From: Kevin H. <hu...@ea...> - 2009-01-07 10:20:12
|
At 1:01am -0400 on Wed, 07 Jan 2008, Alan Ezust wrote: > Personally, I'm of the opinion that such patches should be accepted too. > However, they still must be checked to conform with the current mode > file grammar since it did change abit since 4.2 > Beyond that, I'm fine with accepting such patches to mode files, for obscure > languages. Alright. Suggest either asking Jonathan to wait until we get 4.4.0 out, or to take a look with the most recent "dev" build on the website (4.3pre16, yes?). Given his signature, he's probably the most qualified of anyone to know what's correct regarding FreeMarker anyway, eh? From a CS-person standpoint, and given my earlier comment that ya "gotta start from somewhere," it's hard to argue with "it works." If he decides it works with 4.3pre16 or 4.4.0 ... 2 cents, Kevin |