sourcejammer-users — For help with SJ, use this list.

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Please send a Link

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Check out the Quick Start Guide:

http://www.sourcejammer.org/quickstart.html

--Rob


--- pavan kumar <pav...@ya...> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback.   
> Can you please tell me how to setup the
> SourceJammer-Serer.I have installed J2EE 1.4 and
> Tomcat 5.5 versions. Please help me soon.
> 
> Thanking you,
> --Pavan.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...>
> wrote:
> > There is not executable installation at this
> > time--only zip files. All of the downloads are
> > listed
> > on the SJ downloads page:
> > 
> > http://www.sourcejammer.org/download2.1.html
> > 
> > --Rob
> > 
> > 
> > --- pavan kumar <pav...@ya...> wrote:
> > > Hello, 
> > > 
> > > Please can you send me a link to download the
> > > executable Source Jammer Both Server and Client
> > > Versions.
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > --Pavan.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 		
> > > __________________________________ 
> > > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > > Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over
> > 17,000 guides!
> > > http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal
> > Reports XI.
> > > Version 11 adds new functionality designed to
> > reduce time involved in
> > > creating, integrating, and deploying reporting
> > solutions. Free runtime info,
> > > new features, or free trial, at:
> > http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > > Sou...@li...
> > >
> >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 		
> > __________________________________ 
> > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000
> > guides!
> > http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [SourceJammer-users] backup Archive

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hello, Shital.

SourceJammer stores all of its files using its own naming convention, which is actually pretty
simple, but not relavent right now. It does not use the actual name of the file to name it's own
representation of your file. 

If you want a simple to install and set up backup utility, you might want to look at SyncJammer
(another tool I coded a while back). You can get it as http://syncjammer.sourceforge.net

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Shital Patel <shi...@op...> wrote:
> I just found about the sourceJammer and i installed server on suse linux 
> 9.2 (SJ version 2.1)
> Now i have one question.
> 
> How do i take weekly back up of my code. I mean weekly back up of archive.
> 
> I tried to look but looks like SJ changes file name ?
> 
> I am begineer .Please guide me.
> 
> Thanks
> Shital
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
> Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
> creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
> new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[SourceJammer-users] backup Archive

[Shital P. <shi...@op...>]

I just found about the sourceJammer and i installed server on suse linux 
9.2 (SJ version 2.1)
Now i have one question.

How do i take weekly back up of my code. I mean weekly back up of archive.

I tried to look but looks like SJ changes file name ?

I am begineer .Please guide me.

Thanks
Shital

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Please send a Link

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

There is not executable installation at this time--only zip files. All of the downloads are listed
on the SJ downloads page:

http://www.sourcejammer.org/download2.1.html

--Rob


--- pavan kumar <pav...@ya...> wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> Please can you send me a link to download the
> executable Source Jammer Both Server and Client
> Versions.
> 
> Thank you,
> --Pavan.
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
> http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
> Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
> creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
> new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide

[SourceJammer-users] Please send a Link

[pavan k. <pav...@ya...>]

Hello, 

Please can you send me a link to download the
executable Source Jammer Both Server and Client
Versions.

Thank you,
--Pavan.


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide

Re: [SourceJammer-users] SJEclipse plug-in doesn't work

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Michael, I know this will not sound very helpful to you, but I just did a new installation of
Eclipse 3.0 and downloaded SJ Eclipse from the update site, restarted Eclipse, and SJ Eclipse
worked flawlessly. 

I really don't know what the problem you're having might be. From what the message sounds like, it
almost seems that Eclipse can't actually find the SJ Eclipse jar file, which makes no sense at
all.

Does anyone else out there have any thoughts? Has anyone experienced a problem like this?

A thought just occurred to me. I'm using Eclipse 3.0.2. You're using  3.0.0. Could that account
for the problem?

--Rob



--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> The only restriction on JRE is 1.4 or later. You should be fine with your setup, but obviouly
> there's a problem. Sorry I have not had a chance to do the "clean room" install of the plugin
> myself. I'll see if I can get to that this morning.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> 
> --- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hello Robert, thanks for the answer.
> > 
> > My experience with the -clean Option is also not the best. I have read a
> > thread with a similar problem (but other plug In) where the problem has
> > been solved by using the -clean option. In my case of course the problem
> > occurs with a normal start of eclipse.
> > 
> > I have another installation of eclipse on a separate machine (Win2K) where
> > the problem almost is the same. Is there a constraint in using a special
> > Java Version? I'm using the Java 2 SDK  1.4, my JRE is the Java 2 Runtime
> > Standard 1.4.2_04.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> > Michael
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Has anyone else had this problem? It sounds like everything should be
> > working, Michael (though,
> > actually, I'm not familiar with the -clean option and am not sure why you
> > had to launch Eclipse
> > this way). I'll try a fresh "clean room" install of SJ Eclipse to see if I
> > experience anything
> > similar, though.
> > 
> > --Rob
> > 
> > 
> > --- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've installed the SourceJammerPlugin 1.0.1 in my Eclipse environment via
> > > the Eclipse Update Site Feature. After launching Eclipse (with -clean
> > > option) I wanted to open the preference page for SJEclipse but I got the
> > > error
> > >
> > > "Unable to create the selected preference page"
> > >
> > > with the reason
> > >
> > > "Plug-in org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse was unable to load class
> > > org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse.PreferencePage"
> > >
> > > I'm using Eclipse 3.0.0.
> > >
> > > Any help available?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > > Sou...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> > >
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > Sou...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

Re: [SourceJammer-users] SJEclipse plug-in doesn't work

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

The only restriction on JRE is 1.4 or later. You should be fine with your setup, but obviouly
there's a problem. Sorry I have not had a chance to do the "clean room" install of the plugin
myself. I'll see if I can get to that this morning.

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Robert, thanks for the answer.
> 
> My experience with the -clean Option is also not the best. I have read a
> thread with a similar problem (but other plug In) where the problem has
> been solved by using the -clean option. In my case of course the problem
> occurs with a normal start of eclipse.
> 
> I have another installation of eclipse on a separate machine (Win2K) where
> the problem almost is the same. Is there a constraint in using a special
> Java Version? I'm using the Java 2 SDK  1.4, my JRE is the Java 2 Runtime
> Standard 1.4.2_04.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone else had this problem? It sounds like everything should be
> working, Michael (though,
> actually, I'm not familiar with the -clean option and am not sure why you
> had to launch Eclipse
> this way). I'll try a fresh "clean room" install of SJ Eclipse to see if I
> experience anything
> similar, though.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> 
> --- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've installed the SourceJammerPlugin 1.0.1 in my Eclipse environment via
> > the Eclipse Update Site Feature. After launching Eclipse (with -clean
> > option) I wanted to open the preference page for SJEclipse but I got the
> > error
> >
> > "Unable to create the selected preference page"
> >
> > with the reason
> >
> > "Plug-in org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse was unable to load class
> > org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse.PreferencePage"
> >
> > I'm using Eclipse 3.0.0.
> >
> > Any help available?
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > Sou...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> >
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [SourceJammer-users] SJEclipse plug-in doesn't work

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Has anyone else had this problem? It sounds like everything should be working, Michael (though,
actually, I'm not familiar with the -clean option and am not sure why you had to launch Eclipse
this way). I'll try a fresh "clean room" install of SJ Eclipse to see if I experience anything
similar, though.

--Rob


--- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've installed the SourceJammerPlugin 1.0.1 in my Eclipse environment via
> the Eclipse Update Site Feature. After launching Eclipse (with -clean
> option) I wanted to open the preference page for SJEclipse but I got the
> error
> 
> "Unable to create the selected preference page"
> 
> with the reason
> 
> "Plug-in org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse was unable to load class
> org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse.PreferencePage"
> 
> I'm using Eclipse 3.0.0.
> 
> Any help available?
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[SourceJammer-users] SJEclipse plug-in doesn't work

[Michael G. <mgo...@cs...>]

Hello,

I've installed the SourceJammerPlugin 1.0.1 in my Eclipse environment via
the Eclipse Update Site Feature. After launching Eclipse (with -clean
option) I wanted to open the preference page for SJEclipse but I got the
error

"Unable to create the selected preference page"

with the reason

"Plug-in org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse was unable to load class
org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse.PreferencePage"

I'm using Eclipse 3.0.0.

Any help available?

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer Server Performance

[Stan W. <won...@ya...>]

Hi Rob, Brant,

I remember reading a while back that a potential
source of slowness was how you have your DNS set up to
resolve names.  The symptom was that external
references were quick to resolve while local
references were very slow.

I'm sorry that I can't remember what the exact problem
and solution were but this may be something to look
into.

Stan Wong

--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...>
wrote:
> Don't really know that the cause could be. I have
> not tested SJ with Java 1.5, yet, so it's
> possible that there's an issue there, but that does
> not seem likely. 
> 
> One thing you could do is check your appstats page:
> http://[sj host
> url:port]/sourcejammer/AppStats
> 
> This will show the amount of memory available to
> SJ's JVM, among other things. Might be of
> interest.
> 
> Another possible question is, how much stuff is in
> your SJ archives? How many files, all together.
> If you have a lot of files (more than 1000) that you
> look at on a regular basis, SJ might need to
> read the meta data from disk more often than is
> optimal (as opposed to reading in from the
> in-memory cache). Keep in mind, also, that when you
> re-start your server, it will have to re-build
> the cache. This could mean that the first time you
> view the contents of a given folder, that the
> contents will seem to load slowly. The next time you
> view that folder, though, it should load much
> more quickly.
> 
> And in case you're wondering, it is possible to
> increas the cache size. Check the docs section of
> the sourcejammer.org site.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> --- bra...@ch... wrote:
> > Robert,
> > 
> > The issue seems to be with my server. When I
> connect to the the SourceJammer development server
> > (http://dev.sourcejammer.org.....) I get really
> good performance. However, when I connect to my
> > server on my local network I get really pour
> performance. This even occurs when I  open the
> > SourceJammer client on the server machine and
> connect to the archive. I am running one instance
> > of the SJ server. Could it be something in the
> Tomcat configuration? (I am using the default
> > config files)
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Brant K. Kyser
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
> Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype.
> Start reading now.
>
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

[SourceJammer-users] Re: Fw: SJ error

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Look in the archives/[archive name]/plugin-work/event-logger. There's a log file for each day. It
is in kind of a funky format because it is intended that this log will be machine readable and be
used for generating reports and other functionality at some point in the future.

This should tell you every single change that SJ made to your archive on any given day.

--Rob


--- Kev...@re... wrote:
> Hello Rob,
> 
> We had our Sys Admin person manually replace the file on the server. After 
> that, we were able to get the file and compile from a local server.  We're 
> going to try a build on another server for the ultimate test.
> 
> Yes, it's kind of strange how that file disappeared.  We suspect maybe 
> there was a network glitch when a developer was checking it in or 
> something.  Last week was a time, when the project was coming to a 
> stopping point.  A lot of files were being checked-in and out, perhaps 
> someone checked-in a bunch at one time, and did not notice if there was a 
> problem.  This is just a guess.
> 
> btw, are there any logs kept by SourceJammer that we could access? 
> 
> Thanks for your help
> 
> Kevin Cloudt
> 770-806-2648
> kev...@re...
> 
> 
> 
> Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> 
> 04/11/2005 05:01 PM
> 
> To
> Kev...@re...
> cc
> 
> Subject
> Re: Fw: SJ error
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> That might fix the problem, but the real question is, why did this happen 
> in the first place? Why
> did a file that should exist suddenly get deleted? It could be that this 
> file actually should NOT
> exist and SJ is confused in thinking that it should. 
> 
> I can't really say why this would be, but maybe someone was checking a 
> file in to SJ and got
> interrupted (lost network connection or some such thing). SJ is not the 
> best at handling these
> sorts of errors (though this is something that will be addressed in the 
> next release). It's
> possible that SJ would create a reference to that file number in the file 
> meta data, but not
> actually create the file.
> 
> I've never had anything like this happen to me, so I'm only guessing. My 
> first impulse is always
> to bounce the SJ server application and see if that makes a problem like 
> this go away. You might
> want to try that. 
> 
> But, in theory, if you know what the source in question should be, you 
> could manually place it in
> the right spot and fix everything.
> 
> Let me know what happens.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> --- Kev...@re... wrote:
> > Hello Rob,
> > 
> > I've got a few more details.  We were able to figure out what file 26891 
> 
> > is supposed to be.  One of the developers removed that file from his PC 
> > and was able to recreate the "....26891 (no such file or directory)" 
> > error.  So we're confident that we know which file disappeared from the 
> SJ 
> > server.  What's strange is this, if one of us tries to check that file 
> > back in from our own PC, we get the above error.
> > 
> > What do you think that we should do to try to fix this?
> > 
> > We've considered going to the actual location of the file on the SJ 
> server 
> > and just recreating it there.  What do you think about that solution?
> > 
> > Thanks for you assistance!
> > 
> > -Kevin
> > 
> > Kevin Cloudt
> > 770-806-2648
> > kev...@re...
> > ----- Forwarded by Kevin Cloudt/Regulus on 04/11/2005 04:38 PM -----
> > 
> > Kevin Cloudt/Regulus 
> > 04/11/2005 04:29 PM
> > 
> > To
> > rob...@ya...
> > cc
> > 
> > Subject
> > SJ error 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Rob,
> > 
> > You've been really responsive in the past concerning SJ questions, and 
> for 
> > that, Thanks! We're getting an SJ error, please see below:
> > 
> > 
> > C:\cygwin\home\MichaelHorner\build.xml:74: Exception in getting project. 
> 
> > Error: IOException. 
> > /usr/local/sourcejammer/server/archives/nas01/source/26891 (No such file 
> 
> > or directory) 
> > 
> > I've verified that the filename 26891 does not exist.  I did find files 
> > 26892 and 26890.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Kevin Cloudt
> > 770-806-2648
> > kev...@re...
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer Server Performance

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Don't really know that the cause could be. I have not tested SJ with Java 1.5, yet, so it's
possible that there's an issue there, but that does not seem likely. 

One thing you could do is check your appstats page: http://[sj host
url:port]/sourcejammer/AppStats

This will show the amount of memory available to SJ's JVM, among other things. Might be of
interest.

Another possible question is, how much stuff is in your SJ archives? How many files, all together.
If you have a lot of files (more than 1000) that you look at on a regular basis, SJ might need to
read the meta data from disk more often than is optimal (as opposed to reading in from the
in-memory cache). Keep in mind, also, that when you re-start your server, it will have to re-build
the cache. This could mean that the first time you view the contents of a given folder, that the
contents will seem to load slowly. The next time you view that folder, though, it should load much
more quickly.

And in case you're wondering, it is possible to increas the cache size. Check the docs section of
the sourcejammer.org site.

--Rob

--- bra...@ch... wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> The issue seems to be with my server. When I connect to the the SourceJammer development server
> (http://dev.sourcejammer.org.....) I get really good performance. However, when I connect to my
> server on my local network I get really pour performance. This even occurs when I  open the
> SourceJammer client on the server machine and connect to the archive. I am running one instance
> of the SJ server. Could it be something in the Tomcat configuration? (I am using the default
> config files)
> 
> --
> 
> Brant K. Kyser
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer Server Performance

[<bra...@ch...>]

Robert,

The issue seems to be with my server. When I connect to the the SourceJammer development server (http://dev.sourcejammer.org.....) I get really good performance. However, when I connect to my server on my local network I get really pour performance. This even occurs when I  open the SourceJammer client on the server machine and connect to the archive. I am running one instance of the SJ server. Could it be something in the Tomcat configuration? (I am using the default config files)

--

Brant K. Kyser

--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:

Hi, Brant.

I want to make sure I understand what's going on. Do you have one instance of that SJ server that
is running or two? In other words, is the problem with how you connect to the server (over the
internet vs. over a local network) or with the server itself? 

I can't think of anything obvious that would cause SJ itself to run slow. However, a network
latency could cause slow performance. 

I'm sorry if that is not very helpful, but I'm really not sure what to tell you.

By the way, thanks for your nice words about SJ.

--Rob


--- Brant Kyser <bra...@ch...> wrote:

>> Robert,
>> 
>> I have setup a server for SourceJammer for the software development 
>> company that I am try to start. However, I seem to be getting really 
>> pour performance. I was wondering if you could point me to any resources 
>> to correct the problem. When connecting to the SourceJamer archive over 
>> the internet from one of the client machines I get amazing performance; 
>> however, when I connect to my local server, it takes several seconds to 
>> populate the file lists, etc everytime you click on something. The 
>> server I'm running it on is a AMD Athlon 1700+ with 768MB of RAM running 
>> Fedora Core 3, Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.7 and Java 1.5.1_01.
>> 
>> BTW: Thanks for such a great open source product. It really seems to be 
>> on par with VERY expense products like Perforce!!!!
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Brant K. Kyser

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hello, Harry.

Since SourceJammer is a java product, it can run under any OS for which there is a Java virtual
machine. This means SJ runs under Windows, Linux, Unix, and Mac. 

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Har...@ya... wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> Could y ou please let me know over which environments your product 
> operates.  We run both Windows and AIX (UNIX) development environments and 
> need to manage software code in both - preferable via the one product. (We 
> do not currently have a DOS file system emulation on UNIX ie Samba).
> 
> thanks,
> 
> ------------------------------------------------
> Harry Meadows
> Software Development Team Lead
> YAKKA
> Australia
> Tel: + 61 (0)3 9279 1660
> har...@ya...
> Mob: +61 (0)408 504499


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer Server Performance

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, Brant.

I want to make sure I understand what's going on. Do you have one instance of that SJ server that
is running or two? In other words, is the problem with how you connect to the server (over the
internet vs. over a local network) or with the server itself? 

I can't think of anything obvious that would cause SJ itself to run slow. However, a network
latency could cause slow performance. 

I'm sorry if that is not very helpful, but I'm really not sure what to tell you.

By the way, thanks for your nice words about SJ.

--Rob


--- Brant Kyser <bra...@ch...> wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> I have setup a server for SourceJammer for the software development 
> company that I am try to start. However, I seem to be getting really 
> pour performance. I was wondering if you could point me to any resources 
> to correct the problem. When connecting to the SourceJamer archive over 
> the internet from one of the client machines I get amazing performance; 
> however, when I connect to my local server, it takes several seconds to 
> populate the file lists, etc everytime you click on something. The 
> server I'm running it on is a AMD Athlon 1700+ with 768MB of RAM running 
> Fedora Core 3, Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.7 and Java 1.5.1_01.
> 
> BTW: Thanks for such a great open source product. It really seems to be 
> on par with VERY expense products like Perforce!!!!
> 
> -- 
> 
> Brant K. Kyser
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date: 4/7/2005
> 
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Considering SourceJammer

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, Mark.

Glad you like SourceJammer and I hope you decide to use it.

As for the GPL/GLPL thing: there is a slight problem with the GPL build. I assure you that it is
the GPL release that you have if the file name says gpl. But this release is not configured by
default to use the Gnu Diff algorithm. You should be able to fix this, though.

Modify your conf.xml file (on your server and all of your clients) by adding the following:

<DiffAlgorithmClass>JLibDiff.GnuDiffAlgorithm</DiffAlgorithmClass>

That should tell the system to use the Gnu Diff engine.

Give it a try and let me know if it works out.

As for the SCC api--I have no information on that. I can't remember who said they were working on
that and I have not heard anything about it for a long time. The best thing I can offer you is the
new Eclipse plugin. I could also offer my own guidance if someone on your team felt like
contributing that to the project. It probably would not be horribly difficult.

Thanks.

--Rob

--- Mark Borgelt <mar...@la...> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am a programmer/analyst with a small company in New Mexico, USA. We
> have a very small IT staff with a lot of different code to manage and we
> are seriously considering SourceJammer for the job. We downloaded the
> 2.1.0.0 (GPL release?) and got a test environment running with very
> little trouble. We're using a linix server with windows clients (java
> 1.5.0_02) and have been evaluating the system for about a week with
> pretty good results. We like several aspects of the system, but need to
> know a couple things before going forward.
> 
> After installation, we discovered we had the LGPL release even though
> the download claimed to be GPL. We have tried downloading from several
> different locations, but always seem to end up with the LGPL version. At
> first we didn't think this would matter, but have since stumbled over
> the issue of text differencing engines and file size limitations. In our
> environment we have some source files that need to be treated as text
> files, but could grow to a size where the text differencing will fail.
> It appears this issue is resolved by the GPL text diff engine
> (correct?), but where can we get this release? Hope this is not just
> something stupid that I'm doing...
> 
> What is the status of an SCC api for SourceJammer? I read in the users
> mail archive that someone was developing this for use with TOAD, but
> couldn't find anything about the current status of that project. We use
> a couple products that support this interface and it would make a nice
> integration for us.
> Thanks for any help you can give us. And many thanks to the development
> team for a cool, open source product!
> Best regards,
> Mark Borgelt
> Laguna Industries, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

[SourceJammer-users] Considering SourceJammer

[Mark B. <mar...@la...>]

Hello,

I am a programmer/analyst with a small company in New Mexico, USA. We
have a very small IT staff with a lot of different code to manage and we
are seriously considering SourceJammer for the job. We downloaded the
2.1.0.0 (GPL release?) and got a test environment running with very
little trouble. We're using a linix server with windows clients (java
1.5.0_02) and have been evaluating the system for about a week with
pretty good results. We like several aspects of the system, but need to
know a couple things before going forward.

After installation, we discovered we had the LGPL release even though
the download claimed to be GPL. We have tried downloading from several
different locations, but always seem to end up with the LGPL version. At
first we didn't think this would matter, but have since stumbled over
the issue of text differencing engines and file size limitations. In our
environment we have some source files that need to be treated as text
files, but could grow to a size where the text differencing will fail.
It appears this issue is resolved by the GPL text diff engine
(correct?), but where can we get this release? Hope this is not just
something stupid that I'm doing...

What is the status of an SCC api for SourceJammer? I read in the users
mail archive that someone was developing this for use with TOAD, but
couldn't find anything about the current status of that project. We use
a couple products that support this interface and it would make a nice
integration for us.
Thanks for any help you can give us. And many thanks to the development
team for a cool, open source product!
Best regards,
Mark Borgelt
Laguna Industries, Inc.

AW: [SourceJammer-users] Error!!

[<And...@rt...>]

Ola Luis,

i had a similar problem some time ago.

Check the file sourcejammer/server/filesys/users.xml
for corrupt entries, such as empty attributes, special characters, ...

Do you remeber the last user you created or changed? Maybe it could be=20
helpful to check the data of that user first within the users.xml.


Good Luck!

Andreas


____________________________________________________________

Andreas Schmeiler
IT-Projektmanager

=20

RTL online=20

RTL interactive GmbH

Postfach 30 11 93 =B7 D=B750781 K=F6ln
Am Coloneum 1 =B7 D=B750829 K=F6ln=20
Tel =B7 0221 / 780-5122=20
Fax =B7 0221 / 780-5109

E-Mail =B7 and...@rt...

=20


=20

=20

"Free will is an illusion. People always choose the perceived path of =
greatest pleasure."=20
(Dogbert, the evil human resources consultant)








> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: sou...@li...=20
> [mailto:sou...@li...] Im=20
> Auftrag von Luis Castillo
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2005 17:17
> An: sou...@li...
> Cc: Oscar Turcios
> Betreff: [SourceJammer-users] Error!!
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Hi Robert,
>=20
> I have an error when I create an user on SourceJammer. The=20
> problem occurs
> when I try to assign archives pesmission (Mantain Archive=20
> User) to an user,
> the applications shows the following
>=20
> (Embedded image moved to file: pic30836.jpg)
>=20
>=20
> Any help you can provide me I'll appreciate
>=20
> Thanks in advance
>=20
> Saludos,
>=20
> Luis Castillo
> UEA Operaciones
> Zurich Seguros S.A.
> Telf. +58 (212) 9010908
> http://www.zurich.com.ve

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Error!!

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hello, Luis.

A little bit more information might help me figure this out for you.

What version of SourceJammer are you using? Have you tried looking for a server-side stack-trace
on the error message by looking in the log file of the servlet container where your SJ server
runs?

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Luis Castillo <lui...@ve...> wrote:
> 
> Hi Robert,
> 
> I have an error when I create an user on SourceJammer. The problem occurs
> when I try to assign archives pesmission (Mantain Archive User) to an user,
> the applications shows the following
> 
> (Embedded image moved to file: pic30836.jpg)
> 
> 
> Any help you can provide me I'll appreciate
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> Saludos,
> 
> Luis Castillo
> UEA Operaciones
> Zurich Seguros S.A.
> Telf. +58 (212) 9010908
> http://www.zurich.com.ve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ******************* FAVOR LEER ESTA NOTA *******************
> Este mensaje  y sus anexos pueden ser confidenciales o legalmente
> privilegiados.   El mismo se dirige a la(s) persona(s) nombrada(s)
> quien(quienes)
> es(son) el(los) único(s) destinatario(s) autorizado(s).  Si este mensaje le
> ha llegado por error,  por favor destrúyalo sin revisarlo y/o diseminarlo y
> notifique al
> remitente inmediatamente.
> Es importante notar que este mensaje no crea ningún contrato, compromiso
> y/u obligación legal por lo cual no asumimos responsabilidad.   Igualmente,
> no
> asumimos responsabilidad por daños causados por parte de terceros que
> puedan resultar en la modificación, falsificación y/o pérdida de mensajes.
> 
> ******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
> This message, along with any attachments, may be confidential or legally
> privileged.  It is intended only for the named person(s), who is/are the
> only
> authorized recipient(s). If this message has reached you in error, please
> destroy it without review and/or dissemination and notify the sender
> immediately.
> It is important to note that this message does not create any contract
> and/or legal obligation for which we assume any responsability.  Also, we
> do not assume
> responsability for damages caused by third persons which could result in
> the modification, falsification or loss of any messages.


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. 
http://personals.yahoo.com

[SourceJammer-users] Error!!

[Luis C. <lui...@ve...>]

Hi Robert,

I have an error when I create an user on SourceJammer. The problem occu=
rs
when I try to assign archives pesmission (Mantain Archive User) to an u=
ser,
the applications shows the following

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30836.jpg)


Any help you can provide me I'll appreciate

Thanks in advance

Saludos,

Luis Castillo
UEA Operaciones
Zurich Seguros S.A.
Telf. +58 (212) 9010908
http://www.zurich.com.ve






******************* FAVOR LEER ESTA NOTA *******************
Este mensaje  y sus anexos pueden ser confidenciales o legalmente
privilegiados.   El mismo se dirige a la(s) persona(s) nombrada(s)
quien(quienes)
es(son) el(los) =FAnico(s) destinatario(s) autorizado(s).  Si este mens=
aje le
ha llegado por error,  por favor destr=FAyalo sin revisarlo y/o disemin=
arlo y
notifique al
remitente inmediatamente.
Es importante notar que este mensaje no crea ning=FAn contrato, comprom=
iso
y/u obligaci=F3n legal por lo cual no asumimos responsabilidad.   Igual=
mente,
no
asumimos responsabilidad por da=F1os causados por parte de terceros que=

puedan resultar en la modificaci=F3n, falsificaci=F3n y/o p=E9rdida de =
mensajes.

******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
This message, along with any attachments, may be confidential or legall=
y
privileged.  It is intended only for the named person(s), who is/are th=
e
only
authorized recipient(s). If this message has reached you in error, plea=
se
destroy it without review and/or dissemination and notify the sender
immediately.
It is important to note that this message does not create any contract
and/or legal obligation for which we assume any responsability.  Also, =
we
do not assume
responsability for damages caused by third persons which could result i=
n
the modification, falsification or loss of any messages.=

[SourceJammer-users] Re: Qs about SourceJammer

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hello, Nadir.

There is no database. SJ stores all files directly on the filesystem (which makes setup pretty
easy, I think).

Your SJ archives can be accessed via a web browser, but that is for read operations only. No
checkins/outs through a web interface. Regardless, SJ does need to run in a servlet contianer
(such as Tomcat) because it uses SOAP as its rpc protocol.

All the documentation is available on the docs page at http://www.sourcejammer.org

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Nadir Sherali <na...@ya...> wrote:
> Hi, Bob,
> 
> We came across your product, SourceJammer, on the web and
> would like to know the following.
> 
> 1. Does sourceJammer archive the files in a database? If
> so, what type of database is required?
> 
> 2. Can sourceJammer be used from a web browser?  If so,
> does it mean that the sourceJammer server needs to be
> installed/configured for a Web-server (e.g Apache Tomcat)?
> Can you point us to a installation/configuration document?
> 
> Thanks
> Nadir -
> 
> 
> Nadir Sherali 
> Email: na...@ya... 
> 
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger 
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. 
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, Ian.

Please note that the version of the client you're using is a new beta release and might not be
completely stable yet. You might want to start out using the 2.1.1.0 client.

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Albert Moliner <amo...@ev...> wrote:
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Stephenson Ian 
>   To: Albert Moliner 
>   Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:51 AM
>   Subject: RE: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message
> 
> 
>   Hallo Albert,
> 
>    
> 
>   Many thanks for such a quick reply.  I changed the L&F to Kunststoff and everything is working
> well now.  I found the installation, both server & client, to be relatively easy.  Also, this
> was the first time installing Tomcat so I’m happy with the result.  I’ve looked at other version
> control systems (e.g. subversion, cvsnt) and found them just too difficult set up and nobody
> that I work with is willing to commit to a product that does not have a GUI.  So far there have
> been no further problems however during the next week I will begin to actually use the
> application.
> 
>    
> 
>   Cheers,
> 
>   Ian
> 
>    
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message

[Albert M. <amo...@ev...>]

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Stephenson Ian=20
  To: Albert Moliner=20
  Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:51 AM
  Subject: RE: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message


  Hallo Albert,

  =20

  Many thanks for such a quick reply.  I changed the L&F to Kunststoff =
and everything is working well now.  I found the installation, both =
server & client, to be relatively easy.  Also, this was the first time =
installing Tomcat so I=92m happy with the result.  I=92ve looked at =
other version control systems (e.g. subversion, cvsnt) and found them =
just too difficult set up and nobody that I work with is willing to =
commit to a product that does not have a GUI.  So far there have been no =
further problems however during the next week I will begin to actually =
use the application.

  =20

  Cheers,

  Ian

  =20


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

  From: Albert Moliner [mailto:amo...@ev...]=20
  Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2005 8:54 PM
  To: Stephenson Ian; sou...@li...
  Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message

  =20

  This error was just reported yesterday in the devel list. If you =
choose any other L&F in the preferences dialog, you should not get that =
alert. Mind, though, that someone has also had trouble with one of the =
L&Fs whose name begins with an 'M' (sorry for the lack of precission, =
blame Marc Palmer for that 8-P), despite I haven't been able to =
reproduce it.

  =20

  There's also a sort of open issue about the .source.jam files location =
(don't worry if you don't know what the hell I am talking about), so =
wait until a new version with a correction for that is released before =
playing with it.

  =20

  Have you found any other problem after your email? You must like risk, =
to use a beta version... ;-)

  =20

  Thanks,

  Albert.

  =20

    ----- Original Message -----=20

    From: Stephenson Ian=20

    To: sou...@li...=20

    Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:50 AM

    Subject: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message

    =20

    I am using the latest Windows client 2.1.2.0 beta (March 24, 2005) =
on a Win2K pc.  When executing the client using either sj_gui.bat or =
sourcejammer.exe, the following error is reported:

    =20

    com.jgoodies.plaf.windows.ExtWindowsLookAndFeel

    =20

    I select OK from the error dialogue box and everything continues on =
as expected.

    =20

    =20

    =20

    =20

    --
    No virus found in this outgoing message.
    Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
    Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.5 - Release Date: =
29/03/2005



  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/2005




  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/2005

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message

[Marc P. <ma...@an...>]

Albert Moliner wrote:
> This error was just reported yesterday in the devel list. If you
> choose any other L&F in the preferences dialog, you should not get
> that alert. Mind, though, that someone has also had trouble with one
> of the L&Fs whose name begins with an 'M' (sorry for the lack of
> precission, blame Marc Palmer for that 8-P), despite I haven't been
> able to reproduce it.

[This is ref SJ beta 2.1.2]

Haha, cheeky :)

It's "Metouia". If I try to go back to preferences and look at the font 
or LAF combo box, they don't pop up when you click the button, and the 
SJ console shows:

Exception occurred during event dispatching:
java.lang.NullPointerException
         at 
net.sourceforge.mlf.metouia.MetouiaScrollPaneUI.paint(MetouiaScrollPa
neUI.java:89)
         at javax.swing.plaf.ComponentUI.update(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paintComponent(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paint(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paintChildren(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paint(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paintChildren(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paint(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paintChildren(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paint(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JLayeredPane.paint(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paintChildren(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paintWithOffscreenBuffer(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paintDoubleBuffered(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.paint(Unknown Source)


See :(

-- 
Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
			
Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
   ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message

[Albert M. <amo...@ev...>]

This error was just reported yesterday in the devel list. If you choose =
any other L&F in the preferences dialog, you should not get that alert. =
Mind, though, that someone has also had trouble with one of the L&Fs =
whose name begins with an 'M' (sorry for the lack of precission, blame =
Marc Palmer for that 8-P), despite I haven't been able to reproduce it.

There's also a sort of open issue about the .source.jam files location =
(don't worry if you don't know what the hell I am talking about), so =
wait until a new version with a correction for that is released before =
playing with it.

Have you found any other problem after your email? You must like risk, =
to use a beta version... ;-)

Thanks,
Albert.

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Stephenson Ian=20
  To: sou...@li...=20
  Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:50 AM
  Subject: [SourceJammer-users] Client Error Message


  I am using the latest Windows client 2.1.2.0 beta (March 24, 2005) on =
a Win2K pc.  When executing the client using either sj_gui.bat or =
sourcejammer.exe, the following error is reported:

  =20

  com.jgoodies.plaf.windows.ExtWindowsLookAndFeel

  =20

  I select OK from the error dialogue box and everything continues on as =
expected.

  =20

  =20

  =20



  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.5 - Release Date: 29/03/2005