|
From: Dominic S. <dd...@ca...> - 2002-02-10 11:17:43
|
> Interesting thought. I think that if the "double implication" > you suggest > were to be implemented, you might as well get rid of the > columns 'recent' > and 'open' because in practice it wouldn't make any > difference where you > clicked (except that unopened files would take a little bit longer to > appear), and list all recent and open buffers together in one > listbox. The > opened/unopened status would still be visible by bold/normal fonts. > > I'd like to solicit some comments here. Is this feasible? I think this would actually be a very good idea, especially if the list could be sorted in a number of ways (e.g. filename, time/date opened, filetype etc). I don't imagine it would be that hard to implement but I haven't looked at the source.... - Dominic |