From: Stefan S. <se...@sy...> - 2010-10-14 02:18:41
|
On 10/13/2010 07:58 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Ralf Hemmecke<hem...@gm...> wrote: >>>> Sounds like a reasonable thing to do for Roundup 2.0 - also tearing out TAL... >>> Hmm, I have quite a lot of code in TAL in the meanwhile, so I'd prefer >>> to slowly phase this out (and keep support of TAL for a while). >> What is so bad with TAL so that people think about removing it? > It was a somewhat revolutionary idea when it was created but I think > it took purity a little too far. Purity always depends on the underlying idioms / paradigms that you want to promote. I would argue that TAL's "function calls" are decidedly impure (and more importantly: difficult to write and maintain), so a templating system with a more concise and convenient way to express substitutions (and other functional objects) would be nice. FWIW, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin... |