Re: [Gramps-bugs] Image display improvements

[Thomas S. - d. a. <duv...@ya...>]

OK=0AI have create a new feature request in Mantis.=0AThe subject is : "Imp=
roving the Website Report (images)" as there was already a post : "Improvin=
g the Website Report".=0AThe discussion continues there...=0A=0A\T,=0A=0A=
=0A =0A--  =0AAny fool can write code that a computer can understand.  =0AG=
ood programmers write code that humans can understand.                     =
                               =0AMartin Fowler   =0AT. : +32 (0)2 742 05 9=
4 =0AM. : +32 (0)497 44 68 12 =0A@  : duv...@ya... =0ADo you =
skype too ... =0AGet Skype and call me for free. ?=0A=0A----- Original Mess=
age ----=0AFrom: Brian Matherly <br...@gr...>=0ATo: Piotr Czub=
aszek <pio...@gm...>; Thomas SMETS - disposable add <duvelbier-tsmets=
@yahoo.com>=0ACc: gra...@li...=0ASent: Wednesday, Augu=
st 1, 2007 6:12:08 AM=0ASubject: Re: [Gramps-bugs] Image display improvemen=
ts=0A=0AThomas,=0A=0AI tend to agree with Piotr. Your solution will surely =
make some other users unhappy. We will require a more general solution. I s=
uggest you try filing a feature request on the tracker at bugs.gramps-proje=
ct.org. Let's try to drum up some discussion there.=0A=0AFeel free to post =
the link here when you have entered the issue.=0A=0A~Brian=0A=0A----- Origi=
nal Message ----=0AFrom: Piotr Czubaszek <pio...@gm...>=0ATo: Thomas =
SMETS - disposable add <duv...@ya...>=0ACc: gramps-bugs@lists=
.sourceforge.net=0ASent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 2:27:06 PM=0ASubject: Re: [=
Gramps-bugs] Image display improvements=0A=0AOn 7/31/07, Thomas SMETS - dis=
posable add <duv...@ya...> wrote:=0A>=0A> Sorry for posting t=
his in the bug ML, I thought doing it in the developper one ... but the mes=
sage does not seems to go through...=0A> Anyway ...=0A> I have a lot of doc=
ument's scanned of various sizes (bigger than the average screen width in g=
eneral), I hacked my previous install of GRAMPS forcing the width to be 80%=
 of the page. I see in the latest version 2.2.8 that it is now set to the r=
ight value. This is not good either as the A0 for instance are completely n=
ot readable in a normal screen :)=0A>=0A> I would suggest to adapt the (var=
ious) source(s) :=0A>     ./docgen/HtmlDoc.py=0A>     + ???=0A> so the size=
 is set to 80% of the page size if the image width is bigger than 640 px ..=
.=0A>=0A> \T,=0A=0AI don't think it's a good idea. Some users may want bigg=
er images even=0Awhen with lower screen resolution. Anyway, images I keep l=
inked to my=0Adatabase are scaled down to fit in the target resolution. Thi=
s is=0Aprobably the most reasonable solution.=0A=0APiotrek=0A=0A-----------=
--------------------------------------------------------------=0AThis SF.ne=
t email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.=0AStill grepping through log files to =
find problems?  Stop.=0ANow Search log events and configuration files using=
 AJAX and a browser.=0ADownload your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get=
.splunk.com/=0A_______________________________________________=0AGramps-bug=
s mailing list=0AG...@li...=0Ahttps://lists.sourcefo=
rge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-bugs=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A