From Sara:
There has been a lot of activity on SBO coming from GSoC SBML<->BioPAX conversion project. I have not followed it fully but once they are concluded we need to check to make sure there is nothing we need to change in the SBML specification relating to SBO. IMHO it would be silly to produce a new relaese that did not account for any SBO changes; but we could also argue that time is a consideration.
Final recommendations:
Andreas and Dagmar both vote 'yes'.
Last edit: Lucian Smith 2016-09-22
Yes please, let's make these changes.
OK.
For the protocol again: yes!
Yes make the change
Fine by me.
I committed a change to SVN that includes these changes for l3v1r2, and inherited for l3v2. This is a relaxation of the rules, so is seemingly OK for an l3v1r2 change. It will be incorporated into RC2 for both specifications, and has been added to http://sbml.org/Documents/Specifications/SBML_Level_3/Version_1/Core/Confirmed_issues_in_the_Level_3_Version_1_Core_Specification
With the release of L3v2, this issue is now resolved.