Menu
▾
▴
opencyc-devel — OpenCyc application developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(11) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(10) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Richard H. M. <rh...@Pi...> - 2007-02-20 14:14:15
|
I translated this DAML representation http://xbean.cs.ccu.edu.tw/~dan/opencyc-0.6.0/cyc.daml into mKR, and am currently making "corrections", with the result being stored in http://mKRmKE.net/knowledge/cyc/myCyc.mkr 1. I'd like to know how this version compares with the current OpenCyc 1.0.2. For example: is version 0.6 the same as 1.0.2? a subset of version 1.0.2? completely different? 2. Are there any new DAML|OWL|other versions of the Upper Ontology available? Any versions of the total knowledge base? 3. Who can I talk to about "corrections"? For example: OWL father sameAs biologicalFather. mKR father is biologicalFather; Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/ |
|
From:
<si...@di...> - 2006-10-02 17:41:45
|
Hi, I wondered if anyone has tried to make a round trip with: IBM javaspeech for recognition Opencyc for reasoning and FreeTTS for speech output ...as to produce an intelligent talking machine (not like Alice or the like, which is not very clever). Cheers, Silvere. -- __________________________________________________________________________________________ Silvere Martin-Michiellot You will find my latest opensource contribution on www.jscience.org __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: John De O. <joh...@gm...> - 2006-04-18 03:39:47
|
> Hi. I have a few questions about the Cyclify project announced here: > http://opencyc.org/ > > 1. Will the opencyc mailing lists (like this one) be the main discussio= n forum > for Cyclify? That's not currently the plan. People may still simply want to do development with OpenCyc, so we don't want to intrude on these lists. Cyclify has a more specific mission, as discussed in the announcement presentation that was turned into a podcast. > > 2. If I find a possible bug in the ontology, will I send it to one of t= hese email > lists (or the opencyc bug tracker)? > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=3D389632&group_id=3D27274&func=3Dbr= owse > No. We're going to set up more specific workflows within the Cyclify projec= t. > 3. Cyclify is compared to the Wikipedia project. Already on the Cyc Fo= undation page > http://www.cycfoundation.org/ there is a reference to the concept of "o= ntology" that > gives a link to the Wikipedia article. This underscores that the Wikipe= dia article URL > is the de facto standard to referring to a concept on the web (not #$Ont= ology). Ouch. Actually, it was an expedient way to give neophytes an idea of what ontology is. If all of the OWL community adopted Wikipedia's article title as the canonical term, that might be more like a de facto standard. I actually don't think there is a de facto standard for this yet. > What are the plans in Cyclify to work with the fact that the Cyc-L names > won't be the de facto universal identifiers when a web user wants to lin= k to a concept? > Will Cyc adopt a URL system? And map it explicitly to other identifiers= like Wikipedia? > Basically, yes. There will be a URI for every Cyc term. And there will be mappings. The details will be worked out by Cyc Foundation members and then shared more formally. > 4. Wikipedia is already doing ontology stuff. Their Category system al= ready does a lot > of what #$isa and #$genls does. And they are planning typed predicate t= ags. See > http://wiki.ontoworld.org/wiki/Main_Page . Yes, a lot of communities are doing ontology stuff. That's our point. > What is the vision of coordination as both WCyc and Wikipedia (and other= s) vie to have > web users contribute to the respective (huge) ontologies? = Since the Cyc language and Join the Cyc Foundation and help build the vision! > query engine will always be much more rich than what Wikipedia will attem= pt, is the > idea to just have Cyc "scrape" the ontology of Wikipedia? Could there ev= er be enough As a first step, we want to extend the breadth of Cyc with concepts pointed to by Wikipedia article titles. This will at the same time provide a more useful ontological structure to Wikipedia than they could develop from scratch. > friendship between the projects so that a Wikipedia page has a built-in l= ink to the Cyc > engine to do serious natural language queries (which Wikipedia will not l= ikely attempt)? I think a good friendship will develop, and we're certainly going to work to make that happen. And yes, I think serious natural language queries of Wikipedia are a realistic vision of the future, although I wouldn't expect it in the next two years -- at least not against article content. I met with Jimmy Wales a few weeks ago, and he said he is a supporter of Cyc and would like to see it grow the way Wikipedia did. He said he sees the projects as quite similar. > > Thanks, > - Jeff Jeff (and others), I would invite you to continue this discussion within the Cyc Foundation, which you are all welcome to join. Just send an email to joh...@gm... requesting membership. It would be helpful if you could include a summary of your skills, or whatever version of a resume you have lying around, so that we could see how best to make use of your skills. Thanks, #$JohnD |
|
From: Jeff T. <je...@th...> - 2006-04-17 22:12:39
|
Hi. I have a few questions about the Cyclify project announced here: http://opencyc.org/ 1. Will the opencyc mailing lists (like this one) be the main discussion forum for Cyclify? 2. If I find a possible bug in the ontology, will I send it to one of these email lists (or the opencyc bug tracker)? http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=389632&group_id=27274&func=browse 3. Cyclify is compared to the Wikipedia project. Already on the Cyc Foundation page http://www.cycfoundation.org/ there is a reference to the concept of "ontology" that gives a link to the Wikipedia article. This underscores that the Wikipedia article URL is the de facto standard to referring to a concept on the web (not #$Ontology). What are the plans in Cyclify to work with the fact that the Cyc-L names won't be the de facto universal identifiers when a web user wants to link to a concept? Will Cyc adopt a URL system? And map it explicitly to other identifiers like Wikipedia? 4. Wikipedia is already doing ontology stuff. Their Category system already does a lot of what #$isa and #$genls does. And they are planning typed predicate tags. See http://wiki.ontoworld.org/wiki/Main_Page . What is the vision of coordination as both WCyc and Wikipedia (and others) vie to have web users contribute to the respective (huge) ontologies? Since the Cyc language and query engine will always be much more rich than what Wikipedia will attempt, is the idea to just have Cyc "scrape" the ontology of Wikipedia? Could there ever be enough friendship between the projects so that a Wikipedia page has a built-in link to the Cyc engine to do serious natural language queries (which Wikipedia will not likely attempt)? Thanks, - Jeff |
|
From: John De O. <jo...@cy...> - 2006-01-19 19:00:29
|
The prizes ($2500 each) are for best research paper and best proposal involving either OpenCyc (http://www.opencyc.org) or ResearchCyc (http://research.cyc.com) artificial intelligence software. More info is at http://www.opencyc.org/announce/firstCycPrizes. If you'd like to help get the word out, you can "digg" the story at http://digg.com/software/Cyc_Prizes_Offered:_One_month_until_deadline . (You will need to create a free digg account if you don't already have one.) Thanks! John De Oliveira Cycorp P.S. The next version of ResearchCyc, scheduled for late February, will have all of the facts and rules from Full Cyc -- not a subset. The OpenCyc that comes out after that will have all of the terms and all definitional predicates from Full Cyc (but not all assertions and only a few rules). |
|
From: joshua r. <jo...@ar...> - 2004-10-19 04:04:41
|
http://y.20q.net:8095/btest On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Gregory Harrison wrote: > Hey, what do you think of that new consumer-product 20Q? for $14.99 it will > (usually) guess what you are thinking of in 20 questions. It fits in the > palm of your hand. At www.thinkgeek.com > > I have one. It is fun. How much more does Cyc know? Perhaps I am > embarrassing myself by illustrating this advance. > > It uses a neural net. Apparently it uses 250,000 neurons. It feels like a > real advance in applied AI. > > Dr. Greg Harrison > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > OpenCyc-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencyc-devel > -- Joshua Reich josh!i2pi.com Ph: +1 412 216 5882 |
|
From: Gregory H. <gha...@cf...> - 2004-10-19 03:54:21
|
Hey, what do you think of that new consumer-product 20Q? for $14.99 it will (usually) guess what you are thinking of in 20 questions. It fits in the palm of your hand. At www.thinkgeek.com I have one. It is fun. How much more does Cyc know? Perhaps I am embarrassing myself by illustrating this advance. It uses a neural net. Apparently it uses 250,000 neurons. It feels like a real advance in applied AI. Dr. Greg Harrison |
|
From: Francis F. <bul...@ya...> - 2004-10-14 19:19:10
|
Dear opencyc-devel,
I'm trying to assert a GAF of the form (#$Foo1 #$Foo2 #$Foo3 0.5) using the CycAccess API. I can't seem to figure out how to put in a number as one of the arguments; the assertGaf methods all seem to require CycFort arguments (except one that takes a CycList but I'm not sure what it does). If I use createNewPermanent("0.5"), it doesn't like it, since it doesn't like the period, and I don't want #$0.5 anyway, I want the number. I also didn't know if there was an easy way to feed CycL assertions as Strings through the CycAccess API, since maybe I could just do it by hand if I had that.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Best wishes,
Francis Fung
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Seang C. R. <ry...@cs...> - 2004-09-28 19:07:45
|
Hi, I am new to Cyc. I was reading some of the papers in opencyc sites. One of the paper mentioned about integrating cyc with DAML-S (maybe now OWL-S). Has the work been done? If anybody can give some pointers to that topic, I will really appreciate that. Sincerely, Seangchan |
|
From: Jeff T. <je...@th...> - 2004-03-18 19:29:33
|
The opencyc servers are down. http://www.opencyc.org/public_servers Is this intentional? Should there be a message on the web site saying they are defunct or coming back soon? |
|
From: John De O. <jo...@cy...> - 2004-03-11 22:34:52
|
Yes, development did stall, but its starting back up. I expect us to have a release of OpenCyc within the next few months, in which we will release a bunch of new vocabulary. John D. Cycorp At 02:06 PM 3/11/2004 -0800, Jeff Thompson wrote: >I don't see any news for opencyc or CVS commits for over a year. >Is there any news on whether the project is still in development and why >no news? > >Thanks, >- Jeff > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >_______________________________________________ >OpenCyc-devel mailing list >Ope...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencyc-devel |
|
From: Jeff T. <je...@th...> - 2004-03-11 22:17:32
|
I don't see any news for opencyc or CVS commits for over a year. Is there any news on whether the project is still in development and why no news? Thanks, - Jeff |
|
From: Aaron R. <ar...@co...> - 2004-02-05 22:21:28
|
confirm 639801 |
|
From: Kevin B. <kbl...@mi...> - 2004-01-16 17:02:44
|
you'd be correct. After looking around a bit more I was sad to see that opencyc is only sudo open source. It's open source in the same sense that the Linksys wireless AP is open source ;) You have some of the source just not enough to do a full rebuild. *sigh* And since both the linux and windows binaries are compiled for x86 instruction code, that leaves 2 of the *cough* better *cough* processors out in the cold for us OS X and Solaris developers. Though I'll keep my eye open and if a OS X port ever come about I'll probably become more involved in the development process. Cheers. wh...@ly... wrote: > > > > I just came across opencyc this week, and would like to get more > > involved. One of the things wanted to do , was try to build a binary for > > Darwin. Has anyone else on the list already done this (I do not want to > > reinvent the wheel here), or if not would anyone other then me even be > > interested in it after I am done? > > > > Kevin > > One thing to recognize about OpenCyc is that > the interpreter for CycL is not released as Open Source. > It is the knowledge written in CycL that is Open Source (LGPL). > Thus, you have the case where you need to package the binary executables > that are already released rather than rebuild from C/SubL. > I believe Darwin is a version of FreeBSD, but I think it doesn't run > x86 code. (please tell me if I'm wrong) If Darwin can run either an > x86 Linux program or an x86 win32 program, then you can use the existing > binaries on your system. > > Another option, which I haven't explored, is to run Bochs under Darwin. > I believe it would let you run Linux on top of Bochs, and then Bochs on > top of Darwin. > > Well, it is an interesting adventure. I'd love to hear your path continues. > > David Whitten (713) 791-1414 ext 6116 > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > OpenCyc-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencyc-devel |
|
From: <wh...@ly...> - 2003-12-21 13:50:38
|
> > I just came across opencyc this week, and would like to get more > involved. One of the things wanted to do , was try to build a binary for > Darwin. Has anyone else on the list already done this (I do not want to > reinvent the wheel here), or if not would anyone other then me even be > interested in it after I am done? > > Kevin One thing to recognize about OpenCyc is that the interpreter for CycL is not released as Open Source. It is the knowledge written in CycL that is Open Source (LGPL). Thus, you have the case where you need to package the binary executables that are already released rather than rebuild from C/SubL. I believe Darwin is a version of FreeBSD, but I think it doesn't run x86 code. (please tell me if I'm wrong) If Darwin can run either an x86 Linux program or an x86 win32 program, then you can use the existing binaries on your system. Another option, which I haven't explored, is to run Bochs under Darwin. I believe it would let you run Linux on top of Bochs, and then Bochs on top of Darwin. Well, it is an interesting adventure. I'd love to hear your path continues. David Whitten (713) 791-1414 ext 6116 |
|
From: Kevin B. <kbl...@mi...> - 2003-12-19 20:12:16
|
they already have binaries for Windows on the site. Not just Linux. josh zeidner wrote: > I would be interested in a windows installer build. > Are you planning on packaging the binary for Win32? > > -josh z > > --- Kevin Blanchard <kbl...@mi...> wrote: > > I just came across opencyc this week, and would like > > to get more > > involved. One of the things wanted to do , was try > > to build a binary for > > Darwin. Has anyone else on the list already done > > this (I do not want to > > reinvent the wheel here), or if not would anyone > > other then me even be > > interested in it after I am done? > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux > > Tutorials. > > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your > > skills. Sign up for IBM's > > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the > > bash shell to sys admin. > > Click now! > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenCyc-devel mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencyc-devel > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > OpenCyc-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencyc-devel |
|
From: josh z. <jjz...@ya...> - 2003-12-19 20:06:41
|
I would be interested in a windows installer build. Are you planning on packaging the binary for Win32? -josh z --- Kevin Blanchard <kbl...@mi...> wrote: > I just came across opencyc this week, and would like > to get more > involved. One of the things wanted to do , was try > to build a binary for > Darwin. Has anyone else on the list already done > this (I do not want to > reinvent the wheel here), or if not would anyone > other then me even be > interested in it after I am done? > > Kevin > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux > Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your > skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the > bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > OpenCyc-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencyc-devel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree |
|
From: Kevin B. <kbl...@mi...> - 2003-12-19 18:23:15
|
I just came across opencyc this week, and would like to get more involved. One of the things wanted to do , was try to build a binary for Darwin. Has anyone else on the list already done this (I do not want to reinvent the wheel here), or if not would anyone other then me even be interested in it after I am done? Kevin |
|
From: Miro <mi...@bo...> - 2003-12-04 02:18:30
|
Hello. I need a program made in JAVA or JSP that could read OpenCyc database = using JDBC. If someone has Java JDBC source that do it, please, share the source = with me. If someone is trying to do it but is getting trouble coding = than please, tell-me. I want to help you. If someone has tips about it = please to tell-me too.=20 Nowadays I don=B4t have time to involve-me with Oracle native systems = however I need OpenCyc database under Java JDBC. and Thanks: God will bless you! ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Sharf Law Firm=20 To: ope...@li...=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: [OpenCyc-devel] Opencyc for lawyers Hello: I am a 15 year bankruptcy litigation attorney who would very much like = to explore the practical applications of Opencyc for practicing = attorneys. I have the desire and time, as well as the ability. I do = NOT, however, have the time to learn how to communicate with Opencyc = using the programming language that it uses, and my understanding is = that Opencyc does not yet communicate in English. Would anyone on this service list like to collaborate and develop a = useful legal reasoning engine? Mark M. Sharf 818-788-4800 ban...@pa... Encino, California |
|
From: Ben Y. <by...@ya...> - 2003-12-04 01:52:52
|
Hi,
Your project is highly interesting to me.
I no legal background, but I do have extremely broad
technical experience for someone of my age (23). One
of my more enjoyable experiences was a co-op at
Cycorp.
The problem is that I am currently employed (part
time) AND working on my thesis. Expect both of these
to end in May or June, and would love if this could be
what's next for me. If the fact that I could not
start until them does not disqualify me, let me know
and I'll send over a resume (I'm away from my computer
right now) and describe my Cycorp experience in some
depth.
Warm Regards,
Ben
--- Sharf Law Firm <ban...@pa...> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am a 15 year bankruptcy litigation attorney who
> would very much like to explore the practical
> applications of Opencyc for practicing attorneys. I
> have the desire and time, as well as the ability. I
> do NOT, however, have the time to learn how to
> communicate with Opencyc using the programming
> language that it uses, and my understanding is that
> Opencyc does not yet communicate in English.
>
> Would anyone on this service list like to
> collaborate and develop a useful legal reasoning
> engine?
>
> Mark M. Sharf
> 818-788-4800
> ban...@pa...
> Encino, California
=====
From Leaf
Sunlight and mist turn a young leaf into tea.
Tea can turn you into something new.
Tea. A natural gift of love.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
|
|
From: Stephen R. <re...@cy...> - 2003-12-03 19:55:49
|
The current release of OpenCyc would be suitable only for deliberative robot control activities, those in which some seconds are allocated for decision making. As a workaround, you could store a state-machine definition in a microtheory, extract it entirely into the robot application during initialization and use that for the sub-second reactive behavior of the robot. I am currently in the midst of writing a behavior engine for Cyc that takes this approach that may be available next year. -Steve On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Piermarco Burrafato wrote: > Hi, > > I am investigating the possibility to use OpenCyc for real-time > applications, especially robotics. The question is: since Cyc is a huge > knowledge base, even though I built my own "little" microtheory, would > this suffise for getting good performances during query time? I mean, > would this assure a reasonable computation time for inferencing any fact > from the KB when, say, the system is approaching a potentially dangerous > state? Would Cyc let the robot get broken crashing against a wall, or > would rather Cyc save it? > > Many thanks for any help. > > Best regards > -- =========================================================== Stephen L. Reed phone: 512.342.4036 Cycorp, Suite 100 fax: 512.342.4040 3721 Executive Center Drive email: re...@cy... Austin, TX 78731 web: http://www.cyc.com download OpenCyc at http://www.opencyc.org =========================================================== |
|
From: Ben Y. <by...@ya...> - 2003-12-03 18:17:28
|
I think the answer to this question might hinge on the garbage collector in Cyc's run time environment... it's certainly something that I'm curious about, in any case. How incremental is the GCing? If fairly incremental, what's a safe upper bound time wise on a collection cycle? Is it in its own thread? If so, what's the max fraction of cycles it would take away from the execution at any given point. Is there any way of configuring any of these behaviors? I'm curious about what you're doing robotics-wise, as I'm doing robotics research as well. Something to discuss one on one if you're so inclined. Regards, Ben --- Piermarco Burrafato <pm...@cs...> wrote: > Hi, > > I am investigating the possibility to use OpenCyc > for real-time > applications, especially robotics. The question is: > since Cyc is a huge > knowledge base, even though I built my own "little" > microtheory, would > this suffise for getting good performances during > query time? I mean, > would this assure a reasonable computation time for > inferencing any fact > from the KB when, say, the system is approaching a > potentially dangerous > state? Would Cyc let the robot get broken crashing > against a wall, or > would rather Cyc save it? > > Many thanks for any help. > > Best regards > -- > Piermarco Burrafato > Ph.D. Student > DINFO Università degli Studi > Viale delle Scienze > 90128 Palermo, ITALY > EMail bur...@cs... > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback > Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? > Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and > help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > OpenCyc-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencyc-devel ===== From Leaf Sunlight and mist turn a young leaf into tea. Tea can turn you into something new. Tea. A natural gift of love. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Sharf L. F. <ban...@pa...> - 2003-12-03 18:16:57
|
Hello: I am a 15 year bankruptcy litigation attorney who would very much like = to explore the practical applications of Opencyc for practicing = attorneys. I have the desire and time, as well as the ability. I do = NOT, however, have the time to learn how to communicate with Opencyc = using the programming language that it uses, and my understanding is = that Opencyc does not yet communicate in English. Would anyone on this service list like to collaborate and develop a = useful legal reasoning engine? Mark M. Sharf 818-788-4800 ban...@pa... Encino, California |
|
From: Piermarco B. <pm...@cs...> - 2003-12-03 17:54:45
|
Hi, I am investigating the possibility to use OpenCyc for real-time applications, especially robotics. The question is: since Cyc is a huge knowledge base, even though I built my own "little" microtheory, would this suffise for getting good performances during query time? I mean, would this assure a reasonable computation time for inferencing any fact =66rom the KB when, say, the system is approaching a potentially dangerou= s state? Would Cyc let the robot get broken crashing against a wall, or would rather Cyc save it? Many thanks for any help. Best regards --=20 Piermarco Burrafato Ph.D. Student DINFO Universit=E0 degli Studi Viale delle Scienze 90128 Palermo, ITALY EMail bur...@cs... |
|
From: Joshua N P. <jpr...@po...> - 2003-08-26 02:05:07
|
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:17:23PM +0400, Alexander A. Abutov wrote: > Saturday, August 23, 2003, 3:40:44 PM, you wrote: > >> Is there something clear or latent method, procedure, SUBL > >> command(s) or something else for debugging or viewing _full_ inference tree > >> generated by OpenCyc inference engine? > JNP> Do you already know about PowerLoom / WhyNot? > > Yes. I know about PowerLoom / WhyNot. > I have download PowerLoom at http://www.isi.edu/isd/LOOM/PowerLoom/ > (~3Mb jar file) > and have read documentation at http://www.isi.edu/isd/LOOM/PowerLoom/documentation/documentation.html > But I have find only undocumented command "WHYNOT:" in PowerLoom > command interpreter and nothing about connecting to OpenCyc and so on. > > Is pointed distributive what all identify as WhyNot system? Or not? I don't know myself. Also, this might be off-topic for opencyc. Please repeat your question on the powerloom-forum. I am sure they will be ready to help you. I have asked some questions there and received prompt attention. -- A new cognitive theory of emotion, http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/aleader |
4 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
