|
From: Hanns H. R. <co...@sc...> - 2018-01-09 08:17:11
|
I mean -- to elaborate: the relative mode works perfectly on macOS, with the assumed operation: relative coordinates, absolute pressure and tilt. If an application uses tilt and pressure, it would have to assume absolute values. So even if there is only a "global" mode, that mode can only be interpreted as relating to coordinates. On 09/01/18 09:10, Hanns Holger Rutz wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for the answers. But as I said, you cannot do _anything_ useful > with relative/integrated tilt because the values are meaningless, so I > can't imagine any application using those values. Or am I missing some > use case? > > Would it be possible to fix this issue? > > Best, .h.h. > > > On 09/01/18 04:34, Peter Hutterer wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:00:19PM -0800, Jason Gerecke wrote: >>> My apologies for the delay in replying -- >>> >>> When the tablet is switched to relative mode, it seems that all axes >>> (not just X and Y) begin emitting relative data. This appears to be >>> intentional, however: commit 49d7635e19 introduced this behavior, >>> noting that "the [axis value] builds up to the maximum and stays >>> there, even when the pen is lifted off the tablet." It links to >>> https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxwacom/bugs/156/ which suggests leaving >>> the pressure/tilt/etc. values absolute and only making the X and Y >>> axes relative. Why this suggestion was not acted on, I'm not sure... >>> Perhaps applications assume(d) that all axes were absolute or >>> relative, and so having a device "partially relative" caused problems? >> >> I think this was the issue. In the XI 1.x protocol you only have a device >> mode, not a per-axis mode (that's XI2, but well, backwards compatibility >> guarantees we can never use it). So you can't have one axis as relative and >> one as absolute, no way to tell the client that's the case. And the mode is >> device-global (with no event, iirc). >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >>> I'm pinging the person who made that change to see if they can >>> remember anything, but its been this way for an awfully long time... >>> >>> Jason >>> --- >>> Now instead of four in the eights place / >>> you’ve got three, ‘Cause you added one / >>> (That is to say, eight) to the two, / >>> But you can’t take seven from three, / >>> So you look at the sixty-fours.... >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:14 AM, Hanns Holger Rutz <co...@sc...> wrote: >>>> ping... >>>> >>>> On 21/11/17 13:40, Hanns Holger Rutz wrote: >>>>> hi, >>>>> >>>>> I don't know if this is the right place to ask (if not, please kindly >>>>> point me to a better forum) -- I'm having problems with a Wacom Intuos3 >>>>> on Debian Stretch; whenever I use relative coordinate mode, the tilt >>>>> values are fluctuating more or less randomly and not correctly >>>>> initialised when I approach the tablet with the stylus; it seems there >>>>> is a bug that tries to apply some "relative integration" to the tilt >>>>> values as well, which of course is wrong. >>>>> >>>>> Is this a known issue? >>>>> >>>>> Best, .h.h. >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linuxwacom-discuss mailing list >>>> Lin...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-discuss >>> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxwacom-discuss mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-discuss > |