From: Didier B. <d....@fr...> - 2011-09-05 21:19:50
|
-----Original Message----- >From: ce...@hu... [mailto:ce...@hu...] >Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:57 PM >To: Mailing list for OmegaT developers. >Subject: Re: [OmTdev] Hashsums > > >In fact I misread it, you are right. >I am not familiar with Ant, not sure if I can help with that, then. > >But yet, I was thinking about something different, and apparently >simpler, namely the hashes of the zips and exes and tarballs in >http://www.omegat.org/en/dl_overview.php - It's not clear from you write, so, to be clear, those on dl_overview.php are the ones on Sourceforge. >precisely for those >people who wouldn't compile from source. The one dozen files of >Standard and Latest versions only. Or at least Standard, who is >probably updated last frequently. > >In that case, no need to be cross-platform. >Once generated, Someone still has to do it. And generated from what reference? >have it >available at OmegaT site - so ok, in that case it would be Marc to >upload. > >If betas come out way more often than stable release and the update >is a problem, then at least checksums for the stable release? > >An Ant task would create hashes for individual files of the >subfolders of the source, that is something different. And no need >for it, just to check integrity of the original zip. I think you misunderstand what an Ant task would be. An Ant task does what it is supposed to do, so, if one was created to generate hashes in a text file, it would do that. The point about an Ant task was: either it is fully automatic, or I won't do it. Didier |