|
From: Pete P. <pet...@cy...> - 2003-08-18 18:16:46
|
Jaromir Swierczynski, OPTY wrote: >>Oh OK. In 4.1 this was only possible with soft wrap on, but really it >>was a side effect of the poor soft wrap implementation. I'm not sure >>having this is a good idea. Does anybody else miss this "feature"? > > > Well, I just get used to this "feature". > I did not realize it is a "bug" ;-) I too miss the soft wrap implementation, of course I always thought of it as a feature rather than a bug... Pete |