Menu
▾
▴
linux-apus-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(210) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(167) |
Aug
(128) |
Sep
(218) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(71) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(179) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(183) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2001-02-20 05:15:54
|
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: > How could you put it in the wrong place? I rather suspect your client - w= hat > version of cvs do you have? I have 1.10.8 . 1.10.7 Do you commit with the log message on the command line or use an editor ($CVSEDITOR) ? ken =20 |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-02-19 11:10:51
|
hi, > > Anything about options etc. I should add to the changelog for the 2.4.1 kernel > > image? :) > > Only options are the usual video=virge:800x600-16 sort, video=virge:virge8 not video=virge:mode:800x600-60 (ie, you dont define mode, and 16 is depth, not frequency) alan |
|
From: T. <Ren...@gm...> - 2001-02-19 11:06:47
|
Hello everybody! Last week I donwloaded the whole 2.2 tree from sourceforge net after the mail with subject: CVS Update: 2.2 (15.02.2001) arrived! I compiled the sources using a config which I used to compile the former 2.2.10 sources (the kernel I got with the former sources works fine). After trying the newly compiled kernel the console output one gets while Linux boots was higher than the visible screen, so that a few lines were beyond the lower screen edge. After Linux booted and while X was started my monitor switched off like it does if it gets to low/high frequency values that it can't display! As mentioned above: I used the same config, the same startscript, the same XF86Config and so on! These values are fine for all previous kernels/sources (2.2.10 and even 2.4)! Does anybody know what happend with the sources after the changes described within the above-mentioned mail were applied? Many thanx and kind regards -- ======================== René Thol ------------------------------------ Multimedia Computing University of Ulm ======================== E-Mail: Ren...@gm... ======================== |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-18 22:18:47
|
Ken Tyler wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: >=20 > > Anything about options etc. I should add to the changelog for the 2.4= .1 > > kernel image? :) >=20 > Only options are the usual video=3Dvirge:800x600-16 sort, video=3Dvirge= :virge8 > (or 16 or 32) for a default mode, and the font and inverse options whic= h > I've used, touched or tested. >=20 > Do you want a list of modes ? Thanks, but I just put an example in the changelog, I think that'll do un= til you implement modedb support. :) --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-18 22:17:59
|
Ken Tyler wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: >=20 > > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >=20 > > > Why do we see the log message in the `Modified files' section inste= ad of > > > the `Log message' section these days?` > > > > It's only Ken's commits. No idea whazzup. >=20 > Probably I put the log message in the wrong place - I'll do better next > time. How could you put it in the wrong place? I rather suspect your client - w= hat version of cvs do you have? I have 1.10.8 . --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2001-02-18 10:27:02
|
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Ken Tyler wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michel D=E4nzer wrote:
> > BTW why don't you use the standard mode database?
> =20
> > Documentation/fb/modedb.txt
>=20
> Geert has suggested that, its next on my list - but I'm not a fast
> worker...
>=20
> Has modedb.c obsoleted the fbset and /etc/fb.modes approach ?
No, but it has more or less obsoleted all `proprietary' mode selection st=
uff in
each specific fbdev driver.
And as soon as we add more options to modedb, matroxfb (which needs flags=
for
things like sync on green) will start using it as well...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m6=
8k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. =
But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like=
that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2001-02-16 22:06:53
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: > BTW why don't you use the standard mode database? =20 > Documentation/fb/modedb.txt Geert has suggested that, its next on my list - but I'm not a fast worker... Has modedb.c obsoleted the fbset and /etc/fb.modes approach ? ken |
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2001-02-16 21:53:09
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: > Anything about options etc. I should add to the changelog for the 2.4.1 k= ernel > image? :) Only options are the usual video=3Dvirge:800x600-16 sort, video=3Dvirge:vir= ge8 (or 16 or 32) for a default mode, and the font and inverse options which I've used, touched or tested. Do you want a list of modes ? Ken. |
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2001-02-16 21:47:53
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Why do we see the log message in the `Modified files' section instead o= f the > > `Log message' section these days?` >=20 > It's only Ken's commits. No idea whazzup. Probably I put the log message in the wrong place - I'll do better next time. Ken. |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-16 16:43:35
|
I've been trying to do this for the whole afternoon, but it always hangs = when I try to edit the already created 2.4.1 release. I'm going into weekend now, can anyone please complete this if it works f= or him? TIA --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-16 13:35:57
|
Ken Tyler wrote: > Modified files: > 2.3/drivers/video/: virgefb.c virgefb.c Added initialisation (n= o > more -v on boot, supports fbset mode > changes, 8, 16 and 32 (slow) depths. BTW why don't you use the standard mode database? Documentation/fb/modedb.txt --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-16 13:28:37
|
Ken Tyler wrote: > 2.3/drivers/video/: virgefb.c virgefb.c Added initialisation (n= o > more -v on boot, supports fbset mode > changes, 8, 16 and 32 (slow) depths. Great Ken! Anything about options etc. I should add to the changelog for the 2.4.1 k= ernel image? :) --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-16 10:36:33
|
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ken Tyler wrote: > > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus > > Module name: 2.2 > > Repository: 2.2/drivers/video/ > > Changes by: kent@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/02/15 11:59:16 > > > > Modified files: > > 2.2/drivers/video/: virgefb.c virgefb.c Modified code to be > > identical with 2.3/2.4 version where > > possible > > > > Log message: >=20 > Why do we see the log message in the `Modified files' section instead o= f the > `Log message' section these days?` It's only Ken's commits. No idea whazzup. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2001-02-16 10:26:27
|
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ken Tyler wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus
> Module name: 2.2
> Repository: 2.2/drivers/video/
> Changes by: kent@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/02/15 11:59:16
>
> Modified files:
> 2.2/drivers/video/: virgefb.c virgefb.c Modified code to be
> identical with 2.3/2.4 version where
> possible
>
> Log message:
Why do we see the log message in the `Modified files' section instead of the
`Log message' section these days?`
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@us...> - 2001-02-15 19:58:31
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.2 Repository: 2.2/drivers/video/ Changes by: kent@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/02/15 11:59:16 Modified files: 2.2/drivers/video/: virgefb.c virgefb.c Modified code to be identical with 2.3/2.4 version where possible Log message: |
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@us...> - 2001-02-15 19:55:47
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.3 Repository: 2.3/drivers/video/ Changes by: kent@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/02/15 11:56:31 Modified files: 2.3/drivers/video/: virgefb.c virgefb.c Added initialisation (no more -v on boot, supports fbset mode changes, 8, 16 and 32 (slow) depths. Log message: |
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@us...> - 2001-02-15 19:52:47
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.3 Repository: 2.3/drivers/video/ Changes by: kent@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/02/15 11:53:31 Added files: 2.3/drivers/video/: virgefb.h virgefb.h Should be merged with other S3 header files Log message: |
|
From: T. <Ren...@gm...> - 2001-02-14 14:49:51
|
Hi again! Alan Buxey schrieb: > hi, > > > So where should finally I post compilation errors? > > It is pointless to post the > same error lists more than once. I really did? (iirc I only posted different (not even all) error outputs I got during my compilation attempts)! Bye -- ======================== René Thol ------------------------------------ Multimedia Computing University of Ulm ======================== E-Mail: Ren...@gm... ======================== |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-02-14 14:39:30
|
hi, > Not yet (I suppose), cause Linux told me today 70nsram, while I was looking for > memory capacity (seems that I've only 127 and less MB of RAM, while I've 4x32MB > installed on PPC card! Avail within AmigaOS bootet with no startup also shows only > 127MB after switching on the machine! Does anybody know why? Does the PPC-card > with all patches and so installed eat such much RAM, before the system gets it?)! 512K for ROM-shadowing, 512K for PPC.lib stuff. its all documented. you can gain 512k of that back if you do not wish to fastROM your system. alan |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-02-14 14:37:41
|
hi, > So where should finally I post compilation errors? I would say just once to both lists. Under the developer list it can be seen if there are errors with any APUS code, under the user list your CONFIGs can be examined. It is pointless to post the same error lists more than once. If people choose to ignore (or dont bother reading) then they'll only do more of the same later alan |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-14 13:09:27
|
Ren=E9 Thol wrote: > > > Meanwhile I think I've the buggiest Linux of all! Nothing works, ne= ither > > > 2.4 comilation nor CD-burning (I've got 2 blank CDs with 4MB on the= m, > > > cdrecord made with the only 2.4 kernel I ever made; after 4 MB some= kind > > > of timeout occurs!; I won't take this 2.4 kernel again, cause it ha= ngs > > > the whole Linux after a while (have to press Ctrl-Amiga-Amiga then)= !)! > > > > From your experience (most of all the apparently-non-deterministic > > signals 11 and 4) I suspect you could suffer from hardware problems. = Do > > you use the 60nsram option? >=20 > Not yet (I suppose), cause Linux told me today 70nsram, Okay. I wasn't suggesting using that option, I suspected it might cause problems. > (seems that I've only 127 and less MB of RAM, while I've 4x32MB > installed on PPC card! Avail within AmigaOS bootet with no startup also > shows only 127MB after switching on the machine! Does anybody know why?= Does > the PPC-card with all patches and so installed eat such much RAM, befor= e the > system gets it?)! In AmigaOS, yes. In Linux it's the kernel. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: T. <Ren...@gm...> - 2001-02-14 13:01:37
|
Michel Dänzer schrieb: > René Thol wrote: > > > Meanwhile I think I've the buggiest Linux of all! Nothing works, neither 2.4 > > comilation nor CD-burning (I've got 2 blank CDs with 4MB on them, cdrecord > > made with the only 2.4 kernel I ever made; after 4 MB some kind of timeout > > occurs!; I won't take this 2.4 kernel again, cause it hangs the whole Linux > > after a while (have to press Ctrl-Amiga-Amiga then)!)! > > >From your experience (most of all the apparently-non-deterministic signals 11 > and 4) I suspect you could suffer from hardware problems. Do you use the > 60nsram option? Not yet (I suppose), cause Linux told me today 70nsram, while I was looking for memory capacity (seems that I've only 127 and less MB of RAM, while I've 4x32MB installed on PPC card! Avail within AmigaOS bootet with no startup also shows only 127MB after switching on the machine! Does anybody know why? Does the PPC-card with all patches and so installed eat such much RAM, before the system gets it?)! Bye -- ======================== René Thol ------------------------------------ Multimedia Computing University of Ulm ======================== E-Mail: Ren...@gm... ======================== |
|
From: T. <Ren...@gm...> - 2001-02-14 12:58:35
|
Hello, Alan Buxey schrieb: > hi, > > please move your problems to the linux-apus-user list. > > I believe three of us have already asked you to tell us what version of > gcc you are using. you must answer us, or we cannor help you! > 2.95.2 is needed to compile 2.4 without gcc errors. 'gcc -v' will tell > you what we need to know. Within user list I was told (some weeks ago) compilation probs belong into devel-list! Within user-list I posted that I forgot to tell the gcc version within my mail to devel-list. I've got 2.95.2-1 and glib version 1.2.7-65! So where should finally I post compilation errors? Regards -- ======================== René Thol ------------------------------------ Multimedia Computing University of Ulm ======================== E-Mail: Ren...@gm... ======================== |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-02-14 12:57:21
|
Ren=E9 Thol wrote: > Meanwhile I think I've the buggiest Linux of all! Nothing works, neithe= r 2.4 > comilation nor CD-burning (I've got 2 blank CDs with 4MB on them, cdrec= ord > made with the only 2.4 kernel I ever made; after 4 MB some kind of time= out > occurs!; I won't take this 2.4 kernel again, cause it hangs the whole L= inux > after a while (have to press Ctrl-Amiga-Amiga then)!)! From your experience (most of all the apparently-non-deterministic signal= s 11 and 4) I suspect you could suffer from hardware problems. Do you use the 60nsram option? --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-02-14 12:48:45
|
hi, please move your problems to the linux-apus-user list. I believe three of us have already asked you to tell us what version of gcc you are using. you must answer us, or we cannor help you! 2.95.2 is needed to compile 2.4 without gcc errors. 'gcc -v' will tell you what we need to know. Also, CDR problems wont magically fix themselves...someone with the hardware that YOU have (hint) will need to spend time/effort in looking at the SG driver under APUS alan |
107 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
