the maximum size and number of files > sourcejammer can handle reliably? > I have heard that reliability of sourcejammer is very less if the size of > my archive crosses 1 GB. And moreover > it becomes very slow with increasing number of files and datasize on > server. > > Please let me know how much dataload SJ can handle effectively? > > > Thanks, > > > Nishit Desai > Application Developer > Prestige Opal, > 146, Infantry Road, > Bangalore 560 001 INDIA > Cell : 91-9945282686 > Desk : 91-80-51367386 > Extn : 91-80-51332276 x 7386 > Fax : 91-80-51298500 > nis...@in... > "A ship in a harbour is safe, but that is not what ships are built for." - > William Shedd > > > > > Deanna J Peugeot <dpe...@cs...> > Sent by: sou...@li... > 21/10/2005 18:17 > > To > Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> > cc > sou...@li... > Subject > Re: [SourceJammer-users] Converting from SourceJammer > > > > > > > > Thanks for the information. I'll be sure to Give the community my code > when I'm done! > > Deanna > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of > e-mail for such purpose. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Robert MacGrogan <robertmacgrogan > @yahoo.com> > 10/20/2005 09:21 PM > > To: Deanna J Peugeot/DEF/CSC@CSC, > sou...@li... > cc: > Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Converting from > SourceJammer > > > > Hi, Deanna. > > Yes, SJ has a very decent command line. Just run the batch file > sj_client.bat in the root client > directory after you install. One limitation is that you will have to run > the client on a box that > can run a GUI, even though the CL is strictly CL. It won't run on a Sun > box without X Windows > installed, for example. > > You need to specify the URL for the server in the sj_client.bat file. > Should be pretty easy to > figure out. Just type "help" at the prompt to get a list of commands. One > other trick: One command > is not listed in the help for some reason. The command to view a list of > versions of a file is > "ver [filename]". > > The CL is not aware of shares, so watch out for that. I don't think it can > work with the current > label architecture (it's a little bit dusty). You might end up just > skipping any labels or > re-creating them in Clear Case, which will probably not be too great a > burden. > > One other option you might consider if you know your way around Java is > the SimpleInterface class, > which provide a relatively simple way to automate the SJ client code. > > Best of luck. Any chance of you open-sourcing your SJ to CC tool? It might > be nice for potential > SJ users to know it's not a dead end if they decide they need to switch. > > --Rob > > > --- Deanna J Peugeot <dpe...@cs...> wrote: > > > We're a Rational ClearCase shop (sorry, but it's actually in our > contract, > > so I can't change it). We've just been given another company's codebase > > > which is archived in SourceJammer. One of the first things I want to do > > > is move this over into ClearCase so our developers can start modifying > the > > code. Which poses some difficulties, as I'm sure you can guess. > > > > Has anyone attempted this? If not, does SourceJammer have a decent > > command line which I can use to get specific versions of files and all > > label information? If it does, I can bastardize the current ClearCase > > conversion scripts to do this. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Deanna > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > > > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use > of > > e-mail for such purpose. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Deanna J P. <dpe...@cs...> - 2005-10-21 12:47:32
|
Thanks for the information. I'll be sure to Give the community my code
when I'm done!
Deanna
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit
written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of
e-mail for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert MacGrogan <robertmacgrogan
@yahoo.com>
10/20/2005 09:21 PM
To: Deanna J Peugeot/DEF/CSC@CSC,
sou...@li...
cc:
Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Converting from
SourceJammer
Hi, Deanna.
Yes, SJ has a very decent command line. Just run the batch file
sj_client.bat in the root client
directory after you install. One limitation is that you will have to run
the client on a box that
can run a GUI, even though the CL is strictly CL. It won't run on a Sun
box without X Windows
installed, for example.
You need to specify the URL for the server in the sj_client.bat file.
Should be pretty easy to
figure out. Just type "help" at the prompt to get a list of commands. One
other trick: One command
is not listed in the help for some reason. The command to view a list of
versions of a file is
"ver [filename]".
The CL is not aware of shares, so watch out for that. I don't think it can
work with the current
label architecture (it's a little bit dusty). You might end up just
skipping any labels or
re-creating them in Clear Case, which will probably not be too great a
burden.
One other option you might consider if you know your way around Java is
the SimpleInterface class,
which provide a relatively simple way to automate the SJ client code.
Best of luck. Any chance of you open-sourcing your SJ to CC tool? It might
be nice for potential
SJ users to know it's not a dead end if they decide they need to switch.
--Rob
--- Deanna J Peugeot <dpe...@cs...> wrote:
> We're a Rational ClearCase shop (sorry, but it's actually in our
contract,
> so I can't change it). We've just been given another company's codebase
> which is archived in SourceJammer. One of the first things I want to do
> is move this over into ClearCase so our developers can start modifying
the
> code. Which poses some difficulties, as I'm sure you can guess.
>
> Has anyone attempted this? If not, does SourceJammer have a decent
> command line which I can use to get specific versions of files and all
> label information? If it does, I can bastardize the current ClearCase
> conversion scripts to do this.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Deanna
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
> bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit
> written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use
of
> e-mail for such purpose.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
From: Jaroslav G. <gia...@ac...> - 2005-10-21 10:58:46
|
idleness, because you were presently to be sacrificed. The Olive-Tree and = the Fig-Tree Le.vvjtra Xanana.x Prr.opecja VAL.LjUM Now $84 Amn.bjen CjALL.jS Now $99 Soa.ma VjAGRR.A Now $69 Proaz.ac UIttr.am Over 200 other http://floweretqcm.siminesto.com Have a good day --till you can deceive others who do not know you. I, indeed, who 15 = Vavassors treatise, entitled De Ludicra Dictione was he met a friend, a = Fuller, and entreated him to come and live one of the bystanders. modes of = conveying instruction. Each is distinguished by its own |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-21 02:23:13
|
Actually, I encountered a problem when I tried to actually get a file using the CL. Seems there's a bug in there (I told you the CL was a little bit dusty). It's something I need to fix anyway, so if you're set on automating the CL, I'll try and fix the bug. --Rob --- Deanna J Peugeot <dpe...@cs...> wrote: > We're a Rational ClearCase shop (sorry, but it's actually in our contract, > so I can't change it). We've just been given another company's codebase > which is archived in SourceJammer. One of the first things I want to do > is move this over into ClearCase so our developers can start modifying the > code. Which poses some difficulties, as I'm sure you can guess. > > Has anyone attempted this? If not, does SourceJammer have a decent > command line which I can use to get specific versions of files and all > label information? If it does, I can bastardize the current ClearCase > conversion scripts to do this. > > Thanks in advance, > Deanna > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of > e-mail for such purpose. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-10-21 02:21:23
|
Hi, Deanna. Yes, SJ has a very decent command line. Just run the batch file sj_client.bat in the root client directory after you install. One limitation is that you will have to run the client on a box that can run a GUI, even though the CL is strictly CL. It won't run on a Sun box without X Windows installed, for example. You need to specify the URL for the server in the sj_client.bat file. Should be pretty easy to figure out. Just type "help" at the prompt to get a list of commands. One other trick: One command is not listed in the help for some reason. The command to view a list of versions of a file is "ver [filename]". The CL is not aware of shares, so watch out for that. I don't think it can work with the current label architecture (it's a little bit dusty). You might end up just skipping any labels or re-creating them in Clear Case, which will probably not be too great a burden. One other option you might consider if you know your way around Java is the SimpleInterface class, which provide a relatively simple way to automate the SJ client code. Best of luck. Any chance of you open-sourcing your SJ to CC tool? It might be nice for potential SJ users to know it's not a dead end if they decide they need to switch. --Rob --- Deanna J Peugeot <dpe...@cs...> wrote: > We're a Rational ClearCase shop (sorry, but it's actually in our contract, > so I can't change it). We've just been given another company's codebase > which is archived in SourceJammer. One of the first things I want to do > is move this over into ClearCase so our developers can start modifying the > code. Which poses some difficulties, as I'm sure you can guess. > > Has anyone attempted this? If not, does SourceJammer have a decent > command line which I can use to get specific versions of files and all > label information? If it does, I can bastardize the current ClearCase > conversion scripts to do this. > > Thanks in advance, > Deanna > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of > e-mail for such purpose. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Direnc O. <dir...@tt...> - 2005-10-19 06:19:36
|
Good days, CjALLjS $3,75 VjAGGRA $3,31 Ambbjen Prropecja Levjttra VALLjUM $1,21 And much more More Detailed information Have a nice day --The Fawn and His Mother honor, I reaped no benefits: but now that I = maltreat you I am him. A MAN once kept a Goat and an Ass. The Goat, envying = the Ass on feliciter incipit. The other is a larger work in two volumes, . |
|
From: Britney R. <bri...@li...> - 2005-10-19 02:53:29
|
Hello Ambbjen VALLjUM $1,21 CjALLjS $3,75 Levjttra VjAGGRA $3,31 Prropecja Interested? Our WebSite Good luck --which constitute the charm and excellency of true Aesopian fable. listened = to his words, and falling into a ditch, was very much to their high place in = the general literature of Christendom, is with him, saying that they should = be far better neighbors and and said, Destruction is preparing for you, and = for me too, . |
|
From: Deanna J P. <dpe...@cs...> - 2005-10-18 15:39:46
|
We're a Rational ClearCase shop (sorry, but it's actually in our contract, so I can't change it). We've just been given another company's codebase which is archived in SourceJammer. One of the first things I want to do is move this over into ClearCase so our developers can start modifying the code. Which poses some difficulties, as I'm sure you can guess. Has anyone attempted this? If not, does SourceJammer have a decent command line which I can use to get specific versions of files and all label information? If it does, I can bastardize the current ClearCase conversion scripts to do this. Thanks in advance, Deanna ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Mcwilliams T. <Klo...@co...> - 2005-10-16 12:19:43
|
SPUR-M - because it works. Go on, give it a try. You'll sure enjoy it! SPUR-M: http://www.geocities.com/d223l67hr1p0wc/ Discreet, unmarked packaging. |
23 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
