sourcejammer-users — For help with SJ, use this list.

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up

[Veronica L B. <Ver...@in...>]

Rob:

Thanks for the information.  I did untar the client download in a clean 
area, change the LAF in the clientconf.xml file then start the gui up but 
still get the error.  The java managed user preference file?  Is it in the 
sourcejammer directory?

Thanks!
Ronni





Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> 
05/12/2005 11:14 AM

To
Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...>, 
sou...@li...
cc

Subject
Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up






The LAF setting in clientconf is only used the very first time you start 
your SJ client. After
that, this value gets written to a user preferences file managed by Java. 
The setting in
clientconf no longer applies. 

If kunststoff is the default LAF in the Linux client download, well, I 
don't know why it's trying
to load the Windows LAF on startup. I'll have to take a look. I no longer 
have a linux machine
around to play with, so I may not have tested the Linux client release as 
thoroughly as I should
have.

--Rob


--- Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...> wrote:
> Hey Rob!  Thanks for the help. 
> 
> I'm using the client-2.1.0.0 download.
> 
> It might not be THAT easy for me to modify the LAF in the config file - 
> I'm pretty dumb!     :-)      I have, however tried to look through what 

> comes in the tar file and I see this line in the clientconf.xml file:
> 
> <InitialLookAndFeel>kunststoff</InitialLookAndFeel>
> 
> But when I cancel past the error message and splash screen and actually 
> look at what's in the preferences the Look and Feel is defaulted in the 
> app to "windows".  Changing this takes care of the error at start up. 
But 
> if I change the LAF in the clientconf.xml file to something like "metal" 

> and look at the preferences in the app there is no change - it still 
says 
> kunststoff.
> 
> On my windows box - the clientconf.xml file comes with "windows".  I can 

> change the LAF in the clientconf to "metal" and look at the preferences 
> and it still says "windows".
> 
> I hope all this info helps some.  Maybe I'm using clientconf when I 
should 
> be using just conf but I can see both are being used at startup.
> 
> Thanks again!
> (and sorry!  I'm sending this email from my Windows box and I've been 
told 
> my mail client puts some extra junk on it so I apologize up front - it's 

> not a virus - just some lame attempts at adding pictures)
> 
> Ronni
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> 
> 05/12/2005 10:04 AM
> 
> To
> Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...>, 
> sou...@li...
> cc
> 
> Subject
> Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start 
up
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Veronica. 
> 
> Could you tell me the exact version of the SJ client you're having this 
> problem with? 
> 
> Regardless, it should be fairly easy for you to modify the default LAF 
in 
> the config file and
> rebuild the tar, if you have to.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> 
> --- Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...> wrote:
> > I need some advice on the look and feel default settings.  The tar 
file 
> is 
> > set to "windows" which causes and error on my Linux box.  I have 
> installed 
> > both the Windows and Linux versions exploring the differences to see 
if 
> > there is something missing.  I can change the look and feel then the 
> error 
> > goes away but I have a couple of Linux users that are going to install 

> and 
> > I had hoped they could avoid the error since I am not certain how to 
> > explain the error and work around to them over the distance.
> > 
> > Thank you!  I really do appreciate the support?
> > Ronni
> 
> 
> 
> Discover Yahoo! 
> Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it 
out! 
> http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html
> 
> 


 
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

The LAF setting in clientconf is only used the very first time you start your SJ client. After
that, this value gets written to a user preferences file managed by Java. The setting in
clientconf no longer applies. 

If kunststoff is the default LAF in the Linux client download, well, I don't know why it's trying
to load the Windows LAF on startup. I'll have to take a look. I no longer have a linux machine
around to play with, so I may not have tested the Linux client release as thoroughly as I should
have.

--Rob


--- Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...> wrote:
> Hey Rob!  Thanks for the help. 
> 
> I'm using the client-2.1.0.0 download.
> 
> It might not be THAT easy for me to modify the LAF in the config file - 
> I'm pretty dumb!     :-)      I have, however tried to look through what 
> comes in the tar file and I see this line in the clientconf.xml file:
> 
> <InitialLookAndFeel>kunststoff</InitialLookAndFeel>
> 
> But when I cancel past the error message and splash screen and actually 
> look at what's in the preferences the Look and Feel is defaulted in the 
> app to "windows".  Changing this takes care of the error at start up.  But 
> if I change the LAF in the clientconf.xml file to something like "metal" 
> and look at the preferences in the app there is no change - it still says 
> kunststoff.
> 
> On my windows box - the clientconf.xml file comes with "windows".  I can 
> change the LAF in the clientconf to "metal" and look at the preferences 
> and it still says "windows".
> 
> I hope all this info helps some.  Maybe I'm using clientconf when I should 
> be using just conf but I can see both are being used at startup.
> 
> Thanks again!
> (and sorry!  I'm sending this email from my Windows box and I've been told 
> my mail client puts some extra junk on it so I apologize up front - it's 
> not a virus - just some lame attempts at adding pictures)
> 
> Ronni
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> 
> 05/12/2005 10:04 AM
> 
> To
> Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...>, 
> sou...@li...
> cc
> 
> Subject
> Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, Veronica. 
> 
> Could you tell me the exact version of the SJ client you're having this 
> problem with? 
> 
> Regardless, it should be fairly easy for you to modify the default LAF in 
> the config file and
> rebuild the tar, if you have to.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> 
> --- Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...> wrote:
> > I need some advice on the look and feel default settings.  The tar file 
> is 
> > set to "windows" which causes and error on my Linux box.  I have 
> installed 
> > both the Windows and Linux versions exploring the differences to see if 
> > there is something missing.  I can change the look and feel then the 
> error 
> > goes away but I have a couple of Linux users that are going to install 
> and 
> > I had hoped they could avoid the error since I am not certain how to 
> > explain the error and work around to them over the distance.
> > 
> > Thank you!  I really do appreciate the support?
> > Ronni
> 
> 
>  
> Discover Yahoo! 
> Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out! 
> http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html
> 
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up

[Veronica L B. <Ver...@in...>]

Hey Rob!  Thanks for the help. 

I'm using the client-2.1.0.0 download.

It might not be THAT easy for me to modify the LAF in the config file - 
I'm pretty dumb!     :-)      I have, however tried to look through what 
comes in the tar file and I see this line in the clientconf.xml file:

<InitialLookAndFeel>kunststoff</InitialLookAndFeel>

But when I cancel past the error message and splash screen and actually 
look at what's in the preferences the Look and Feel is defaulted in the 
app to "windows".  Changing this takes care of the error at start up.  But 
if I change the LAF in the clientconf.xml file to something like "metal" 
and look at the preferences in the app there is no change - it still says 
kunststoff.

On my windows box - the clientconf.xml file comes with "windows".  I can 
change the LAF in the clientconf to "metal" and look at the preferences 
and it still says "windows".

I hope all this info helps some.  Maybe I'm using clientconf when I should 
be using just conf but I can see both are being used at startup.

Thanks again!
(and sorry!  I'm sending this email from my Windows box and I've been told 
my mail client puts some extra junk on it so I apologize up front - it's 
not a virus - just some lame attempts at adding pictures)

Ronni






Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> 
05/12/2005 10:04 AM

To
Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...>, 
sou...@li...
cc

Subject
Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up






Hi, Veronica. 

Could you tell me the exact version of the SJ client you're having this 
problem with? 

Regardless, it should be fairly easy for you to modify the default LAF in 
the config file and
rebuild the tar, if you have to.

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...> wrote:
> I need some advice on the look and feel default settings.  The tar file 
is 
> set to "windows" which causes and error on my Linux box.  I have 
installed 
> both the Windows and Linux versions exploring the differences to see if 
> there is something missing.  I can change the look and feel then the 
error 
> goes away but I have a couple of Linux users that are going to install 
and 
> I had hoped they could avoid the error since I am not certain how to 
> explain the error and work around to them over the distance.
> 
> Thank you!  I really do appreciate the support?
> Ronni


 
Discover Yahoo! 
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html

[SourceJammer-users] Re: Sourcejammer

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, Naveen.

I've answered your questions below:

--- Nav...@xa... wrote:
> Robert,
> 
>   This is Naveen Verma. I am working as Team Lead in Xansa India Ltd.
>   I have had a look at sourcejammer. I am very impressed with it. I am
>   planning to evaluate sourcejammer and if things work fine, we'll use the
>   same in our project.
> 
>   Thanks you very much for such a wonderful work.
> 
>   I have a couple of questions/clarifications from you. Sorry if I am
>   asking silly questions as I have not started evaluating yet. Please
>   answer.
> 
>   ·   Can it be used freely in any commercial organization?

Yes. See the license agreement for details, but both the GPL and GLPL versions can be used by
commercial organizations. The only restrictions are on re-distribution.

>   ·   What are its advantages over VSS? VSS uses the server-side view and
>   by default gives the single check-out for files (but allows multiple
>   check-outs).  On the other hand, CVS uses the client-side view and by
>   default gives the multiple check-outs for files. What types of check-outs
>   does sourcejammer support?

SJ only supports the single checkout model. One big advantage over VSS is speed for any users who
are not directly connected to your network. I also believe SJ is more stable than VSS and all data
is stored in plain text files, so if there is a problem, it is always possible to fix the data. I
also think the SJ gui is pretty good compared to other systems.

>   ·   Can I get any comparison document of sourcejammer with VSS and CVS?
> 

Haven't written anything like that.

Thanks.

--Rob

> Best Regards,
> Naveen Kr. Verma,
> Xansa (India) Ltd,
> CUG: 2657
> Ph: 91-120-2444123, Ext. 5100
> 
> 
> Whilst this email has been checked for all known viruses, recipients should undertake their own
> virus checking as Xansa will not accept any liability whatsoever.
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and protected by client privilege.
>  It is solely for the use of the intended recipient.
> Please delete it and notify the sender if you have received it in
> error. Unauthorised use is prohibited.
> 
> Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not
> necessarily the organisation.
>      Xansa, Registered Office: 420 Thames Valley Park Drive,
>      Thames Valley Park, Reading, RG6 1PU, UK.
>      Registered in England No.1000954.
>      t  +44 (0)8702 416181
>      w  www.xansa.com
> 


		
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer Support

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, Sanjeev.

It sounds like you might be having the problem discussed here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/sou...@li.../msg00168.html

Let me know if this thread doesn't help you solve your problem.

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Sanjeev Yamdagni <sa...@th...> wrote:
> Robert,
>  
> We are using SourceJammer 2.1. For one particular archive, when we click on
> [Archive-> Maintain Archive Users], we get an error  box  saying "ERROR:
> Null".
>  
> My guess is that for some reason user file for this archive got corrupted or
> something. Can you please tell me how to fix this issue ?
>  
> Regards
>  
> ~Sanjeev
> ******************************************
> Sanjeev Yamdagni
> Technical Manager
> ThomasKelly Software Associates
> One Sugar Creek Center Blvd., Suite #410
> Sugar Land, TX-77478
> Phone :(281) 565-1461
> Fax   :(281) 565-1462
> web   : <http://www.thomaskelly.com/> www.thomaskelly.com
> ******************************************
>  
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, Veronica. 

Could you tell me the exact version of the SJ client you're having this problem with? 

Regardless, it should be fairly easy for you to modify the default LAF in the config file and
rebuild the tar, if you have to.

Thanks.

--Rob


--- Veronica L Bounmixay <Ver...@in...> wrote:
> I need some advice on the look and feel default settings.  The tar file is 
> set to "windows" which causes and error on my Linux box.  I have installed 
> both the Windows and Linux versions exploring the differences to see if 
> there is something missing.  I can change the look and feel then the error 
> goes away but I have a couple of Linux users that are going to install and 
> I had hoped they could avoid the error since I am not certain how to 
> explain the error and work around to them over the distance.
> 
> Thank you!  I really do appreciate the support?
> Ronni


		
Discover Yahoo! 
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html

[SourceJammer-users] Re: how to create users on sourcejammer server?

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

The doc means admin on your SJ server. If you cant log in with admin/admin and you really cant
find users.xml then something went wrong with your install. Did you run the install script? 

--Rob
--- nat...@gm... <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi,
> I downloaded and installed 2.1.1.0 beta1 server. The documentation
> says that I have to first create an archive, as an admin user. admin
> user on what?
> 
> I'm running WindowsXP Pro SP2, Tomcat 5.5.9. Admin user means, admin
> on my windows machine, or on Tomcat or in SourceJammer? The
> sourcejammer admin config doc says that there will be a users.xml
> file. But that is not found in my installation.
> 
> What username/password should I use ('admin/admin' specified in the
> quickstart guide doesn't work either) or how do i create users for
> sourcejammer?
> 
> thanks
> Nathan



		
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/

[SourceJammer-users] Default Look and Feel Causing Errors on Start up

[Veronica L B. <Ver...@in...>]

I need some advice on the look and feel default settings.  The tar file is 
set to "windows" which causes and error on my Linux box.  I have installed 
both the Windows and Linux versions exploring the differences to see if 
there is something missing.  I can change the look and feel then the error 
goes away but I have a couple of Linux users that are going to install and 
I had hoped they could avoid the error since I am not certain how to 
explain the error and work around to them over the distance.

Thank you!  I really do appreciate the support?
Ronni

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer Tool is great!

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Thanks, Vivek!


--- Vivek Jain <viv...@ya...> wrote:
> Dear Robert,
>   Thanks for great tool. I am currently evaluating source control tool for our project and saw
> sourcejammer, which is awesome tool for source control.
>  
> I am going to recommend using this tool and get away from Source Safe.
>  
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> 		
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail Mobile
>  Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.


		
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Recursive Check Out/In

[Albert M. <amo...@ev...>]

Though I don't have immediate access to SJ right now, Timo added that feature in
the latest client. It's still in beta status, but you can download it from the
Source Forge (don't be afraid by the beta label).

Cheers,
Albert.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Grieve" <se...@ts...>
To: <sou...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: [SourceJammer-users] Recursive Check Out/In


> Hello, is there a way to do a recursive Check Out and Check In of all
> files and subdirectories from a parent directory? I can only find
> options in the client to select multiple files in a single directory for
> Checking Out and In. I need to do a mass change for hundreds of JSPs in
> many subdirectories and I'd like to avoid manually going through every
> subdirectory.
>
> Thanks a lot. We've been using SJ at our shop for a while and it's been
> a great product.
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
>

[SourceJammer-users] Recursive Check Out/In

[Sean G. <se...@ts...>]

Hello, is there a way to do a recursive Check Out and Check In of all 
files and subdirectories from a parent directory? I can only find 
options in the client to select multiple files in a single directory for 
Checking Out and In. I need to do a mass change for hundreds of JSPs in 
many subdirectories and I'd like to avoid manually going through every 
subdirectory.

Thanks a lot. We've been using SJ at our shop for a while and it's been 
a great product.


Sean

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Error When connecting to server

[Chris D. <gp...@ti...>]

Hi Firoz,

I believe this is an error related to using JRE 1.5.  Try the 
instructions here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/sou...@li.../msg00140.html

Chris


Firoz Fazil wrote:
> hi
>  
> i get an an error when trying to make an archive using source jammer 
> client. The error is as follows :
>  
> Source Jammer is having trouble communicating with the server. A fault 
> was generated :
>  
> Fault Code = SOAP-ENV:Server
> Fault String = Exception from service object:Provider
> org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformerFactoryImpl not found
>  
> I run sourcejammer server on tomcat 5.0.28 on a fedora core 3 server. 
> The client is installed in a windows xp workstation.
>  
> What could be the problem possibly ?
>  
> Regards
> Firoz
>  

[SourceJammer-users] Error When connecting to server

[Firoz F. <ffa...@ya...>]

hi

i get an an error when trying to make an archive using source jammer =
client. The error is as follows :

Source Jammer is having trouble communicating with the server. A fault =
was generated :=20

Fault Code =3D SOAP-ENV:Server
Fault String =3D Exception from service object:Provider
org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformerFactoryImpl not found

I run sourcejammer server on tomcat 5.0.28 on a fedora core 3 server. =
The client is installed in a windows xp workstation.

What could be the problem possibly ?

Regards
Firoz

Re: [SourceJammer-users] History Keyword and Comments in XML Files

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, James.

This is definitely something I'll fix for the next release. This should probably be configurable
or at least default to something that will be friendly to as many file types as possible. Perhaps
a line of underscores?

There's no way to configure this now, but it would be an easy change for you to make to the source
and compile your own versrion of the server, if you know you're way around Java. The offending
file is org.sourcejammer.server.keywords.KeywordTags, and the variable to change would be
HIST_SEPARATOR.

If you don't think you can make this modification yourself, let me know and I'll do it for you.
Just let me know what version of SJ you are running.

--Rob


--- James Saffery <jam...@sw...> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We have been using SourceJammer happily now for over a year with very little
> trouble.
> 
> I would now like to start using keyword expansion with XML source files, but
> have run into an issue with the History keyword: SJ delimits history entries
> with a line of multiple dashes, however double dashes are not allowed in XML
> comments.
> 
> Is there a way of telling SourceJammer to use something other than a line of
> dashes to delimit the history entries?
> 
> I have been using trying to use the History keyword as follows:
> 
>   <!-- History: 
>   $History: $ 
>   -->
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> James
> 
> 
> 
> James Saffery
> Leading Analyst, Project Leader for Beringer Blass Software
> Swisslog Australia Pty Limited
> +61 2 9869 5929 direct
> +61 2 9869 5900 office
> +61 400 203 718 mobile
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> This message may contain legally privileged or confidential 
> information and is therefore addressed to the named persons only. 
> The recipient should inform the sender and delete this message, 
> if he/she is not named as addressee. 
> The sender disclaims any and all liability for the integrity 
> and punctuality of this message. 
> The sender has activated an automatic virus scanning by 
> Messagelabs, but does not guarantee the virus free 
> transmission of this message.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
> Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
> Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
> Click here to start!  http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Unable to create XML file when adding a file.

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Thanks, Bruce.

I'll consider your suggestion, but I'm not sure this is something I have control over. It's an OS
specific thing and I'm not sure Java gives me that type of control, unless there's something I'm
missing.

--Rob


--- "B. Whittaker" <bru...@op...> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> 
> thanks for that. I really appreciate the quick response.
> 
> Basically a big part of my issue was that I installed sourcejammer as root
> and all of the files had owner write permissions only - so nobody else had
> access.
> 
> Can I recommend a change to the installation instructions ? This may need
> code mods as well. If a SourceJammer user had been created with the
> SourceJammer group and this was used for installation. Then server could
> execute using the SourceJammer ID (suid if needed) and there would be no
> issue.
> 
> If you think my recommendation is way off track then just ignore it - it's
> definitely not a criticism.
> 
> By the way, I love the product and appreciate the work you are putting in on
> it.
> 
> Keep up the good work,
> 
> 
> Bruce Whittaker.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robert MacGrogan" <rob...@ya...>
> To: "B. Whittaker" <bru...@bi...>;
> <sou...@li...>
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 1:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Unable to create XML file when adding a
> file.
> 
> 
> > The only directory SJ should have to write to is the sourcejammer/server
> directory. I really don't
> > think there's anywhere else it needs access to. It's possible that there
> might be something
> > somewhere that tries to write to the WEB-INF/conf directory, but I don't
> think I'm doing that
> > anymore.
> >
> > You might want to make double sure that the server directory SJ is using
> is the one you think it
> > is. Take a look at the serverconf.xml file in WEB-INF/conf. You should see
> an entry for
> > <ServerDirectory> and also maybe <DefaultArchiveRoot> and maybe even
> <FileSysDirectory>. These
> > will be the directories that SJ needs write access to.
> >
> > --Rob
> >
> >
> > --- "B. Whittaker" <bru...@op...> wrote:
> > > OS : Fedora 3.
> > >
> > > I'm new to sourcejammer and I've just set up my first archive - all good
> if I do it as admin.
> > > However, if I attempt add a file/folder then I keep getting an error
> indicating that it is
> > > unable to access or save an XML file because a "File or directory is
> read-only".
> > >
> > > I've ensured that the /usr/local/sourcejammer/server directory and below
> in are owned by root
> > > with the group being sourcejammer. The files are group writeable and the
> user is in the
> > > sourcejammer group.
> > >
> > > I'm unsure where the XML file resides or what I have to do to provide
> access to all. At the
> > > moment only admin can do everything it wants to.
> > >
> > > Help ??
> > >
> > > Bruce.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[SourceJammer-users] History Keyword and Comments in XML Files

[James S. <jam...@sw...>]

Hi,

We=20have=20been=20using=20SourceJammer=20happily=20now=20for=20over=20a=20=
year=20with=20very=20little
trouble.

I=20would=20now=20like=20to=20start=20using=20keyword=20expansion=20with=20=
XML=20source=20files,=20but
have=20run=20into=20an=20issue=20with=20the=20History=20keyword:=20SJ=20de=
limits=20history=20entries
with=20a=20line=20of=20multiple=20dashes,=20however=20double=20dashes=20ar=
e=20not=20allowed=20in=20XML
comments.

Is=20there=20a=20way=20of=20telling=20SourceJammer=20to=20use=20something=20=
other=20than=20a=20line=20of
dashes=20to=20delimit=20the=20history=20entries?

I=20have=20been=20using=20trying=20to=20use=20the=20History=20keyword=20as=
=20follows:

=20=20<!--=20History:=20
=20=20$History:=20$=20
=20=20-->

Thank=20you.

Regards,

James



James=20Saffery
Leading=20Analyst,=20Project=20Leader=20for=20Beringer=20Blass=20Software
Swisslog=20Australia=20Pty=20Limited
+61=202=209869=205929=20direct
+61=202=209869=205900=20office
+61=20400=20203=20718=20mobile


____________________________________________________________
This=20message=20may=20contain=20legally=20privileged=20or=20confidential=20=

information=20and=20is=20therefore=20addressed=20to=20the=20named=20person=
s=20only.=20
The=20recipient=20should=20inform=20the=20sender=20and=20delete=20this=20m=
essage,=20
if=20he/she=20is=20not=20named=20as=20addressee.=20
The=20sender=20disclaims=20any=20and=20all=20liability=20for=20the=20integ=
rity=20
and=20punctuality=20of=20this=20message.=20
The=20sender=20has=20activated=20an=20automatic=20virus=20scanning=20by=20=

Messagelabs,=20but=20does=20not=20guarantee=20the=20virus=20free=20
transmission=20of=20this=20message.

Re: [SourceJammer-users] SJ plugin installation

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Hi, Tarik

The only documentation is here:

http://sjextensions.sourceforge.net/

I admit it is not very thorough.

The 4th step is that you need to set up the SJ Eclipse properties for a project. Pull up the
properties dialog for your Eclipse Project and you should see an SJ Eclipse section. The page I've
linked to above describes what you need to do next. Let me know if you still have questions.

Thanks.

--Rob



--- Tarik Choufa <tc...@fe...> wrote:
> Hi,
> First thank you for bringing us SJ plugin for eclipse it is really a 
> GOOD GOOD idea.
> However, the documentation was a little bit missed. I installed sj for 
> eclipse and set the path to the client. But the part where I have a 
> trouble to set the config for the project.
> Could please send more details:
> 1- I make the archive on the server
> 2- I installed a client on c:/sourcejammer/client
> 3- I installed sj in eclipse and set the path of the client (in preferences)
> 4- ???
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> /Tarik
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
> Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
> Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
> Click here to start!  http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[SourceJammer-users] SJ plugin installation

[Tarik C. <tc...@fe...>]

Hi,
First thank you for bringing us SJ plugin for eclipse it is really a 
GOOD GOOD idea.
However, the documentation was a little bit missed. I installed sj for 
eclipse and set the path to the client. But the part where I have a 
trouble to set the config for the project.
Could please send more details:
1- I make the archive on the server
2- I installed a client on c:/sourcejammer/client
3- I installed sj in eclipse and set the path of the client (in preferences)
4- ???

Thanks a lot.

/Tarik

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SJ Label question

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

A removed file (or folder) can be restored. A removed file (or folder) can also be deleted, which
will permanently remove it from the archive.

Check out the discussion of this subject in the User's Guide under "Removing/Restoring."

--Rob

 
--- Kev...@re... wrote:
> Rob,
> 
> What is the difference between 'delete' and 'remove'?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kevin Cloudt
> 770-806-2648
> kev...@re...


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [SourceJammer-users] Unable to create XML file when adding a file.

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

The only directory SJ should have to write to is the sourcejammer/server directory. I really don't
think there's anywhere else it needs access to. It's possible that there might be something
somewhere that tries to write to the WEB-INF/conf directory, but I don't think I'm doing that
anymore.

You might want to make double sure that the server directory SJ is using is the one you think it
is. Take a look at the serverconf.xml file in WEB-INF/conf. You should see an entry for
<ServerDirectory> and also maybe <DefaultArchiveRoot> and maybe even <FileSysDirectory>. These
will be the directories that SJ needs write access to.

--Rob


--- "B. Whittaker" <bru...@op...> wrote:
> OS : Fedora 3.
> 
> I'm new to sourcejammer and I've just set up my first archive - all good if I do it as admin.
> However, if I attempt add a file/folder then I keep getting an error indicating that it is
> unable to access or save an XML file because a "File or directory is read-only".
> 
> I've ensured that the /usr/local/sourcejammer/server directory and below in are owned by root
> with the group being sourcejammer. The files are group writeable and the user is in the
> sourcejammer group.
> 
> I'm unsure where the XML file resides or what I have to do to provide access to all. At the
> moment only admin can do everything it wants to. 
> 
> Help ??
> 
> Bruce.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SJEclipse plug-in doesn't work

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Thanks for updating me, Michael. I'll make a not of that on the SJ-Eclipse site.

--Rob


--- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Robert,
> 
> thank's again for your support. You're right. Obviously there is a problem
> with the sj eclipse plugin 1.0.1 and Eclipse 3.0.0. I've had three
> independent Eclipse installations of that version, all failed with that
> plugin. Now I've migrated to Eclipse 3.0.2 and it works.
> Have a nice weekend,
> Michael
> 
> --- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> > Michael, I know this will not sound very helpful to you, but I just did a
> new installation of
> > Eclipse 3.0 and downloaded SJ Eclipse from the update site, restarted
> Eclipse, and SJ Eclipse
> > worked flawlessly.
> >
> > I really don't know what the problem you're having might be. From what
> the message sounds like, it
> > almost seems that Eclipse can't actually find the SJ Eclipse jar file,
> which makes no sense at
> > all.
> >
> > Does anyone else out there have any thoughts? Has anyone experienced a
> problem like this?
> >
> > A thought just occurred to me. I'm using Eclipse 3.0.2. You're using
> 3.0.0. Could that account
> > for the problem?
> >
> > --Rob
> 
> 
> 
> --- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> > The only restriction on JRE is 1.4 or later. You should be fine with your
> setup, but obviouly
> > there's a problem. Sorry I have not had a chance to do the "clean room"
> install of the plugin
> > myself. I'll see if I can get to that this morning.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --Rob
> >
> >
> > --- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello Robert, thanks for the answer.
> > >
> > > My experience with the -clean Option is also not the best. I have read
> a
> > > thread with a similar problem (but other plug In) where the problem has
> > > been solved by using the -clean option. In my case of course the
> problem
> > > occurs with a normal start of eclipse.
> > >
> > > I have another installation of eclipse on a separate machine (Win2K)
> where
> > > the problem almost is the same. Is there a constraint in using a
> special
> > > Java Version? I'm using the Java 2 SDK  1.4, my JRE is the Java 2
> Runtime
> > > Standard 1.4.2_04.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone else had this problem? It sounds like everything should be
> > > working, Michael (though,
> > > actually, I'm not familiar with the -clean option and am not sure why
> you
> > > had to launch Eclipse
> > > this way). I'll try a fresh "clean room" install of SJ Eclipse to see
> if I
> > > experience anything
> > > similar, though.
> > >
> > > --Rob
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I've installed the SourceJammerPlugin 1.0.1 in my Eclipse environment
> via
> > > > the Eclipse Update Site Feature. After launching Eclipse (with -clean
> > > > option) I wanted to open the preference page for SJEclipse but I got
> the
> > > > error
> > > >
> > > > "Unable to create the selected preference page"
> > > >
> > > > with the reason
> > > >
> > > > "Plug-in org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse was unable to load
> class
> > > > org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse.PreferencePage"
> > > >
> > > > I'm using Eclipse 3.0.0.
> > > >
> > > > Any help available?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
> users.
> > > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > > > Sou...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
> users.
> > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > > Sou...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > Sou...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> >
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [SourceJammer-users] back up source repository

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

Take a look at another open source project I developed. It's called SyncJammer and it's located
here:

http://syncjammer.sourceforge.net

I use it to back up my SJ servers.

Thanks.

--Rob


--- shital <shi...@op...> wrote:
> Is there any way to take Source Jammer Source repository back up on regular
> basis.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Shital
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[SourceJammer-users] Unable to create XML file when adding a file.

[B. W. <bru...@op...>]

OS : Fedora 3.

I'm new to sourcejammer and I've just set up my first archive - all good =
if I do it as admin. However, if I attempt add a file/folder then I keep =
getting an error indicating that it is unable to access or save an XML =
file because a "File or directory is read-only".

I've ensured that the /usr/local/sourcejammer/server directory and below =
in are owned by root with the group being sourcejammer. The files are =
group writeable and the user is in the sourcejammer group.

I'm unsure where the XML file resides or what I have to do to provide =
access to all. At the moment only admin can do everything it wants to.=20

Help ??

Bruce.

[SourceJammer-users] Re: SJEclipse plug-in doesn't work

[Michael G. <mgo...@cs...>]

Hello Robert,

thank's again for your support. You're right. Obviously there is a problem
with the sj eclipse plugin 1.0.1 and Eclipse 3.0.0. I've had three
independent Eclipse installations of that version, all failed with that
plugin. Now I've migrated to Eclipse 3.0.2 and it works.
Have a nice weekend,
Michael

--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> Michael, I know this will not sound very helpful to you, but I just did a
new installation of
> Eclipse 3.0 and downloaded SJ Eclipse from the update site, restarted
Eclipse, and SJ Eclipse
> worked flawlessly.
>
> I really don't know what the problem you're having might be. From what
the message sounds like, it
> almost seems that Eclipse can't actually find the SJ Eclipse jar file,
which makes no sense at
> all.
>
> Does anyone else out there have any thoughts? Has anyone experienced a
problem like this?
>
> A thought just occurred to me. I'm using Eclipse 3.0.2. You're using
3.0.0. Could that account
> for the problem?
>
> --Rob



--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> The only restriction on JRE is 1.4 or later. You should be fine with your
setup, but obviouly
> there's a problem. Sorry I have not had a chance to do the "clean room"
install of the plugin
> myself. I'll see if I can get to that this morning.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --Rob
>
>
> --- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Robert, thanks for the answer.
> >
> > My experience with the -clean Option is also not the best. I have read
a
> > thread with a similar problem (but other plug In) where the problem has
> > been solved by using the -clean option. In my case of course the
problem
> > occurs with a normal start of eclipse.
> >
> > I have another installation of eclipse on a separate machine (Win2K)
where
> > the problem almost is the same. Is there a constraint in using a
special
> > Java Version? I'm using the Java 2 SDK  1.4, my JRE is the Java 2
Runtime
> > Standard 1.4.2_04.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Has anyone else had this problem? It sounds like everything should be
> > working, Michael (though,
> > actually, I'm not familiar with the -clean option and am not sure why
you
> > had to launch Eclipse
> > this way). I'll try a fresh "clean room" install of SJ Eclipse to see
if I
> > experience anything
> > similar, though.
> >
> > --Rob
> >
> >
> > --- Michael Goerlich <mgo...@cs...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've installed the SourceJammerPlugin 1.0.1 in my Eclipse environment
via
> > > the Eclipse Update Site Feature. After launching Eclipse (with -clean
> > > option) I wanted to open the preference page for SJEclipse but I got
the
> > > error
> > >
> > > "Unable to create the selected preference page"
> > >
> > > with the reason
> > >
> > > "Plug-in org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse was unable to load
class
> > > org.sourcejammer.extension.sjeclipse.PreferencePage"
> > >
> > > I'm using Eclipse 3.0.0.
> > >
> > > Any help available?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
users.
> > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > > Sou...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > SourceJammer-users mailing list
> > Sou...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-users mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
>



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
SourceJammer-users mailing list
Sou...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users

[SourceJammer-users] back up source repository

[shital <shi...@op...>]

Is there any way to take Source Jammer Source repository back up on regular
basis.

 

Thanks

Shital