From: <pro...@we...> - 2004-02-23 19:00:51
|
Hi Jeroen, Re your questions and a bit more info on CASE Studio. I created fairly muc= h the largest documentation possible activating every switch in doc export= . As a result e.g. the RTF doc is quite lengthy; that can be automatically= cut down. I will be more than happy to continually maintain the data model part as l= ong as there is no license for CASE Studio for a Mantis developer. As said= , my IT development folks love it, and we will 100% continue to use it. An= idea I have is, as my company makes heavy use of Mantis, to "pay" for Man= tis by contributing a CASE Studio license to the community. I could put th= e money into my budget. What I need is someone who owns the license (Ken=3F)= and is legally responsible to make sure that only one installation for th= at license file exists, is not distributed etc bla bla. This would make th= e development team independant of me (although I'd still like to be of hel= p). Problem is that afaik license has to be registered with a department o= r individual; I'll check with the provider. Also, as we already have quite= some licenses globally, we get the discounted price =8099 :-) There is built in support for free text in script generation, but I haven'= t looked into to what degree. The tool is very flexible, even has a plugin= language to extend some of the import/export capabilities (we wrote our o= wn import/export script to do forward and reverse engineering for our prop= rietary DB system)... I will have to check. So, to continue documenting: is there any material somewhere someone could= make available that explains the tables (not so difficult without though)= and variables (a bit more time consuming without)=3F This could help me get= a basic doc out faster. Also, who is/are contacts working core on the dat= abase and knowing most about it=3F Should we continue this path, we should c= ommunicate directly and only send general infos and summaries to this list= . I find the mail functionality a bit odd, or I use wrong bad tools ;-) Cheers, Matthias =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F ... and the winner is... WEB.DE FreeMail! - Deutschlands beste E-Mail ist zum 39. Mal Testsieger (PC Praxis 03/04) http://f.web.de/=3Fmc=3D021191 |