From: Roman T. <tso...@gm...> - 2017-11-09 11:26:47
|
Any ideas? Is anybody using favourites? Those who are do you expand your items right from the favourites list? Is there anyone who is bothered by these columns? I would like to fix that but do not want to break anyone's experience (quite poor I believe as it is practically unusable). On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Roman Tsourick <tso...@gm...> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > There is a feature request I would +1, columns customization. But now it > is not possible due to the nature of the table of files/items. And this is > why (for those who is not aware including me): > > The browser uses virtual file system layer to deal with files/items and > supports a number of those: "filefs" "urlfs" "roots" "favourites" at least. > The grid does not distinguish between them but mixes altogether on demand. > On every openning of a directory a particular vfs is given and table model > asks that fs for attriutes the fs supports. Every attribute becomes a > column in the table (like type, size, last modified). Those attributes > (columns) are not replaced but new ones added to existing list. So we can > not have a defined column set for every fs, but the resulting list is > unpredictable by nature. > > This mechanism makes possible a nice facility you can see if you have any > items in your favourites. Add directory to favourites, open favourites > (favourites fs is loaded, which has two columns), click on the plus sign to > expand that dir and what happens is that a new fs queried and its > attributes added as columns to existing ones. > > I wonder is this feature actually used/necessary? Would it be better > prevent FSs from mixing and have separated column sets? (In case of > favourites it could just add new items to the list so expansion still > possible but not adding new columns) > > > -- > Best regards, > Roman. > > mailto: tso...@gm... > -- Best regards, Roman. mailto: tso...@gm... |