Re: [ jEdit-devel ] Beanshell in classpath

[Shlomy R. <sre...@gm...>]

Wouldn't moving the embedded BeanShell to another package break
plugins that may be using BeanShell?
If backward compatibility can be preserved, I vote for moving it.
Among other things, the embedded BeanShell prevents automated testing
of jEdit using Abbot&Costello, and I'm very much interested in using
these tools to automated jEdit testing.

Shlomy

On 9/21/07, Matthieu Casanova <cho...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi,
> jEdit uses a modified version of beanshell. I think it is not possible
> to use the normal distribution, so if a user has beanshell in his
> classpath it breaks jEdit.
> I think we could move the embedded beanshell in another package. It
> would be easy and would solve this problem.
> What do you think ? Should I do that ?
>
> Matthieu
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> jEdit Developers' List
> jEd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
>