Re: [sbml-required] Updates

[Michael H. <mh...@ca...>]

I like the changes!  The list idea in particular addresses a limitation of the previous scheme.

MH

On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:10:45 +0100, Lucian Smith wrote:
> I'm working on updating 'req' to use the new 'mathChanged' child, and I 
> have a few other changes to propose, all visible at
> 
> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1tmE9ZorGlMlqnAkoln65ilIHcAkDLCKv5pfYl8TwUJ4
> 
> * That we allow more than one 'MathChanged' child, for situations where 
> the math of an element is affected by more than one package (i.e. 
> Spatial and Comp; or Distrib and Arrays)
> 
> * A change in the attribute names:
> 
> 'mathOverridden' -> 'changedBy' (the fact that the math has changed is 
> now encapsulated in the object name)
> 
> 'coreHasAlternativeMath' -> 'viableWithoutChange'  (when multiple 
> packages affect the same element, it's not core that needs to be 
> checked; it's 'whatever is there minus this package' that needs to be 
> checked.)
> 
> Any opinions?
> 
> -Lucian
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
> _______________________________________________
> sbml-required mailing list
> sbm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbml-required