From: Jarek C. <jar...@po...> - 2012-06-13 07:03:22
|
W dniu 2012-06-13 00:43, Kazutoshi Satoda pisze: > I think we will still need some API breakages at minor releases since > our APIs were still not so clean to keep compatibility. However, we > should minimize such case and I hope all new APIs will be designed > aiming this goal. I will read the sources you linked to and place a rule somewhere. Of course if you do it before me, it would be really fine. I don't think a definition of api must be made first. In general you all seem to agree that new api may be added, and old api may be even broken, but that should be avoided. > > It should be clarified first why a simple call of Desktop.open() is > not enough. I couldn't find it in code itself, log message, and the > original feature request. > http://jedit.svn.sourceforge.net/jedit/?view=rev&rev=20057 > http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3406759 Please start a separate thread because discussing "desktop.open" under general api discussion is not a good idea. Please remember to fork correctly: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/jedit/index.php?title=Conventions,_procedures#Rewriting_the_subject_.28forking.29 Jarek |