From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-05-03 07:21:45
|
Merge Requests item #2984022, was opened at 2010-04-08 19:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kerik-sf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1235750&aid=2984022&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: for 4.3.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Eric Le Lay (kerik-sf) >Assigned to: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda) Summary: fix blocking HelpViewer Initial Comment: r17544 http://jedit.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jedit?view=rev&revision=17544 r17546 http://jedit.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jedit?view=rev&revision=17546 r17549 http://jedit.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jedit?view=rev&revision=17549 see bug #1231914 - jEdit not responsible when waiting for unavailable input https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1231914&group_id=588&atid=100588 r17544 targets slow throughput websites r17549 targets unaccessible websites I can only confirm that r17549 works for sure : I tried it when disabling the proxy, behind a corporate firewall (network timeout after a LONG time). r17544 seems to make page load slower on average, but the UI seems more responsive. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eric Le Lay (kerik-sf) Date: 2010-05-03 09:21 Message: I reverted r17544 & r17546 to trunk in r17725. Could you still apply r17549? Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Le Lay (kerik-sf) Date: 2010-04-26 21:11 Message: You seem to be right. I inserted a link in some user guide to http://guide.macports.org, which is quite a big HTML page and throttled my connection using ipfw : sudo ipfw pipe 1 config bw 200Byte/s sudo ipfw add 1 pipe 1 dst-port 80 The jEdit UI was completely frozen until the whole page was loaded. I'm still experimenting with it. I'll let you know if I find a workaround. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda) Date: 2010-04-24 19:20 Message: It seems that r17549 is enough, and r17544 doesn't make any change over r17549. Do you have any test case that r17544 makes difference? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1235750&aid=2984022&group_id=588 |