From: Victor B. <vb...@gm...> - 2009-05-21 06:52:33
|
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Gianluca Sforna <gi...@gm...> wrote: > Hi John, > thanks for bringing this back on the table > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, John Reese <jr...@le...> wrote: >> After testing, it seems that jQuery doesn't interfere with any of the >> existing Javascript/Projax implementations in Mantis, and that the two >> libraries play well with each other. I'm not sure if this would help to >> spark any sort of final decisions on the subject, but it at least >> demonstrates that it would be possible for us to maintain the existing >> Projax features while also moving forward with new features implemented >> in jQuery, and/or eventually updating the Projax features to jQuery. > > If this is the case, my preference goes to a plan like: > > 1. add JQuery to MantisBT (core, not plugin) > 2. move the existing projax based stuff to jquery > 3. get rid of projax&friends [Victor] This plan makes sense to me. > Additionally, please consider (at least optionially) loading JQuery > using the google faciities at: > http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs > as it makes things easier and faster for everyone. [Victor] Looks like a good idea. Is there an offline story for this? (i.e.. a way to drop these files locally somewhere and they would be picked up by Google api?). For example, MantisBT installed on a laptop that is not online for testing or development or local use? Not a critical scenario, but was just wondering. Regards, Victor. |