htmlvalidator-help Mailing List for HTML Validator for Mozilla and Firefox (Page 3)
Brought to you by:
mgueury
Menu
▾
▴
htmlvalidator-help — Help for HTML Validator extension for Firefox
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(65) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Spectroscope <spe...@gm...> - 2007-02-25 18:33:46
|
Oh, you're right. I didn't look in the submenu of "icon"; I guess this isn't a place where one would expect it. The new option is fine, btw. In my opinion, as these are the main switches, both options should be moved back into the main menu, maybe separated with an extra line. That would guarantee quick access and an easy find. Additionally, naming the about-box "Help..." could make users expect a help page or some kind of documentation. I'd suggest "About..." instead and moving it to the other two options, that don't do anything with the current viewed page. This would lead to something like this. .----------------------- | Options | Icon > | About... .----------------------- | Enable | Enable for www.whatever.com .----------------------- | Advanced > | Cleanup... | Page Source... |.---------------------- Just an idea. > It is still there in the Icon submenu with a new other option: Disable > for site. > I do not know if it is intuitive or not ? Maybe it should be done in > another way. I am open to any comment about this. > > Marc > > Spectroscope wrote: >> With the latest RC I found that the menu item to enable/disable the extension >> (in the right-click menu) is gone. So now we have first to open the options >> dialog, check "Enable validation in the browser" and afterwards click ok (and >> the same thing reverse to disable it). >> >> If it's possible, please bring this menu item back. That was the easiest way >> to launch the validation for a quick-check. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> Htmlvalidator-help mailing list >> Htm...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help >> >> > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-25 13:13:19
|
It is still there in the Icon submenu with a new other option: Disable for site. I do not know if it is intuitive or not ? Maybe it should be done in another way. I am open to any comment about this. Marc Spectroscope wrote: > With the latest RC I found that the menu item to enable/disable the extension > (in the right-click menu) is gone. So now we have first to open the options > dialog, check "Enable validation in the browser" and afterwards click ok (and > the same thing reverse to disable it). > > If it's possible, please bring this menu item back. That was the easiest way > to launch the validation for a quick-check. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > |
|
From: Spectroscope <spe...@gm...> - 2007-02-24 16:03:03
|
With the latest RC I found that the menu item to enable/disable the extension (in the right-click menu) is gone. So now we have first to open the options dialog, check "Enable validation in the browser" and afterwards click ok (and the same thing reverse to disable it). If it's possible, please bring this menu item back. That was the easiest way to launch the validation for a quick-check. |
|
From: Spectroscope <spe...@gm...> - 2007-02-24 14:19:22
|
There's this menu item "Advanced > Online W3C validator" which passes online and local pages to the W3C HTML validator. Would it be possible to optionally send those pages to the validator at validome.org? Their results are better readable and they provide four languages and what I read in the local media their XHTML results are more accurate. |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-21 18:30:42
|
Hi Seb, First, thanks for reporting the problem ! This domain list feature has been rewritten with new Firefox 1.5 API in the extension 0.837 (rc2). Currently not available. It will be available as soon as the shell of sourceforge is back working. https://sourceforge.net/docs/A04 It will be available here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/index.html Hope it helps, Marc sp...@lf... wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm a user or your wonderfull extension for firefox. > I found a very little bug about options : > > "Browser, Validate page in only the domains" > > if I wrote several domains, separated by commas but I put by error a > space > between coma and domain, the domain is ignored. > > not critical, but I was a little bit disapointed .... > > Your extension remains great, in a word thanks for your work !! > > Seb > Si vous n'etes pas destinataires de ce message, merci d'avertir > l'expediteur de l'erreur de distribution et de le detruire immediatement. > Ce message contient des informations confidentielles ou appartenant a > La Francaise des Jeux. Il est etabli a l'intention exclusive de ses > destinataires. Toute divulgation, utilisation, diffusion ou > reproduction (totale ou partielle) de ce message ou des informations > qu'il contient, doit etre prealablement autorisee. > Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration et son > integrite ne peut etre assuree. La Francaise des Jeux decline toute > responsabilite au titre de ce message s'il a ete modifie ou falsifie. > > If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify > the sender of the wrong delivery and delete it immediately from your > system. > This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging > to La Francaise des Jeux and is intended solely for the addressees. > The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either > whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is > prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be > guaranteed. La Francaise des Jeux shall not be liable for this e-mail > if modified or falsified. > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-21 18:29:37
|
Wonderfull. I will check if I can do something when creating the directory. Thanks a lot! Marc NoWhereMan wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Marc Gueury <mailto:mg...@sk...> > *To:* agr...@us... > <mailto:agr...@us...> > *Cc:* htm...@li... > <mailto:htm...@li...> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:52 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Htmlvalidator-help] Bug Html Validator 0.836rc1 > > André G. wrote: >> Hello >> >> The SGML Parser of Html Validator 0.836rc1 did not work with Firefox (2.0.0.1) on Ubuntu/Kubuntu 6.10. Every site returns 0 Errors / 0 Warrings. >> >> The Tidy Parser works and is ok. >> >> > > Hi André, > > Unhappily, I have no Ubuntu to try. > > Some questions, > - Do you see any error message in the javascript console ? > - Which user do you use ? Does it work with root ? and not > with end-users ? > - Can you search for the directory sgml-lib in your ~/.mozilla > directory and give the complete path. > cd ~/.mozilla > find ~/.mozilla -name sgml* -print > find ~/.mozilla -name tidy* -print > > [...] > > *Don't forget to chmod 0777 the tidy extension dir in your > profile directory* > ** > ** > ** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > |
|
From: NoWhereMan <now...@fl...> - 2007-02-21 18:14:45
|
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Marc Gueury=20
To: agr...@us...=20
Cc: htm...@li...=20
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Htmlvalidator-help] Bug Html Validator 0.836rc1
Andr=E9 G. wrote:=20
Hello
The SGML Parser of Html Validator 0.836rc1 did not work with Firefox =
(2.0.0.1) on Ubuntu/Kubuntu 6.10. Every site returns 0 Errors / 0 =
Warrings.=20
The Tidy Parser works and is ok.
Hi Andr=E9,
Unhappily, I have no Ubuntu to try.
Some questions,
- Do you see any error message in the javascript console ?
- Which user do you use ? Does it work with root ? and not with =
end-users ?
- Can you search for the directory sgml-lib in your ~/.mozilla =
directory and give the complete path.
cd ~/.mozilla
find ~/.mozilla -name sgml* -print
find ~/.mozilla -name tidy* -print
[...]
Don't forget to chmod 0777 the tidy extension dir in your profile =
directory
|
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-21 17:52:58
|
André G. wrote: > Hello > > The SGML Parser of Html Validator 0.836rc1 did not work with Firefox (2.0.0.1) on Ubuntu/Kubuntu 6.10. Every site returns 0 Errors / 0 Warrings. > > The Tidy Parser works and is ok. > > Hi André, Unhappily, I have no Ubuntu to try. Some questions, - Do you see any error message in the javascript console ? - Which user do you use ? Does it work with root ? and not with end-users ? - Can you search for the directory sgml-lib in your ~/.mozilla directory and give the complete path. cd ~/.mozilla find ~/.mozilla -name sgml* -print find ~/.mozilla -name tidy* -print - you should see a tidy_last_validated.html in the list ? Do you see it ? - Can you run the diagnostics logging ? http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html#DIAGLOG <http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html#DIAGLOG> Thanks by advance, Marc |
|
From: G. <agr...@us...> - 2007-02-20 22:44:06
|
Hello The SGML Parser of Html Validator 0.836rc1 did not work with Firefox (2.0.0= .1) on Ubuntu/Kubuntu 6.10. Every site returns 0 Errors / 0 Warrings.=20 The Tidy Parser works and is ok. --=20 Andr=E9 G. <agr...@us...> |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-13 20:23:03
|
Hi Andy, Quite interesting mail. You are in short quite right. The SGML parser is builded inside a DLL called nsTidy.dll (or .so) containing both tidy and opensp. It bundles too most DTDs of W3c to make validation locally. But I think that opensp has the bad habit to make anyway request to a DTD when the link is used in the doctype. I fixed a lot of issues about this. Because I work also most of the time behind a proxy. I do not know the issue you speak about here. I would be really interested to get a sample to see what I can do to solve it. Thanks by advance, Marc Andy Dingley wrote: > I love the extension, especially the new SGML validator. However we've > also just switched to a web proxy here in the office which kills it > dead! > > I've read a past message, suggesting that the problem is with OpenSP not > supporting proxies for DTD retrieval and that there's little you can do > about it. This is sad, but understandable. > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=37500793 > > > I've noticed something though, which gives me an idea. It seems possible > to validate HTML pages with a doctype declaration that only use the > identifier and not the URL. I assume that your validator has some > "well-known" DTDs (such as HTML 4.01) embedded into it, and for these it > passes them directly to OpenSP, rather than requiring them to be loaded. > > Would it be possible to also do this for the well-known DTDs, even if > these also specify a URL ? Obviously this might be restricted to those > that also specified an equally well-known URL known to match that > identifer. Even if it's no help to people with those funny > editor-specific HTML 3.2 extended doctypes, it could be a great boon to > those of us trying to hammer out mainstream HTML 4.01 > > > As it is, I've recently been trying to sell the local pointy-haired boss > on the virtues of "valid HTML", only to have him then reject my recent > page as having "1484 HTML mistakes in it" (mostly "element <p> > undefined" - it is of course perfectly valid). Ah, preserve us from the > User with Half A Clue... 8-) > > > Thanks again for a great piece of kit > > |
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2007-02-09 11:40:10
|
Werner Flamme schrieb am 09.02.2007 12:02: > Marc, > I will try to install another Firefox, maybe the libxpcom.so and/or=20 > libxpcom_core.so differ too much. And that did the trick! Now /usr/lib64/firefox is populated, "ldd libnstidy.so" shows the correct library, an HTMLValidator is runnig as go= od as with FF 1.5! Thanks for your patience! Regards, Werner --=20 Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV Helmholtz-Zentrum f=FCr Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-3921 - Fax (0341) 235-453921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: wer...@uf... |
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2007-02-09 11:02:52
|
Marc,
another problem now :-(
Yesterday I changed ldconfig's config, so that all libraries for=20
libnstidy.so were found. And HTMLValidator shows up when I look ath the=20
source of a page.
BUT:
- HTMLValidator does nothing with the source code, just the blue bar=20
running at the bottom of the window
- HTMLValidator does not show up in the status bar of the browser window
I tried to link to another xpcom library by pointing ldconfig to=20
/usr/lib64/seamonkey. Successful on one side:
> ldd libnstidy.so
libxpcom.so =3D> /usr/lib64/seamonkey/libxpcom.so (0x00002abb564=
fb000)
libnspr4.so =3D> /usr/lib64/libnspr4.so (0x00002abb566ff000)
libplds4.so =3D> /usr/lib64/libplds4.so (0x00002abb5693a000)
libplc4.so =3D> /usr/lib64/libplc4.so (0x00002abb56b3f000)
libpthread.so.0 =3D> /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002abb56d45000)
libdl.so.2 =3D> /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00002abb56f60000)
libstdc++.so.6 =3D> /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002abb5716500=
0)
libm.so.6 =3D> /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002abb57463000)
libgcc_s.so.1 =3D> /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00002abb576b9000)
libc.so.6 =3D> /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002abb578c8000)
libxpcom_core.so =3D> /usr/lib64/seamonkey/libxpcom_core.so=20
(0x00002abb57c0a000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)
>
It links against 64 bit libraries, all libs are found. BUT unsuccessful o=
n=20
the other side:
FATAL ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file coul=
d=20
not be found.
Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/tidy;1'] has no properties
Source File: chrome://tidy/content/tidyUtil.js
Line: 96
This was where I was before... :-(
I will try to install another Firefox, maybe the libxpcom.so and/or=20
libxpcom_core.so differ too much.
Regards,
Werner
Marc Gueury schrieb am 07.02.2007 23:30:
> Hi Werner,
>=20
> The extension need to have firefox to load this library with XPCOM. It=20
> is a kind of list of dynamic libraries.
> @mozilla.org/tidy;1 is the name of the library in XPCOM. It seems it is=
=20
> not registered or the library can not
> be loaded. Have you checked the FAQ about this ?
>=20
> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html point 3
>=20
> Marc
>=20
> Werner Flamme wrote:
>> Marc Gueury schrieb am 31.01.2007 23:42:
>> =20
>>> You make me think about it . I need to upload a new version for Firef=
ox=20
>>> 2.0 and AMD 64.
>>> It is here, http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.7.9.5-x86-64/
>>>
>>> It was done by Matthew.
>>>
>>> Marc
>>> =20
>> Marc, thank you for the link. I downloaded the extension and installed=
it=20
>> the usual way. Now I get=20
>> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/no_tidy_lib.html on starting: "=
FATAL=20
>> ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could n=
ot be=20
>> found."
>> ...
>> Additional info:
>> Symptoms:
>> In the Java console, you will see this error message
>> Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/tidy;1'] has no properties
>> Source File: chrome://tidy/content/tidyUtil.js
>> Line: 96
>>
>> In my extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components the=
re is=20
>> a libnstidy.so with SONAME libnstidy.so. What does the extension need?=
And=20
>> where does it search?
>>
>> Werner
>>
>> =20
>=20
>=20
--=20
Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV
Helmholtz-Zentrum f=FCr Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ
Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig
Tel.: (0341) 235-3921 - Fax (0341) 235-453921
http://www.ufz.de - eMail: wer...@uf...
|
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2007-02-08 11:09:36
|
Marc Gueury schrieb am 07.02.2007 23:30: > Werner Flamme wrote: >> Marc Gueury schrieb am 31.01.2007 23:42: >> =20 >>> You make me think about it . I need to upload a new version for Firef= ox=20 >>> 2.0 and AMD 64. >>> It is here, http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.7.9.5-x86-64/ >>> >>> It was done by Matthew. >>> >>> Marc >>> =20 >> =20 > Hi Werner, >=20 > The extension need to have firefox to load this library with XPCOM. It=20 > is a kind of list of dynamic libraries. > @mozilla.org/tidy;1 is the name of the library in XPCOM. It seems it is= =20 > not registered or the library can not > be loaded. Have you checked the FAQ about this ? >=20 > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html point 3 >=20 > Marc Marc, thanks, yes it's working now! The library was there, but not found = by=20 ldconfig, so hidden to Firefox... I use openSUSE 10.2 on x86_64, and in /usr/lib64/firefox was no libxpcom.= so=20 - must come from an update, since pin shows the library at the proper=20 place. I now added a "firefox.conf" in /etc/ld.so.conf.d with the line=20 /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.8.1 in it (the library is in /usr/lib64/thunderbir= d,=20 /usr/lib64/seamonkey, /usr/lib64/sunbird - but not in /usr/lib64/firefox.= =20 The 32bit library is at /usr/lib/firefox...). Now HTMLValidator is runnin= g.=20 The library was there, but not found by ldconfig, so hidden to Firefox... Now I still miss the icon in the status line... Firebug is shown there, b= ut=20 HTMLValidator is not. However, when looking at a page's source code,=20 HTMLValidator is present there. In my Citrix environment, Firebug is the=20 rightmost icon, HTMLValidator on its left side. Leftmost, there is=20 Colorzilla (on both systems). Regards, Werner >=20 >> Marc, thank you for the link. I downloaded the extension and installed= it=20 >> the usual way. Now I get=20 >> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/no_tidy_lib.html on starting: "= FATAL=20 >> ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could n= ot be=20 >> found." >> ... >> Additional info: >> Symptoms: >> In the Java console, you will see this error message >> Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/tidy;1'] has no properties >> Source File: chrome://tidy/content/tidyUtil.js >> Line: 96 >> >> In my extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components the= re is=20 >> a libnstidy.so with SONAME libnstidy.so. What does the extension need?= And=20 >> where does it search? >> >> Werner >> >> =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV Helmholtz-Zentrum f=FCr Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-3921 - Fax (0341) 235-453921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: wer...@uf... |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 23:28:36
|
It is available here for Windows and Linux: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html New Release Candate 1: 0.836 * Components have now each a version: > Extension 0.836 / Htmlpedia 20070205 / LibraryVersion 20070206. * Fixed the compatibility problem with Firebug. A problem with keyboard. * Fixed installation problem with Seamonkey 1.1 * "Wrap long lines" is not anymore hidden when Show Line number is enabled * Fixed a problem with Highlight syntax and line numbers Enjoy, Marc |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 23:25:35
|
Hi Akapuma, This should be solved in version 0.836 Marc ca...@we... wrote: > Hello, > > if I want to install the htmlvalidator 0835 on my seamonkey 1.1, I get = the following error: > > Install Html Validator (based on Tidy) > An unknown error occured. Error code: -214 > Look at the following URL for a description of the error code: > http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/xpinstall/err.html > > The link obove doesn't work. > > Best regards > > akapuma > _______________________________________________________________________= ___ > Erweitern Sie FreeMail zu einem noch leistungsst=E4rkeren E-Mail-Postfa= ch! =09 > Mehr Infos unter http://freemail.web.de/home/landingpad/?mc=3D021131 > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit= y? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job = easier. > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geron= imo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > > =20 |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 23:23:28
|
Hi Stephano, Even if the extension is running inside firefox, the extension takes care only about standard. I see this about XML islands: < With Internet Explorer, the unofficial <xml> tag can be used...> If it is an Ms extension for HTML or XHTML, it is not a part of the HTML standard. As such, it is invalid HTML. The extension validates standard HTML. Nothing else. You should try to use the standards in place of such Ajax tricks :-) About MacOSX, sorry, there is currently no MacOSX version of the 0.8x version. Anyway, as it is not a standard HTML, it will not help you. Hope it helps, Marc bargioni wrote: > > On 31/gen/07, at 23:37, Marc Gueury wrote: > >> Hi Stefano, >> >> Please give me an example. > > <html> > <body> > <xml id="note" src="note.xml"></xml> > </body> > </html> > > I copied it from look at http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_data_island.asp > where you can understand better what xml islands are. They are related > with AJAX. > >> And also try the version 0.8x to see if it does not solve your issue. >> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >> It is nearly no beta software. There are nearly no bug in it. > > I'm running Mac OS X. Can I use Win or Linux version? > Thanks a lot. Stefano >> Marc >> >> >> bargioni wrote: >>> Dear Marc, >>> HTML Validator rises errors for web pages that contain xml islands. >>> Is there a way to avoid this? Hidding the xml island? Patching HTML >>> Validator...? >>> Thanks a lot for your Ffox extension. >>> Stefano >>> >> > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 22:56:53
|
Hi Joe, Thanks a lot for the bug report. I got several people that pinged me about the problem but could not reproduce it. Like you say, it is not due to my extension, neither to Firebug. I tried to include your fix, but it brakes the extension :-) Anyway, I looked further and found a way to reproduce one of the issue mentioned here: http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/browse_thread/thread/90a9f17941cd2418/f6f61001631aec4d?lnk=gst&q=validator&rnum=1 <http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/browse_thread/thread/90a9f17941cd2418/f6f61001631aec4d?lnk=gst&q=validator&rnum=1> I found another way to work-around the issue by removing the creation of the tooltip during the onLoad trigger. I did upload a new version of next version of HTML Validator (0.836) with a fix for this: - can you check if it works for you. http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html Whatever is the result, I am interested to know if it solves the problem you are seeing. If not, can you tell me more about your environment OS and so on. Thanks by advance, Marc Joe Hewitt wrote: > Hi Marc, > > I'm the creator of the Firebug extension. My users have been > frequently reporting a problem that occurs when Firebug and HTML > Validator are installed together. I looked into it today and have > found a solution which I need your help with. Here are some threads > discussing the problem: > > http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/browse_thread/thread/225b23ce17780e3/bbb3e28cc7ce9e70?lnk=gst&q=validator&rnum=2 > > > http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/browse_thread/thread/90a9f17941cd2418/f6f61001631aec4d?lnk=gst&q=validator&rnum=1 > > > Basically, neither one of us are doing anything wrong. This is a bug > in Firefox's notoriously fragile keyboard focus code. It seems that > the problem is triggered when HTML Validator builds up the DOM of its > tooltip. The easiest solution I have found is simply to call the > function onTidyBrowserTopLoad after a timeout, like so: > > --- tidyBrowser.js 2007-02-03 13:26:56.000000000 -0800 > +++ tidyBrowser2.js 2007-02-03 13:26:59.000000000 -0800 > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > onLoadTidyUtil(); > oTidyBrowser = new TidyBrowser(); > window.top.removeEventListener("load", onTidyBrowserTopLoad, true); > - window.top.addEventListener("load", onTidyBrowserTopLoad, true); > + //window.top.addEventListener("load", function() { > setTimeout(onTidyBrowserTopLoad); }, true); > window.top.removeEventListener("pageshow", > onTidyBrowserTopPageShow, true); > window.top.addEventListener("pageshow", onTidyBrowserTopPageShow, > true); > } > > I would have preferred to find a fix in Firebug, but unfortunately I > haven't been able to do so yet. Do you think you could include this > patch in HTML Validator and release an update to the extension? > > Thanks! > > - Joe > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 22:46:00
|
Hi Fabrice, Jonas, Marc, It should be solved since several days now. The file had a wrong privilege on the webserver. My fault. It should now work. Thanks for reporting this ! Marc Creuzot Fabrice wrote: > Hello, > > It's impossible to download HTML Validator for Linux 64 bits. > > > http://htmlvalidator.sourceforge.net/mozilla/tidy_firefox_linux64_0795.xpi > > > 403 Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access > /mozilla/tidy_firefox_linux64_0795.xpi on this server. |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 22:39:57
|
Hi Guido, Can you explain, with copy HTML or Error ? Which HTML validator version ? Normally it should work. I just tested it. I have Firefox 2.0.0.1 and XP SP2 too. Anyway it can happen if Firefox decide to remove the HTML from the cache it happens often for framesets. Hope it helps, Marc Guido wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello Marc, > > Very Nice product but I'm trying to use your "Copy to Clipboard" > option but it does not (seem to) work for me. Could you please advise? > > I'm running Windows XP SP2 and Firefox 2.0.0.1 > > Regards, > > Guido > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFFylFGEOd4fQXdSxkRAgAaAJ9y49VzPGQr+kCN0l1niLN0HQHJfgCffIHd > NgL7WyWyhwHaLypNhtutSgo= > =TTCY > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 22:31:13
|
Hi Werner, The extension need to have firefox to load this library with XPCOM. It is a kind of list of dynamic libraries. @mozilla.org/tidy;1 is the name of the library in XPCOM. It seems it is not registered or the library can not be loaded. Have you checked the FAQ about this ? http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html point 3 Marc Werner Flamme wrote: > Marc Gueury schrieb am 31.01.2007 23:42: > >> You make me think about it . I need to upload a new version for Firefox >> 2.0 and AMD 64. >> It is here, http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.7.9.5-x86-64/ >> >> It was done by Matthew. >> >> Marc >> > > Marc, thank you for the link. I downloaded the extension and installed it > the usual way. Now I get > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/no_tidy_lib.html on starting: "FATAL > ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be > found." > ... > Additional info: > Symptoms: > In the Java console, you will see this error message > Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/tidy;1'] has no properties > Source File: chrome://tidy/content/tidyUtil.js > Line: 96 > > In my extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components there is > a libnstidy.so with SONAME libnstidy.so. What does the extension need? And > where does it search? > > Werner > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-07 22:30:57
|
Werner Flamme wrote: > Marc Gueury schrieb am 31.01.2007 23:42: > >> You make me think about it . I need to upload a new version for Firefox >> 2.0 and AMD 64. >> It is here, http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.7.9.5-x86-64/ >> >> It was done by Matthew. >> >> Marc >> > > Hi Werner, The extension need to have firefox to load this library with XPCOM. It is a kind of list of dynamic libraries. @mozilla.org/tidy;1 is the name of the library in XPCOM. It seems it is not registered or the library can not be loaded. Have you checked the FAQ about this ? http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html point 3 Marc > Marc, thank you for the link. I downloaded the extension and installed it > the usual way. Now I get > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/no_tidy_lib.html on starting: "FATAL > ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be > found." > ... > Additional info: > Symptoms: > In the Java console, you will see this error message > Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/tidy;1'] has no properties > Source File: chrome://tidy/content/tidyUtil.js > Line: 96 > > In my extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components there is > a libnstidy.so with SONAME libnstidy.so. What does the extension need? And > where does it search? > > Werner > > |
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2007-02-05 15:33:16
|
Marc Gueury schrieb am 31.01.2007 23:42: > You make me think about it . I need to upload a new version for Firefox= =20 > 2.0 and AMD 64. > It is here, http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.7.9.5-x86-64/ >=20 > It was done by Matthew. >=20 > Marc Marc, thank you for the link. I downloaded the extension and installed it= =20 the usual way. Now I get=20 http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/no_tidy_lib.html on starting: "FAT= AL=20 ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not = be=20 found." ... Additional info: Symptoms: In the Java console, you will see this error message Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/tidy;1'] has no properties Source File: chrome://tidy/content/tidyUtil.js Line: 96 In my extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components there = is=20 a libnstidy.so with SONAME libnstidy.so. What does the extension need? An= d=20 where does it search? Werner --=20 Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV Helmholtz-Zentrum f=FCr Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-3921 - Fax (0341) 235-453921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: wer...@uf... |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-01-31 22:59:47
|
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-01-31 22:57:39
|
Hi Ren=E9, I think there is a Firefox bug about this behavior not due to my extensio= n. But anyway. I heard that loosing the focus on Firefox and set it back=20 allow to wa the issue. It seems too that it happens only when Firebug is used at the same time.=20 Is it your case too ? Anyway, I never seen it ... I am not sure there is such a bug and I would like to have a=20 reproducable testcase and a bug logged in bugzilla, for Firefox 2.0.0.1 for this. It seems it=20 happens in this version only. Marc Ps: You speak French ? info - medialab360 wrote: > dear mr. gueury, > > i've been told of the existence of your add-on and after finding it i=20 > installed it. works quite good thank you so far for this nice extension. > but i've got a little problem i could reproduce but that couldn't be=20 > logged. if the add-on is enabled there is no possibility to copy &=20 > paste text from outside the browser into the address bar. after=20 > disabling the add-on and restarting firefox all runs good. enabling=20 > the add-on and all text will be blocked. > > maybe it would help: i'm working with firefox 2.0.0.1 at mac os x=20 > (intel) and the html validator version is the current stable 0.795. > > if i could provide you more information please let me know. > > > kind regards > ren=E9 > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-01-31 22:52:46
|
Hi Olivier, This is really something weird. I can see it too with my Seamonkey. I had to switch to 2 lines that both copy files to solve it. It is really not understandable why it was working before and why changing the order of the copy of 2 files solve this issue. It will be fixed in 0.836. Marc Oliver Reimann wrote: > Hi Marc! > > Am 28.01.2007 17:15 schrieb Marc Gueury: >> Try to reinstall, it is probably the download from Sourceforge that >> failed. > > Okay I try (new download, new install)... > > ...same error (popup) as before: > > ------- > An unknown error occurred. Error code: -214 > Look at the following URL for a description of the error code: > http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/xpinstall/err.html > ------- > > Regards, Oliver > >> Marc >> >> Oliver Reimann wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Thanks a lot for the great extension! >>> >>> Unfortunately I can not install v0.835 under SeaMonkey 1.1. >>> >>> I get an "unknown error", Error code -214. >>> >>> Now I installed 0.795 (with success) -- but I like to use the SGML >>> parser. >>> >>> (I already used 0.8x with SeaMonkey 1.0x without problems.) >>> >>> Best Regards from Berlin (Germany), >>> Oliver aka Keks :) >>> >>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.2pre) >>> Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 > |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
