You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(42) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(37) |
2003 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
2004 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
From: Bruno T. <ba...@ip...> - 2002-07-23 14:32:26
|
Hi, Here is the Portuguese (not Brasilian) traslation file for IDS. Thanks. Bruno Tavares |
From: Anthony A. D. T. <aa...@ve...> - 2002-05-28 17:51:07
|
> Personally, I don't use it, however I know of many that do use it, so >removing it would be a step back for those folks that do enjoy its >advantages. I wasn't suggesting that embedded comments be abandoned - just the futile attempt to use image::info to extract them. |
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2002-05-28 13:50:17
|
"Anthony A. D. Talltree" wrote: > I tried that. No response whatsoever. Since the API is fundamentally > flawed, IMHO it should just be abandoned. Personally, I don't use it, however I know of many that do use it, so removing it would be a step back for those folks that do enjoy its advantages. I'll look into it and maybe write a wrapper around its shortcomings as a last resort. Thanks for bringing this up. -- H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 Director of Internet Operations / SysAdmin . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave, #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |
From: Anthony A. D. T. <aa...@lo...> - 2002-05-28 06:37:51
|
> Image::Info wasn't written by us, however you can send email to Gisle Aas <g >is...@Ac...>, the author. Perhaps you can get them to fix the problems > with it? I tried that. No response whatsoever. Since the API is fundamentally flawed, IMHO it should just be abandoned. |
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2002-05-28 06:21:03
|
"Anthony A. D. Talltree" wrote: > I hope that doing *something* about image_info is in there. Whoever > implemented it was insane. It returns a different type for Comment if > there's one line or multiple. Sometimes it doesn't see embedded > comments at all. I eventually gave up on it and just slapped in Image::Info wasn't written by us, however you can send email to Gisle Aas <gi...@Ac...>, the author. Perhaps you can get them to fix the problems with it? -- H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 Director of Internet Operations / SysAdmin . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave, #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2002-05-28 02:34:31
|
Paul Delano wrote: > I got some complaints from people that they couldn't see the images. It appears that the encodeSpecialChars() is too agressive in replacing characters in image names. Specifically, it appears that AOL browsers have trouble with encoded "-" and "_". AOL browsers are like really low on my priority list, but nevertheless, it needs to work over a big variety of browsers. I will incorporate this patch together with all the other ones still pending. Thank you. A call to everyone else on the list: Over the past several months that we have not had any code release, I'm sure many of you may have done your own patches and or modifications to your 0.81 source tree. I'd like to see what people have been doing, what are the features that people have added to their installations, errors that have been patched up locally and others. What I'm planning on doing is the following (in this order): - Apply the current set of (waiting) patches that have been received, and whatever new bug fixes people submit. - If there are features that seem to have been incorporated several times on custom sites, I will see that they get into the current source tree - Release another tarball, possibly 0.82 with all the new stuff - Implement a code-freeze on 0.8x - this basically means I will continue to fix bugs, but will not implement any new features. New features will start getting added to the list of the rewrite. The rewrite itself is currently stagnant. I need to catch up on Apache::PageKit first before I can dive into John's code (I'm more of a HTML::Mason guy). So for the time being, let's hold on to 0.8x ... -- H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 Director of Internet Operations / SysAdmin . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave, #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |
From: Bruno T. <ba...@ip...> - 2002-05-08 17:01:13
|
I came across this bug yesterday. I have a enormous colection of albums, but i want people to be able to see only some of them in IDS. So, in the albums directorie i've created symbolic links (im using linux) to the albums that i wanted available in IDS. So far so good. The proble is the search functions, it does not follow symbolic links, so it is not possible to search comments or filenames. I fixed this by changing the line 906 of the index.cgi from: find (\&searchForFiles, "./albums/"); to find ({wanted => &searchForFiles, follow_fast=>1}, "./albums/"); this method makes the File::Find::find to follow the sym links without performance lost and without no impact to windows servers. (sorry for my bad english) Thank You Bruno Tavares |
From: K. <kyl...@us...> - 2002-04-12 14:16:06
|
Hi, I've got a digital camera and am (as everyone else) looking for software to generate galleries, both dynamically and statically. Ids seems to have most of the features I need. A complete rewrite is mentioned as a long term goal, what is the status on this rewrite? How will it differ from the current implementation? Is there a design description, however short, anywhere? I've done some perl programming, and would be interested in filling in some parts if there is a (somewhat) cohorent design thought out. -- René |
From: Tad T. <ta...@ol...> - 2002-03-30 02:05:29
|
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 19:40, Techwolf wrote: > This is because Redhat compiles apache with the configure options of > --suexec-docroot=/var/www/cgi-bin. I've change it to > --suexec-docroot=/home and rebuild it so I could give users cgi with > group/owner id if allowed in httpd.conf, such as IDS. :-) Thanks for the info - I had assumed it was apache, not RH's build of Apache. > Now that I am thinking about it...I may be talked into writing a small > bash/shell script that will do it all for fixing the suexec problem for > Redhat systems. Any idea what this would look like? I've got the problem that at home I can twiddle configs and move server roots around, but my external host is out of my hands. (They're running RH6.2, so for the time being it shouldn't be an issue) It would be ice to at least know how to get around the problem if they ever upgrade. Thanks, Tad |
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2002-03-30 01:44:17
|
nicole wrote: > Anyone know how to get off this mailing list?? I cant find it on the site. Check the headers of each message, as well as the footer banner. Header: List-Help: <mailto:ids...@li...?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:ids...@li...> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel>, <mailto:ids...@li...?subject=subscribe> List-Id: <ids-devel.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel>, <mailto:ids...@li...?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=ids-devel> Footer: IDS-devel mailing list IDS...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel (Note about the above URL: you need to scroll all the way to the bottom, enter your email address and click on 'Edit Optinos' - that will then take you to the Unsubscribe option) -- H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 Director of Internet Operations / SysAdmin . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave, #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |
From: nicole <tha...@fr...> - 2002-03-30 00:56:26
|
Anyone know how to get off this mailing list?? I cant find it on the site. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Techwolf" <Tec...@at...> To: <ids...@li...> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [Ids-devel] Problems on RH7.2? > At 01:47 PM 3/28/2002 -0500, Tad Truex wrote: > >http://test.example.com/ids/ -> /home/idsuser/www/ids (test was rooted at > >/home/idsuser/www) This failed with permission problems. > > > >I reconfigure my server to serve > >http://ids.example.com/ -> /var/www/html/ids (now the real server is > >rooted at > >/var/www/html/ and the script being suexec'ed is one level below the real root > >and at the toplevel of the virutal server). Everything works fine. > > This is because Redhat compiles apache with the configure options of > --suexec-docroot=/var/www/cgi-bin. I've change it to > --suexec-docroot=/home and rebuild it so I could give users cgi with > group/owner id if allowed in httpd.conf, such as IDS. :-) > > If anyone wants details on how to do rpm --rebuilds with different config > options, send me an e-mail to Tec...@at... or ask here. :-) > > If the new IDS that being worked on come out with the feature of multiable > users, I may be willing to create a rpm package for IDS sence I have become > quiet familer with rpm package management. > > Now that I am thinking about it...I may be talked into writing a small > bash/shell script that will do it all for fixing the suexec problem for > Redhat systems. > > > Techwolf > Tec...@at... > http://www.techwolf.net/index.html > PGP public keys on web site. > > > _______________________________________________ > IDS-devel mailing list > IDS...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ids-devel > |
From: Techwolf <Tec...@at...> - 2002-03-30 00:40:24
|
At 01:47 PM 3/28/2002 -0500, Tad Truex wrote: >http://test.example.com/ids/ -> /home/idsuser/www/ids (test was rooted at >/home/idsuser/www) This failed with permission problems. > >I reconfigure my server to serve >http://ids.example.com/ -> /var/www/html/ids (now the real server is >rooted at >/var/www/html/ and the script being suexec'ed is one level below the real root >and at the toplevel of the virutal server). Everything works fine. This is because Redhat compiles apache with the configure options of --suexec-docroot=/var/www/cgi-bin. I've change it to --suexec-docroot=/home and rebuild it so I could give users cgi with group/owner id if allowed in httpd.conf, such as IDS. :-) If anyone wants details on how to do rpm --rebuilds with different config options, send me an e-mail to Tec...@at... or ask here. :-) If the new IDS that being worked on come out with the feature of multiable users, I may be willing to create a rpm package for IDS sence I have become quiet familer with rpm package management. Now that I am thinking about it...I may be talked into writing a small bash/shell script that will do it all for fixing the suexec problem for Redhat systems. Techwolf Tec...@at... http://www.techwolf.net/index.html PGP public keys on web site. |
From: Tad T. <ta...@ol...> - 2002-03-28 19:34:30
|
> require script execution from the document root (this would probably be counterproductive to security). > I'm not sure I have completely interpreted the apache page correctly. I think you are right that the limitations are not quite so severe for regular cgi scripts (outside the web directory), but my understanding for things like index.cgi, is that they are limited - here's the bit that causes my confusion (from <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/suexec.html>) # For security and efficiency reasons, all suexec requests must # remain within either a top-level document root for virtual host # requests, or one top-level personal document root for userdir # requests. For example, if you have four VirtualHosts configured, # you would need to structure all of your VHosts' document roots off # of one main Apache document hierarchy to take advantage of suEXEC # for VirtualHosts. I haven't fiddled around with disabling the apache suexec mechanism and using the good old +s mode, but I suspect that apache will get all grumpy about that too... /Tad |
From: Jeff <je...@ba...> - 2002-03-28 19:06:16
|
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:47:26PM -0500, Tad Truex wrote: > http://test.example.com/ids/ -> /home/idsuser/www/ids (test was rooted at > /home/idsuser/www) This failed with permission problems. > > I reconfigure my server to serve > http://ids.example.com/ -> /var/www/html/ids (now the real server is rooted at > /var/www/html/ and the script being suexec'ed is one level below the real root > and at the toplevel of the virutal server). Everything works fine. Remember that the server root is hard-coded into suexec which could explain why it would not execute scripts in /home/idsuser but could in /var/www . In addition, I have not found suexec to require script execution from the document root (this would probably be counterproductive to security). Jeff |
From: Anthony A. D. T. <aa...@ve...> - 2002-03-28 19:06:08
|
> I'm not sure why Apache has made the directory depth restictions - seems >somewhat arbitrary to me... I've never seen such a restriction, but then, I'd never use a vendor-supplied Apache. One never knows what goofy args and directories they compile in. My understanding of suexec is that all affected cgi's must live under a single directory, to which suexec permission is granted. In my case I gave in and just created a /home/websites, under which I have www.foo.bar, www.baz.glarch, and which I suexec enabled. I struggled with the mess for a while, and this is what finally worked. It's always seemed weird to me that IDS out of the box wants a wholly publically-writeable tree to live in. |
From: Tad T. <ta...@ol...> - 2002-03-28 18:47:34
|
> > This means those directories aren't writable by the owner of the > process. If you're running suexec, then the IDS process is theoretically i > owned by that user, which means the directories should also be owned by > it. Otherwise, those directories need to be owned by the web daemon. > This is close to the answer. In fact, the problem is that Apache's suexec wrapper places some (in my opinion odd) restrictions on where the script can be located. For a script running on a virtual server in a web a accessible directroy, the virtual server root must be located no more than one directory level from the top of the real server's tree. Furthermore, the script must be at the top level of the virtual server's root. In my case I had http://test.example.com/ids/ -> /home/idsuser/www/ids (test was rooted at /home/idsuser/www) This failed with permission problems. I reconfigure my server to serve http://ids.example.com/ -> /var/www/html/ids (now the real server is rooted at /var/www/html/ and the script being suexec'ed is one level below the real root and at the toplevel of the virutal server). Everything works fine. I am sure there is some other way to fix this, but it seems to work for now. My guess is that the suexec mechanism changed sometime after RedHat 6.2 (which was the last time this sort of thing worked for me.) I'm not sure why Apache has made the directory depth restictions - seems somewhat arbitrary to me... Oh well. Thakns for the input, Tad |
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2002-03-28 18:08:11
|
Tad Truex wrote: > Could not write a description (album-data/Sample Album/album_image.txt) > Couldn't create temporary file: (Permission denied) at /idsShared.pm line 226. > Couldn't unlink album-data/Sample Album/album_image.txt.21979-206 . > No such file or directory at /idsShared.pm line 233. This means those directories aren't writable by the owner of the process. If you're running suexec, then the IDS process is theoretically owned by that user, which means the directories should also be owned by it. Otherwise, those directories need to be owned by the web daemon. -- H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 Director of Internet Operations / SysAdmin . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave, #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |
From: Tad T. <ta...@ol...> - 2002-03-28 15:57:35
|
I'm not sure this is the correct place for this, as I'm pretty sure it is a RedHat specific issue, but I'm having trouble with directory permissions on a stock RH7.2 installation. I get the following errors in my error log when running version 0.81. Could not write a description (album-data/Sample Album/album_image.txt) Couldn't create temporary file: (Permission denied) at /idsShared.pm line 226. Couldn't unlink album-data/Sample Album/album_image.txt.21979-206 . No such file or directory at /idsShared.pm line 233. My guess is that this has something to do with the suexec mechanism but I'm not entirely sure. Any thoughts? Thanks, Tad |
From: Moshe J. <mo...@ru...> - 2002-01-25 13:41:27
|
I'm not enough of a Perl hacker to fix this, but IDS has at least two problems with handling parentheses. One is in the name of a comment poster. A poster used ":)" in his name and it caused the "Show recent comments" function to completely break. Try it. Another (bigger) problem is filenames with parentheses. You cannot rename them through the IDS admin interface. Try it. Hopefully someone can come up with the fix for this (as well as confirm my suspicions)... Seems to be a pretty big problem. Thanks! Moshe -- Moshe Jacobson http://runslinux.net moshe at runslinux dot net 404-206-4060 -=- AIM: Jehsom |
From: Douglas E. M. <do...@ke...> - 2002-01-23 05:45:28
|
Ok, lets start with the bug On the 'Recent Comments' page, if the person's name has () brackets in it, such as Erin (Maggie), then the comment line is left blank. This does not occur on the picture pages, just on 'Recent Comments'. Secondly, is there any way to make it so that it would allow users to see multpile pages of 'Recent Comments' such as in groups of 10 or 20 so they can scroll back through added comments without stopping to check each picture? Other than that let me just say I love this software! Doug |
From: Stephen J. G. <go...@sl...> - 2002-01-17 04:52:32
|
Hi All, I've just started using this and its seems to be pretty close to what I was looking for. I have (at least) two suggestions/questions. I tried using the rotate function, however, it wants to modify the original image. I'd rather it made a copy in the image-cache directory rather than overwrite teh original (I have it setup so that the web server can't actually write to the original directory). I looked at the Rotate method in the admin/index.cgi file and it looks simple to change it there, however, would it be easy to get the ids/index.cgi to pick up that version instead of the unrotated original? The second thing is that it doesn't seem to display the EXIF information from my pictures. You can browse these at; http://www.sgowdy.org/cgi-bin/ids/index.cgi if you want to have a look at some of the pictures (I noticed such a request for a similar problem in the archives). regards, Stephen. -- /------------------------------------+-------------------------\ |Stephen J. Gowdy | SLAC, MailStop 17, | |http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~gowdy/ | 2575 Sand Hill Road, | | | Menlo Park CA 94025, USA | |EMail: go...@sl... | Tel: +1 650 926 3144 | \------------------------------------+-------------------------/ |
From: Anthony A. D. T. <aa...@ve...> - 2002-01-04 06:59:49
|
I figured it out. Image::Info's image_info has bizarre behavior: Textual comments found in the file. The value is a reference to an array if there are multiple comments found. Who the heck dreamed up the idea of not always returning the same data type? AUGUGGUGUGHGHHHH!!!!!! Here's a workaround for that design flaw. I have no idea how it managed to work in the past. *** index.cgi Fri Oct 5 16:15:28 2001 --- /new/index.cgi Thu Jan 3 22:26:32 2002 *************** *** 686,697 **** $imageNameTrimmed =~ s/\.([^.]+)\Z//; $fileExtension = $1; ! my $embeddedComments; if ($displayImageData eq 'y') { my($picinfo) = image_info("albums/$albumtodisplay/$imagetodisplay"); if (defined($picinfo->{'Comment'})) { $embeddedComments = join("<br />\n", $picinfo->{'Comment'}); } else { #Set the embeddedComments string to null, so we don't have to keep checking $embeddedComments='<i>'.$localization{'image-noComments'}.'</i>'; --- 686,702 ---- $imageNameTrimmed =~ s/\.([^.]+)\Z//; $fileExtension = $1; ! my $embeddedComments, $ref, $t; if ($displayImageData eq 'y') { my($picinfo) = image_info("albums/$albumtodisplay/$imagetodisplay"); if (defined($picinfo->{'Comment'})) { + if ($picinfo->{'Comment'} =~ /^ARRAY/) { + $t = $picinfo->{'Comment'}; + $embeddedComments = join("<br />\n", @{$t}); + } else { $embeddedComments = join("<br />\n", $picinfo->{'Comment'}); + } } else { #Set the embeddedComments string to null, so we don't have to keep checking $embeddedComments='<i>'.$localization{'image-noComments'}.'</i>'; |
From: Anthony A. D. T. <aa...@ve...> - 2002-01-04 04:40:13
|
For some reason when viewing an image with an embedded comment, I now get ARRAY(0x888ae0) instead of the comment. Ideas? |
From: John M. <mo...@mu...> - 2001-12-16 19:08:43
|
IDS 0.81 is now available: http://ids.sourceforge.net/ Changes: * Slovak, Swedish, and Japanese (partial) localizations * works with ImageMagick 5.40 * popup menus work both with and without JavaScript * file upload should now work on Windows servers * more tolerance for corrupt images and non-standard data tags within images * revised IIS configuration script Thanks to all of those who contributed. John |
From: Ashley M. K. <as...@pc...> - 2001-12-10 00:59:44
|
nicole wrote: > this is a stupid question really.. but when linking to .htpasswd from > .htaccess what is the form supposed to be? relative or absolute? > i cant get it to accept my password when i hit the first page (/admin) Absolute. Always. My .htaccess file looks like this: AuthUserFile /full/path/to/hidden/htpasswd AuthGroupFile /dev/null AuthName "Gallery Administration" AuthType Basic <Limit GET> require user admin </Limit> -- H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:as...@pc...> . 303.442.6410 x130 Director of Internet Operations / SysAdmin . 800.441.3873 x130 Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave, #6 http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. |