From: Kory P. <kor...@gm...> - 2008-11-11 23:59:48
|
hmmm... looking into this further, it might just be best to leave it as it is... Here on Ubuntu, I don't even see the xinitrc file being used. The only two locations that exist are $home/.xinitrc (created by wacomcpl) and /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc. But that second file doesn't matter, because I renamed it and everything worked fine. Plus $home/.xinitrc isn't even run on my system. I have to set it to run manually as a shell script. I also found a link on the x.org site (though it looks like older documentation) http://www.x.org/archive/X11R6.8.1/doc/startx.1.html (near the bottom) That contradicts with the system paths for xinitrc. I think that it will be so different on each system that changing it now could lead to problems. I can't see any way to remedy this unless you found the system paths for all Distros and then some. Maybe you have a better idea? Thanks for the reply.... I think I see now why you put that there in the first place... Kory On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:31 -0800, Ping@LinuxWacom wrote: > Kory, > > You do have a valid point. But, I remember there was a reason to add > that line .... > > After googling "xinitrc", I see this link: > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/systems/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.aix.cmds/doc/aixcmds6/xinit.htm. You can see that, in the case there were no ~/.xinitrc (no local xinitrc), the system-wide xinitrc would have be executed if it exists. > > Maybe we should check the system-wide .xinitrc under all > possible paths before adding it to the local .xinitrc? > > I am open to suggestions. If it is easier for you to change the > code than to explain the solution (that is normally the case for > me) , you can submit a patch to Tracker or to this list. I'll take > care of it. > > Ping > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Kory Prince <kor...@gm...> > wrote: > Is there a certain reason why the .xinitrc made by wacomcpl > calls the > main system script? > It adds the lines: > run the primary system script > . /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc > > Is there any reason to keep putting those lines in? > I understand the need for those lines on some systems, but I > figure if > they are needed, then they would already be present, and not > need to be > added. It's just my opinion, but what is the reason for > inserting thoses > lines? Thanks, > Kory |