From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-10-30 14:49:13
|
Documentation item #3430495, was opened at 2011-10-30 15:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by didierbr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=912617&aid=3430495&group_id=68187 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: correct mistake Group: 2.5 - user manual Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: smolejv (vitosmolej) Assigned to: smolejv (vitosmolej) >Summary: Switching from SUN to Oracle Initial Comment: Open point - but if we decide to do it, I would ölike to do it in concert with Didier. Regards smo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Didier Briel (didierbr) Date: 2011-10-30 15:49 Message: I have no objection (Sun is not going back). I agree that it should be done in 2.5 (/trunk) as mentioned in this report, not in 2.3. Didier ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=912617&aid=3430495&group_id=68187 |