From: Steve J. <ste...@wi...> - 2006-07-07 18:01:34
|
On 7-Jul-06, at 1:08 PM, Andy Streich wrote: > That's important and, as yet, no one has offered a concrete > response to > Slava's remarks, "If having jEdit require Java 1.5 simplifies code, > removes > special cases and fixes bugs, I think its a good idea." Actually, I think that the question should be "Is there anyone who feels that they would be screwed if jEdit required a 1.5 JDK?". If it's just a fringe case or two, no big deal. As was mentioned, one can always stick with jEdit 4.2 (at least for a while). OTOH, someone might have a valid case for wanting to stick with 1.4. I'd also suggest that one of the maintainers post such a question to the users mailing list to give the general user base an opportunity to comment. Steve Jakob |