Menu
▾
▴
linux-apus-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(210) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(167) |
Aug
(128) |
Sep
(218) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(71) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(179) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(183) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2001-03-28 22:47:36
|
I occassionally get an X crash that stops my machine dead, not in any particular program but usually at a mouse click. Here's the dmesg output, can anyone see anything significant ? 2.2.10 Ken. floating point used in kernel (task=c10d4000, pc=c0006d18) /* c0006d18 T do_gettimeofday */ NIP: C0006D1C XER: 00000000 LR: C0019454 REGS: c10d5da0 TRAP: 0700 MSR: 0008b072 EE: 1 PR: 0 FP: 1 ME: 1 IR/DR: 11 TASK = c10d4000[524] 'X' mm->pgd c1490000 Last syscall: 78 last math c18f2000 GPR00: C0003A20 C10D5E50 C10D4000 C10D5E58 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000020 GPR08: 00000004 C10D5E90 C001942C 41242493 00000000 10274650 1027E154 1027E354 GPR16: 1027CE90 10270000 10280000 10280000 00009072 090D5E80 00000000 C0003C98 GPR24: C00039CC 1026CD5C 10291660 00000001 00000000 7FFFF618 00000000 C10D5E58 Call backtrace: 00000040 C0003A20 00000000 10030BF8 10032E9C 10038C24 10031E48 10031004 10049768 1006A5D0 100415D4 100552D8 0FE9B69C 00000000 0xC0003A20 (0xC00039CC + 0x00000054) DoSyscal Kernel panic: Exception in kernel pc c0006d1c signal 4 Rebooting in 180 seconds..NIP: C00066C0 XER: 20000000 LR: C0003C98 REGS: c10d5b60 TRAP: 0700 MSR: 00081072 EE: 0 PR: 0 FP: 0 ME: 1 IR/DR: 11 TASK = c10d4000[524] 'X' mm->pgd c1490000 Last syscall: 78 last math c18f2000 GPR00: 000304A0 C10D5C10 C10D4000 C10D5C20 80F60000 00000003 801E156A 6E203138 GPR08: 30207365 C0170000 0002BF1F 0BCAC000 44242424 10274650 1027E154 1027E354 GPR16: 1027CE90 10270000 10280000 10280000 00001072 090D5C10 00000000 C0003C98 GPR24: C00066C0 1026CD5C 10291660 00000001 00000000 C0170000 00000004 C01A0000 Call backtrace: C0015B7C C0015414 C0005CC8 C0005EE0 C0003C98 00000040 C0003A20 00000000 10030BF8 10032E9C 10038C24 10031E48 10031004 10049768 1006A5D0 100415D4 100552D8 0FE9B69C 00000000 0xC0015B7C (0xC0015938 + 0x00000244) printk 0xC0015414 (0xC001533C + 0x000000D8) panic 0xC0005CC8 (0xC0005C80 + 0x00000048) _exception 0xC0005EE0 (0xC0005E94 + 0x0000004C) ProgramCheckException 0xC0003C98 (0xC0003B04 + 0x00000194) _switch 0x00000040 (0xC0000000 + 0x40000040) _start 0xC0003A20 (0xC00039CC + 0x00000054) DoSyscall 0x00000000 (0xC0000000 + 0x40000000) _start Kernel panic: Exception in kernel pc c00066c0 signal 4 Rebooting in 180 seconds..<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< |
|
From: <fh...@at...> - 2001-03-28 01:38:38
|
In <OE2...@ho...>, on 03/24/01 at 10:17 AM, Benoit Sévigny <ben...@ho...> said: >So what's up with the development of CSPPC SCSI device driver? >Has anybody made progress? I still intend to work on it, when I get my Amiga running again and when I have time. I have not had success so far, but I am learning more with each attempt. Has anyone else tried working on the driver lately? Fred |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-03-26 10:47:55
|
Bugs item #411221, was updated on 2001-03-25 14:03 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105907&aid=411221&group_id=5907 Category: 2.4 Kernel Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Kernel Panic Initial Comment: When I start Linux, I get this message: Kernel Panic: kernel access of bad area: pc c00c9274 lr c00c9268 address 70 tsk hwclock/18 My system: A1200 68k 040/PPC 603e, 64Mb RAM I have installed the latest boothacks, kernel, and other stuff. All the RPM's from LinuxPPC.org from the "stable" directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michel Dänzer (mdaenzer) Date: 2001-03-26 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=34113 Does this still happen if you move /lib/modules/2.4.2/kernel/drivers/char/rtc.o out of the way? If yes, there's probably a bug in the RTC (real time clock) code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105907&aid=411221&group_id=5907 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-03-25 22:03:06
|
Bugs item #411221, was updated on 2001-03-25 14:03 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105907&aid=411221&group_id=5907 Category: 2.4 Kernel Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Kernel Panic Initial Comment: When I start Linux, I get this message: Kernel Panic: kernel access of bad area: pc c00c9274 lr c00c9268 address 70 tsk hwclock/18 My system: A1200 68k 040/PPC 603e, 64Mb RAM I have installed the latest boothacks, kernel, and other stuff. All the RPM's from LinuxPPC.org from the "stable" directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105907&aid=411221&group_id=5907 |
|
From: Giorgio T. <gt...@us...> - 2001-03-25 09:08:16
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus
Module name: 2.3
Repository: 2.3/drivers/ide/
Changes by: gterzi@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/03/25 01:08:13
Log message:
sobstituted with a more revised version (see file notes)
Modified files:
2.3/drivers/ide/:
buddha.c
Revision Changes Path
1.3 +14 -8 2.3/drivers/ide/buddha.c
|
|
From: Rene B. <re...@we...> - 2001-03-23 15:32:12
|
Hello! Alan Buxey wrote: > > I have compiled and tested the xf-4_0_3 branche, no problems detected= yet. > > > > Has anyone some special to test? > > have you got a PCI-supporting kernel and are you using the glint-driver= > (Bvision/CVision) directly - ie without using the FBDev > > alan Yes I use a 2.2.10 and 2.4.1 kernel with PCI, and I am using the glint dr= iver, but always with UseFBDev option. Will try without it next time. Ciao, Ren=E8 |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-03-22 17:34:34
|
hi, > I have compiled and tested the xf-4_0_3 branche, no problems detected yet. > > Has anyone some special to test? have you got a PCI-supporting kernel and are you using the glint-driver (Bvision/CVision) directly - ie without using the FBDev alan |
|
From: Rene B. <re...@we...> - 2001-03-22 16:40:54
|
Hello! Alan Buxey wrote: > cvs co -r xc-4_0_3 xc > > this is the 4.0.3 branch. i now have the files, but havent compiled ye= t. I have compiled and tested the xf-4_0_3 branche, no problems detected yet= =2E Has anyone some special to test? Ciao, Ren=E8 |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2001-03-22 15:15:56
|
Alan Buxey wrote: > include/linux/version.h had the following info in it: >=20 > UTS_RELEASE=3D2.4.1 > linux_version_code=3D132097 >=20 > (or something VERY similar - i scribbled it down) >=20 > this seems to be wrong. I know that I had a clock scew at some point > (some files were dated in the year 2022 ..dont know how THAT year happe= ned > to appear) could this be the reason? I'll just CVS update if so. include/linux/version.h isn't even in CVS but generated during the build.= So the clock skew is indeed likely to be the problem. --=20 Michel D=E4nzer | Relog-Reagency AG | http://r= elog.ch=20 Weinbergstrasse 108 | 8006 Z=FCrich | +41 (0)1 36= 8 55 55 |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-03-22 10:39:00
|
hi, > Isn't that just the SUBLEVEL = 2 line at the top the main Makefile ? > > Just noticed I have a .#Makefile.1.17 file so something has gone astray at > sometime, this has SUBLEVEL = 1. update: no, my Makefile had 'SUBLEVEL = 2' on the third line. however, I think I may have found the issue, include/linux/version.h had the following info in it: UTS_RELEASE=2.4.1 linux_version_code=132097 (or something VERY similar - i scribbled it down) this seems to be wrong. I know that I had a clock scew at some point (some files were dated in the year 2022 ..dont know how THAT year happened to appear) could this be the reason? I'll just CVS update if so. alan |
|
From: Michel D?n. <mda...@us...> - 2001-03-21 22:55:37
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus
Module name: 2.3
Repository: 2.3/arch/ppc/configs/
Changes by: mdaenzer@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/03/21 14:55:34
Log message:
forgot about defconfig - that's even better of course
Modified files:
2.3/arch/ppc/:
defconfig
2.3/arch/ppc/configs/:
apus_defconfig
Removed files:
./:
.config-apus
Revision Changes Path
1.4 +341 -257 2.3/arch/ppc/defconfig
1.2 +551 -166 2.3/arch/ppc/configs/apus_defconfig
|
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-03-21 20:24:46
|
hi, > Isn't that just the SUBLEVEL = 2 line at the top the main Makefile ? > > Just noticed I have a .#Makefile.1.17 file so something has gone astray at > sometime, this has SUBLEVEL = 1. thanks! I'll edit this > I had a different problem with the 2.4 kernel not being able to find > modules. The sub-dir structure in /lib/modules/2.4.? has changed, > updating to modutils-2.3.14-3.ppc.rpm fixed things. oh, i know that already - having been an early 2.4-alpha user in x86 land (I'm not too keen on he new modules layout :-( ) alan |
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2001-03-21 19:34:47
|
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Alan Buxey wrote: Hello, > anyhow, the problem is that when i compiled the kernel, 'make > modules_install' placed the modules into /lib/modules/2.4.2 (as you'd > expect!) but when I boot the created kernel image, its looking for modules > in the /lib/modules/2.4.1 directory! i've copied the modules from 2.4.2 > to 2.4.1 for now - but this behaviour is wrong - so I've reported it here. Isn't that just the SUBLEVEL = 2 line at the top the main Makefile ? Just noticed I have a .#Makefile.1.17 file so something has gone astray at sometime, this has SUBLEVEL = 1. I had a different problem with the 2.4 kernel not being able to find modules. The sub-dir structure in /lib/modules/2.4.? has changed, updating to modutils-2.3.14-3.ppc.rpm fixed things. Ken. |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2001-03-21 15:06:53
|
> > Log message: > > example config, used for the precompiled kernels. The idea is to in= clude > > as much stuff as possible, things useful for installation built into = the > > kernel and the rest as modules > > > > Added files: > > ./: > > .config-apus >=20 > excellent. the user just has to rename and 'make oldconfig' a well-thou= ght > solution :-) Thanks, but it will only be useful if people are aware of it, do you thin= k my post to the user list is enough for that? Another (possibly related) thought about docs: Is there any reason why we shouldn't set up a FAQ-o-matic? I know there is at least one SourceForge project providing one, I think it would be great if someone could look in= to it. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de= veloper CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project m= ember |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-03-21 11:21:54
|
hi, > Log message: > example config, used for the precompiled kernels. The idea is to include as much stuff as possible, things useful for installation built into the kernel and the rest as modules > > Added files: > ./: > .config-apus excellent. the user just has to rename and 'make oldconfig' a well-thought solution :-) alan |
|
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-03-20 19:38:08
|
Alan Buxey wrote: > > How can I get the sources for the 4.0.3? There is no 4.0.3 branch in the > > cvs at http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ Or must I use the xc > > or HEAD? I`m a little bit confused... > > cvs co -r xc-4_0_3 xc > > this is the 4.0.3 branch. i now have the files, but havent compiled yet. Shouldn't this be xf-4_0_2 ? Whatever, it's on the xf-4_0_2-branch. This might be a bit confusing because we are changing our version numbering scheme, just believe me that it will be better in the end. :) > i guess nothings changed in the 4.0.2 branch so the glint driver still > crashes out. At least the PCI problem which Sven thinks is the cause for our trouble is fixed. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member |
|
From: Michel D?n. <mda...@us...> - 2001-03-20 19:29:59
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus
Module name: 2.3
Repository: ./
Changes by: mdaenzer@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/03/20 11:32:20
Log message:
example config, used for the precompiled kernels. The idea is to include as much stuff as possible, things useful for installation built into the kernel and the rest as modules
Added files:
./:
.config-apus
|
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2001-03-20 19:15:52
|
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:50:31PM +0000, Alan Buxey wrote: > hi, > > > How can I get the sources for the 4.0.3? There is no 4.0.3 branch in the cvs at > > http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ Or must I use the xf-4_0_2-branch, xc or HEAD? I`m a > > little bit confused... > > cvs co -r xc-4_0_3 xc > > this is the 4.0.3 branch. i now have the files, but havent compiled yet. > > i guess nothings changed in the 4.0.2 branch so the glint driver still > crashes out. There were a (small) number of glint fix that got into 4.0.3, see the CHANGELOG file for details. in particualr, there is one fix, that i hope will be fixing the problems that were encountered when using 2.4.x without pci compiled in. I think at least. The symptoms were that it complained about a lot of missing symbols/modules. Friendly, Sven Luther |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-03-20 16:57:11
|
hi, I've recently compiled a kernel made from 2.4.2 CVS sources (and it didnt fail when booted - I've yet to look at what option caused failure) anyhow, the problem is that when i compiled the kernel, 'make modules_install' placed the modules into /lib/modules/2.4.2 (as you'd expect!) but when I boot the created kernel image, its looking for modules in the /lib/modules/2.4.1 directory! i've copied the modules from 2.4.2 to 2.4.1 for now - but this behaviour is wrong - so I've reported it here. I guess an ID flag isnt set correctly..where? alan |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-03-20 16:48:34
|
hi, > How can I get the sources for the 4.0.3? There is no 4.0.3 branch in the cvs at > http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ Or must I use the xf-4_0_2-branch, xc or HEAD? I`m a > little bit confused... cvs co -r xc-4_0_3 xc this is the 4.0.3 branch. i now have the files, but havent compiled yet. i guess nothings changed in the 4.0.2 branch so the glint driver still crashes out. alan |
|
From: Rene B. <re...@we...> - 2001-03-20 15:34:52
|
Hello! Sven LUTHER wrote: > Please compile and try out the xf-4_0_2-branch version, and report any = problem > you encounter. The HEAD cvs version will be released around may or so, = we have > more time with it. I have compiled and tried the xf-4_0_2-branch and I can not detect any pr= oblem so far. But I have the same problems as with all other pre-compiled X4 versions I= tried out. I have reported these problems some weeks ago. Maybe its a specific hardwar= e problem with my configuration, so don`t worry about this. But I think my X4-server problem is kernel related, because these problem= s only appear if I use the glint driver, with fbdev all works fine. O.K. The xf-4_0_2-branch works with a 2.2.10 kernel as well as on my 2.4.= 1 kernel. I also have compiled and tested the version I got with: cvs co xc. With this, the keyboard doesn`t work right. The shift-key is mapped to th= e alt-key and so there is no alt-key available. Pressing the shif-key makes no effect. = Also some keys at the nummeric-pad doesn`t work. All other keys seems working right. This effect is given running X under 2.4 or 2.2.10 kernel, it also doesn`= t matter if glint or fbdev is using. But if I using glint, I got a server crash after a minute or so: Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting Maybe its related with the same problem I described above. I will continuing try out the xf-4_0_2-branch. How can I get the sources for the 4.0.3? There is no 4.0.3 branch in the = cvs at http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ Or must I use the xf-4_0_2-branch, xc or HEA= D? I`m a little bit confused... Ciao, Ren=E8 |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2001-03-19 09:46:23
|
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 04:43:39PM +0100, Rene Brothuhn wrote: > > Hi! > > > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > You should get the latest CVS version, available at : > > > > http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ > > > > and add the -rbranch_4.0.2 option to cvs co. > > > > Beware though, the source are huge, and you need lot of disk space. > > o.k. I have checked it out with -rxf-4_0_2-branche option and also checked out the > latest XF4 version (only cvs co xc). > > Please tell me if 4.0.3 are available. 4.0.3 is available since saturday, 17 march 2001. Friendly, Sven Luther |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2001-03-16 16:56:16
|
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 04:43:39PM +0100, Rene Brothuhn wrote: > > Hi! > > > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > You should get the latest CVS version, available at : > > > > http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ > > > > and add the -rbranch_4.0.2 option to cvs co. > > > > Beware though, the source are huge, and you need lot of disk space. > > o.k. I have checked it out with -rxf-4_0_2-branche option and also checked out the > latest XF4 version (only cvs co xc). Please compile and try out the xf-4_0_2-branch version, and report any problem you encounter. The HEAD cvs version will be released around may or so, we have more time with it. I would be interrested to know what will happen with it with a PCI less 2.4.x kernel. maybe it would even work ? > Please tell me if 4.0.3 are available. Normally really soon now, but cannot tell, most assuredly this weekend though. Friendly, Sven Luther |
|
From: Rene B. <re...@we...> - 2001-03-16 15:43:27
|
Hi! Sven LUTHER wrote: > You should get the latest CVS version, available at : > > http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ > > and add the -rbranch_4.0.2 option to cvs co. > > Beware though, the source are huge, and you need lot of disk space. o.k. I have checked it out with -rxf-4_0_2-branche option and also checke= d out the latest XF4 version (only cvs co xc). Please tell me if 4.0.3 are available. Ciao, Ren=E8 |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2001-03-16 08:19:01
|
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Rene Brothuhn wrote: > > Hello! > > > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > Hello, ... > > > > Xfree 4.0.3 should be released nextly, in order for it to work fine on apus, > > it would be nice if someone could compile it and test it, in order to avoid > > the mess that 4.0.2 caused. Someone feels up to that ? > > Hmm, I could try it. > Where can I get the sources? I can't find it at ftp.xfree86.org. Or wait until tommorow, for 4.0.3 to be out, ... I don't know if you will have time for compiling it before then. Friendly, Sven Luther |
107 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
