Request that QM have an option to generate the QS_FUN_DICTIONARY and/or QS_SIG_DICTIONARY calls associated with a model. Currently one has to hand add/edit these calls for every new/changed state.
Yes, indeed QM can (and should) assist in generating the QS dictionaries. This is a planned feature in QM, and will be implemented by adding new code-genation directives, which the developers then can insert into their action code (typically on the top-most initial transition).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Implemented (partially) in QM 4.2.1 (for QS_FUN_DICTIONARY() entries). The QS_OBJ_DICTIONARY() entries cannot be easily generated automatically, because it is not clear which object names the user wishes to expose (e.g., opaque pointers).
--MMS
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Yes, indeed QM can (and should) assist in generating the QS dictionaries. This is a planned feature in QM, and will be implemented by adding new code-genation directives, which the developers then can insert into their action code (typically on the top-most initial transition).
I think this a duplicate of #94 and #97.
Implemented (partially) in QM 4.2.1 (for
QS_FUN_DICTIONARY()entries). TheQS_OBJ_DICTIONARY()entries cannot be easily generated automatically, because it is not clear which object names the user wishes to expose (e.g., opaque pointers).--MMS