From: Julian F. <ju...@be...> - 2003-03-12 06:45:44
|
Ondrej Jombik wrote: >>>AFAIK: References header aim is to reference e-mail messages by its >>>replies. Thus new e-mails should have this empty. Particular values >>>for References header are extracted from Message-ID header. >> >>Yes, so is this an ugly hack, or is it an "acceptable" use of the >>references header? If it isn't valid and the threading is going to be >>weird, we should just add custom X- headers to hold this information. >>This works equally well for filtering mail... the only reason to use >>references is if that makes actual sense. > > > Actually we have added an implementation of threading based just on > References without Message-ID setting. My later response was due to > observations of this matter. I wanted to know if they would sort. And > they do. At least in Mutt; I will check also Pine e-mail client. Cool. If I can see the code, I'll give it a try in Mozilla. > > >>X-mantis-project-number X-mantis-project-name X-mantis-bug-number >>X-mantis-server-name > > > Setting these does not make so much sence, since they are not used for > threading and sorting of e-mail messages. > > So conclusion: the code I posted (btw. did I post code doing this?) is > doing its job well and can be used in production environment. All the > things it does is setting up References e-mail header to right values. As far as I remember you never posted code. I think this is a cool idea (although Mozilla actually seems to thread them fine based on their subjects) so if you have code I would very much like to see it. I'm still not 100% clear what you are proposing so I'm interested to see it more concretely. Julian -- ju...@be... Beta4 Productions (http://www.beta4.com) |