From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-04-03 21:22:41
|
Plugin Bugs item #2942475, was opened at 2010-01-29 13:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kog13 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=565475&aid=2942475&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust) >Assigned to: Damien (kog13) Summary: JavaSideKick: use project properties or .classpath Initial Comment: JavaSideKick should not store any project properties in the java 'properties' file. It should all go in either files that are stored in the project tree (as the case with .classpath) or in ProjectViewer's properties via PV's API. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Damien (kog13) Date: 2011-04-03 16:22 Message: My bad, didn't notice the date. =) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2011-04-03 16:11 Message: this is an old ticket. if you did actually close it, then assign to yourself and close it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Damien (kog13) Date: 2011-04-03 15:58 Message: Doesn't it already? I remember making a change to JavaSideKick that set "java.optionalClasspath" and other properties via the VPTProject instance rather than jEdit's global properties. Isn't this the basic idea? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2010-01-31 19:28 Message: Basically, you're going to have to fix JavaSideKick to use the new (not yet existing) ProjectViewer API for getting and setting project dependencies info. The back-end storage will be handled by projectviewer. So for now, there is nothing you can do, until projectviewer is fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dale Anson (daleanson) Date: 2010-01-31 17:03 Message: Alan, would you please clarify? I think this is relation to a recent thread on the developer's mailing list, but from that thread and this request, I'm not sure what needs to be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2010-01-29 13:20 Message: Or maybe it should just use eclipse .project files too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=565475&aid=2942475&group_id=588 |