sourcejammer-users Mailing List for SourceJammer (Page 18)
Brought to you by:
robertmacgrogan
Menu
▾
▴
sourcejammer-users — For help with SJ, use this list.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(102) |
Feb
(92) |
Mar
(83) |
Apr
(89) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-23 03:22:28
|
I'm happy to say that we finally have a SourceJammer Eclipse plugin under development. It still needs some enhancing and lots more testing, but the skeleton is in place. Anyone who is really interested in testing this, I've got all the stuff you need to install it in the dev.sourcejammer.org archive. Connect your SJ client to: http://dev.sourcejammer.org/servlet/rpcrouter user=anon pwd=anon archive=SourceJammer Location=/extensions/sj-eclipse/dist To install the plugin (and please, this is early early alpha stuff), just create a directory in the Eclipse plugins directory. I think you can call it what you like, but I've been using sj_eclipse in my testing. We'll use something more long winded someday. Then just put all the files in that dist folder into the plugin directory you create. Re-start Eclipse and you should be in business. This is an Eclipse 3.0 plugin, by the way. Here's what it can do so far (using the right-click popup menu): * Get file(s) * Check in file(s) * Check out file(s) You need to go to your preferences to point the plugin to your SJ client install directory. And you also need to set the properties at the project level. On the properties page, relative path means the relative path within your SJ archive for the root of the Eclipse project. For example, if you have an Eclipse project for sj-client-2.1, the relative path for the code in the SourceJammer archive would be "/current/ver2.1/src/client/". Leading and trailing slashes are required (for now, at least). No quote marks, obviously. Well, please try it out and give me feedback. I'll post again when I've added more functionality. --Rob __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Albert M. <amo...@ev...> - 2005-02-21 15:28:33
|
If the encoding is set the same way in both config files, what's your Linux's locale? Albert. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert MacGrogan" <rob...@ya...> To: "Thomas Werner" <tho...@me...>; <sou...@li...> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 4:21 PM Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Encoding Problems with linux server > Hi, Thomas. > > Just to be absolutely clear, did you set the encoding style for xml and text in the config file on > your server? Is the encoding style set the same way on your client as well? > > If so, then I'm not sure what the problem could be. There should be no difference in how SJ > behaves on a Linux server as compared to a Windows server. It could be that some additional > localization configuration is necessary on the server in general, but I'm really not an expert in > this particular area. > > --Rob > > > --- Thomas Werner <tho...@me...> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > i'm using the sourcejammer client and server on windows for nearly a year and it > > allways worked fine. Now i've set up a linux server and applied all the > > necessary configuration for german encoding. This configuration works fine on > > the windows machine, the linux server still seems to ignore it. All german > > umlauts get replaced by question marks. > > I used the same client machine for contacting both servers. The three machines > > are configured as follows: > > > > Client: Windows XP SP 2, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer client 2.1 > > Win-Server: Windows 2003, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer server 2.1 > > Linux-Server: Suse Linux 9.1, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer server 2.1 > > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > Thomas > > > > -- > > Thomas Werner > > Software Engineer > > > > Tel: +49 721 92910-0 > > Fax: +49 721 92910-555 > > tho...@me... > > > begin:vcard > > fn:Thomas Werner > > n:Werner;Thomas > > org:medavis GmbH;Development > > adr:;;Waldstrasse 71-73;Karlsruhe;;76133;Germany > > email;internet:tho...@me... > > title:Software Engineer > > tel;work:+49 721 92910 0 > > tel;fax:+49 721 92910 99 > > x-mozilla-html:FALSE > > url:http://www.medavis.com > > version:2.1 > > end:vcard > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-21 15:21:28
|
Hi, Thomas. Just to be absolutely clear, did you set the encoding style for xml and text in the config file on your server? Is the encoding style set the same way on your client as well? If so, then I'm not sure what the problem could be. There should be no difference in how SJ behaves on a Linux server as compared to a Windows server. It could be that some additional localization configuration is necessary on the server in general, but I'm really not an expert in this particular area. --Rob --- Thomas Werner <tho...@me...> wrote: > Hi, > > i'm using the sourcejammer client and server on windows for nearly a year and it > allways worked fine. Now i've set up a linux server and applied all the > necessary configuration for german encoding. This configuration works fine on > the windows machine, the linux server still seems to ignore it. All german > umlauts get replaced by question marks. > I used the same client machine for contacting both servers. The three machines > are configured as follows: > > Client: Windows XP SP 2, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer client 2.1 > Win-Server: Windows 2003, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer server 2.1 > Linux-Server: Suse Linux 9.1, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer server 2.1 > > Thanks for your help! > > Thomas > > -- > Thomas Werner > Software Engineer > > Tel: +49 721 92910-0 > Fax: +49 721 92910-555 > tho...@me... > > begin:vcard > fn:Thomas Werner > n:Werner;Thomas > org:medavis GmbH;Development > adr:;;Waldstrasse 71-73;Karlsruhe;;76133;Germany > email;internet:tho...@me... > title:Software Engineer > tel;work:+49 721 92910 0 > tel;fax:+49 721 92910 99 > x-mozilla-html:FALSE > url:http://www.medavis.com > version:2.1 > end:vcard > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Thomas W. <tho...@me...> - 2005-02-21 08:47:33
|
Hi, i'm using the sourcejammer client and server on windows for nearly a year and it allways worked fine. Now i've set up a linux server and applied all the necessary configuration for german encoding. This configuration works fine on the windows machine, the linux server still seems to ignore it. All german umlauts get replaced by question marks. I used the same client machine for contacting both servers. The three machines are configured as follows: Client: Windows XP SP 2, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer client 2.1 Win-Server: Windows 2003, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer server 2.1 Linux-Server: Suse Linux 9.1, JDK & JRE 1.4.0.2_6, SourceJammer server 2.1 Thanks for your help! Thomas -- Thomas Werner Software Engineer Tel: +49 721 92910-0 Fax: +49 721 92910-555 tho...@me... |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-14 23:21:59
|
New Features. Here's a quick list of what's going in the release: > Here is the complete list of what i have done: > > > > > > - Adding a bunch of new icons for actions > > - Changing the existing icons of the most actions > > - The userid/password dialog comes up with the current system user if the > user > > is not stored > > - Feature request 722140: The .source.jam files can be stored to a > different > > folder. So it is possible to keep them out of the target source directories > > (feature can be enabled in the pref-dialog-advanced) > > - Optimizing the imports of some files > > - Changing some source parts that created java warnings > > - Fixing some spelling bugs in the german language file > > - Inserting the newest version of the plastic look and feel library > > - Resize tree in move/copy dialog > > - Open tree in move/copy dialog with current selected tree position > > - Inserting an "unlink" checkbox to diff view > > - Inserting eclipse like headers to all panels > > - Using Karten Lentzsch's UIFSplitPane to remove the borders of the > JSplitPane > > dividers > > - improving diff view (compactor) > > - Feature request 840843: Encrypted local password > > - New right-click behavior: A right click onto the FileTable selects the > > underlying item if there is no item previously selected > > - fixing bug: 968076 Copy from a project into itself is not prevented > > - fixing hardcoded texts in various dialogs > > - Feature request 848278: Implementing recursive operations for folders (at > the > > moment checkout, checkin) --- "Sommerville, Robert E (N-CSC)" <rob...@lm...> wrote: > The new client release is for bugs or features? > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: sou...@li... > [mailto:sou...@li...] On Behalf Of > Robert MacGrogan > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 1:47 PM > To: Giorgio Franceschetti; SourceJammer Users > Subject: [SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer > > > Hi, Giorgio. > > Yes, development is active right now, though after a brief rest period. > > A new client release will be available soon, plus an Eclipse plugin. And > work will soon begin on a full 2.2 development cycle. > > Thanks. > > --Rob > > --- Giorgio Franceschetti <g.f...@vi...> wrote: > > > --------------------------------- > Hi, > I'm interested in using a source version control program > differentfrom CVS. I'd like to evaluate SourceJammer, but, as I've not a > lot of time, > I'd like not to lose time in dead projects. > May you please tell me if this project is still being developed? I'm > asking this because I've seen that the last version was releasedmore > than one year ago. Thanks, > Giorgio. > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > All your favorites on one personal page - Try My Yahoo! > http://my.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com |
|
From: Sommerville, R. E (N-CSC) <rob...@lm...> - 2005-02-14 20:25:29
|
The new client release is for bugs or features?
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: sou...@li...
[mailto:sou...@li...] On Behalf Of
Robert MacGrogan
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 1:47 PM
To: Giorgio Franceschetti; SourceJammer Users
Subject: [SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer
Hi, Giorgio.
Yes, development is active right now, though after a brief rest period.
A new client release will be available soon, plus an Eclipse plugin. And
work will soon begin on a full 2.2 development cycle.
Thanks.
--Rob
--- Giorgio Franceschetti <g.f...@vi...> wrote:
---------------------------------
Hi,
I'm interested in using a source version control program
differentfrom CVS. I'd like to evaluate SourceJammer, but, as I've not a
lot of time,
I'd like not to lose time in dead projects.
May you please tell me if this project is still being developed? I'm
asking this because I've seen that the last version was releasedmore
than one year ago. Thanks,
Giorgio.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page - Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
SourceJammer-users mailing list Sou...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users
|
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-10 18:46:59
|
Hi, Giorgio.
Yes, development is active right now, though after a brief rest period.
A new client release will be available soon, plus an Eclipse plugin. And work will soon begin on a
full 2.2 development cycle.
Thanks.
--Rob
--- Giorgio Franceschetti <g.f...@vi...> wrote:
---------------------------------
Hi,
I'm interested in using a source version control program differentfrom CVS.
I'd like to evaluate SourceJammer, but, as I've not a lot of time,
I'd like not to lose time in dead projects.
May you please tell me if this project is still being developed?
I'm asking this because I've seen that the last version was releasedmore than one year ago.
Thanks,
Giorgio.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com
|
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-10 18:38:04
|
Hi, David. Sorry for your trouble. I've seen this weird error from time to time myself, and I am not sure what the root cause is. But I suspect that what is happening is that there is an empty file or "project" metadata file somewhere out there. The trick is to drill your way through the project meta data files until you find the project that is giving you the error messages when you browse it. Was this the file you attempted to edit? You can find this file by following some of the guidelines in this doc: http://www.sourcejammer.org/docAboutServerFiles.html Once you find the project, you'll have to inspect all of its child files (both project and file), to see which one is corrupt. It will probably be obvious. As I said, the file will probably be blank. Once you've done this, you can delete the reference to the offending project/file from the parent project file. Then re-start your SJ server. I know this is a complete pain. We are about to start development on a 2.2 release, and I think some kind of corruption cleanup utility would be a nice thing to have. Obviously, in an ideal world, issues like this would never occur. But until we can guarantee that they won't, it would be nice if SJ at least recognized what the problem was and prompted you to clean out corrupt file reference instead of crapping out completely. Hopefully this is helpful. --Rob PS: My guess is that it is a recently added file or folder that is causing the trouble, so hopefully you won't actually lose any data. Good luck. --- David Rickard <Dav...@te...> wrote: > Source Jammer: 2.1.0.0 > Tomcat: 4.1.29 > Java: j2sdk1.4.2_02 > Server: SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 > > We've been using SourceJammer for 1-2 years now, generally without > complaint. Recently, SourceJammer began refusing to read one project > folder from our archive (all other projects read fine). The error message is: > Unable to access File information. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: > Premature end of file. > > The following stack traces were produced in the logs: > org.sourcejammer.util.ConfigurationException: > org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of > file. org > .xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of file. > org.sourcejammer.project.model.FileAccessException: org.xml. > sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of file. > org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.deserialize(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.XMLUtilFS.xmlToProject(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readProjectNode(Unknown Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectNode(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.projectNodeToProject(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.getProject(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.view.MasterControlProgram.getProjectInfo(Unknown > Source) > > org.sourcejammer.project.model.FileAccessException: > org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of fil > e. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectChildName(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.setChildren(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.deserialize(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.XMLUtilFS.xmlToProject(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readProjectNode(Unknown Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectNode(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.projectNodeToProject(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.getProject(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.view.MasterControlProgram.getProjectInfo(Unknown > Source) > > org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown Source) > at org.sourcejammer.xml.XMLUtil.getXMLDoc(Unknown Source) > at org.sourcejammer.xml.XMLUtil.getXMLDoc(Unknown Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readXMLDocFromFileSys(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readNodeName(Unknown Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectChildName(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.setChildren(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.deserialize(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.XMLUtilFS.xmlToProject(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readProjectNode(Unknown Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectNode(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.projectNodeToProject(Unknown > Source) > at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.getProject(Unknown > Source) > at > org.sourcejammer.project.view.MasterControlProgram.getProjectInfo(Unknown > Source) > > I attempted to edit the parent file for the project folder (under the > archive project file)--but this caused SourceJammer to lose track of _all_ > projects in the archive (a quick restore of the original file brought the > projects back). > > Is there any simple way to track down which file is causing the > problems? And is there any simple/safe way to fix the file once we > identify the problem? > > > -- > > David Rickard > Software Engineer > > TechBooks/GTS > Your Single Source Solution! > Los Angeles CA * York, PA * Boston,MA * New Delhi, India > Visit us on the World Wide Web > <http://www.techbooks.com>http://www.techbooks.com > > dav...@te... > 5650 Jillson St., Los Angeles, CA 90040 > (323) 888-8889 x331 > (323) 888-1849 (Fax) > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 |
|
From: David R. <Dav...@te...> - 2005-02-09 18:14:15
|
Source Jammer: 2.1.0.0 Tomcat: 4.1.29 Java: j2sdk1.4.2_02 Server: SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 We've been using SourceJammer for 1-2 years now, generally without complaint. Recently, SourceJammer began refusing to read one project folder from our archive (all other projects read fine). The error message is: Unable to access File information. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. The following stack traces were produced in the logs: org.sourcejammer.util.ConfigurationException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of file. org .xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of file. org.sourcejammer.project.model.FileAccessException: org.xml. sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of file. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.deserialize(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.XMLUtilFS.xmlToProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readProjectNode(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectNode(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.projectNodeToProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.getProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.view.MasterControlProgram.getProjectInfo(Unknown Source) org.sourcejammer.project.model.FileAccessException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. Premature end of fil e. org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectChildName(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.setChildren(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.deserialize(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.XMLUtilFS.xmlToProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readProjectNode(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectNode(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.projectNodeToProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.getProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.view.MasterControlProgram.getProjectInfo(Unknown Source) org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file. at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.xml.XMLUtil.getXMLDoc(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.xml.XMLUtil.getXMLDoc(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readXMLDocFromFileSys(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readNodeName(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectChildName(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.setChildren(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.ProjectNodeDeserializer.deserialize(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.XMLUtilFS.xmlToProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.Util.readProjectNode(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.model.filesys.NodeLibraryFS.getProjectNode(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.projectNodeToProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.controller.ProjectController.getProject(Unknown Source) at org.sourcejammer.project.view.MasterControlProgram.getProjectInfo(Unknown Source) I attempted to edit the parent file for the project folder (under the archive project file)--but this caused SourceJammer to lose track of _all_ projects in the archive (a quick restore of the original file brought the projects back). Is there any simple way to track down which file is causing the problems? And is there any simple/safe way to fix the file once we identify the problem? -- David Rickard Software Engineer TechBooks/GTS Your Single Source Solution! Los Angeles CA * York, PA * Boston,MA * New Delhi, India Visit us on the World Wide Web <http://www.techbooks.com>http://www.techbooks.com dav...@te... 5650 Jillson St., Los Angeles, CA 90040 (323) 888-8889 x331 (323) 888-1849 (Fax) |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-09 15:04:42
|
Hi, Rich. Thanks for your comments. You're right that you can't do what you're suggesting with the current version of SJ. Each SJ folder maps to one and only one default local directory. Far be it from me to tell you how to manage your files, but I'd prefer to encourage people to set up their local file structure to mimic the structure they want to have in their SJ archive. Even if there were no problem from a programming perspective in adding the feature that you want, I'd be worried about it being "dangerous in the wrong hands." Personally, I'm not sure this is a feature I'd want in SJ. But I'd like to hear what others think. I've been known to be swayed when multiple people ask for the same feature. Thanks again. --Rob --- R M Willems <rmw...@co...> wrote: > Hello, > > This is either a how-do-I-do-this question or a RFE. The user docs say that an archive folder > must be mated with a local directory before files can be added to the folder. No problem there. > What does "Default" in the phrase "Set Default Directory" mean ? The implication is that, for a > given folder, I could have multiple directories that feed into it. Where am I going with this > you ask ? I'd rather not create a structure in the archive that exactly matches the structure on > my disk if I don't have to. Sometimes the tools I use create lots of directory levels that I'd > rather not replicate in the archive. Sometimes I'd like to group files together that aren't > grouped together on the hard drive. A specific example would probably help: > > My InstallAnywhereNow installer-maker tool puts its output file, a self-extracting exe file, > several levels deep in a directory structure it likes to create. I have a few programs that I > use the tool to make self-extracting exe files for. So, if I had to replicate all of the levels > for each of the programs I create, we're talking lots of folders in the archive. I know I don't > have to put all of the intermediate directory levels in the archive, but I'd also like to > collect all of the self-extracting exe files in one place in the archive, and I don't think > SourceJammer will let me. I think once I map an archive folder to a directory, SourceJammer > expects all of the files in the folder to be in that same directory. I'd like it if, for a given > archive folder, individual files in that folder could be in different places on my hard disk. > > Given that the disk looks like this > > directoryA contains: directoryB contains: directoryC contains: self-extracting exe file named > abc.exe > AND > directoryD contains: directoryE contains: directoryF contains: a different self-extracting exe > file, this one named def.exe > AND > directoryG contains: directoryH contains: directoryI contains: a different self-extracting exe > file, this one named ghi.exe > > I'd like one folder in the archive to be named "Installers" and contain the three > self-extracting exe files named abc.exe and def.exe and ghi.exe. > The default directory for the folder could be either directoryC or directoryF or directoryI. > Let's say for argument's sake it was directoryC. > If so, I wouldn't have to do anything more for abc.exe other than to add it to the archive. > For the def.exe and ghi.exe files I'd have to override the default directory. > > Can I do this with the current version of SourceJammer ? Any plans to do this in the future ? > > Thanks for listening and thanks for the free version control program, > > Rich W > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: R M W. <rmw...@co...> - 2005-02-09 04:41:27
|
Hello, This is either a how-do-I-do-this question or a RFE. The user docs say = that an archive folder must be mated with a local directory before files = can be added to the folder. No problem there. What does "Default" in the = phrase "Set Default Directory" mean ? The implication is that, for a = given folder, I could have multiple directories that feed into it. Where = am I going with this you ask ? I'd rather not create a structure in the = archive that exactly matches the structure on my disk if I don't have = to. Sometimes the tools I use create lots of directory levels that I'd = rather not replicate in the archive. Sometimes I'd like to group files = together that aren't grouped together on the hard drive. A specific = example would probably help: My InstallAnywhereNow installer-maker tool puts its output file, a = self-extracting exe file, several levels deep in a directory structure = it likes to create. I have a few programs that I use the tool to make = self-extracting exe files for. So, if I had to replicate all of the = levels for each of the programs I create, we're talking lots of folders = in the archive. I know I don't have to put all of the intermediate = directory levels in the archive, but I'd also like to collect all of the = self-extracting exe files in one place in the archive, and I don't think = SourceJammer will let me. I think once I map an archive folder to a = directory, SourceJammer expects all of the files in the folder to be in = that same directory. I'd like it if, for a given archive folder, = individual files in that folder could be in different places on my hard = disk. Given that the disk looks like this directoryA contains: directoryB contains: directoryC contains: = self-extracting exe file named abc.exe AND directoryD contains: directoryE contains: directoryF contains: a = different self-extracting exe file, this one named def.exe AND directoryG contains: directoryH contains: directoryI contains: a = different self-extracting exe file, this one named ghi.exe I'd like one folder in the archive to be named "Installers" and contain = the three self-extracting exe files named abc.exe and def.exe and = ghi.exe. The default directory for the folder could be either directoryC or = directoryF or directoryI. Let's say for argument's sake it was directoryC. If so, I wouldn't have to do anything more for abc.exe other than to add = it to the archive. For the def.exe and ghi.exe files I'd have to override the default = directory. Can I do this with the current version of SourceJammer ? Any plans to do = this in the future ? Thanks for listening and thanks for the free version control program, Rich W |
|
From: Stan W. <won...@ya...> - 2005-02-07 21:58:44
|
Instead of db-srv as the server, you may have to use: http://localhost:8080 depending on how you have your SSH tunnel set up. If you have specified port 8080 on the client side of the tunnel and 8080 on your server then the above should work. If, say, you've mapped 12345 on the client side of the tunnel and 8080 on the server side, then you would use http://localhost:12345 --- James N Parsells <ni...@20...> wrote: > Hi Stan, > > I'm still working on this sourcejammer problem here > at the office. As of > now I have tomcat running with JAVA_HOME set > properly. I've made it past > the ssh errors, and now try to connect via web > http://db-srv:8080 and > get a connection refused error. I've tried using the > sourcejammer client > to connect and I get the same error. I'm one step > closer to getting this > working. > > Thanks, > > Nick > > On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 18:27, Stan Wong wrote: > > Hi, James, > > > > The SSH message indicates that the server and > client > > may be using and expecting different versions of > the > > SSH protocol (versions 1 and 2). Typically, a > server > > will be set up to recognize both SSH versions 1 > and 2. > > In my case I deliberately set the server to > recognize > > only version 2 so anyone that wanted to connect > would > > have to have a version client. > > > > Rob, might be right on the Tomcat version. I > upgraded > > from version 3 to 4 and it was easy with the > exception > > of tracking down where JAVA_HOME was set. > > > > Stan > > > > --- James N Parsells <ni...@20...> > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I recently downloaded and configured > sourcejammer > > > 2.1 / tomcat 3.3.2 / > > > j2re 1.4.1 > > > > > > after everything was configured and running i > went > > > to http://db-srv:8080 > > > and saw SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 Protocol > mismatch > > > > > > while trying to create my archive with the > > > sourcejammer client I > > > received the following error: SourceJammer is > having > > > trouble > > > communicating with the server. A problem > occurred in > > > communicating with > > > the SourceJammer/SOAP server. Error parsing HTTP > > > status line > > > "SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2"; > > > java.util.NoSuchElementException > > > > > > Any help on how to fix this would be > appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW > -- > > > Interactive Reporting > > > Tool for open source databases. Create > drag-&-drop > > > reports. Save time > > > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export > to > > > DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > > > Download a FREE copy at > > > http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > SourceJammer-users mailing list > > > Sou...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! > > http://my.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo |
|
From: Stan W. <won...@ya...> - 2005-02-04 23:28:01
|
Hi, James, The SSH message indicates that the server and client may be using and expecting different versions of the SSH protocol (versions 1 and 2). Typically, a server will be set up to recognize both SSH versions 1 and 2. In my case I deliberately set the server to recognize only version 2 so anyone that wanted to connect would have to have a version client. Rob, might be right on the Tomcat version. I upgraded from version 3 to 4 and it was easy with the exception of tracking down where JAVA_HOME was set. Stan --- James N Parsells <ni...@20...> wrote: > Hello, > > I recently downloaded and configured sourcejammer > 2.1 / tomcat 3.3.2 / > j2re 1.4.1 > > after everything was configured and running i went > to http://db-srv:8080 > and saw SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 Protocol mismatch > > while trying to create my archive with the > sourcejammer client I > received the following error: SourceJammer is having > trouble > communicating with the server. A problem occurred in > communicating with > the SourceJammer/SOAP server. Error parsing HTTP > status line > "SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2"; > java.util.NoSuchElementException > > Any help on how to fix this would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > James > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- > Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop > reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to > DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at > http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-04 22:51:22
|
Hi, Jonathan. Are you sure that the server URL is correct in your client-side connection definition? Should be something like this: http://my-server:8080/sourcejammer/servlet/rpcrouter Obviously, use the actual url of your server and the actual port number for Resin (if required). Double check the spelling of "rpcrouter". --Rob --- Jonathan Sarabia <jon...@gm...> wrote: > The text of the error is: > > SourceJammer is having trouble communicating with the server. A > problem occurred in communicating with the SourceJammer/Soap server. > Error opening socket: java.net.connectException: Connection refused: > connect. > > I have already installed the server and the client in a W2K OS. The > java version is Sun JDK 1.4.2 and my servlet container is Resin > 2.1.13. I have already test my Soap services are running (according > with the recommendations of the user guide). > > Could you please help me on this? > > Regards. > -- > Jonathan Sarabia > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Jonathan S. <jon...@gm...> - 2005-02-04 22:20:15
|
The text of the error is: SourceJammer is having trouble communicating with the server. A problem occurred in communicating with the SourceJammer/Soap server. Error opening socket: java.net.connectException: Connection refused: connect. I have already installed the server and the client in a W2K OS. The java version is Sun JDK 1.4.2 and my servlet container is Resin 2.1.13. I have already test my Soap services are running (according with the recommendations of the user guide). Could you please help me on this? Regards. -- Jonathan Sarabia |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-04 15:10:51
|
Hi, Daniel. Thanks for your nice comments. To answer your question: no, SourceJammer development is not finished. We took a break for a while, but right now we are beginning discussions on what to included in the 2.2 release. There will also be a new version of the client and an Eclipse plugin released soon. I should update the SJ news to announce some of this stuff. In case you're interested in working on the new release, you might want to subscribe to the sourcejammer-devel mail list. Thanks. --Rob --- "Daniel Jimenez G." <dji...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Robert. > > Wanna thanks in advance for you and your team working, making > SourceJammer a real and powerful tool. > > Cos´ my profession, coputer analyst and developer, i´m used to work > with different versioning system tools, CVS, Visual Source Safe, > SourceJammer and other propietary repositories... so my only question > is easy: ¿Is Sourcejammer development finished?. > > I´m still using SourceJammer in several projects and cos > Sourcejammer´s web news are out of date, I wander if you and your > team never more develop for this great tool... > > > Thank you as I told you before. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-03 16:43:05
|
Hi, Brandon. I was just able to reproduce your error. I thought I had fixed this problem, but it's still out there. What I'm going to try to do is implement a bug fix and make the new code available to you. Hopefully that will fix your problem without you having to jump through any hoops. Thanks. --Rob --- Brandon Oh <bra...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks again for attending to my problems. > > The folder name is "code(ver1)" and "test2.2", how do I locate the > folder in the sourcejammer folder and how do I remove it? Thanks again > for your great help. > > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:28:02 -0800 (PST), Robert MacGrogan > <rob...@ya...> wrote: __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-02 20:57:32
|
Indeed it should. Try hitting your-server:8080 with a web browser. If TC is running, you should see something there with the tomcat log and all that. If that works, try your-server:8080/sourcejammer and see if you see a nice page with the SourceJammer logo. This will tell us how far along we are, anyway. If you're using startup.sh, you should probably get some kind of log output on the console. This might provide some clues. You should get some startup messages from SJ. If you don't see the log on the console, try tail-ing the stdout log in the TC logs directory. I think that's the right one. But sometimes the log to watch is one of those with a funky long name that includes the date. --Rob --- James N Parsells <ni...@20...> wrote: > I found out the problem.. I was running ssh on port 8080, how silly... > now however when i try to connect to sourcejammer I get a error opening > socket: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused > > i've started up tomcat with sh startup.sh and according to the > documentation tomcat should start sourcejammer > > let me know what you think... thanks > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-02 20:27:36
|
This sounds like it might have something to do with the way your server or firewall or something like that is configured. Are you trying to use SSH tunneling? Or is port 8080 supposed to simply be wide open on your server? I'm pretty much at a loss. Is there anything more you can tell me abou the way your server is configured and how you're trying to access it? Could something else be using prot 8080? Can you hit http://db-srv:8080/sourcejammer with a web browser? Are you really just trying to hit http://db-srv:8080 with your sourcejammer client? Correct URL should be http://db-srv:8080/sourcejammer/servlet/rpcrouter. --Rob --- James N Parsells <ni...@20...> wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for replying to me so quickly. I've done two things since your > email.. installed tomcat 5.5.7 and re-setup sourcejammer. Unfortunately > I'm still getting that error with ssh. The only thing I use ssh for is > remote access to this server, so I am thinking that tomcat / > sourcejammer is trying to use it in some way. Let me know whatcha think > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-02-01 22:32:05
|
Hi, James. First of all, I'm not sure if Tomcat 3.x is compatible with java 1.4.x. I could be wrong. I'm also not sure if SJ 2.1 works with TC 3.x. Is there a particular reason you want to use TC 3.3.2? You could try TC 5.x. It's very slick and a lot faster than 3 or 4. Second, are you using SSH in some capacity on purpose? Or is this something that just jumped out without a good reason? I know it's possible to run SJ over SSH, but I've never done that myself. I believe the concept is called SSH tunneling, but I don't know much more than that. --Rob --- James N Parsells <ni...@20...> wrote: > Hello, > > I recently downloaded and configured sourcejammer 2.1 / tomcat 3.3.2 / > j2re 1.4.1 > > after everything was configured and running i went to http://db-srv:8080 > and saw SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 Protocol mismatch > > while trying to create my archive with the sourcejammer client I > received the following error: SourceJammer is having trouble > communicating with the server. A problem occurred in communicating with > the SourceJammer/SOAP server. Error parsing HTTP status line > "SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2"; java.util.NoSuchElementException > > Any help on how to fix this would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > James > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: James N P. <ni...@20...> - 2005-02-01 19:35:18
|
Hello, I recently downloaded and configured sourcejammer 2.1 / tomcat 3.3.2 / j2re 1.4.1 after everything was configured and running i went to http://db-srv:8080 and saw SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 Protocol mismatch while trying to create my archive with the sourcejammer client I received the following error: SourceJammer is having trouble communicating with the server. A problem occurred in communicating with the SourceJammer/SOAP server. Error parsing HTTP status line "SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2"; java.util.NoSuchElementException Any help on how to fix this would be appreciated. Thanks James |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-01-31 16:10:38
|
This is controlled by the sourcejammer.properties file. The JRE Version references a location in your windows registry. --- Albert Moliner <amo...@ev...> wrote: > > Sorry for the sequential posting, I had forgotten this in the previous one. > > Which VM is SJ using to run? > I have more than one installed, and the client is not using the one under > JAVA_HOME. I guess it was picked up when it was installed, but how can I tell it > to use a different one? > > Thanks, > Albert. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 |
|
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2005-01-31 16:09:04
|
I believe this is a bug in the code that saves the changes you've made in the advanced tab. We can add this to Timo's list, perhaps . . . --Rob --- Albert Moliner <amo...@ev...> wrote: > I don't think that's the cause. > I can open the .source.jam files. I believe what Windows does not tolerate is a > filename with just extension, because if it hided its extension (as it does by > default), then the shown filename would be empty. > > The point is that SJ cannot remember (nor use) the configuration that I enter in > the advanced properties panel. If you type something in the un/hide files > command fields, close the client and reopen it, does what you had written appear > in the fields? > > Thanks, > Albert. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marc Palmer" <ma...@an...> > To: <sou...@li...> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:39 PM > Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Hiding files > > > > Albert Moliner wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > Is there something wrong with the command to hide the .source.jam files in > > > Windows? > > > Even though I set it in the advanced preferences tab, the source.jam never > get > > > hidden. And then, when I reopen the client and go to that panel, the filed > is > > > empty again, so it is not being saved. Is that just my problem, or is it a > bug? > > > > Just a guess, but I bet windows is getting confused by the leading "." > > in the name. For example, I can never edit files (using shell UI > > elements) that are called .htaccess for example. > > > > > > -- > > Marc Palmer - - - wj...@wa... > > > > Wangjammers, J2ME Developers > > ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/games/ > > > > Blog > > ~ http://www.jroller.com/page/Wangjammer5 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > > _______________________________________________ > > SourceJammer-users mailing list > > Sou...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 |
|
From: Albert M. <amo...@ev...> - 2005-01-31 15:09:39
|
I don't think that's the cause. I can open the .source.jam files. I believe what Windows does not tolerate is a filename with just extension, because if it hided its extension (as it does by default), then the shown filename would be empty. The point is that SJ cannot remember (nor use) the configuration that I enter in the advanced properties panel. If you type something in the un/hide files command fields, close the client and reopen it, does what you had written appear in the fields? Thanks, Albert. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Palmer" <ma...@an...> To: <sou...@li...> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Hiding files > Albert Moliner wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Is there something wrong with the command to hide the .source.jam files in > > Windows? > > Even though I set it in the advanced preferences tab, the source.jam never get > > hidden. And then, when I reopen the client and go to that panel, the filed is > > empty again, so it is not being saved. Is that just my problem, or is it a bug? > > Just a guess, but I bet windows is getting confused by the leading "." > in the name. For example, I can never edit files (using shell UI > elements) that are called .htaccess for example. > > > -- > Marc Palmer - - - wj...@wa... > > Wangjammers, J2ME Developers > ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/games/ > > Blog > ~ http://www.jroller.com/page/Wangjammer5 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-users mailing list > Sou...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-users > |
|
From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2005-01-31 14:41:42
|
Albert Moliner wrote: > Hello. > > Is there something wrong with the command to hide the .source.jam files in > Windows? > Even though I set it in the advanced preferences tab, the source.jam never get > hidden. And then, when I reopen the client and go to that panel, the filed is > empty again, so it is not being saved. Is that just my problem, or is it a bug? Just a guess, but I bet windows is getting confused by the leading "." in the name. For example, I can never edit files (using shell UI elements) that are called .htaccess for example. -- Marc Palmer - - - wj...@wa... Wangjammers, J2ME Developers ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/games/ Blog ~ http://www.jroller.com/page/Wangjammer5 |
23 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
