phpwiki-talk

[Phpwiki-talk] Version Criteria

[Sergio T. <ser...@ho...>]

I have been traversing through the PHPWiki documenation using PHPDocumentor 
on the the .php files in /lib ... and have also been looking at data entered 
into the six PHWiki tables created with MySQL. Its not clear, so I'm 
wondering if anyone knows what the criteria is for a major version compared 
to a minor version (associated with the "latestmajor" and "latestminor" 
attributes in the recent table)?

On the related topic of versioning, what happens if, in the version table, 
the value of the minor_edit attribute exceeds 256 characters (I.e., tinyint 
if unsigned has a range of 0 to 255)?

Serj

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] PHPDocumentor + PHPWiki

[Joby W. <joby@u.washington.edu>]

No there is no overarching documentation AFAIK.

The root of everything is in lib/main.php.

The main function starts things off and instatiates a WikiRequest object 
(probably the least documented class in the program) from which just about 
everything runs.

jbw

Sergio Trejo wrote:

> I just ran PHPDocumentor on PHPWiki using some basic inputs to 
> PHPDocumentor. I tried output as HTML and PDF. Wow, the PDF is 600+ pages!
> 
> The packages of Procedural Elements (what I've read of them all so far) 
> seem documented and cohesive with their descriptions of their Classes. I 
> noticed when running a basic (HTML:Smarty / default.ini) PHPDocumentor 
> process on the PHPWiki folder (runs recursively), that the main package 
> apparently requires a name (because it thinks that a command-line 
> PHPDocumentor switch "-o" is the name of the main package which of 
> course isn't true). Does anyone have any suggestions on the best way to 
> maximize PHPDocumentor to create as much documentation about PHPWiki? 
> Besides the packages and their classes, I didn't see any output 
> documentation that describes how PHPWiki is all tied together using its 
> many classes. Is there such an overview document, or are PHPWiki users 
> and developers on their own with respect to understanding how all the 
> pieces fit together? Anyone else used PHPDocumentor on PHPWiki before? I 
> scanned the Help and Open Discussion forums and didn't find any previous 
> discussion on this topic.
> 
> ST
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
> Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Phpwiki-talk mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk

[Phpwiki-talk] PHPDocumentor + PHPWiki

[Sergio T. <ser...@ho...>]

I just ran PHPDocumentor on PHPWiki using some basic inputs to 
PHPDocumentor. I tried output as HTML and PDF. Wow, the PDF is 600+ pages!

The packages of Procedural Elements (what I've read of them all so far) seem 
documented and cohesive with their descriptions of their Classes. I noticed 
when running a basic (HTML:Smarty / default.ini) PHPDocumentor process on 
the PHPWiki folder (runs recursively), that the main package apparently 
requires a name (because it thinks that a command-line PHPDocumentor switch 
"-o" is the name of the main package which of course isn't true). Does 
anyone have any suggestions on the best way to maximize PHPDocumentor to 
create as much documentation about PHPWiki? Besides the packages and their 
classes, I didn't see any output documentation that describes how PHPWiki is 
all tied together using its many classes. Is there such an overview 
document, or are PHPWiki users and developers on their own with respect to 
understanding how all the pieces fit together? Anyone else used 
PHPDocumentor on PHPWiki before? I scanned the Help and Open Discussion 
forums and didn't find any previous discussion on this topic.

ST

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

[Phpwiki-talk] Fatal PhpWiki Error

[Jean-Bernard W. <jw...@fr...>]

Hi all !
this is the message i get after installing phpwiki to my website.
I'm complete crap in php and sql so this is all chinese to me - no 
disrespect meant at all.

Can you help me there ?

PearDB.php:681: Fatal[256]: wikidb_backend_mysql: fatal database error

     * DB Error: unknown error
     * (INSERT INTO recent (id, latestversion, latestmajor, latestminor) 
SELECT id, MAX(version), MAX(IF(minor_edit=0,version,0)), 
MAX(IF(minor_edit<>0,version,0)) FROM version WHERE id=273 GROUP BY id 
[nativecode=1030 ** Got error 134 from table handler])

-- 
Mais qu'est-ce qu'il a de plus que moi Rick Hunter ?

[Phpwiki-talk] Re: Phpwiki-talk digest, Vol 1 #789 - 3 msgs

[Micki K. <mic...@co...>]

I'm also running a large internal phpwiki site, with full document 
production - see 
http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/PhpWikiToDocBookAndPDF

Would love to see the current phpwiki branch thicken out a bit with a 
1.3.5 release!

My big requests - well-groomed implementation of db-based 
authentication, a 'page template'-style selector a la Michael Van 
Dam's mod, page variables (for auto anchor naming, etc.), and 
automatic html Table of Contents when desired (%%TOC%%) by 
sectionhead a la dbwiki.

Even without such wishes, we've got a very vibrant program in phpwiki!

Micki

At 8:21 PM -0700 10/20/03, php...@li... wrote:
>Send Phpwiki-talk mailing list submissions to
>	php...@li...
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	php...@li...
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	php...@li...
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Phpwiki-talk digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: phpwiki status (Carsten Klapp)
>    2. Re: phpwiki status (Rui Carmo)
>    3. Re: phpwiki status (Arnaud Fontaine)
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:07:55 -0400
>Subject: Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status
>Cc: Norberto Meijome <nu...@me...>,
>    Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken...@Go...>,
>    Rui Carmo <rui...@ac...>,
>    "Frank Shearar" <fra...@rn...>,
>    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_WAGNER?= <jw...@fi...>
>To: php...@li...
>From: Carsten Klapp <car...@ya...>
>
>Hi All,
>
>I'm still catching up on the PhpWiki mailing list from the last few
>months so bear with me. I will look at the current submitted patches
>over the upcoming week.
>
>Fortunately I have more time now (and some new recent inspiration (: )
>to work on PhpWiki, and there are a few people who will be helping me
>to update the German localizations. I haven't been in contact with the
>other developers for a while so I can't say anything about their
>personal schedules at the moment.
>
>I hope to clean up a few items to get ready for a 1.3.5 release, but I
>don't know yet whether I can do actual SourceForge file releases
>without Steve Wainstead (who usually handles it). Anyway, I'll commit
>whatever updates I can to CVS so at least they will be more readily
>available to everyone.
>
>(The project manager Steve Wainstead must be away on vacation, he is
>probably somewhere diving underwater or whatnot.)
>
>:)
>Cheers,
>Carsten
>
>On Sunday, October 19, 2003, at 07:34  pm, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
>>  Been there, done that (contacted wainstead via his @sourceforge
>>  email), zilch  reply.
>>
>>  We all try again for another week, (maybe he/she's on holidays? ) and
>>  then, if we get no reply, we fork. I don't particularly like spawns
>>  projects all over the place, but we do need to keep working on the
>>  code.
>>
>>  I'll contact a couple of people from the ones that have commited code
>>  to see what's going on.
>>
>>  Regards,
>>  Norberto Meijome
>>
>>  "The only people that never change are the stupid and the dead", Jorge
>>  Luis Borges.
>>
>>
>>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>>  From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:Ken...@Go...] Sent:
>>>>  Monday, 20 October 2003 3:06 AM
>>>>  To: php...@li...
>>>>  Subject: Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Rui Carmo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  After a year or so of puttering around with the sources
>>>>  (and yes, I've
>>>>
>>>>>  compared mine with the current CVS a couple of months
>>>>  back), I've come
>>>>>  to the conclusion that PhpWiki is stalled. The existing
>>>>  code base has an
>>>>>  excellent structure (it's well designed, even if somewhat
>>>>  obscure at
>>>>>  times due to the amount of abstraction used), but bits of
>>>>  it (like the
>>>>>  block parser and the database layer) seem like they should
>  >>> have evolved
>>>>>  further and were frozen while people waited for further redesign.
>>>>>
>>>>  well, it seems unclear whether there's any activity in the way of
>>>>  patches, or even anyone around to commit them on behalf of
>>>>  submitters. sometimes people make better progress on things like
>>>>  this if they have a greater investment.  sometimes not. :-)
>>>>
>>>>  whatever, i think *i* would, so i see no harm in asking the powers
>>>>  that be on this project for commit access.  if they say no, i'm no
>>>>  worse off; if they say yes, i could conceivably be better off.
>>>>
>>>>  always assuming that the project admins are on this list. :-)
>>>>  --
>>>>  #ken	P-)}
>>>>
>>>>  Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
>>>>  Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>>>>
>>>>  "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 01:27:46 +0100
>From: Rui Carmo <rui...@ac...>
>To: Norberto Meijome <nu...@me...>,
>  php...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status
>
>Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
>>  Been there, done that (contacted wainstead via his @sourceforge
>>  email), zilch  reply.
>>
>>  We all try again for another week, (maybe he/she's on holidays? ) and
>>  then, if we get no reply, we fork.
>
>
>I'm in. I've even kept a feature list (and a name suggestion) from the
>days when I thought I might have time to do my own wiki with a colleague:
>
>http://the.taoofmac.com/space/LiveWiki
>
>(bit muddled, I know. I'll straighten it out)
>
>I have only one demand: Clean CSS-based themes from the outset, without
>those funky yellow tones. Heck, I'll code those :)
>
>Oh, and SQL-based uploaded file storage. :)
>
>R.
>
>http://the.taoofmac.com
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 3
>Subject: Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status
>From: Arnaud Fontaine <ar...@cr...>
>Reply-To: ar...@cr...
>To: phpwiki <php...@li...>
>Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:29:37 +0200
>
>Le lun 20/10/2003 =E0 01:34, Norberto Meijome a =E9crit :
>>  Been there, done that (contacted wainstead via his @sourceforge email),=20
>>  zilch  reply.
>>=20
>
>If some of you speak french, you can head to my wiki :
>http://wiki.crao.net
>
>We have written a lot of stuff about universal wiki syntax and some
>other stuff (like a rss feed reader plugin).
>
>My web designer and I also wrote some "skins/themes" for phpwiki.
>
>The one on CraoWiki is quite old now ... but we have a new one running
>on http://autrans.crao.net/ and the next CraoWiki theme is on
>http://nwiki.crao.net/ for testing.
>
>After writing 6 different themes ... I just miss the good Smarty
>Template engine !! But well ... maybe it's not a priority :)
>
>I can (with a neutral logo) add them to the PhpWiki tree along with my
>RssFeed plugin.
>
>I also run some private wikis protected by the external http
>authentification. I wrote a little hack to get this external auth
>working with PhpWiki ... not perfect but works.
>
>I'm also working on the XmlRpc side to add remote page modification and
>creation.
>
>Oh ... btw, CraoWiki has more than 2800 pages, about 200 contributors
>(normal non geek ppl) and more than 26000 visits a month (more than
>16000 visitors). So its a nice real life benchmark for PhpWiki :)
>
>Last time I tried to overload it using ab (with 100 concurrent users and
>100 requests per users), it was able to deliver 7+ requests per second
>(no cache at all, MySQL and GDBM as backend on a dual PIII 1ghz and 1.5
>GB of Ram).
>
>We need to dig into the code for some optimization ... 7 request per
>second is not much ...
>
>Well ... It time to move this great project ahead.
>--=20
>Arnaud Fontaine
>Jabber: sh...@ra...
>ICQ: 3504789
>
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>_______________________________________________
>Phpwiki-talk mailing list
>Php...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk
>
>
>End of Phpwiki-talk Digest


-- 

Micki
mailto:mic...@co...

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status

[Arnaud F. <ar...@cr...>]

Le lun 20/10/2003 =E0 01:34, Norberto Meijome a =E9crit :
> Been there, done that (contacted wainstead via his @sourceforge email),=20
> zilch  reply.
>=20

If some of you speak french, you can head to my wiki :
http://wiki.crao.net

We have written a lot of stuff about universal wiki syntax and some
other stuff (like a rss feed reader plugin).

My web designer and I also wrote some "skins/themes" for phpwiki.

The one on CraoWiki is quite old now ... but we have a new one running
on http://autrans.crao.net/ and the next CraoWiki theme is on
http://nwiki.crao.net/ for testing.

After writing 6 different themes ... I just miss the good Smarty
Template engine !! But well ... maybe it's not a priority :)

I can (with a neutral logo) add them to the PhpWiki tree along with my
RssFeed plugin.

I also run some private wikis protected by the external http
authentification. I wrote a little hack to get this external auth
working with PhpWiki ... not perfect but works.

I'm also working on the XmlRpc side to add remote page modification and
creation.

Oh ... btw, CraoWiki has more than 2800 pages, about 200 contributors
(normal non geek ppl) and more than 26000 visits a month (more than
16000 visitors). So its a nice real life benchmark for PhpWiki :)

Last time I tried to overload it using ab (with 100 concurrent users and
100 requests per users), it was able to deliver 7+ requests per second
(no cache at all, MySQL and GDBM as backend on a dual PIII 1ghz and 1.5
GB of Ram).

We need to dig into the code for some optimization ... 7 request per
second is not much ...

Well ... It time to move this great project ahead.
--=20
Arnaud Fontaine
Jabber: sh...@ra...
ICQ: 3504789

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status

[Rui C. <rui...@ac...>]

Norberto Meijome wrote:

> Been there, done that (contacted wainstead via his @sourceforge 
> email), zilch  reply.
>
> We all try again for another week, (maybe he/she's on holidays? ) and 
> then, if we get no reply, we fork. 


I'm in. I've even kept a feature list (and a name suggestion) from the 
days when I thought I might have time to do my own wiki with a colleague:

http://the.taoofmac.com/space/LiveWiki

(bit muddled, I know. I'll straighten it out)

I have only one demand: Clean CSS-based themes from the outset, without 
those funky yellow tones. Heck, I'll code those :)

Oh, and SQL-based uploaded file storage. :)

R.

http://the.taoofmac.com

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status

[Carsten K. <car...@ya...>]

Hi All,

I'm still catching up on the PhpWiki mailing list from the last few 
months so bear with me. I will look at the current submitted patches 
over the upcoming week.

Fortunately I have more time now (and some new recent inspiration (: ) 
to work on PhpWiki, and there are a few people who will be helping me 
to update the German localizations. I haven't been in contact with the 
other developers for a while so I can't say anything about their 
personal schedules at the moment.

I hope to clean up a few items to get ready for a 1.3.5 release, but I 
don't know yet whether I can do actual SourceForge file releases 
without Steve Wainstead (who usually handles it). Anyway, I'll commit 
whatever updates I can to CVS so at least they will be more readily 
available to everyone.

(The project manager Steve Wainstead must be away on vacation, he is 
probably somewhere diving underwater or whatnot.)

:)
Cheers,
Carsten

On Sunday, October 19, 2003, at 07:34  pm, Norberto Meijome wrote:

> Been there, done that (contacted wainstead via his @sourceforge 
> email), zilch  reply.
>
> We all try again for another week, (maybe he/she's on holidays? ) and 
> then, if we get no reply, we fork. I don't particularly like spawns 
> projects all over the place, but we do need to keep working on the 
> code.
>
> I'll contact a couple of people from the ones that have commited code 
> to see what's going on.
>
> Regards,
> Norberto Meijome
>
> "The only people that never change are the stupid and the dead", Jorge 
> Luis Borges.
>
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:Ken...@Go...] Sent: 
>>> Monday, 20 October 2003 3:06 AM
>>> To: php...@li...
>>> Subject: Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status
>>>
>>>
>>> Rui Carmo wrote:
>>>
>>>> After a year or so of puttering around with the sources
>>> (and yes, I've
>>>
>>>> compared mine with the current CVS a couple of months
>>> back), I've come
>>>> to the conclusion that PhpWiki is stalled. The existing
>>> code base has an
>>>> excellent structure (it's well designed, even if somewhat
>>> obscure at
>>>> times due to the amount of abstraction used), but bits of
>>> it (like the
>>>> block parser and the database layer) seem like they should
>>> have evolved
>>>> further and were frozen while people waited for further redesign.
>>>>
>>> well, it seems unclear whether there's any activity in the way of 
>>> patches, or even anyone around to commit them on behalf of 
>>> submitters. sometimes people make better progress on things like 
>>> this if they have a greater investment.  sometimes not. :-)
>>>
>>> whatever, i think *i* would, so i see no harm in asking the powers 
>>> that be on this project for commit access.  if they say no, i'm no 
>>> worse off; if they say yes, i could conceivably be better off.
>>>
>>> always assuming that the project admins are on this list. :-)
>>> -- 
>>> #ken	P-)}
>>>
>>> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
>>> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>>>
>>> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status

[Norberto M. <nu...@me...>]

Been there, done that (contacted wainstead via his @sourceforge email), 
zilch  reply.

We all try again for another week, (maybe he/she's on holidays? ) and 
then, if we get no reply, we fork. I don't particularly like spawns 
projects all over the place, but we do need to keep working on the code.

I'll contact a couple of people from the ones that have commited code to 
see what's going on.

Regards,
Norberto Meijome

"The only people that never change are the stupid and the dead", Jorge 
Luis Borges.


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:Ken...@Go...] 
>>Sent: Monday, 20 October 2003 3:06 AM
>>To: php...@li...
>>Subject: Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status
>>
>>
>>Rui Carmo wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>After a year or so of puttering around with the sources 
>>>      
>>>
>>(and yes, I've
>>    
>>
>>>compared mine with the current CVS a couple of months 
>>>      
>>>
>>back), I've come 
>>    
>>
>>>to the conclusion that PhpWiki is stalled. The existing 
>>>      
>>>
>>code base has an 
>>    
>>
>>>excellent structure (it's well designed, even if somewhat 
>>>      
>>>
>>obscure at 
>>    
>>
>>>times due to the amount of abstraction used), but bits of 
>>>      
>>>
>>it (like the 
>>    
>>
>>>block parser and the database layer) seem like they should 
>>>      
>>>
>>have evolved 
>>    
>>
>>>further and were frozen while people waited for further redesign.
>>>      
>>>
>>well, it seems unclear whether there's any activity in the 
>>way of patches, or even anyone around to commit them on 
>>behalf of submitters. sometimes people make better progress 
>>on things like this if they have a greater investment.  
>>sometimes not. :-)
>>
>>whatever, i think *i* would, so i see no harm in asking the 
>>powers that be on this project for commit access.  if they 
>>say no, i'm no worse off; if they say yes, i could 
>>conceivably be better off.
>>
>>always assuming that the project admins are on this list. :-)
>>-- 
>>#ken	P-)}
>>
>>Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
>>Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>>
>>"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum 
>>Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & 
>>Strategies in The Enterprise 
>>Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room 
>>http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
>>_______________________________________________
>>Phpwiki-talk mailing list
>>Php...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk
>>
>>    
>>

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status

[Rodent of U. S. <Ken...@Go...>]

Rui Carmo wrote:
> 
> After a year or so of puttering around with the sources (and yes, I've 
> compared mine with the current CVS a couple of months back), I've come 
> to the conclusion that PhpWiki is stalled. The existing code base has an 
> excellent structure (it's well designed, even if somewhat obscure at 
> times due to the amount of abstraction used), but bits of it (like the 
> block parser and the database layer) seem like they should have evolved 
> further and were frozen while people waited for further redesign.

well, it seems unclear whether there's any activity in the way of
patches, or even anyone around to commit them on behalf of submitters.
sometimes people make better progress on things like this if they
have a greater investment.  sometimes not. :-)

whatever, i think *i* would, so i see no harm in asking the powers
that be on this project for commit access.  if they say no, i'm no
worse off; if they say yes, i could conceivably be better off.

always assuming that the project admins are on this list. :-)
-- 
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"

[Phpwiki-talk] Ability to add more users to index.php?

[Sergio T. <ser...@ho...>]

From what I can discern based on the messages posted to this list and some 
kind responses thus far, there is not an authorization built into PhPWiki. 
Does this mean then that, when editing phpwiki/index.php file (such as to 
define an ADMIN_USER and ADMIN_PASSWD), this Admin user (and password) is 
the only user one can add to access phpwiki? No ability to add more users?

ST

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

RE : [Phpwiki-talk] session table

[<jw...@fi...>]

Hello,

To the best of my knowledge, authentification is not fully implemented =
in
the current version of phpwiki.

It enables you to log who had made changes, but there is no full fledge
session mechanism

The table might be there only for future usage

J=E9r=F4me=20

-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: php...@li...
[mailto:php...@li...] De la part de Sergio =
Trejo
Envoy=E9=A0: jeudi 16 octobre 2003 18:06
=C0=A0: php...@li...
Objet=A0: [Phpwiki-talk] session table

Hi,

I just started using PhPWiki and I think its really cool. I hooked it up =
to=20
MySQL rather easily on my Mac running Jaguar, and soon comes Panther. =
Thanks

for those who made PhPWiki.

In my first days of trial and error using PhPWiki, I have created a =
login=20
name and have logged into the wiki, and have created some pages. And =
then=20
afterward I queried the tables and data in the wiki MySQL database. I=20
wonder, why is it that there is no data stored in the session table of =
the=20
wiki MySQL database? I queried the session table one time right after I=20
logged into the wiki and created a page with a WikiWord.

Is there some other ocassion or situation when session table is used? =
Thanks

for any suggestions.

ST

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*=20
http://join.msn.com/?page=3Dfeatures/junkmail



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Phpwiki-talk mailing list
Php...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk

[Phpwiki-talk] session table

[Sergio T. <ser...@ho...>]

Hi,

I just started using PhPWiki and I think its really cool. I hooked it up to 
MySQL rather easily on my Mac running Jaguar, and soon comes Panther. Thanks 
for those who made PhPWiki.

In my first days of trial and error using PhPWiki, I have created a login 
name and have logged into the wiki, and have created some pages. And then 
afterward I queried the tables and data in the wiki MySQL database. I 
wonder, why is it that there is no data stored in the session table of the 
wiki MySQL database? I queried the session table one time right after I 
logged into the wiki and created a page with a WikiWord.

Is there some other ocassion or situation when session table is used? Thanks 
for any suggestions.

ST

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

RE : [Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status

[<jw...@fi...>]

Hello again,

Are there any of the original phpwiki developers still on this list ?

It would be interesting to hear from them in order to better understand the
status of the project and where they see it going within the next months.

Thank you for your time and insights

[Phpwiki-talk] CONGRATULATION

[<net...@ne...>]

  NETHERLANDS CASINO LOTTERY
  FROM: INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION/PRIZE AWARD DEPT.
  REF: 2671890937-026
  BATCH: 000234/02

  RE: WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL NOTICE:

  We are pleased to inform you of the result of the NETHERLAND CASINO  International Lottery programs held on the 31st August,2003. Your e-mail
  address attached to ticket number 2671890937-026 with game number 16566
  drew lucky numbers 17,19,35,39,44,58 which consequently won. You have
  therefore been approved for a lump sum pay  of   Five hundred thousand
 Fifty Thousand Euros  ( 550,000.00 Euros ). CONGRATULATIONS!!

 All participants were selected through a computer ballot
  system drawn from our sponsors' databases, including over
  150,000 company and individual email addresses and names submitted by our
  agents from all over the world. To file
  for your claim, please contact:our fiduciary agent Mr. MARK LEWIS, email address:mar...@sp...   Financial Services in The Netherlands;  
  Due to mix up of some numbers and names, we ask that you keep
  your winning information confidential until your claims have been
  processed.This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming
  and unwarranted abuse of this program by some participants.

  Please not that all winnings must be claimed not later than
  6th november,2003. After this date all unclaimed winnings
  will be null and void.In order to avoid unnecessary delays and
  complications remember to quote your reference number and batch
  numbers in all correspondence. Furthermore,should there be any change of
  address do inform our agents as soon as possible.

  Congratulations once more and thank you for being part of our
  promotional program.

  Sincerely yours,
 MARK LEWIS (NETHERLANDS CASINO)

[Phpwiki-talk] THANKS

[<mr...@ne...>]

Dear Friend. 
As you read this, I don't want you to feel sorry for 
me, because, I believe everyone will die someday. 
My name is MOSES AZIZ, a merchant in Dubai, in the 
U.A.E.I have been diagnosed with Esophageal cancer .
It has defiled all forms of medical treatment, and right now 
I have only about a few 
months to live, according to medical experts. 
I have not particularly lived my life so well, as I 
never really cared for anyone(not even myself)but my 
business. Though I am very rich, I was never 
generous, I was always hostile to people and only 
focused on my business as that was the only thing I 
cared for. But now I regret all this as I now know 
that there is more to life than just wanting to have 
or make all the money in the world. 
I believe when God gives me a second chance to come 
to this world I would live my life a different way 
from how I have lived it. Now that God has called 
me, I have willed and given most of my property 
and assets to my immediate and extended family 
members as well as a few close friends. 
I want God to be merciful to me and accept my soul 
so, I have decided to give alms to charity 
organizations, as I want this to be one of the last 
good deeds I do on earth. So far, I have distributed 
money to some charity organizations in the U.A.E, 
Algeria and Malaysia. Now that my health has 
deteriorated so badly, I cannot do this myself 
anymore. I once asked members of my family to close one 
of my accounts and distribute the money which I have 
there to charity organization in Bulgaria and 
Pakistan, they refused and kept the money to 
themselves. Hence, I do not trust them anymore, as 
they seem not to be contended with what I have left 
for them. 
The last of my money which no one knows of is the 
huge cash deposit of twenty four million dollars 
$24,000,000,that I have with a finance/Security Company 
abroad. I will want you to help me collect this deposit 
and dispatched it to charity organizations.



I have set aside 20% for you and for your time.

God be with you. 

[Phpwiki-talk] auto-login with httpauth

[Arnaud F. <ar...@cr...>]

I've hacked a bit the WikiUser code to allow (cvs version) an external
auth with http authentification.

It works fine (I get the login and password) but I didn't find a way to
have the user auto logged in on the wiki side ! One need, after the HTTP
login process, to click on the login button on the wiki side ! 

More, once logged this way, if I try to access the userpref page, it ask
me for the password once again ...

hmmm ... any clue ?
-- 
Arnaud Fontaine
Jabber: sh...@ra...
ICQ: 3504789

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] Copyrighted image.

[Jon <d9...@na...>]

On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:05:13PM +1000, Bill van der Meyden wrote:
> I would think that you know what copyright means!
>  
> It might be a good idea to remove on your site's URL http://uvsq.free.fr/wiki/
> index.php?full=endeavour-web
>  
> the image http://www.endeavour-web.org/images/batavia-mast-large.jpg 

This has nothing to do with the phpwiki developers (which this mailing
list is for). It is like going after the apache webserver developers
when someone is using the apache webserver to host a copyrighted
picture without permission.

It is the people behind http://uvsq.free.fr/wiki/ you should
ask. Maybe they are subscribed to this mailing list, but most likely
not.

A much faster solution is to just go to the page and edit it and
remove the link yourself. It is a wiki after all.

-- 
Jon Åslund

[Phpwiki-talk] Copyrighted image.

[Bill v. d. M. <vd...@oz...>]

I would think that you know what copyright means!

It might be a good idea to remove on your site's URL =
http://uvsq.free.fr/wiki/index.php?full=3Dendeavour-web

the image http://www.endeavour-web.org/images/batavia-mast-large.jpg=20

Thank you!

Webmaster
Endeavour Web

[Phpwiki-talk] phpwiki status

[<jw...@fi...>]

Hello,

=20

After reading the forum on sourceforge, I realize that I am not the only =
one
willing to commit to a specific wiki codebase, in the hope that all the =
best
wiki functionalities will be available over the time in that codebase.

=20

Phpwiki has great functionalities, and =96 to the best of my =
understanding =96 a
very robust/adaptative core architecture.

=20

What do you people on this list think of the future of phpwiki ? is =
there
going to be a new release soon ? is there a consistent developer
documentation somewhere that could help other people join ?

=20

Some people in the forum talk about forking the project. Why do you =
think
are they coming to this extreme ?

=20

I hope this will start a constructive discussion

J=E9r=F4me

[Phpwiki-talk] custom auth

[Rodent of U. S. <Ken...@Go...>]

let me try again, in case i wasn't clear the first time (an all
too common occurrence).

what does my login.tmpl script need to do if it determines that
the user is authenticated?  if it's doing the authentication,
how does it notify the rest of the wiki of the fact?  should
it frob the session variables or something?  or what?

i have tried to trace this, and it's a maze of twisty little
passages.  i chose phpwiki because i know and like php, but
modifying it is so difficult i'm wondering if maybe i should
try something else.

is it even actively maintained?  this list seems to be primarily
questions rather than answers; is that true or are the answers
just being sent to the askers and not cced to the list?
-- 
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] sudden DB-access error

[Arnaud F. <ar...@cr...>]

Le mer 08/10/2003 =E0 12:17, Timm a =E9crit :

>  DB Error: unknown error
>  (LOCK TABLES akwiki_page WRITE,akwiki_version WRITE,akwiki_link=20
> WRITE,akwiki_recent WRITE,akwiki_nonempty WRITE [nativecode=3DAccess deni=
ed for=20
> user: 'massenmensch@localhost' to database 'massenmensch'])

It seems you don't have the credentials to access the database
"massenmensch".

If your ISP has setup a new MySQL, maybe he didn't updated the users
table.

The error is very clear : "Access denied" ...=20
--=20
Arnaud Fontaine
Jabber: sh...@ra...
ICQ: 3504789

[Phpwiki-talk] sudden DB-access error

[Timm <ko...@ma...>]

Hi there!

Suddenly my PhpWikis stopped running (1.3.3, 1.3.4) - for error see below=
=2E=20
Other program accessing entries in the same MySQL table still work, the=20
entries are still there, I didn't change anything in the wiki-code=20
(MySQL-access: "'dsn' =3D>=20
'mysql://massenmensch:<pwd>@localhost/massenmensch'). Are there potential=
=20
inconsitencies w/ new MySQL- or php-versions my provider might have set u=
p?

Puzzled and hoping for help,=20

Timm

-------------------------------------


lib/Request.php:116: Warning[2]: ob_start(): output handler 'ob_gzhandler=
'=20
cannot be used after 'URL-Rewriter'


lib/WikiDB/backend/PearDB.php:680: Fatal[256]: wikidb_backend_mysql: fata=
l=20
database error

 DB Error: unknown error
 (LOCK TABLES akwiki_page WRITE,akwiki_version WRITE,akwiki_link=20
WRITE,akwiki_recent WRITE,akwiki_nonempty WRITE [nativecode=3DAccess deni=
ed for=20
user: 'massenmensch@localhost' to database 'massenmensch'])


FatalerWikiFehler


lib/WikiDB/backend/PearDB.php:680: Fatal[256]: wikidb_backend_mysql: fata=
l=20
database error

 DB Error: unknown error
 (LOCK TABLES akwiki_page WRITE,akwiki_version WRITE,akwiki_link=20
WRITE,akwiki_recent WRITE,akwiki_nonempty WRITE [nativecode=3DAccess deni=
ed for=20
user: 'massenmensch@localhost' to database 'massenmensch'])

Re: [Phpwiki-talk] Formal/informal German PhpWiki?

[Oliver B. <ob...@de...>]

Carsten Klapp wrote:

[...]

> The formal version would be ideally targeted towards businesses and
> other organizations who may be interested in starting their own
> PhpWiki, and who otherwise would not even be able to consider using
> PhpWiki because it currently employs the informal German language;

that's a good idea, but more important would be to have a _complete_ 
translation of the texts, i.e. the formatting help was not translated 
in 1.3.4 IIRC, and I believe there were other language related 
glitches.

I already considered translating the missing texts, but since the 
users understood the english version pretty good, I didn't continue.

> Also, I would like to see any formal notation (Sie) as the default for
> a German PhpWiki installation, but we can continue to offer the

The disadvantage is that the delay of the German versions likely 
would increase.

I agree with you that for a business environment in Germany the 
presentation of PhpWiki should be smoother. But that's IMHO more than 
the formal/informal question, a more foolproof introduction to 
PhpWiki would be useful.

I offered Wikis for three different groups because I was sure that 
they could profit from the simple cooperation principle, but found it 
very difficult to get them accepting it. The main problems were:

- too lazy to read the explanations
- didn't understand the explanations
- didn't dare to press "edit" to try how it works
- didn't want to share information

For _non-technical_ people, it seems to be a real hurdle. For the 
technical versed, it might be not so important to have a German 
version at all.

BTW: Only one of the three Wikis was really alive and (hopefully) 
useful for some period. Today I use Wiki as a kind of CMS or PIM, and 
I really love it because it's simple and has an open data format.

Another problem in a business environment could be the lack of access 
control (and user authentication). I didn't check the nightly 
snapshot for a while, is there any progress with PagePermissions?

Oliver

[Phpwiki-talk] Formal/informal German PhpWiki?

[Carsten K. <car...@us...>]

Hi All(-e DeutschSprachigePhpWikizens),

Recently I have been discussing modifications to the German version of 
PhpWiki with Helmer Pardun, who is writing a new book about Wikis.

http://www.deutschewikiakademie.de/phpwiki

We have concluded that we would like to have PhpWiki in both formal 
German and a separate translation for informal German. As it stands 
now, the German PhpWiki is a mixture of formal and informal. (In 
comparison, the French PhpWiki translations are strictly formal.)

The formal version would be ideally targeted towards businesses and 
other organizations who may be interested in starting their own 
PhpWiki, and who otherwise would not even be able to consider using 
PhpWiki because it currently employs the informal German language; 
while the informal version could still be offered for the 
Wiki-hobbyists (who probably would not insist on traditional formal 
German anyway). Another possibility would be to eliminate the informal 
German from PhpWiki altogether; however, seeing as a lot of work has 
already gone towards the current (informal) German translation of 
PhpWiki I think it best to keep it and simply add a formal German 
translation.

Also, I would like to see any formal notation (Sie) as the default for 
a German PhpWiki installation, but we can continue to offer the 
informal (Du) as an option. Perhaps by renaming the current 
"phpwiki/locale/de" directory to "phpwiki/locale/de-informal"? (oder 
"phpwiki/locale/de-informell"?) In that case, WikiHobbyists would then 
simply discard "phpwiki/locale/de" and replace it with the contents of 
"phpwiki/locale/de-informal" if he/she so chooses for their personal 
PhpWiki.


If there are no objections within a week or so, I would like to make 
the necessary changes to maintain two separate variations of these 
German translations in the PhpWiki-CVS.


Any comments, suggestions or ideas? (Positive, negative, or otherwise 
welcome.)


Vielen Dank,

Carsten Klapp <car...@us...>