The sbml for examples 7.4 and 7.5 does not declare reversible="false" on the reactions. However, the text explaining the examples uses irreversible reactions.
This is clearly an inconsistency in the specification, though I'd say this is more than a typo. There is really no alternative course of action except to amend the SBML code in the way described. Nevertheless, it is conceivable that this has conformance implications because readers might have been misled.
Since there's really no other course of action possible except to modify the SBML examples, and since 3/5 of the editors agree, I'm going to short-circuit the process slightly, and change the status to "Pending" as an accepted issue with conformance implications.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 730 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
It looks like this was corrected for l3v1, but still needs to be incorporated to l2v5. Since it used to be 'Pending' I'm going to re-set it to 'Pending'.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I am accepting this issue as valid.
I am accepting this issue as valid.
I am accepting this issue as valid.
This is clearly an inconsistency in the specification, though I'd say this is more than a typo. There is really no alternative course of action except to amend the SBML code in the way described. Nevertheless, it is conceivable that this has conformance implications because readers might have been misled.
Since there's really no other course of action possible except to modify the SBML examples, and since 3/5 of the editors agree, I'm going to short-circuit the process slightly, and change the status to "Pending" as an accepted issue with conformance implications.
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 730 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).
It looks like this was corrected for l3v1, but still needs to be incorporated to l2v5. Since it used to be 'Pending' I'm going to re-set it to 'Pending'.
Fixed in SVN for L2v5, and will be part of the forthcoming release of that specification.