From: Erik v. P. <er...@va...> - 2013-07-20 10:22:21
|
dw schreef op za 20-07-2013 om 02:07 [-0700]: > > An argument could be made that we have broken backward compatibility > and it's our responsibility to fix it. On the other hand, one could > say they are using our library incorrectly (by not including any of > our headers), and the fact that it worked at all was a fluke and > inconsistent with the MSDN docs. > I would say we have to mimic the MSVC behavior as close as possible. This bring us to the question whether boost can be compiled successfully for x86_64 using MSVC. If the upstream boost devs have added workarounds for mingw-specific toolchain bugs we could try to persuade them to drop or loosen these workarounds. Regards, Erik van Pienbroek |