|
From: Vampire <Vam...@gm...> - 2007-01-22 07:38:24
|
Sorry, maybe it's just me being pissed of IBM currently. I was forced to work with IRAD (IBM Rational Application Developer), an Eclipse based application for J2EE application development, for a project for university with two other colleagues and the most problems we had were due to the crappy and buggy software. We only worked for two weeks with IRAD but had many times to recreate WebSphere server profiles because IRAD corrrupted them, we had many times to reinstall IRADs and we wasted many time to find out why our application is not working to finally find out it was due to a bug in the damn IRAD/WepSphere. Slava Pestov wrote: >Hi, > >There is nothing making IBM's Java worse than Sun's (in fact IBM's >has a few extra features, such as tail recursion optimization in the >JIT), and there are platforms which run IBM's Java for which no Sun >Java port exists. > >Slava > >On 21-Jan-07, at 10:08 AM, Vampire wrote: > > > >>Hi Sergey, >> >>I don't know exactly, besides that IBM only produces crap and that >>suns >>JRE is the best and most stable and that jEdit works best with Suns >>JRE. >>But the dependency was added by Alan, who is occupied with moving >>currently, so you would have to wait for him to answer why he added it >>as dependency. >> >> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > |