From: Kai T. <kti...@go...> - 2010-06-07 09:14:51
|
2010/6/7 Henry N. <hen...@ya...>: > On 07.06.2010 09:20, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Wolfgang Glas<wol...@ev...> wrote: >>> On 2010-06-07 08:52, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs >>>> <dmi...@ub...> wrote: >>>>> On 6 June 2010 12:00, Ozkan Sezer<se...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Wolfgang Glas<wol...@ev...> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm using GUID_DEVINTERFACE_USB_DEVICE in my windows code, which uses >>>>>>> setupapi.dll. This declaration has been in ddk/usbiodef.h as of mingw-w64-gcc-4.4.1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However this header seems to be gone in erecnt versions (I'm currently on >>>>>>> sezero gcc-4.4.5-20100527). Morevover I can't find GUID_DEVINTERFACE_USB_DEVICE >>>>>>> in any other header. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anybody have deper insights into this issue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ragards and TIA, Wolfgang >>>>>> This is a problem in our way of providing ddk headers: We >>>>>> do a svn-link to reactos headers, specifically to their >>>>> Is the svn-link pinned to a particular revision on the 1.0 branch? >>>> It is not. >>>> >>>>> (Stability& reproducibility is important for packagers ;-) ) >>> I'd like to double the request for reproducability. From the packagers viewpoint >>> it would be better to stick to a hand-selected (and tested) snapshot of upstream >>> sources. >>> >>> Ozkan, will you provide us with a new snapshot once the missing header problem >>> is sorted out? >>> >>> Best regards, Wolfgang >>> >> Well when things get sorted out, we can make a "ddk snapshot" >> release. Would that be appropriate? > > From user side this would be very welcome. It is very difficult to find > the right ddk headers for a snapshot of mingw build. > For such snapshot this test case should please produce no errors and no > warnings: > > PREFIX=.../W64_160271 > TARGET=x86_64-w64-mingw32 > GCC=$PREFIX/bin/$TARGET-gcc > > echo "#include<ntddk.h>">check.c > $GCC -I$PREFIX/$TARGET/include/ddk -Wall -c -o check.o check.c > > -- > Henry N. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Min...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > Well, the only solution I see here for the ddk-optional SDK is, that we do a fork of it and have to maintain it by ourself. The only need we would have here is a volunteer doing the manual merge and which signs responsible to build up an testsuite for it. We should keep in experimental branch the link to reactos-svn, but replace the links in branches. When we found a volunteer for it, we can proceed on this. Kai -- | (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste | (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help | (")_(") him gain world domination |