openflow-dev

[Openflow-dev] Fast Work List implemented

[<jm...@so...>]

Today I have implemented the idea of the Fast Work List.
Just checked in the cvs, so if you like it, try it !

Personally, I can't leave anymore without it :-)

Vicenzo and Daniele, Sorry for "splashing" a bit the nice code (adding
some a note at the end of openflow.py). That's my way of programming, in
the university my comments were longer than the code by itself, and all
were written in this really really bad english I have)...

So feel free to correct the english, and the bugs also :-)

--=20

      __o
    _ \<_
   (_)/(_)

Saludos de Juli=E1n
EA4ACL
-.-

Foro Wireless Madrid
http://opennetworks.rg3.net

Re: [Openflow-dev] Wacky version Numbers

[<jm...@so...>]

Hello,

As far as I know, 0.7.2 is the latest version.

I thinks there is no confusion, the last version is in the official site,
www.openflow.it. Maybe they could but "Last version"

[Openflow-dev] Demo_english Problems

[AdvertisingDept <Lay...@ro...>]

I have problems with the Demo_english.zexp from the openflow.it site.

User monitor's permissions do not work as implied.

". . .login as "monitor" (password "monitor"). Doing this you will be 
able to see all the worklists and applications."
My demo does not allow me to see all worklists and applications.


My Procedure:

1) import Demo_english from my import folder.
2) quit my browser to eliminate the zope admin cookies.
3) Start browser and surf to Demo_english.
4) Click 'Submit new issue form' and login as Alex.
5) create an issue of 'bug' kind.
6) create an issue of 'system' kind.
7) create an issue of '- new/different -'
8) quit browser to eliminate Alex's cookies.
9) Start browser and surf to Demo_english.
10) Click 'Responsible worklist' and login as monitor.

Monitor only sees the '- new/different -' issue.
Why does monitor not see ALL issues
including the unassigned 
'bug' and 'system' issues?


Thanks in Advance

[Openflow-dev] Wacky version Numbers

[AdvertisingDept <Lay...@ro...>]

First time user to OpenFlow. 
Very confused by your number versioning system.

I just downloaded 0.7.2 from the www.openflow.it site.
I have also seen version 1.0x at other locations.

Being a very diligent person, I went ahead and searched for hours through 
various mailing lists, the zope site, and other web places.
There are some randomly placed messages about some lower numbered 
versions being a later revision than higher numbered versions.
Would somebody please re-release the current version as 1.5?
This will make the current version the highest number version and stop 
the confusion for all!

I doubt any First Time user to OpenFlow would realize that 1.0x is an 
older revision than 0.7.x

And I may be incorrect, and there IS a more recent version than 0.7.2

[Openflow-dev] [Zope-Annce] Launched: First Zope Magazine! (fwd)

[<jm...@so...>]

Michel Pelletier talks about a new product: Metaflow , in the new ZopeMag
(see below)



To start on these projects, I looked at the two existing Zope workflow
tools, the CMF and OpenFlow. Neither tool satisfied our needs for:

    *   A simple, standalone Zope component. In this regard, OpenFlow
comes closest to being self-contained and having minimal dependencies. CMF
Workflow is the opposite; no content can be moved through CMF Workflow
unless it is CMF content and works through the CMF interface with CMF's
tools. This is great for CMF, but we didn't need any of CMFs other
features.
    * An extensible object model. Both OpenFlow and CMF Workflow objects
are monolithic Zope classes; there are no abstract base to extend upon.
This ties the product to Zope only and locks out Python-only or Jython
based projects.
    * An clean, native Python API that is environment neutral. This means
that no Zope assumptions are made at the most abstract level, and that the
API is meant to be called from Python or Python Scripts, not just from the
web. Both products have pretty good APIs in this regard.
    * Documentation. Neither OpenFlow nor DCWorkflow is documented to any
serious degree. Nor are there any example applications bundled with either
products.
    * Usability. DCWorkflow is pretty good in the usability department;
most of the features are pretty obvious to anyone who knows a little bit
about workflow. OpenFlow's usability was a little too opaque and
confusing, and the OpenFlow designers seem to use a workflow
terminology-set I'm unfamiliar with, so without documentation it made it
even harder to understand without doing some research on the Internet.
    * Tests. Neither OpenFlow or DCWorkflow come with any test code. This
increases the risks and vendor-dependency associated with a important core
component to our business. Well written tests can also make great
developer level example documentation.




 ----------
Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mark Pratt <mp...@be...>
To: zop...@zo...
Subject: [Zope-Annce] Launched:  First Zope Magazine!

Hello all,

beehive's Education & Publishing division is pleased to
announce the release of the first Zope magazine:  "ZopeMag"
-- focusing on Zope's developers and users.

Available online: "ZopeMag" features interviews with industry
leaders, tutorials and a new product review every two weeks.

The feature article "Real World Workflow with Zope and MetaFlow"
is available freely to all interested parties; all other content
is available exclusively to our subscribers.

The URL is: http://www.zopemag.com

As we recently changed some Nameserver entries, you may want
to try the IP address:

http://212.42.249.24

(This descrepancy should resolve itself within 24 hours.)

Regards,

Mark and all the bees of beehive

--------------------------------------------------------------
mark pratt  (managing director) 	ma...@be...
beehive elektronische medien GmbH       http://www.beehive.de
phone: +49 30 847-82 0                  fax: +49 30 847-82 299



_______________________________________________
Zope-Announce maillist  -  Zop...@zo...
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

  Zope-Announce for Announcements only - no discussions

(Related lists -
 Users: http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
 Developers: http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

[Openflow-dev] Auto pushing in OF

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

BEFORE:

OpenFlow had two policies for assigning work: pull and push. "Pull" means=
=20
users will fetch workitems from a pool of unassigned workitems. "Push"=20
implies that a user could manually assign a workitem to another user.

You could see these policies as "pull" and "manual push", since the pushi=
ng=20
had to be done manually by some user.


NOW:

I just updated the CVS so that another assignment policy could be used: "=
AUTO=20
PUSH", meaning that OpenFlow will automatically assign the workitem to a =
user=20
when the workitem arrives in the activity. The assignment will be done=20
invoking an application (declared in OF as usual) that should return an u=
ser=20
name. To the application will be passed a "possible_users" parameter=20
reporting a list of user names enabled to start that activity application=
=2E

Since older versions of OpenFlow will crash using this new version, you c=
an=20
use an automatic updating function callable by the 'Management' tab of=20
OpenFlow. Just go to the URL "http://yourZope.site/whereverOFis/Managemen=
t"
and click on the update button. All the activities in all processes will =
get=20
a "manual push" setting.

As usual, comments and questions are appreciated.


Daniele =3D)

[Openflow-dev] Fast ToDo list idea

[<jm...@so...>]

What do you think of having a fast ToDo list, where in a glance I can
launch my actities.
I think also that each new instance could have assigned a different color,
so you could follow it easily through the ToDo list


process a    O  O  O
process b    O  O  O  O  O  O  O  O
process c    O  O
process d    O


The O is an job to do, it each has a different color. Something on it
could also mark the state (maybe the shape of the symbol, or the "canvas"
of the color inside the symbol)

To know what activity it is, we could use the ALT html code, so when you
put the mouse over it you have a the name of it. (note: I think that it
would be nice to have a comment for each application (or activity?).


--=20

      __o
    _ \<_
   (_)/(_)

Saludos de Juli=E1n
EA4ACL
-.-

Foro Wireless Madrid
http://opennetworks.rg3.net

Re: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

Great!

thanks a lot. You will all find the fixed code on cvs (I just finished=20
committing the change).

Daniele =3D)


On Monday 25 March 2002 14:01, Peter Edwards wrote:
> Solved!
>
> I had another quick look, this time at dtml/openflow/Instances.dtml (an=
d
> corresponding Processes.dtml) and found the appropriate difference at l=
ine
> 17.
>
> I tried changing
>   <form action=3D"" method=3D"post">
>
> to
>   <form action=3D"." method=3D"post">
>
> and IE5 now works as it should!   :-)
>
> Best wishes
> Peter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:=09Peter Edwards [SMTP:P.E...@er...]
> Sent:=0925 March 2002 09:41
> To:=09'Daniele Tarini'; Ope...@li...
> Subject:=09RE: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)
>
> To confirm - I just had a look at openflow.py, and I don't see any
> difference between the way processes and instances are deleted. Yet IE5
> always responds correctly to process deletion, and never to instance
> deletion.
>
> I don't think it can be anything to do with page caching, because the z=
ope
> object for the instance has not been deleted - if I quit IE5 and reload=
,
> the object is still there. Strange.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:=09Daniele Tarini [SMTP:d.t...@ic...]
> Sent:=0925 March 2002 08:55
> To:=09Peter Edwards; 'Michael Beaulieu'; Ope...@li...=
=2Enet
> Subject:=09Re: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)
>
> On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:18, Peter Edwards wrote:
> > To OpenFlow developers: is deleting instances any different from dele=
ting
> > anything else?
> > Are you using a bit of non-standard HTML here, or else something that
> > Micro$oft implements wrongly?
>
> It is a normal Zope item removal, it is like deleting anyting else in Z=
ope.
> The only other thing it does is redirecting your browser to the page
> showing the "Process instances" tab. Could this trick IE5 (the page was
> previously cached by IE5)?
>
> Daniele
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openflow-dev mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openflow-dev

RE: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Peter E. <P.E...@er...>]

Solved!

I had another quick look, this time at dtml/openflow/Instances.dtml (and 
corresponding Processes.dtml) and found the appropriate difference at line 17.

I tried changing
  <form action="" method="post">

to
  <form action="." method="post">

and IE5 now works as it should!   :-)

Best wishes
Peter


-----Original Message-----
From:	Peter Edwards [SMTP:P.E...@er...]
Sent:	25 March 2002 09:41
To:	'Daniele Tarini'; Ope...@li...
Subject:	RE: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

To confirm - I just had a look at openflow.py, and I don't see any difference
between the way processes and instances are deleted. Yet IE5 always responds
correctly to process deletion, and never to instance deletion.

I don't think it can be anything to do with page caching, because the zope
object for the instance has not been deleted - if I quit IE5 and reload, the
object is still there. Strange.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From:	Daniele Tarini [SMTP:d.t...@ic...]
Sent:	25 March 2002 08:55
To:	Peter Edwards; 'Michael Beaulieu'; Ope...@li...
Subject:	Re: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:18, Peter Edwards wrote:
> To OpenFlow developers: is deleting instances any different from deleting
> anything else?
> Are you using a bit of non-standard HTML here, or else something that
> Micro$oft implements wrongly?

It is a normal Zope item removal, it is like deleting anyting else in Zope.
The only other thing it does is redirecting your browser to the page showing
the "Process instances" tab. Could this trick IE5 (the page was previously
cached by IE5)?

Daniele

_______________________________________________
Openflow-dev mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openflow-dev

RE: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Peter E. <P.E...@er...>]

To confirm - I just had a look at openflow.py, and I don't see any difference 
between the way processes and instances are deleted. Yet IE5 always responds 
correctly to process deletion, and never to instance deletion.

I don't think it can be anything to do with page caching, because the zope 
object for the instance has not been deleted - if I quit IE5 and reload, the 
object is still there. Strange.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From:	Daniele Tarini [SMTP:d.t...@ic...]
Sent:	25 March 2002 08:55
To:	Peter Edwards; 'Michael Beaulieu'; Ope...@li...
Subject:	Re: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:18, Peter Edwards wrote:
> To OpenFlow developers: is deleting instances any different from deleting
> anything else?
> Are you using a bit of non-standard HTML here, or else something that
> Micro$oft implements wrongly?

It is a normal Zope item removal, it is like deleting anyting else in Zope.
The only other thing it does is redirecting your browser to the page showing
the "Process instances" tab. Could this trick IE5 (the page was previously
cached by IE5)?

Daniele

Re: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:18, Peter Edwards wrote:
> To OpenFlow developers: is deleting instances any different from deleti=
ng
> anything else?
> Are you using a bit of non-standard HTML here, or else something that
> Micro$oft implements wrongly?

It is a normal Zope item removal, it is like deleting anyting else in Zop=
e.=20
The only other thing it does is redirecting your browser to the page show=
ing=20
the "Process instances" tab. Could this trick IE5 (the page was previousl=
y=20
cached by IE5)?

Daniele

Re: [Openflow-dev] Management Tab

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:13, Michael Beaulieu wrote:
> I am new to both Zope and Openflow.
>
> I notice that the Management Tab in an openflow instance says it is use=
d
> for debugging purposes.  Can someone give me a clue how to use this?

I usually use this form for doing some upgrading to an old version of=20
openflow. I change the dtml (in dtml/Management.dtml) so that it has a li=
ne=20
that says:

<a href=3D"FixMe">FixMe</a>

Refreshing the product and clicking on the new link the FixMe method woul=
d be=20
invoked (and I usualy put some patch code in the FixMe method!).

Another way I use it is for getting some additional infos I don't get fro=
m=20
other dtmls. I write down some dtml (again in dtml/Management.dtml) to sh=
ow=20
me the stuff I want to see.

You might as well disregard the Management tab, I was thinking about remo=
ving=20
it anyway.

Daniele =3D)

Re: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:01, you wrote:
> While I was browsing the source I came across something that seems a bi=
t
> off ( from the little I know about security )
>
> I have to say I'm a bit confused :-o
>
> line 274 of openflow.py
> security.declarePrivate('Manage OpenFlow')
> -- right above the method: def processIdActivityIdFromItem(self,item)
>
> version 1.28 doesn't have this method or this security declaration
>
> if this is a bug could someone explain the behaviour it might be causin=
g?
>


Yes, it is a bug, even though it won't show up anyway. The line should ha=
ve=20
been (it has been corrected on the cvs):

security.declarePrivate('processIdActivityIdFromItem')

The behaviour of the bug is: it declares that the class method "Manage=20
OpenFlow" is to be considered for private use. The method can't be called=
=20
from anything except other class methods. Since "Manage OpenFlow" is not =
a=20
method declared anywhere, the security declaration does nothing. Clear en=
ough?

Daniele =3D)

Re: [Openflow-dev] Management Tab

[<en...@ic...>]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:13:39AM -0700, Michael Beaulieu wrote:
> I am new to both Zope and Openflow.
>=20
> I notice that the Management Tab in an openflow instance says it is used =
for
> debugging purposes.  Can someone give me a clue how to use this?

You can use the Process Instance tab to simulate the flow of a process
instance before creating your web applications to see if it works well.
You can create a process instance and access to the API functionalities
from that interface.
I'm working on a serious improvemnt of the testing interface and will be
soon available, any suggestion and comment are ,as usual, very welcome.

> Thanks,
> Mike
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Openflow-dev mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openflow-dev

--=20
Vincenzo Di Somma - Responsabile Ricerca e Sviluppo - Icube S.r.l.
Sede:   Via Ridolfi 15 - 56124 Pisa (PI), Italia
E-mail: e.d...@ic...              WWW: www.icube.it
Tel:    (+39) 050 97 02 07              Fax: (+39) 050 31 36 588

Re: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[<en...@ic...>]

hi,
I'm trying to fix the bug, but I have problems now in understanding what
happen exactly, we have the same version on different machines and
different OS, on solaris it works well with every browsers we've tried,
on linux (debian) it depends on the browser, sometime if you delete it
twice it
works, on redhat work well...maybe the html we produce is not well
accepted by the browsers. I hope to fix it for the end of the week.


On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:01:17AM -0700, Michael Beaulieu wrote:
>=20
> I am a zope newbie and I am trying to learn both Zope and Openflow.
>=20
> I have been browsing the archives and I saw a thread regarding a problem
> deleting instances.  I am having the same problem.
>=20
> OpenFlow version 7.1
> On both Zope versions 2.4 and 2.5, I have created an instance and have not
> been able to delete it.  I have tried restarting the browser, and I can
> click on the instance after attempting to delete it and I get the history=
 of
> the instance.
>=20
> Any insight would be appreciated.
>=20
> While I was browsing the source I came across something that seems a bit =
off
> ( from the little I know about security )
>=20
> I have to say I'm a bit confused :-o
>=20
> line 274 of openflow.py
> security.declarePrivate('Manage OpenFlow')
> -- right above the method: def processIdActivityIdFromItem(self,item)
>=20
> version 1.28 doesn't have this method or this security declaration
>=20
> if this is a bug could someone explain the behaviour it might be causing?
>=20
> kind regards,
> Mike
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Openflow-dev mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openflow-dev

--=20
Vincenzo Di Somma - Responsabile Ricerca e Sviluppo - Icube S.r.l.
Sede:   Via Ridolfi 15 - 56124 Pisa (PI), Italia
E-mail: e.d...@ic...              WWW: www.icube.it
Tel:    (+39) 050 97 02 07              Fax: (+39) 050 31 36 588

RE: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Michael B. <mi...@se...>]

I am using IE 5.5

thanks, I'll try Netscape right away.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Edwards [mailto:P.E...@er...]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:19 AM
To: 'Michael Beaulieu'; Ope...@li...
Subject: RE: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)


Yes, I had a problem deleting instances (deleting anything else is OK)

The problem occurs consistently for me, if I am using Internet Explorer 5.
If I use Netscape instead (an old version I had lying arround) , there is no
problem.
What browser are you using?

To OpenFlow developers: is deleting instances any different from deleting
anything else?
Are you using a bit of non-standard HTML here, or else something that
Micro$oft
implements wrongly?

Peter


-----Original Message-----
From:	Michael Beaulieu [SMTP:mi...@se...]
Sent:	21 March 2002 17:01
To:	Ope...@li...
Subject:	[Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)


I am a zope newbie and I am trying to learn both Zope and Openflow.

I have been browsing the archives and I saw a thread regarding a problem
deleting instances.  I am having the same problem.

OpenFlow version 7.1
On both Zope versions 2.4 and 2.5, I have created an instance and have not
been able to delete it.  I have tried restarting the browser, and I can
click on the instance after attempting to delete it and I get the history of
the instance.

Any insight would be appreciated.

While I was browsing the source I came across something that seems a bit off
( from the little I know about security )

I have to say I'm a bit confused :-o

line 274 of openflow.py
security.declarePrivate('Manage OpenFlow')
-- right above the method: def processIdActivityIdFromItem(self,item)

version 1.28 doesn't have this method or this security declaration

if this is a bug could someone explain the behaviour it might be causing?

kind regards,
Mike


_______________________________________________
Openflow-dev mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openflow-dev

RE: [Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Peter E. <P.E...@er...>]

Yes, I had a problem deleting instances (deleting anything else is OK)

The problem occurs consistently for me, if I am using Internet Explorer 5.
If I use Netscape instead (an old version I had lying arround) , there is no 
problem.
What browser are you using?

To OpenFlow developers: is deleting instances any different from deleting 
anything else?
Are you using a bit of non-standard HTML here, or else something that Micro$oft 
implements wrongly?

Peter


-----Original Message-----
From:	Michael Beaulieu [SMTP:mi...@se...]
Sent:	21 March 2002 17:01
To:	Ope...@li...
Subject:	[Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)


I am a zope newbie and I am trying to learn both Zope and Openflow.

I have been browsing the archives and I saw a thread regarding a problem
deleting instances.  I am having the same problem.

OpenFlow version 7.1
On both Zope versions 2.4 and 2.5, I have created an instance and have not
been able to delete it.  I have tried restarting the browser, and I can
click on the instance after attempting to delete it and I get the history of
the instance.

Any insight would be appreciated.

While I was browsing the source I came across something that seems a bit off
( from the little I know about security )

I have to say I'm a bit confused :-o

line 274 of openflow.py
security.declarePrivate('Manage OpenFlow')
-- right above the method: def processIdActivityIdFromItem(self,item)

version 1.28 doesn't have this method or this security declaration

if this is a bug could someone explain the behaviour it might be causing?

kind regards,
Mike


_______________________________________________
Openflow-dev mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openflow-dev

[Openflow-dev] Management Tab

[Michael B. <mi...@se...>]

I am new to both Zope and Openflow.

I notice that the Management Tab in an openflow instance says it is used for
debugging purposes.  Can someone give me a clue how to use this?

Thanks,
Mike

[Openflow-dev] Deleting instances (cont)

[Michael B. <mi...@se...>]

I am a zope newbie and I am trying to learn both Zope and Openflow.

I have been browsing the archives and I saw a thread regarding a problem
deleting instances.  I am having the same problem.

OpenFlow version 7.1
On both Zope versions 2.4 and 2.5, I have created an instance and have not
been able to delete it.  I have tried restarting the browser, and I can
click on the instance after attempting to delete it and I get the history of
the instance.

Any insight would be appreciated.

While I was browsing the source I came across something that seems a bit off
( from the little I know about security )

I have to say I'm a bit confused :-o

line 274 of openflow.py
security.declarePrivate('Manage OpenFlow')
-- right above the method: def processIdActivityIdFromItem(self,item)

version 1.28 doesn't have this method or this security declaration

if this is a bug could someone explain the behaviour it might be causing?

kind regards,
Mike

[Openflow-dev] API with doc string

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

Dear all,

I just updated the API documentation: each API now has its doc string to=20
explain what it does.

You can find it at:
http://www.openflow.it/Documentation/documentation/APIList

Daniele =3D)

[Openflow-dev] Access to sf

[<jm...@so...>]

Hey, take a look at this !!

http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/index.php?report=3Dlast_30&group_id=3D=
2370

Not so bad :-)


--=20

      __o
    _ \<_
   (_)/(_)

Saludos de Juli=E1n
EA4ACL
-.-

Foro Wireless Madrid
http://opennetworks.rg3.net

Re: [Openflow-dev] APIs

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

On Thursday 14 March 2002 10:37, Juli=E1n Mu=F1oz wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Daniele Tarini wrote:
> > You might also want to check out the latest documentation I wrote: an=
 OF
> > broad introduction. You can find it at:
> > http://www.openflow.it/Documentation/documentation/OpenFlowIntroducti=
on
>
> Nice ! :-)

Thank you very much =3D)

> I have seen yesterday that you have also Documented the API.

Well, right now it's more a complete list rather than a real documentatio=
n.=20
But we'll soon get to documenting the APIs as well!

> Take a look at the sumary about the API I wrote a few weeks ago, it is
> very usefull because it contains the BASIC API (all you need the 99% of
> the time).

I saw the API usage you wrote and I like it a lot: it should help people=20
figuring out what to do and which API to use in most applications. Thank =
you=20
very much for your efforts, Juli=E1n!

Daniele =3D)

Re: [Openflow-dev] Official project site almost ready; new doc available

[Daniele T. <d.t...@ic...>]

On Thursday 14 March 2002 10:31, Juli=E1n Mu=F1oz wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Daniele Tarini wrote:
> > OpenFlow 0.7.1 (0.7 with the latest bug fixed) as well as the new dem=
o
> > have been released on www.openflow.it.
>
> Ok, so we are with 0.7 ??? Should it not be 0.6 ??
> That's the same :-)

Yes, the current version is 0.7: it's basically the same as 0.6 but the n=
ame=20
had to be changed since a mislabelling happened some time ago that induce=
d in=20
some confusion.=20

That was the kind of problems we had when we where using 3 sites for=20
downloading OpenFlow =3D)

Thanks,
=09Daniele =3D)

Re: [Openflow-dev] Official project site almost ready; new doc available

[<jm...@so...>]

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Daniele Tarini wrote:

> You might also want to check out the latest documentation I wrote: an OF
> broad introduction. You can find it at:
> http://www.openflow.it/Documentation/documentation/OpenFlowIntroduction

Nice ! :-)

I have seen yesterday that you have also Documented the API.
Take a look at the sumary about the API I wrote a few weeks ago, it is
very usefull because it contains the BASIC API (all you need the 99% of
the time).

Maybe the complete API could be called "SDK" ??

That's the same also, just a matter of names :-)


--=20

      __o
    _ \<_
   (_)/(_)

Saludos de Juli=E1n
EA4ACL
-.-

Foro Wireless Madrid
http://opennetworks.rg3.net

Re: [Openflow-dev] Official project site almost ready; new doc available

[<jm...@so...>]

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Daniele Tarini wrote:


> OpenFlow 0.7.1 (0.7 with the latest bug fixed) as well as the new demo ha=
ve
> been released on www.openflow.it.

Ok, so we are with 0.7 ??? Should it not be 0.6 ??
That's the same :-)


--=20

      __o
    _ \<_
   (_)/(_)

Saludos de Juli=E1n
EA4ACL
-.-

Foro Wireless Madrid
http://opennetworks.rg3.net