|
From: Alan E. <ala...@gm...> - 2010-01-11 22:27:06
|
The whole point of branching with a "Stable" and a "devel" is so that you can commit these changes to trunk. This will be in 4.4 and not in 4.3. So I think it should not be necessary for you to continue committing to that other branch you created. If it breaks people's favorite plugins, they can go back to using the latest 4.3 stable branch until those plugins are fixed. On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Matthieu Casanova <cho...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, in fact the api is probably not completely compatible for sources and > binaries, I'll check that and tell you, or I can commit changes to fix that, > but before I would prefer to merge the api in the trunk > > 2010/1/10 Shlomy Reinstein <sre...@gm...> > > Hi, >> >> Can you specify what needs to be fixed in those plugins? I don't have >> time to play with the new implementation, especially since I never use >> more than one edit pane. I can fix some problems quickly in those >> plugins, but please tell me what needs fixing. >> >> Shlomy >> >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Alan Ezust <ala...@gm...> >> wrote: >> > Trying it out now. Seems to work as we want it to. >> > >> > Plugins I noticed immediately that need to be fixed once we make these >> > changes to the trunk: >> > >> > SideKick, Markersets, WhiteSpace. >> > I assume BufferTabs also, although I didn't try it yet. >> > Perhaps others, that's just what I noticed at first. >> > >> > So once you commit to trunk, those plugins will need to be fixed up >> asap. I >> > hope the other plugin maintainers are will help out in this. >> > >> > Very nice, anyone can easily generate a patch from that and see the >> changes >> > this way: >> > >> > svn diff -c 16883 > bufferset_changes.patch >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Matthieu Casanova < >> cho...@gm...> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, I just committed the new bufferset api. >> >> Now the scope of buffersets is the same for all editpanes, and all >> >> editpane get it's own bufferSet and never change it's instance >> >> There were a lot of changes, and since it took me a long time to do it, >> >> there were also a lot of svn merges, so it seems to work but I didn't >> want >> >> to break the trunk and created a branch "new_bufferset_api" >> >> Please try it and tell me if it works for you if everybody is happy >> I'll >> >> merge that in the trunk >> >> Matthieu >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community >> >> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support >> >> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and >> >> easy >> >> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >> >> -- >> >> ----------------------------------------------- >> >> jEdit Developers' List >> >> jEd...@li... >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community >> > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support >> > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and >> easy >> > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >> > -- >> > ----------------------------------------------- >> > jEdit Developers' List >> > jEd...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel >> > >> > >> > > |