From: Martin C. <cas...@ea...> - 2005-03-27 03:35:09
|
Paul Clarke wrote: > 4. I have been doing Genealogy for over 25 years and have used four > different programs, two of which went belly up. If I move over to > Gramps, which would a very large task, is there any guarrentee that > Gramps will continue to be supported for the long term. > > I would love to use Gramps and get rid of my last Windows program and > would like to get involved in its development, as far as I can, if I > move over. > Paul, I know exactly what you are talking about. My genealogy data is on a win-only program right now, and I've had to convert it three times, a most unpleasant process. I want to convert to Gramps, and I will, but I approach this with extreme caution. I've been playing with Gramps for a while now, checking in to see how it was going now and then. Then I noticed that it was getting "almost there", but more importantly, at a very respectable rate. An impressive rate, I think. So I adjusted my attitude. If I want a decent linux genealogy program I'm going to have to dive in and help build it. That takes a bit of a mind-set change: you can actually report bugs and request features and they will be heard. Any luck with that with your other programs? Gramps needs work, and lots of it. It's also a hugely complex programming project. The trick here is to break it down to a tiny piece that you can digest, and after learning that tiny piece, learn something else. I started by looking at a plugin report that had a serious flaw, and learned enough to correct it. It wasn't a biggie, more cosmetic. The point is that I've started. Then I downloaded the source. And it was very, very, rewarding when I realized I can not only control my research, my data, and my citations, I can also control the program's behavior. That adds a whole new dimension to the genealogy game. Success of Gramps depends a lot more on you and me than "them". A refreshing change..... -- Marty Cassidy Seattle, WA USA |