You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(8) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(85) |
Mar
(121) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(9) |
2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(57) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
2005 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(27) |
2006 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(5) |
2007 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(19) |
2008 |
Jan
(94) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(15) |
Jun
|
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(5) |
2010 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Kon A. <ang...@ip...> - 2002-09-27 09:03:31
|
Hi Guys, If it's OK with all I'd like to get this one off the ground. Kon On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 02:49, James E. Flemer wrote: > Thanks to Kon, there is preliminary support for individual > results. Please test this. I think it would be even better > if when the results are displayed, there is some method to > navigate between responses. A dropdown (similar to the main > results selector page), or Prev/Next buttons (or both) > would be a good idea ... any takers on implementing this? > > v1.5-RC1 is delayed until Monday now, pending a few GUI > patches from Kon, so get any changes in asap. > > Take it easy, > -James > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts > on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now > for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 > http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab > _______________________________________________ > phpESP-devel mailing list > php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-25 03:42:41
|
Feature Requests item #577888, was opened at 2002-07-06 04:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 Category: gui Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Summary: TreeGui Initial Comment: As mentioned in the developer forum, it seems as we agree a tree like structure on the left side WITHOUT frames is a really good solution to future development. So how about implementing it. May I suggest that Kon who is the designer figure something out? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-09-25 13:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I tried to incorporate a tree structure into the new GUI but it simply did not work. In design terms it left a hell of a lot of real estate empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-09-25 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I tried to incorporate a tree structure into the new GUI but it simply did not work. In design terms it left a hell of a lot of real estate empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-09-25 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I tried to incorporate a tree structure into the new GUI but it simply did not work. In design terms it left a hell of a lot of real estate empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-07-06 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I'll have a look at this for the new gui but can't promise that it'll be a tree structure as I don't believe such structures should be used as main navigation menus. -Kon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-25 03:41:43
|
Feature Requests item #577888, was opened at 2002-07-06 04:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 Category: gui Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Summary: TreeGui Initial Comment: As mentioned in the developer forum, it seems as we agree a tree like structure on the left side WITHOUT frames is a really good solution to future development. So how about implementing it. May I suggest that Kon who is the designer figure something out? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-09-25 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I tried to incorporate a tree structure into the new GUI but it simply did not work. In design terms it left a hell of a lot of real estate empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-09-25 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I tried to incorporate a tree structure into the new GUI but it simply did not work. In design terms it left a hell of a lot of real estate empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-07-06 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I'll have a look at this for the new gui but can't promise that it'll be a tree structure as I don't believe such structures should be used as main navigation menus. -Kon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-25 03:41:30
|
Feature Requests item #577888, was opened at 2002-07-06 04:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 Category: gui Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Summary: TreeGui Initial Comment: As mentioned in the developer forum, it seems as we agree a tree like structure on the left side WITHOUT frames is a really good solution to future development. So how about implementing it. May I suggest that Kon who is the designer figure something out? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-09-25 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I tried to incorporate a tree structure into the new GUI but it simply did not work. In design terms it left a hell of a lot of real estate empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-07-06 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I'll have a look at this for the new gui but can't promise that it'll be a tree structure as I don't believe such structures should be used as main navigation menus. -Kon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 |
From: <mic...@gm...> - 2002-09-23 08:21:30
|
> Well, it has been proposed quite a few times to make the > install easier in the way you propose ... But I don't see > that it is any different. Isn't it now necessary to make > sure each component (admin, handler, survey) has the path > to the "phpESP.local.ini.php"? yes and no, the only thing that has to be stable is the directory layout of phpESP. As long as it is like .../phpESP <= here is the new config file /admin /handler /survey you have no problem with my changes. These assume that the three directories are one level lower than the root installation directory. The advantage of my changes is that you only have to specify the installation directory _once_ - in the new config file. In the "normal" 1.4 version I had to change four (?) files. An added plus is that you can easier switch between a local and a web installation of phpESP, in case you are constantly modifying the software according to your needs. You change on the local system, then comment out one line in the new config file and now you can upload the changes (once the data base access infos are also defined two times - local and web). > > I think you'll find the gettext detection and loading much > more windows compatible in version 1.5. Great! Could my "old" version of PHP (4.0.5) also be a cause for the strange effects with gettext? >You can always > place a "<br>" or "<p> </p>" at the end of you section > text if you need more spacing. I believe that behavior is > better than extra spacing due to whitespace in the textarea > box. Ok, I agree .. > Please try v1.5, the first release canidate will be > out this week. I am eager to download it ;-) Michael -- Werden Sie mit uns zum "OnlineStar 2002"! Jetzt GMX wählen - und tolle Preise absahnen! http://www.onlinestar.de |
From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-09-22 16:57:41
|
Well, it has been proposed quite a few times to make the install easier in the way you propose ... But I don't see that it is any different. Isn't it now necessary to make sure each component (admin, handler, survey) has the path to the "phpESP.local.ini.php"? Basically there are two options, install in a fixed location (lib/php/contrib as I suggest), or change things so that it is always a relative install (similar to horde). I think in the future, phpESP will take a similar approach to horde, and use all relative paths, but this reduces the flexibility of the logical layout of your website. Of course, failing to find the INI using relative paths, the scripts could be made to fall back to a "pathless" include(), allowing for placing the phpESP.ini somewhere in the php include_path ... I think you'll find the gettext detection and loading much more windows compatible in version 1.5. You can always place a "<br>" or "<p> </p>" at the end of you section text if you need more spacing. I believe that behavior is better than extra spacing due to whitespace in the textarea box. Please try v1.5, the first release canidate will be out this week. -James On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 mic...@gm... wrote: > Hello, > I've modified a few things, see below. Perhaps someone of the core > developers integrates some of it in the main branch. > Regards+Thanks for this great software > Michael Städler > ------------- > ma...@mi... > modified: phpESP version 1.4, May 2002 > > Changes on 22.09.2002: > > * easier installation: installation directory and other vars have been > placed in a new config file, phpESP.local.ini.php. Now you can also easier switch > between a local install and a web install, in case you are modifying phpESP. > * phpESP.ini has been renamed to phpESP.ini.php for security purposes. Now > you can put this file to the "normal" ESP directory and it isn't readable even > if one tries to access the file directly with his browser. I know this isn't > the optimum, but it is easy to use and at least you can alternatively make a > "securer" installation like now. > > NECESSARY CHANGES FOR THAT: > Changes in admin/phpESP.ini.php: > - added line on top: require_once "../phpESP.local.ini.php"; > - line 13 changed: $locale_path = "$install_dir/locale"; > - line 61 changed: 'include_path' => "$install_dir/admin/include/", > Changes in admin/manage.php: > - added line on top: require_once "../phpESP.local.ini.php"; > - line 12 changed: $CONFIG = "$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"; > Changes in public/handler.php: > - line 17: require("$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"); > Changes in public/handler-prefix.php: > - line 45: require("$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"); > Changes in public/survey.php: > - line 3: require("$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"); > ---------------------- > deleted line 13 in phpESP.ini.php ($lang = ..) => put this into the new ini > file > contents of file phpESP.local.ini.php: > <?php > // comment this out when running on a web server > $exec_mode = "local"; > > if ($exec_mode == "local") { > $install_dir = "d:/dwww/phpESP"; > } else { > $install_dir = "/www/<useraccount>/<userdomain>/phpESP"; > } > // the database infos should also be put in here! > > // language selection > $lang = 'de'; // or en or .. > ?> > ---------------------- > Workaround for a problem with gettext on my Windows system (phpESP doesn't > work): > phpESP.ini.php: > - problem with gettext on my windows system (phpESP doesn't work): > commented out line 21 - 42 > - new line 43: if(!extension_loaded('gettext') && !defined('_GETTEXT')) { > => thus the wrapper is always active, now all is in english, but better > than nothing.. > > ---------------------- > BUGS: > - behind section text should always be put an empty line (in the survey). > Empty lines at bottom of section text should not be thrown out automatically > > |
From: <mic...@gm...> - 2002-09-22 16:15:13
|
Hello, I've modified a few things, see below. Perhaps someone of the core developers integrates some of it in the main branch. Regards+Thanks for this great software Michael Städler ------------- ma...@mi... modified: phpESP version 1.4, May 2002 Changes on 22.09.2002: * easier installation: installation directory and other vars have been placed in a new config file, phpESP.local.ini.php. Now you can also easier switch between a local install and a web install, in case you are modifying phpESP. * phpESP.ini has been renamed to phpESP.ini.php for security purposes. Now you can put this file to the "normal" ESP directory and it isn't readable even if one tries to access the file directly with his browser. I know this isn't the optimum, but it is easy to use and at least you can alternatively make a "securer" installation like now. NECESSARY CHANGES FOR THAT: Changes in admin/phpESP.ini.php: - added line on top: require_once "../phpESP.local.ini.php"; - line 13 changed: $locale_path = "$install_dir/locale"; - line 61 changed: 'include_path' => "$install_dir/admin/include/", Changes in admin/manage.php: - added line on top: require_once "../phpESP.local.ini.php"; - line 12 changed: $CONFIG = "$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"; Changes in public/handler.php: - line 17: require("$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"); Changes in public/handler-prefix.php: - line 45: require("$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"); Changes in public/survey.php: - line 3: require("$install_dir/admin/phpESP.ini.php"); ---------------------- deleted line 13 in phpESP.ini.php ($lang = ..) => put this into the new ini file contents of file phpESP.local.ini.php: <?php // comment this out when running on a web server $exec_mode = "local"; if ($exec_mode == "local") { $install_dir = "d:/dwww/phpESP"; } else { $install_dir = "/www/<useraccount>/<userdomain>/phpESP"; } // the database infos should also be put in here! // language selection $lang = 'de'; // or en or .. ?> ---------------------- Workaround for a problem with gettext on my Windows system (phpESP doesn't work): phpESP.ini.php: - problem with gettext on my windows system (phpESP doesn't work): commented out line 21 - 42 - new line 43: if(!extension_loaded('gettext') && !defined('_GETTEXT')) { => thus the wrapper is always active, now all is in english, but better than nothing.. ---------------------- BUGS: - behind section text should always be put an empty line (in the survey). Empty lines at bottom of section text should not be thrown out automatically -- Werden Sie mit uns zum "OnlineStar 2002"! Jetzt GMX wählen - und tolle Preise absahnen! http://www.onlinestar.de |
From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-09-18 16:49:21
|
Thanks to Kon, there is preliminary support for individual results. Please test this. I think it would be even better if when the results are displayed, there is some method to navigate between responses. A dropdown (similar to the main results selector page), or Prev/Next buttons (or both) would be a good idea ... any takers on implementing this? v1.5-RC1 is delayed until Monday now, pending a few GUI patches from Kon, so get any changes in asap. Take it easy, -James |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-18 16:42:59
|
Feature Requests item #406914, was opened at 2001-03-07 23:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=406914&group_id=8956 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: James Flemer (jimmerman) Summary: individual results for every respondent Initial Comment: could you make an individual results page for the answers of every respondent not just the summary of results page... the page would have some sort of a form that asks for the respondent_id of that certain survey then when submitted it returns all the data into the page together with the questions(or just question_id numbers) and the answers from all the tables (answers_bool, answers_text etc.) used in that survey... thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-09-18 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 Preliminary support added. Patch submitted by Kon Angelopoulos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-16 16:58 Message: Logged In: NO this individual data could possibly be temporary, with an experation, prior to be compiled into the aggregate data for that survey. But to be the most useful for doing individual assessment/profiling this feature should be incorporated into the database so that individuals can see their survey data as well as seeing survey data from others that may have been submitted against their name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=406914&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-18 13:34:21
|
Bugs item #611041, was opened at 2002-09-18 06:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=611041&group_id=8956 Category: User Group: v1.4 >Status: Deleted >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem with Other category in checkboxe Initial Comment: I'm getting an error when testing a survey created in phpESP 1.4. When a user puts in a value for "Other" when this is used with a checkbox (i.e. when "!other" has been specified) I get the following error: Fatal error: [] operator not supported for strings in /usr/local/lib/php/contrib/phpESP/admin/include/lib/es presponse.inc on line 156 However things seem to work okay with radio buttons and !other cheers Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-09-18 08:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 This is a duplicate bug report. This bug has already been fixed in CVS. Please search existing bug reports before submitting new ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-18 08:10 Message: Logged In: NO BTW this error only occurred when multiple checkboxes were selected. Removing the square brackets in the offending line of the PHP script seems to fix the problem! At least it does ni PHP 4.2 cheers Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=611041&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-18 13:10:17
|
Bugs item #611041, was opened at 2002-09-18 04:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=611041&group_id=8956 Category: User Group: v1.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem with Other category in checkboxe Initial Comment: I'm getting an error when testing a survey created in phpESP 1.4. When a user puts in a value for "Other" when this is used with a checkbox (i.e. when "!other" has been specified) I get the following error: Fatal error: [] operator not supported for strings in /usr/local/lib/php/contrib/phpESP/admin/include/lib/es presponse.inc on line 156 However things seem to work okay with radio buttons and !other cheers Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-18 06:10 Message: Logged In: NO BTW this error only occurred when multiple checkboxes were selected. Removing the square brackets in the offending line of the PHP script seems to fix the problem! At least it does ni PHP 4.2 cheers Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=611041&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-18 11:28:57
|
Bugs item #611041, was opened at 2002-09-18 04:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=611041&group_id=8956 Category: User Group: v1.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem with Other category in checkboxe Initial Comment: I'm getting an error when testing a survey created in phpESP 1.4. When a user puts in a value for "Other" when this is used with a checkbox (i.e. when "!other" has been specified) I get the following error: Fatal error: [] operator not supported for strings in /usr/local/lib/php/contrib/phpESP/admin/include/lib/es presponse.inc on line 156 However things seem to work okay with radio buttons and !other cheers Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=611041&group_id=8956 |
From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-09-17 13:55:18
|
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Kon Angelopoulos wrote: > I know you've all been patient with the new GUI release. > As I've mentioned in previous posts I've got a couple of days of work left on > it and it will be available. I just need to find a couple of full days to > finish coding and testing and at the moment my fulltime job is consuming all > my time. Not commiting to a date but can say that it should be available > within a fortnight. Do you want me to wait to release v1.5 Release Canidate 1 until this is in? I think everything is ready for RC1, but that would mean that your GUI stuff won't be in v1.5. -James |
From: Kon A. <ang...@ip...> - 2002-09-17 05:21:54
|
Hi Guys, I know you've all been patient with the new GUI release. As I've mentioned in previous posts I've got a couple of days of work left on it and it will be available. I just need to find a couple of full days to finish coding and testing and at the moment my fulltime job is consuming all my time. Not commiting to a date but can say that it should be available within a fortnight. Kon On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:00, jonas solo wrote: > Hi James, > > Exactly. yes I know that I can retrieve individual responses via SQL > statements and I did that already and worked fine, but this is only usefull > for one-time evaluation not for automatic human assessment feedbacks.. this > means : as a user you can login, run your survey, and get your individual > responses automatic and you can come back and observe your progress again > and again... that�s what we are planning to use phpESP for.. ;-) > However, thanks for your thoughts and I can understand that you are focused > on more urgent issues . > I am excited to try the 1.5 version. > Btw... hows the new front-ent design growing ? > > cheers and thanks > Jonas Solo > > > Do you mean that you need to be able to view individual > > responses (rather than aggregate data)? It is possible to > > get that information from the phpesp database. It is not an > > option though the GUI at this time though. Someone with a > > decent knowlege of relational databases should be able to > > show you how to get the information you desire. I don't > > have the time to add that feature now, though. > > > > -James > > > > On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, jonas solo wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I�m testing phpESP for a planned human ressource assement site ...and > > > > I�ve > > > > > to say that phpESP is really a great concept so far. > > > But to use phpESP for our needs finally it would be great to have > > > single-user-survey-evaluation features (as already someone described in > > > > a former > > > > > phpESP newsletter). That would make phpESP really unbeatable...:-) > > > Is there someone out there who like to face that challenge ? ;-) > > > > > > P.S: However, you are all doing a great job !... > > > > > > greets and thanks > > > Jonas solo |
From: jonas s. <jon...@gm...> - 2002-09-16 22:00:39
|
Hi James, Exactly. yes I know that I can retrieve individual responses via SQL statements and I did that already and worked fine, but this is only usefull for one-time evaluation not for automatic human assessment feedbacks.. this means : as a user you can login, run your survey, and get your individual responses automatic and you can come back and observe your progress again and again... that´s what we are planning to use phpESP for.. ;-) However, thanks for your thoughts and I can understand that you are focused on more urgent issues . I am excited to try the 1.5 version. Btw... hows the new front-ent design growing ? cheers and thanks Jonas Solo > Do you mean that you need to be able to view individual > responses (rather than aggregate data)? It is possible to > get that information from the phpesp database. It is not an > option though the GUI at this time though. Someone with a > decent knowlege of relational databases should be able to > show you how to get the information you desire. I don't > have the time to add that feature now, though. > > -James > > On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, jonas solo wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I´m testing phpESP for a planned human ressource assement site ...and > I´ve > > to say that phpESP is really a great concept so far. > > But to use phpESP for our needs finally it would be great to have > > single-user-survey-evaluation features (as already someone described in > a former > > phpESP newsletter). That would make phpESP really unbeatable...:-) > > Is there someone out there who like to face that challenge ? ;-) > > > > P.S: However, you are all doing a great job !... > > > > greets and thanks > > Jonas solo > > > > > > > -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 21:58:04
|
Feature Requests item #406914, was opened at 2001-03-07 20:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=406914&group_id=8956 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: James Flemer (jimmerman) Summary: individual results for every respondent Initial Comment: could you make an individual results page for the answers of every respondent not just the summary of results page... the page would have some sort of a form that asks for the respondent_id of that certain survey then when submitted it returns all the data into the page together with the questions(or just question_id numbers) and the answers from all the tables (answers_bool, answers_text etc.) used in that survey... thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-09-16 14:58 Message: Logged In: NO this individual data could possibly be temporary, with an experation, prior to be compiled into the aggregate data for that survey. But to be the most useful for doing individual assessment/profiling this feature should be incorporated into the database so that individuals can see their survey data as well as seeing survey data from others that may have been submitted against their name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=406914&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 21:51:39
|
Feature Requests item #610225, was opened at 2002-09-16 14:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=610225&group_id=8956 Category: data analysis Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Question Grouping Initial Comment: Hello, I can see a real need for question grouping, not just for our needs. The ability to establish question groups within each survey so that those question responses are tabulated as a group so that graphing and analysis can focus on these specific question groups instead of trying to extrapolate this data from individual question responses. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=610225&group_id=8956 |
From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-09-16 20:31:49
|
Do you mean that you need to be able to view individual responses (rather than aggregate data)? It is possible to get that information from the phpesp database. It is not an option though the GUI at this time though. Someone with a decent knowlege of relational databases should be able to show you how to get the information you desire. I don't have the time to add that feature now, though. -James On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, jonas solo wrote: > Hi all, > > I´m testing phpESP for a planned human ressource assement site ...and I´ve > to say that phpESP is really a great concept so far. > But to use phpESP for our needs finally it would be great to have > single-user-survey-evaluation features (as already someone described in a former > phpESP newsletter). That would make phpESP really unbeatable...:-) > Is there someone out there who like to face that challenge ? ;-) > > P.S: However, you are all doing a great job !... > > greets and thanks > Jonas solo > > > |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 20:27:32
|
Feature Requests item #608040, was opened at 2002-09-11 15:23 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=608040&group_id=8956 Category: survey format Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: New question type: True/False Initial Comment: I've been trying to adapt the Yes/No question to work with True/False questions, but it's obviously not what it was designed for. Another boolean type for True/False (using the same type of radio buttons as does Yes/No) would be great. Thank you. -- Richard Barnet web...@cs... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-09-16 15:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 Use a radio button type with two options "True" and "False". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=608040&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 20:25:50
|
Feature Requests item #574279, was opened at 2002-06-26 15:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=574279&group_id=8956 Category: None Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: flobee (flobee) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: NEED a prefix for the tables Initial Comment: hi friends! i cannot update and test newer versions because i only have one running system only one database and have to care about existing tables and i cannot get run phpESP on an standart windows CPU . can you please include this simple trick!? kind regards flobee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-09-16 15:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 Duplicate of request #524578 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=574279&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 20:24:55
|
Feature Requests item #573866, was opened at 2002-06-25 18:03 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573866&group_id=8956 Category: data analysis Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Clementz (rebirth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Project Overview Initial Comment: There should be a managers screen somewhere which doesn't just show which projects are alive, but how many interviews collected in the surveys etc. to get a brief overview of the surveys which are active. Possibly you should be able to check in when you configure a new survey what your target is (number of interviews to conduct). Then you could have the surveys coloured yellow as not started, green as active and red as finished perhaps. Surveys should be reported one line for each so you could get a simple printout for the entire day. The row ought to contain ID/Name/Conducted interviews/Target to reach/Starting date/deadline/response rate (Conducted/Target). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-09-16 15:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 number of responses now shown in a few places ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-07-06 05:47 Message: Logged In: NO What can I respond to that? Examples have been popular before, so let me pick another one! Let's say I run a news website for beos (don't we all love that OS by the way). I have structured my visitors into different groups, developers, ordinary users, other news sites etc. On a regular basis I conduct small surveys with each of the groups on different matters, such as the news themselves, new products on the market and their opinions, feature requests in the future wanted etc. Suddenly I have 6-7 surveys active where I want at least 500 answers in each to make any good assumptions out of it. Unfortunately, I also have a lack of time so I would prefer just to get a quick overview of the progress rather than click through every and each one of them.... How do I get that? Sounds reasonable? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kon Angelopoulos (angek) Date: 2002-06-26 08:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=198398 I get the feeling that you may have a specific need to be able to monitor/record interview processing/progress online. phpESP is a "general" purpose survey tool which can be used for many explicit purposes. It's its "generic" nature that provides such versitility; to incorporate such detailed features will, in my opinion, take away from phpESPs true purpose. Kon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573866&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 20:21:47
|
Feature Requests item #573852, was opened at 2002-06-25 17:45 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573852&group_id=8956 Category: survey format Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Clementz (rebirth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Control questions / remove items Initial Comment: in many surveys you'd like to be able to have a list of response codes for multiple questions which you want to use in the question after. This functionality should be applied. For instance Q1 Which car brands do you recognise of the ones below? 1. Saab 2. Volvo 3. Ford 4. BMW 5. None of the above Q2 *CONTROL Q1 Which of these car brands would you consider buying? 1. Saab 2. Volvo 3. Ford 4. BMW 5. None of the above In this case, people shouldn't be able to buy a car which they don't even know of. Should be added to the features. Also you should be able to put in a no control for certain items, such as none of the above. Because if they are aware of 2 brands but wouldn't consider buying one of them, then none of the above should be displayed anyway. version 1.5? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-09-16 15:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 Similar to request #491535 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573852&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 20:20:10
|
Feature Requests item #560585, was opened at 2002-05-25 17:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=560585&group_id=8956 Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: text labels for rating scale Initial Comment: the "rate" scale is static with numbers ranging from 1 to n. I would like that to be assignable so I can have text, for instance. Instead of a scale of "1 -2 -3 - 4 - 5 - N/A", I want to be able to implement a scale like: "Great - OK - Opinion Free - Not OK - Sucks - N/A" or anything else (and blank values, especially for interim points on the scale, would be acceptable). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-07-11 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 Yes, logart. That is the problem. One idea is to change the storage model for the surveys from SQL to XML, which would make this type of feature possible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephen Lawrence (logart) Date: 2002-07-11 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14468 The tough part about doing this is that you would have to capture both the reponse text value, along with the numerical value. Right now, the response_rank table is set up with all INT datatypes. There would have to be anther field added to that table of type VARCHAR or something that would contain the textual meaning of the answer. You need to capture the text along with the number in case you change the text values of the ratings later on. You would then skew the data because, for example, "1" used to mean good but now "1" is bad. If you don't save the "good" or "bad" along with each record, you would never know the numbers represent. right? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=560585&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 20:19:17
|
Feature Requests item #556910, was opened at 2002-05-16 13:50 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=556910&group_id=8956 Category: data analysis Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Christopher Kolar (ckolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: missing values/radio buttons Initial Comment: Hi. I am running phpESP 1.3.x and have a question/comment on how it handles missing values. I collect a lot of Likert data using radio buttons and was wondering why the scales are calibrated starting at 0 in the code? When I look at the CSV it means that I have to shift everything, which is not that big a deal. The problem is that when a person skips an answer it looks like it is inserting a 0 in the field to indicate a missig value. This leads to obvious problems when it comes to analysis. I'm sorry if I missed something obvious in the docs. I think that this is a great project and just want to suggest and edge that could be smoothed. Cheers, --chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-09-16 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 This feature has been added to the CVS tree. It will be available in the next release of phpESP. For instructions on obtaining sources from CVS please see: http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=8956 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christopher Kolar (ckolar) Date: 2002-09-16 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=40678 Hi. I'm planning my life for the net couple of months and I was wondering if this missing value/radio button issue has been addresses in the upcoming 1.5? I saw something about the use of javascript to validate radio buttons, but am not sure if this really addresses the issue of where the scale starts and how missing values are recorded. Thanks much, --chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=556910&group_id=8956 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-09-16 20:15:06
|
Feature Requests item #558781, was opened at 2002-05-21 13:12 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=558781&group_id=8956 >Category: None >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: More flexible export options Initial Comment: When exporting surveys to csv files get created with 0600 permissions. Two new options should be added to phpESP.ini: "default_save_path", and "default_save_umask". The save path should allow macro expansion for the current username, i.e. "/usr/home/%s/data". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=558781&group_id=8956 |