|
From: Bjorn W. <mai...@bd...> - 2005-04-20 09:37:26
|
Hi all, Thanks for all info and advice! Upon Slava's advice I have tried the 4.3pre2 version. I made sure to rename my .jedit user dir so the 4.3 version could start with a clean slate. I removed all plugins (thanks Steve), for testing 4.3 and 4.2. It feels 4.3 is somewhat better than the 4.2 scrolling, although its not perfect (yet). The removal of the plugins had only the expected effect of Jedit starting up more quickly. I also noticed that the steps JEdit takes seem to be quit large and in percentages -in my case around 5%- on average. This seems to be in contradiction with somekind of 'smoothness' if you know what I mean. At a co-worker's mac the same scrolling problems as mine are there and he has the same problems with it. That's another reason for me in trying to fix it. I will try to test Jedit on some different macs and see what the results are for 4.2 and 4.3. I know scrolling seems such a minor issue, but for someone that is using JEdit as my main tool this minor annoyance is becoming something that evolves into frustration with using Jedit. As for the issues with Java being not fast or small -I can live with that- but there are other Java apps that seem more responsive such as Cyberduck (ftp client) which I also use. I guess the advice for better hardware and OS is a joke, because I can't imagine saying that as a solution to someone ;) Has anyone had the time to see if the same kind of haviour that SmoothWheel delivers for Firefox can be used for Jedit? I have no experience in developing Java applications, but I'm willing to help out...just let me know what I can do to make life easier for you guys in solving this issue. Maybe it is possible to generate somekind of logoutput so I can 'show' the kind of cursor movement I now get. So you guys can (re)view it? Optional I can try to create some kind of screencapture? I hope I can contribute into making JEdit THE editor and by solving this issue I would feel JEdit would be well on its way. grtz BjornW Steve Jakob wrote: > > On 19-Apr-05, at 3:18 PM, Slava Pestov wrote: > >> Bjorn Wijers wrote: >> >>> I am using Jedit 4.2 on a G4 powerbook with 1,5 GB of mem and Java >>> 1.4.2_05. Although the specs seem quite nice Jedit is using loads of >>> resources. Using Activity Monitor I get the following data When just >>> 2 files are open and doing 'nothing': >>> -around 10 till 20% cpu load. Sometimes dropping to almost 0 and >>> just as sudden climbing to 20%. >>> -20 threads running >>> -68.14 MB real memory (no clue what real memory is..) >>> Jedit feels sluggish on the powerbook...and sometimes outright slow. >>> What can I do to make Jedit less resource intensive? >> >> >> Well, Java is not known for being small or fast, and the slow speed of >> Mac OS X and the G4 CPU compounds the issue. > > > Umm ... yeah, right. I've got basically the same setup as Bjorn (G4 > Powerbook, OS X 10.3.9, 1.5GB RAM, jEdit 4.2final, Java 1.4.2_05) and > jEdit feels more responsive than it did on Linux. I've currently got 173 > threads (57 processes) running, 152 files open in jEdit requiring about > 90MB, and jEdit feels just fine. > > Obviously there's something else going on. > > Bjorn: The first thing I'd do is remove all plugins and see if that > makes a difference. > > Also, when running Activity Monitor sort by the %CPU column; is jEdit at > the top or is something else consuming CPU resources? For me, jEdit is > the #1 memory consumer, but seldom in the top 5 for CPU. > > Good luck, > > Steve Jakob > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. > Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in > creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime > info, > new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 |